Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Affordability
Affordable housing refers to housing units that are affordable by that section of society whose income
is below the median household income.
Tenure
Housing tenure describes the legal status under which people have the right to occupy their
accommodation. The most common forms of tenure are:
Row houses
One of a series of houses, often of similar or identical design, situated side by side and joined by common
walls. A house having at least one side wall in common with a neighboring dwelling. It has front and back
yard through which the light and ventilation will be received. In some cases it will be received from roof.
Rapid growth of urban areas in most developing countries in the last few decades has led to shortfall in
many sectors, primarily housing. The problem has been two-fold: on one hand, the majority of the people
moving to the urban areas have lacked the necessary asset and financial holdings in order to acquire a
"decent" house. On the other hand, the designated government agencies and bodies have not provided
sufficient housing units which are affordable for the poor majority in urban areas. The proliferation of
slums and squatter settlements has been a result of this scenario. But a growing understanding of the
dynamics involved in the development and expansion of squatter settlements has led to a number of
innovative housing schemes in various developing countries to solve the "dilemma" of housing.
Particularly with the intention of improving the environmental quality of squatter settlements and provide
it with the basic necessary infrastructure, one such innovative schemes which has received wide
acknowledgement and following has been "sites-and-services" schemes.
Sites-and-services schemes became the byword for solving the problem of squatter settlements.
Squatter settlements were and has always been considered illegal and in order to relocate and
rehabilitate the squatters (as a function of "slum clearance"), plots of land (or sites) with infrastructure
on it (or services) were provided, and the beneficiaries had to, in most of the projects, build their own
houses on such land. There are a wide variety of sites-and-services schemes, ranging from the
subdivided plot only to a serviced plot of land with a "core" house built on it.
The key components of a housing scheme are the plot of land, infrastructure (like roads, water supply,
drainage, electricity or a sanitary network), and the house itself. Various inputs that go into them include
finance, building materials/technology, and labour.
Thus, the sites-and-services approach advocated the role of government agencies only in the preparation
of land parcels or plots with certain basic infrastructure, which was to be sold or leased to the intended
beneficiaries.
The next step of actual house building was left to the beneficiaries themselves to use their own
resources, such as informal finance or family labour and various other types of community participation
modes to build their house. The beneficiaries could also build the house at their own phase, depending on
the availability of financial and other resources. This adopted the basic principle of the development of a
squatter settlement but without the "squatting" aspect.
Utility wall: A "utility" wall is built on the plot which contains the connections for water, drainage,
sewerage and electricity. The beneficiaries had to build the house around this wall, and utilize the
connections from it. Some projects provided this utility wall in the form of a sanitary core consisting of a
bathroom/toilet, and/or a kitchen.
Latrine: Due to its critical waste disposal problem, many project provide a basic latrine (bathroom and/or
toilet) in each plot.
Roof frame/ shell house, core house: The roof is the costliest component of a house and requires skilled
labour to build. Therefore, some projects provide the roof structure on posts, and the beneficiaries have
to build the walls according to their requirements. Conversely, a plinth is sometimes built by the
implementing agency, which forms a base over which the beneficiaries can build their house. Other
variations to this are the shell house (which is an incomplete house consisting of a roof and two side
walls, but without front or rear walls) and a core house (consisting of one complete room).
With several assumptions and misconceptions regarding low-income families, sites-and-services projects
have been subject to many shortcomings in its conception, identification of beneficiaries, implementation
and cost recovery. Thus sites-and-services schemes have often been rendered unaffordable or
inaccessible for the lowest-income groups by bureaucratic procedures, institutional requirements and
political problems. Some of the constraints have been:
Location: With high land costs in urban areas, most sites-and-services schemes are location on the fringe
where such costs are not very high. This however causes two problems: one, the large distance between
the site and existing delivery networks, off-site and on-site provision of infrastructure is high and
construction can be delayed. Two, the extra distances that the beneficiaries have to travel (and the
consequent extra costs) to the employment centres would discourage many beneficiaries to take
advantage of such schemes.
