'In The Beginning - . Then What?' (Johan Peters)

1
In the Beginning . . . . then What? www.johanpeters.in
In the Beginning . . . .
then What?
Evolution
and
Creation
by
Johan Peters
2
Individual pages or chapters of this book may not be reproduced or transmitted

electronically nor photocopied, as the complete book is to be used for study so the
students can get a clear overall view of our origins. The differences and the pros and
cons, of both evolution and creation, are presented by the author in the form of the
following court-case. The text may under no circumstance be edited, nor the order of
events be changed without the prior written permission from the author.
The views expressed in the book are those of the author and the publisher takes
no responsibility for any of the statements.
Revised August 2017
The unbiased
Student and Teacher Textbook
concerning our Origins.
Copyright June 2016 Johan Peters

All rights reserved.
Layout and typeset Author

Cover and art by Author
Photographs by author and/or purchased from www.fotolia.com
Concerning any other pictures: these are the authors teaching aids and despite many hours of online research, the original
artists could not be traced. Any information about these is sincerely appreciated, so credit can be given where credit is due.
3
PREFACE
WHY THIS BOOK?
During recent philosophical discussions

with my son on the different ethical subjects
of life, from the Greek mythological gods to
the idea of euthanasia, we came to the
conclusion that there was a need to
assemble a clear document or thesis
concerning our origins.
Did it occur by the process of the evolution theory, which has become a
cornerstone of modern science, or by design also known as creation,
which is often referred to not as a scientific, but as a religious point of
view.
I was invited to be the recorder in 'The Scopes Retrial - Evolution and
Creation' court case, which for me personally was most enlightening. It
was good to see the evidence from both sides and it was an honour for
me to be called upon to record this case.
The recording leaves the reader free to decide between facts and
fiction, between circumstantial evidence and religion.
The names of the honourable Lord Justice and of both witnesses for
evolution and creation have been changed due to the sensitivity of the
case.
The court has ruled that it should be a completely
FREE DOWNLOAD at the recorders website www.johanpeters.in
and at www.issuu.com
Hard copies can be requested from the above sites.
4
I invite you to attend this controversial court case and it is my desire

that it may shed light and give you a clearer understanding concerning
both approaches to our origins.
It is a free download, as this is the courts desire, in the hope that it will
be scientifically helpful for students, who often cannot afford the high
costs of a book with colour photographs and valuable information.
In the Beginning. . . then What? is a study guide as well as a teaching

manual for both evolution and creation.
For those interested in the evolution explanation, the related sections

are marked with the 'Homo Sapiens', written in italic Cambria font.
For those interested in the creation account, the associated texts

are marked with the Atom.
WHY PART TWO?

Due to the importance of the case, half of the international members of
the Jury were chosen from the academic and science community and
the other half are representing the major world religions.
The personal and controversial questions from these Jurors concerning
their religion have been edited out, as these have no bearing on the
case and are published in 'Part 2 - My Controversial Client'.
5
"I could not put 'In the Beginning . . . then What?' down! I found it a
fascinating, lively court case, with science, facts and evidence. . . . This
is a must-read for anyone who is interested in our origins and desires
to be well informed, in order to determine an intellectual, non-
religious, factual and science-based, personal opinion."
Vincent Paul. (Linguist, Belgium)
"The book is awesome. . . very enlightening, amazing amount of
research that you have done."
Alan Steve (Teacher, India)
"Many, many thanks for this."
Piet K. (Ret'd Dir. Publishing Co., Netherlands)
"This is a book for students and serious thinkers. I'll be forwarding it to

many people in the hope that it will benefit our youth."
Ben J. (Instructor, India)
"I'm reading your book. Learning lots. It is having an impact and

making us think. I believe it will speak to many young minds."
Sudeep Naik (Life-coach, India)
6
CONTENTS
Pages Chapter Subject
11 Chapter 1 - All Rise, Introduction.

