Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOE IMC 1 - October 2007
DOE IMC 1 - October 2007
DOE Overview:
Background Information: Participants:
Tool: Pro-Star Hood Top Matt Billman
Date: 10/11/07 Travis Horstman
Press: 217 Scott Dodd
IMC: Omnova Jim Rennick
Rick Mikesell
Summary:
The DOE was conducted in molding on the Pro-Star Hood Top model in Press 217. There were
three factors that were studied for this experiment. Of those three factors IMC Open Height, IMC
Closing Speed, and the interaction of these two factors were found to be significant for the Total
Area of Air Entrapment and the Number of Pits. It showed that an IMC Open Height of 0.04 and
an IMC Closing Speed of 3 produced the best part. A follow-up DOE was also conducted to help
confirm the selected DOE set points. The next step is to ensure that all of the proper controls are
put into place.
DOE Design:
The table below shows the settings that were used for the DOE.
DOE Results:
There are two significant factors and one significant two-way interaction over the observed
ranges for air entrapment total and the total number of pits on the part:
IMC Open Height
IMC Closing Speed
IMC Open Height * IMC Closing Speed
The factors and interactions in the table below were found to be statistically significant
with at least a 95% confidence level.
Y-Variable Significant Main Effects Significant Interactions
Air Trap Total IMC Open Height IMC Open Height*IMC Closing Speed
IMC Closing Speed
Number of Pits IMC Open Height IMC Open Height*IMC Closing Speed
IMC Closing Speed
Non Coat None None
The following is a summary of the R-sq and R-sq (adj) for each of the Y-variables in the DOE. An
R-sq value above 50% suggests a strong relationship exists. Therefore, the DOE model explains
56.09% of the variation for Air Trap Total and 66.61% of the variation for the Number of Pits.
NOTES: Even though IMC Shot Size does not appear to be significant the selected range for that
variable can impact the significance. Perhaps if a larger range for shot size had been selected the
outcome may have shown it as a significant factor.
Main Effects Plot (data means) for Air Trap Total (in^2)
IMC Open Height IMC Shot Size Point Ty pe
16
Corner
Center
12
Mean of Air Trap Total (in^2)
0
0.04 0.07 0.10 1.25 1.30 1.35
IMC Closing Speed
16
This indicates that to minimize
12
the air entrapment area an IMC
Open Height of 0.04 and an IMC
Closing Speed of 3 should be
8 chosen for the Pro-Star hood top.
0
3 13 23
Main Effects Plot (data means) for Pits Number
IMC Open Height IMC Shot Size Point Ty pe
Corner
30
Center
20
Mean of Pits Number
10
0
0.04 0.07 0.10 1.25 1.30 1.35
IMC Closing Speed
30 This indicates that to minimize
the number of pits an IMC Open
Height of 0.04 and an IMC Closing
20
Speed of 3 should be chosen for
the Pro-Star hood top.
10
0
3 13 23
Appendix
DOE Design:
This is a 2-Level DOE with 3 factors.
DOE Factors:
1. IMC Open Height
2. IMC Shot Size
3. Closing Speeds - IMC
DOE Design:
Full
Replications:
There are 3 replications used for this DOE.
Center Points:
There are 5 center points used for this DOE. This will provide us with information on the possible
presence of second order affects (curvature) in the model and still allow us to conduct the
screening DOE.
Randomization of Runs:
The run order was randomized per Minitab.
Number of Parts:
There will be a total of 29 parts run for this DOE. (8 combinations * 3 replications = 24 parts + 5
center points).
Interactions:
The interactions will be reviewed for this study. In a full factorial DOE none of the results are
confounded. Therefore, all of the interactions can be studied.
Scoring:
The size of the total air entrapment area was measured (ferning, pits, etc.), the number of pits
was counted, and the total area IMC non-coat was measured.
Estimated Effects and Coefficients for Air Trap Total (in^2) (coded units)
Factorial Fit: Number of Pits versus IMC Open Height, IMC Shot Size, ...
Factorial Fit: Non-Coat versus IMC Open Height, IMC Shot Size, IMC Closing