Bureaucratic Procedures: Selection procedures, designed to ascertain that applicants meet eligibility
criteria, tend to be cumbersome, time-consuming and full of bureaucratic pitfalls, and provide
opportunities for corruption. Besides, for many low-income families, the eligibility criteria are impossible
to meet due to informal sector jobs or low/irregular incomes.
Delay in provision of Services: Due to a lack of coordination between the various implementation agencies
and a "spread" of responsibility of providing the infrastructure and services, there is considerable delay
in the final provision the services, even after the land has been allocated to the beneficiaries.
Standards: High standards of construction and building quality are set by the implementing agencies
making such schemes unaffordable to the target beneficiaries. Some sites-and-services schemes, for
example, prohibit income generating activities on residential plots, including rental of rooms: they,
thereby, limit the opportunities of residents to earn an (additional) income to pay for their plot and their
house.
Cost Recovery: Most sites-and-services schemes are plagued by poor cost recovery. One reason is the
high costs that beneficiaries have to bear shortly after moving into the scheme. They have to pay for the
plot as well as construction of the house, while they might be facing loss of income due to the move to the
new scheme. Transport, water and electricity costs add to the burden which they might not have had
before. But some of the main reasons for poor recovery has been delay in provision of services,
inadequate collection methods, lack of sanctions for non-payment and absence of political will to enforce
payment.
The value of ownership built up in a home or property that represents the current market value of the
house less any remaining mortgage payments. This value is built up over time as the property owner pays
off the mortgage and the market value of the property appreciates.
Simply put Home Equity is Market Value minus Mortgage Balance. If I have lines of credit against my home,
that is also deducted from the Market Value of my home. If my home is worth Rs 40 lakhs and my
mortgage balance is Rs 30 lakhs I have equity of Rs 10 lakhs
Indira Awaas Yojana is a social welfare flagship programme, created by the Indian Government, to
provide housing for the rural poor in India.
The differentiation is made between rural poor and urban poor for a separate set of schemes operate for
the urban poor(like the Basic Services for Urban Poor).
This scheme was launched by Rajiv Gandhi,the Prime Minister of India at that time.
It is one of the major flagship programs of the Rural Development Ministry to construct houses for BPL
population in the villages.
Under the scheme, financial assistance worth Rs.70,000/- in plain areas and Rs.75,000/- in difficult
areas (high land area) is provided for construction of houses.
The houses are allotted in the name of the woman or jointly between husband and wife.
The construction of the houses is the sole responsibility of the beneficiary and engagement of
contractors is strictly prohibited.
Sanitary latrine and smokeless chullah are required to be constructed along with each IAY house for
which additional financial assistance is provided from Total Sanitation Campaign and Rajiv Gandhi
Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana respectively.
This scheme, operating since 1985, provides subsidies and cash-assistance to people in villages to
construct their houses, themselves.
History
Started in 1985 as part of the Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme (RLEGP), Indira Awaas
Yojana (IAY) has been operating as an independent scheme since 1996.
From 199596 the scheme has been further extended to widows or next-of-kin of defence personnel
killed in action, ex-servicemen and retired members of the paramilitary forces who wish to live in rural
areas as long as they meet basic eligibility criteria.
Purpose
The broad purpose of the scheme is to provide financial assistance to some of the weakest sections of
society for them to upgrade or construct a house of respectable quality for their personal living.
The vision of the government is to replace all temporary (kutchcha) houses from Indian villages by 2017.
Eligibility Criteria
Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, freed bonded labourers, minorities and non-SC/ST rural households
in the BPL category, widows and next-of-kin to defence personnel/paramilitary forces killed in action
(irrespective of their income criteria), ex-servicemen and retired members of paramilitary forces
residing in rural areas form the primary target group of eligible candidates for the IAY Scheme.
Implementation
IAY is an allocation based, centrally sponsored scheme funded on a cost sharing basis between the
Central Government and the State Government in the 75%:25% ratio, except in case of North-eastern
states and Union Territories (UTs). For NE states the central government funds 90% and 100% for the
UTs.