15 Chapter 2 - Evolution Explained.
27 Chapter 3 - Giants, Hoaxes, Earth's Age, Moondust.
49 Chapter 4 - Carbon Dating, Oxygin & OOPses.
59 Chapter 5 - Ice Time, Flood.
69 Chapter 6 - Noah's Ark.
79 Chapter 7 - Snake, Carbon Dating, Dinosaurs.
89 Chapter 8 - Languages, Continental Divide.
103 Chapter 9 - Evidence, Missing Day, Bible Code.
111 Chapter 10 - Origins according to Evolution.
129 Chapter 11 - Filter, Natural Selection, Mutations, Hybrids.
141 Chapter 12 - Superatom, Sterilization, The Challenge.
153 Chapter 13 - Scientific Account of Designed Origins.
181 Chapter 14 - The Final Defenses.
193 Chapter 15 - Judgment and Recommendation
7
THE JOHN SCOPES TRIAL - 1925
The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of

Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes and commonly referred
to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legal
case in 1925 in which a substitute high school
teacher, John Scopes, was accused of violating
Tennessee's Butler Act, which made it unlawful to teach
human evolution in any state-funded school.
The trial was deliberately staged to attract publicity to
the small town of Dayton, Tennessee, where it was held.
Scopes was unsure whether he had ever actually taught
evolution, but he purposely incriminated himself so that
the case could have a defendant.
Scopes was found guilty and fined $100 (equivalent to
$1,349 in 2015), but the verdict was overturned on a
technicality.
The trial served its purpose of drawing intense national
publicity, as national reporters flocked to Dayton to
cover the big-name lawyers who had agreed to
represent each side. William Jennings Bryan, three-time
presidential candidate, argued for the prosecution,
while Clarence Darrow, the famed defense attorney,
spoke for Scopes.
The trial publicized the FundamentalistModernist
Controversy, which set Modernists, who said evolution
was not inconsistent with religion against
Fundamentalists, who said the word of God as revealed
in the Bible took priority over all human knowledge.
The case was thus seen as both a theological contest and

a trial on whether evolution / modern science should be
taught in schools.
8
Wikipedia/Scopes_trial
9
Never, no never did nature say one thing and wisdom say another
Edmond Burke
Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws.

Charles Darwin
Blinding ignorance does mislead us! O, wretched mortals open your eyes.
Leonardo da Vinci
Only a few know, how much one must know to know how little one knows.
Werner Heisenberg
If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it
contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon
the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings.
Leonardo da Vinci
1
Ego =
knowledge
Albert Einstein
10
CHAPTER 1
ALL RISE, INTRODUCTION
All Rise Presiding over the case 'Evolution and Creation' will be the
right honourable Lord Justice Dr. E. Dict.
The Lord Justice speaks:

Dear members of the Jury, welcome. It is good to see that you arrived
safely. Today is Wednesday. Most of you arrived over the weekend
with some extra time to rest. The trial concerning evolution and
creation is reopened, as it is imperative to bring clarity to the confusion
that exists around the subject of how we, and the world we live in,
came into existence.
Seeing the original Scopes Trial in 1925, was a criminal case in the U.S.
Criminal court of Tennessee, we will open The Scopes Retrial as a
criminal case.
However that particular court case became more a publicity stunt, with
emotions running high and accusations flying. As long as I will preside
over the case, I will not allow it to deteriorate into a media muddle,
hence the press will not be present in the court room.
The main person

responsible for the
evolution process is
Mr. Charles Darwin.
Mr. Darwin is not present,

as he expired in the year
1882.
11
The witness for evolution is Professor E. Colog, Ph.D.

He will refer to Mr. Darwins writings and other supporting evidence.
His related pages and accounts will be marked with the 'Homo
Sapiens', written in italics Cambria font.
The responsibility for the creation process lies with Mr. D. Vine, also
known as God. Mr. D. Vine has chosen to remain silent and refers to
his writings.
He has declined to be present in person, as according to him the
absence of both parties will give the jury a more objective insight into
the case.
The witness for creation, is Mr.
N. Voy, and he also will refer to
the writings of his client and
other supporting evidence.
His related pages and

accounts will be
marked with the 'Atom'.
The twelve international members of the Jury will go by the

circumstantial evidence.
Six of the Jurors are chosen to represent the academic and scientific
community, while the other six members represent their country and
their country's general religion.
THE MAIN RESPONSIBILITY OF THE JURY IS TO DECIDE

BETWEEN FACT AND FICTION,
BETWEEN HARD EVIDENCE AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
In criminal law circumstantial evidence is used in courts to establish

guilt or innocence through reasoning.
12
The Lord Justice continues: I quote the cases of,
The State v Busak, where the court stated:

'If there is evidence calling for an answer and an accused person chooses
to remain silent in the face of such evidence, a court may well be entitled
to conclude that the evidence is sufficient in the absence of an
explanation to prove the guilt of the accused.' 1
AND
The State v Tshabalala, where was said that after facing the accused
with direct and credible evidence:
'One is bound to conclude that the totality of the evidence taken in
conjunction with his silence excluded any doubt his guilt.' 2
Witnesses from both sides shall present their evidence in accordance to

the writings of the parties they represent, also referred to as their
clients.
When the Jury has made their decision to name the accountable party
then it will be my responsibility as the judge to decide on the
appropriate sentence.
This sentence will be influenced by a number of factors: principally the
circumstances of the case and the impact that the crime has had on the
victim(s).
13
1. The State v Busak [2000] ZACC 25; 2001 (1) SACR 1 par. 24,
2. The State v Tshabalala 2003 (1) SACR 134 (SCA)
For those present who are less familiar with the court proceedings the
definition of criminal case is:
Prosecution by the State of a person or organization, for committing a public
wrong considered an offense against the State.
State meaning a people permanently occupying a fixed territory bound
together by common habits.
The case 'Evolution and Creation' is now officially reopened.
14
CHAPTER 2
EVOLUTION EXPLAINED
Witnesses, please introduce yourselves in brief and give an

explanation of your presentations.
We call on the Professor to speak on behalf of evolution.
Your Honour, honourable Jury, I am Professor E. Colog at the

Biological Research University. I hold a Ph.D. in the field of Natural
Selection and am awarded a doctorate in Organismal Biology and
Biological Diversity.
I would like to present my case in three parts:

1. An explanation of the biological evolution, which includes natural
selection, carbondating, etc. During my rationalizations I will be
frequently referring to elucidating works of the Smithsonian
Institute.
2. The effect that evolution has on the present development of mankind.
3. In closing I would like to show the importance and honours bestowed
on my client, Mr. Darwin.
Let the witness on behalf of creation introduce himself.

Your Honour, honourable members of the Jury, I am Mr. N.
Voy.
I would also like to represent my client in three parts.
1. The evidence supporting the writings of my client.
2. The biological evidence to support my client.
3. To present circumstantial and scientific evidence and to explain
in simple terms the main goals and plans of my client for
mankind.
15
The honourable Justice speaks:

As Justice presiding over the case I would like to reiterate that only
circumstantial evidence will be accepted for your points of
presentation.
We call on the Professor to take the witness stand for evolution.
Honourable Justice and Jury, I present a

photograph of Herbert Spencer as first
introduction. I wish to refer to Mr. Spencer as
he was an admirer of Mr. Darwin.
Mr. Spencer influenced the structural-
functionalist perspective, he coined the phrase
'survival of the fittest', wrote over 30 books and
gave understanding to the positive and
negative aspects of social Darwinism.
He stated that nothing can exist without these
five basics: Herbert Spencer 1820-1903
Time, Energy (or Force), Action, Space and Matter.

This is evidence enough in itself that tangible hard facts are more important
than religious beliefs.
All things around us exist because of these five basic factors, not because of
some fanatical belief in an unseen creator, forced on us by people that are
too weak to stand on their own and need a God and creation as a crutch to
help them face their difficulties in life.
We are down-to-earth evolutionists and we believe that Mother Earth gave
us life and hence we need to preserve her.
Someone shouts from the balcony: Yeah, Yeah. It is so good that

someone finally says it like it is.
ORDER IN THE COURT
16
I object, Your Honour, I object to the Professor making

personal statements on belief and religion, while the court
has ruled that only circumstantial hard evidence will be accepted.
Objection on behalf of creation sustained! I

would like to ask for two security guards on both
the balconies. Security, please remove those that
will shout from the balcony. We will let this
comment pass, but the next person shouting will
be removed.
Anything that you would like to add, Professor?
No, thank you.
Let Mr. N. Voy speak on behalf of creation.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, I want to expound on

the argument presented by the Professor and refer to the first
sentence of my clients first book, where it states,
'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.' 1
In this first sentence we find these five basics that are quoted by the
Professor: 'In the beginning (which stands for TIME) God (being
ENERGY or FORCE) created (is the ACTION) the heavens (SPACE)
and the earth (MATTER).'
My clients first books date from approximately 1500 B.C. and the
writing of Mr. Spencer from his lifetime 1820-1903 A.D.
Seeing that the parents of Mr. Spencer held firm religious convictions,
which includes the study of my clients writing, I can only assume that
Mr. Spencer came to this conclusion after studying the writings of my
client.
I think that if my client were present he would agree to my
assumption, as well as the down-to-earth view of the Professor to
preserve Mother Earth.
17
1. Genesis 1:1
The Professor stands up,