The funds are allocated to the states based on 75% weightage of rural housing shortage and 25%
weightage of poverty ratio. The housing shortage is as per the official published figures of Registrar
General of India based on the 2001 Census individual capacity
Current provisions
As per the Budget 2011, the total funds allocated for IAY have been set at 100 billion (US$1.6 billion) for
construction of houses for BPL families with special focus on the Left Wing Extremist (LWE) districts.
Impact
Since 1985, 25.2 million houses have been constructed under the scheme. Under the Bharat Nirman Phase
1 project, 6 million houses were targeted and 7.1 million actually constructed from 200506 to 2008
09.[8] Additional, 12 million houses are planned to be constructed or renovated under the Bharat Nirman
Phase 2.[8]
According to the official 2001 figures, the total rural housing shortage is 14.825 million houses.[8] A
yearwise breakdown is given below for the last 5 years:[8]
1 20052006 1,551,923
2 20062007 1,498,367
3 20072008 1,992,349
4 20082009 2,134,061
5 20092010 3,385,619
Total 10,562,319
A. Human Factors
2. Residential Environment
A. Community or Individual Facilities
1. An Approved Community Water Supply or,Where Not Possible, an Approved Individual Water Supply
System
Community participation
Introduction
For any developmental process, involving the people is must which will be helpful in all the design
solutions. They are the one who is going to reside their and their Participation should be justified on the
basis of its contribution toward the objectives of housing and urban management.
A key task for public agencies and officials in planning community engagement is to assess which
engagement techniques are most appropriate in the particular circumstances.
When deciding which engagement method or technique to use in a particular situation or with a particular
group, it is important to consider a number of issues including:
agency issues
community issues and
process issues.
Process issue
Information-sharing techniques
1. Advertising
2. Online information processes
3. Briefings
4. Education and awareness programs
5. Fact sheets
6. Newsletters
7. Media stories
8. News conferences
9. Displays
10. Newspaper inserts
11. Community fairs or events
12. Community meetings
13. Shop fronts
14. Informal club forums
Deliberative polling
Deliberative polling is an attempt to use public opinion research in a new way. A random, representative
sample is first polled on an issue
Summits
A summit is a large scale, time limited event which brings together large numbers of diverse participants
to consider information, engage in dialogue and to make recommendations for action.
Collective learning technique
The aim of the World caf is to create a discussion environment that feels like a caf. World caf can
either be conducted online or in a public space.
Community visioning
It normally involves the facilitation of sessions in which participants are asked to close their eyes and
imagine what their community looks like now, and what it could look like into the future.
Community cultural development
Community cultural development refers to a cluster of community-based arts practices that involve
artists working with community members to build skills, to share information, understandings and
experiences and to actively involve people in developing their community and/or their culture.
Conclusion
Providing participants with feedback - Providing feedback to those who have participated in
an engagement process, allows them to see whether their views have been accurately represented when
decisions are being made.
Following up on engagement - Follow-up strategies provide those who participated in an engagement
process with advice regarding progress made in addressing the issues raised.
Slum upgradtion
Crime prevention through housing design
Principles
1. Surveillance. Involves the location and use of physical features, electrical and mechanical devices,
activities, and people to maximize visibility. It creates a risk of detection for intruders and a perception
of safety for legitimate users.
2. Access control. Employs people, electrical and mechanical devices, and natural measures to create a
perception of risk to intruders and deny them access to targets. It also guides legitimate users safely
through the environment.
3. Territoriality. Uses physical features and activities to express ownership and control of the
environment and promotes pride in the environment. It also discourages presence of outsiders by
controlling the movement of people and vehicles, having someone be responsible for maintaining all
areas in the environment for their intended uses, and delineating public, semipublic/private, and private
spaces, and controlling the movement of people and vehicles.
4. Maintenance. Allows the continued use of areas for their intended uses and maintains the
effectiveness of measures employed for
surveillance, access control, and territoriality.
Principles