I object! The client of Mr. N. Voy is not present, so he cannot assume
that his client will agree.
Objection sustained!
Anything you wish to add Mr. N. Voy?
Not on this point, Your Honour, except the Professor

presenting a photograph of Herbert Spencer is hardly
circumstantial evidence.
We will now take a 30-minute recess.

The doors of the courtroom will close in 25 minutes at 10:55.
__________
The clock shows 11:00.

We call on you, Professor, to present us concrete evidence concerning
the process of evolution.
Your Honour, until recently we understood the world to be 4.6 billion

years, however new evidence shows that the world is much older and
approximately 13.8 billion years. It all started with a tremendous,
unthinkable explosion of a highly compressed miniscule grain of matter.
This is known as the Big Bang, which was so powerful that through its
centrifugal force it hurled the stars and planets into the universe and their
consequent orbits. Later on Lemaitre 1 referred to it as the explosion of the
superatom.
Objection, Your Honour, there are too many flaws in this

centrifugal theory!
Objection overruled! Mr. N. Voy, you will get your turn to speak. We
cannot and will not stop this case for every disagreement. Please be
seated. Thank you.
Please continue, Professor.
18
1. George Lematre - Belgian priest - Astronomer and Professor of
Physics at the Catholic University of Leuven.
On the Earth due to the circumstances of the climate, life started

evolving. It started with the humble beginnings of single cells
multiplying in the humidity of the seas and oceans, which over millions and
millions of years developed into micro organisms that eventually formed
into little creatures.
One good example that we see still in todays nature is that of the tiny
tadpole fish, which develops from a tiny egg.
After some time it spontaniously grows little legs and eventually develops
into a frog. This example develops in a relatively short time, however over
the hundreds of millions of years many species of animal life have evolved.
Before the ice age the climate on Earth was different, plant life on Earth was
more lush and due to this abundant vegetation we have seen the different
reptiles evolve into very outsized dinosaurs and other simular creatures.
The following is an evolution chart concerning the

Phylogenetic Organisation of the Metazoa.
19
20
http://timboyle.com/phylogenetic-organization-of-the-metazoa/
Around 7 million years ago we saw the development of the primate

apes, which then evolved in different stages from the early beginning
to eventually the Homo Sapiens, which is the human race.
Of this I would like to present the family tree, which shows clearly how we
evolved from apes.
The Smithsonian Institute

This tree is developed by the Smithsonian National
Museum of Natural History. Founded in 1846, the
Smithsonian is the world's largest museum, education,
and research complex, consisting of 19 museums and
galleries, the National Zoological Park, and nine research facilities.
21
Secondly I would present a second chart for Study and

Contemplation of our human Phylogeny chart by Dr. Peter Schmid,
of the Antropological Institute of University of Zurich.
He received a doctorate in 1983 from the University.
22
According to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History:

The Ardipithicus group are the earliest humans that evolved in Africa and
took the first steps towards walking upright. This was 4 to 7 million years
ago.
The Australopithecus Africanus early humans that walked upright but
still climbed trees, 2 to 4 million years ago.
Paranthropus Robustus, average 3 ft 9 in (1.2 m) tall, lived about 1.8 to
1.2 million years ago. They had very large megadont cheek teeth with thick
enamel and focused their chewing in the back of the jaw.
The following reconstructions are by

John Gurche, who because of his talent
has given a face to our ancestors.
23
The Homo Group

In the Homo group we find:
Homo Heidelbergensis
Homo Habilis
Homo Erectus average height from

4 ft 9 - 6 ft 1 (145 - 185 cm),
@ 1.89 million - 143,000 years ago.
Homo Neanderthalensis
These are our closest extinct human relative.
About 400,000 - 40,000 years ago.
Homo Sapiens
And last is the Homo Sapiens that is us humans.
Members were first to expand beyond the African
continent.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, thank you for your interest and attentive
listening. I hold a Ph.D. in the field of Natural Selection and am awarded a
doctorate in Organisamal Biology and Biological Diversity.
Although this may have started as a theory, these have now become facts
and are the major cornerstone of science.
The subject of evolution has always been of great interest to me personally,
as it is never ending and we constantly discover new findings and explore
new theories to determine our origins."
24
Here we see a simplified version of the evolution timeline. 1
Mr. N. Voy has been on the edge of his seat and finally bursts
out, Your Honour, I object. This is not circumstantial
evidence. These theories are the figments of someones imagination.
Objection overruled! Sir, you are speaking out of term and you will
get your chance to speak. I have said earlier that it is for the jury to
decide what material is relevant and will be accepted as circumstantial
evidence.
25
1. http://chinookbiology.blogspot.in/2016/06/evolution-timelines.html
The Professor continues,

Your Honour, these facts have been established by scientists that
hold master degrees in science and educated people, not by some religious
fundamental fanatics that believe the simplistic version of creation.
Thank you, this is all that I have on this point.
The honourable Lord Justice comments,

Professor, thank you for your presentation. Gentlemen, I urge you
both, to keep this objective and restrain yourself from making personal
comments.
Thank you. The court now takes a one-hour recess for lunch and
refreshment.
In exactly one hour at 1:30 the court will call upon Mr. N. Voy to make
his presentation on behalf of creation.
The doors of the courtroom will close in exactly 55 minutes, please be
seated before that time so we can proceed without delay.
__________
26
CHAPTER 3
GIANTS, HOAXES, EARTH'S AGE, MOONDUST
ORDER IN THE COURT!

The court will now resume and calls on the witness for creation, Mr.
N. Voy, to take the stand.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, it has been a long time

hobby from me to research history and I have always been
fascinated by the different theories concerning our origin.
My parents were simple, honest, business people that taught me
honesty above all and lying had no place in our family life. Since
childhood I have been interested how it all fits together. The last book
in the world that I wanted to read was the writing of my client.
Objection! Your Honour, let Mr. N. Voy present evidence and not
emotional slob.
Objection overruled, let the witness speak! I urge you, Professor, to

keep your comments objective.
Mr. N. Voy, please keep your introduction short and to the point and
go on with presenting your evidence.
Your Honour, the Professor has explained how we evolved

from primate apes.
During the recess I studied the charts. I am what you call a down-to-
earth person.
I have never seen in my whole life an actual tree, that was not grafted,
bear different kinds of fruit. An apple tree produces apples, a pear tree
gives us pears, and a coconut tree gives coconuts, and lemons grow on
lemon trees, etc.
27
Except of course a Christmas tree that is there for decoration

and enjoyment, but no person, not even the children, believe
that it naturally grows stars, bells and angels, etc.
In the writings of my client he writes in his first chapter,
'each after its kind.' 1

To any level headed person it is clear that this chart is not based in
reality, but is the figment of some confused, evolutionist mind.
Objection! Objection! If I need to keep things objective and refrain

from personal comments then this should also count for this ignorant
creationist.
He totally does not understand the amount of research and intellectual
discussions that have gone into developing these charts and these are not
apple trees. These represent millions of years in the evolutionary
development of mankind.
Objection sustained! Mr. N. Voy, please give your presentation. It is

for the Jury to decide whether these charts are based in reality. Proceed
with your presentation.
Your Honour, according to the evolution presentation we

evolved from creatures that were smaller than us and
throughout time we grew more in size and intelligence to our present
day status.
Hence, I would like to present some photographs of circumstantial
evidence that differ from this theory.
In my clients first book, also known as Genesis, he writes in chapter 6
verse 4,
'There were giants in the earth in those days' 2
Objection, objection, objection the witness is bringing fables and

childrens bedtime stories into the courtroom.
28
1. Genesis 1: 11,12 2. Genesis 6:4
Shouting comes from the balcony, What rubbish, fairy tales of Jack
and the beanstolk with giants. I thought this was a serious court case,
but this is becoming a laughing stock!
All present burst out laughing.
ORDER IN THE COURT! Security, please remove the person that

shouted from the balcony.
Silence. I repeat, order in the court! Any more comments from the
balcony and we will clear the courtroom completely.
The objection is overruled. Let the witness speak and present his
evidence, but it had better be clear circumstantial evidence and no
more theoretical arguments.
Your Honour, I will present my first evidence:

Several pages of photographs concerning excavations to show
that there were actual giants living on this Earth. To show that I am not
talking fables or fairy tales, I present also several newsarticles.
Your Honour, members of the Jury the following photographs are

excavations from all over our planet.
29
There is mumbling among the Jury and on the balcony.
The Justice interjects,

This photograph will
be given to experts for
its authenticity and to
see if this is an actual
photograph.
I wish to
present some
more photographs on
this subject. Also these
should be checked by
the experts.
30
1. http://skeletonpictures.org/Giant-Skeletons-Pictures.php
There is evidence galore and they are discovered all over the planet:
Romania, Saudi-Arabia, India, U.S.A, Mongolia, Greece and on
every continent.
Your Honour, the AIAA (American Institution of Alternative

Archeology) states that a US Supreme Court ruling has forced the
Smithsonian Institution to release classified papers in 2015, dating
from the early 1900s, which show that thousands of giant human
remains were ordered destroyed by high level administrators. 1
The Smithsonian had sued the AAIA for defamation. A turning point
of the court case was when a 1.3 meter long human femur bone, was
shown as evidence in court by Smithsonian whistleblowers.
31
1. http://worldufophotosandnews.org/?p=8621
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/smithsonian-admits-to-destruction-of-
thousands-of-giant-human-skeletons-in-early-1900s/
Please observe the digger in comparison with the skeleton.
New Zealand
August, 1911.
New York Times - May 25, 1882
32
The professor jumps up

and bursts out with an angry
voice,
"I object profusely, Your Honour,
I object, these photographs are
fabricated and a total hoax, this
is absolute nonsense.
These are put on the internet to
1882
confuse and sidetrack us from
what is important.
These newsarticles are totally
outdated rubbish and they were
published by some Bible
believing fundamentalists over a
century ago as 'evidence' to give
so-called 'factual' credence to the Bible,so whose authority was rapidly
waning in those days.
At our esteemed research centre we have no records in our registers of this
absolute non-sensical, ridiculous 'evidence'.
I dont know which 'Supreme Court' that was and where these photos are
produced, but I will guarantee you that they are photoshopped downloads
from totally untrustworthy websites.
Many of these websites have been removed and blocked because of their
ridiculous, perverted and lying contents.
Objection overruled! The Jury will decide what evidence it will keep.
Mr. N. Voy, please continue.
Your Honour, one might argue that this is outdated evidence

from a long time ago and that the times have changed,
however the following is from 2015.
These following skeletons came to light after heavy rainfalls in Mexico,
on March 23, 2015 in Sierra Tapalpa.
33
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXA244yi0fA
Your Honour, honourable members of the Jury, there is ample proof of

giant skeletons, but they miraculously disappear as quickly as they
are excavated and are promptly with the utmost secrecy taken away
for further research, while excavation areas are declared no-fly zone.
I cannot help but think that,
- someone has a few skeletons in his cupboard -
34
There is a chuckle in the court, but not all are in agreement and others
are getting irritated. While some whisper, This is amazing, others
sneer, We dont have to listen to this idiotic nonsense.
Your Honour, according to the writing of my client the world

is approximately a little over 6,000 years old.
Someone shouts from the balcony,

Can he shut up with this nonsense?
From the opposite balcony another shouts back angrily, Can you shut
up and let this man speak!
Ill see you after the court is over you damned, #@%$&, sick-in-your-
brain idiot!
Security, please remove the gentleman on the left balcony that

shouted these intimidations!
There is a bit of a shuffle and loud screaming of profanities. Then the
door closes, the sounds and protests are fading and it is silent again.
Mr. N. Voy, please proceed.
Your Honour, like I said, according to my client the Earth is

approximately 6,000 years old and there have been literally
tens of thousands of giant skeletons found all over the world.
What I cannot understand is that if the world is 4.6, or 13.8 billion years
old and man has been evolving for the last 7 million years from one
stage to another, how come we are not over our head into skeletons of
these different evolutionary stages, just like we excavate the
skeletons of giants?
THE WORLD POPULATION:

It is estimated that the world population reached one billion for the
first time in 1804. As of March 2012, it reached 7 billion. Statistics are
from the United States Census Bureau (USCB) 1
35
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_of_Seven_Billion
So over the space of a good 200 years the population

multiplied by 7.
If according to evolution the Homo Sapiens (that is us humans)
developed 40,000 years ago, then we have 40,000 : 200 = 200 periods of
200 years.
Hence, Your Honour, each 200 years the population multiplies 7 times.
However due to harsh living conditions, disease, lack of medical
supplies and fighting off dinosaurs, we will say that instead of
multiplying 7 times, we make it generous towards the evolution
theory and we say that the population only doubled every 200 years
instead of 7 times.
Hence, after 11,000 years we have 55 periods of 200 years.
That is 2 to the power of 55, or 255, or
2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x
2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2 = that is a
whopping 36.028.797.018.963.968
36 quadrillion, 28 trillion, 797 billion, 18 million, 963 thousand and 968
people after 11,000 years.
After 11,000 year we would have almost 5,000,000 (five million) times
the present day population of 7.4 billion.
The world land area is 510,100,000 km2 or 510,100,000,000,000 mtr2.
That means that some 29,000 years ago we should have
36,028,797,018,963,968 : 510,100,000,000,000 = 70 per meter2.
70 people per square meter already 29,000 years ago.
Now 29,000 years later we would be standing shoulder to shoulder
world-wide probably 1,000 feet deep.
I cannot help but think, Your Honour, that something is wrong with
the time frames of the evolution theory. There are other statistics of the
world population doubling between 20 and 35 years.1
However I wanted to be generous to avoid arguments, but no matter
what, it just does not make any sense, nor fit.
36
1. Zachariah & Vu, 1988; Hern, 1977, 1992; Von Foerster et al., 1960;
Von Foerster, 1966; Umpleby, 1990; Fischer 1993.
Since according to my client we have roughly 4 thousand

years since the flood occurred, I think that somehow the
present day population of 7.4 billion seems more correct and fits better.
CENTRIFUGAL FORCE OF THE BIG BANG

Your Honour, I objected earlier concerning the centrifugal force. With
this my apologies, as I should have just waited till it was my turn to
speak.
The centrifugal force of the big bang theory that orbited the planets
into space, leaves me with some questions.
Seeing that it was the same centifugal force that orbited all the planets,
it only makes sense to me that all the planets, as spinoffs, spin or rotate
on their axis in the same direction.
At least I would say definitely in our solar system. They should all spin
like the Earth rotates from right to left or eastwards.
However Venus, Uranus and Pluto rotate from left to right or
westward on their axis.
37
I am sure someone will come up with a new theory, or has

already explained it away with a new speculation of how the
contra centrifugal rotational dynamics took place, and occurred
several times around 3 to 3 billion years ago.
This, along with other more complex and complicated language that
nobody understands, will explain why Pluto, Venus and Uranus turn
left to right or westward, instead of eastward, which is the case with
the other planets in our solar system.
Your Honour, we dont require a Ph.D., to see that something does not
add up.
HOAXES
For instance, we take as
example the Piltdown man,
which turned out to be a
purposely false hoax, 40
long years after it was
'discovered' by Dawson and
Smith.
Your Honour, the point that
I am trying to make is that
for 40 long years it was
taught in our schools and
confused the young minds
of a whole generation in
their studies.
In 1912 the Piltdown man
discovery was publicized. It
was however constructed by
using the jawbone belonging
to an orangutan, which they
had soaked in potassium, so
it would look like a fossil.1
38
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
Dr. A. J. E. Cave, explained

in 1958, at the Congress of
Zoology that the Homo
Neanderthalensis was the
skeleton of an older
gentleman who had
suffered from arthritis. 1
Your Honour, yet he

remains part of our school
text books till this very day.
The Heidelberg man was constructed by the inspiration of a jawbone

that was considered by many to be quite human. However, he is
another missing link in the tree of evolution.
Your Honour, I am sure that, like many others, you have wondered
what body part was used to construct the Homo Erectus?
There is a slight chuckle on the otherwise serious face of the Lord
Justice, Please continue, but be careful.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, if evolution is true why

can we not find complete skeletons of the missing links, like
we do of the giants? Why do they have to be constructed by the
inspiration of someones imagination, with only a tooth or jaw-bone or
a piece of skull, that are not even excavated in the same place?
LUCY - A MISSING LINK

I quote, 'Scientists have discovered a remarkably
complete skeleton of a 3-year-old female from the
ape-man species represented by 'Lucy'. . . .
. . The remains are 3.3 million years old. .
39
1. http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=625
'It's pretty unbelievable' to find such a complete fossil from

that long ago, said scientist Fred Spoor. 'It's a once-in-a-
lifetime find.' Spoor is professor of evolutionary anatomy at University
College London. . .
. . . Judging by how well it was preserved, the skeleton may have come
from a body that was quickly buried by sediment in a flood, the
researchers said.' 1
'Recently however, it has been revealed that Lucy (Australopithecus

afarensis) had an anatomy ideally suited to climbing trees and was no
different from other apes . . .
The French scientific journal 'Science et Vie' covered the story in 1999
under the headline Adieu, Lucy.
Tel Aviv University anthropologists determined that Lucys lower jaw
bone is some kind of gorilla jaw bone. . . As a result, the evolutionary
researchers concluded that LUCY SHOULD NO LONGER BE
CONSIDERED MANS DIRECT ANCESTOR.' 2
Yet Lucy remains part of the big evolutionary exhibitions to promote
science. 3
Lucy at the
American Museum
of Natural History
But what
Science I ask?
Modern
Science is the
answer.
Your Honour, honourable Jury, what does Modern Science entail?
Can we throw all the basic scientific principles overboard in Modern
Science, so we dont have to stick to facts anymore?
I was always taught that science was based on facts and that science
means reasoning, but sticking to the facts.
40
1. http://www.newsgd.com/culture/culturenews/200609210031.htm
2. http://www.6000years.org/
3. http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/human-
origins-and-cultural-halls/anne-and-bernard-spitzer-hall-of-human-
origins/lucy
The definition of Science is as follows: 1
'The systematic observation of natural events and conditions in

order to discover facts about them and to formulate laws and
principles based on these facts.'
When we look at the chart of Dr. Peter

Schmid of the Zurich University on page
22, I notice that there are seven question
marks on his chart of Our Human
Phylogeny.
Your Honour, to the contrary, my client
leaves us with no questions in his writings. He answers everything and
everything fits water tight.
AGE OF THE EARTH

The Professor explained about the Earths age being an estimated 4.6
billion years old, according to the theory of evolution, or as new
discoveries point to 13.8 billion years. 2
I would like to explain that it may very well be different according to
my clients writing. Like I said earlier, according to my client the world
is approximately 6000 years old.
How did we come up with that number?
My client faithfully recorded the age of the father when his wife gave
birth to a son.
The following is taken from my client's first book, Genesis:
'Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat..Seth (Gen.5:3)
Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos: (Gen.5:6)
Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan: (Gen.5:9)
Cainan lived seventy years and begat Mahalaleel: (Gen.5:12)
Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared: (Gen.5:15)
Jared lived hundred sixty and two years, and begat Enoch: (Gen.5:18)
41
1. Academic Press Dictionary of Science & Technology
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe
Enoch lived sixty five years, and begat Methuselah (Gen.5:21)

Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and
begat Lamech, (Gen.5:25)
Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son: And
he called his name Noah, (Gen.5:28,29)
Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon
the earth.' (Gen.7:6)
The Flood was a one year (+10 days) before the Earth was dry and
they left the Ark. (Gen.7:11 & 8:13,14)
A grand total of 1657 years from the creation till after the Flood.
From after the Flood till Peleg 101 years (see the genealogy on page 94)
'Peleg lived thirty years, and begat Reu: (Genesis 11:18)
Reu lived two and thirty years, and begat Serug: (Gen.11:20)
Serug lived thirty years, and begat Nahor (Gen.11:22)
Nahor lived nine and twenty years, and begat Terah (Gen.11:24)
Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram (Gen.11:26)
Abraham was an hundred years old, when his son Isaac was born
(Gen.21:5)
Isaac was sixty years old when she bare Esau and Jacob (Gen 25:26)
And Jacob said unto Pharaoh, The days of the years of my pilgrimage
are an hundred and thirty years: And Joseph placed his father and his
brethren, and gave them a possession in Egypt, (Gen.47:9,10)
They dwelt in Egypt, four hundred and thirty years. (Gen. 12:40)
The children of Jacob/Israel were forty years in the wilderness: clothes
and shoe did not wax old.' (Deuteronomy 29:5)
We add this up then we have 1052 years till the start of the 'Conquest
of the Promised Land'. The generally accepted date for this is 1451 B.C.
From Creation till after the Flood . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1657 yrs
From after the Flood till start of Conquest Promised Land . . 1052 yrs
Conquest of Promised Land - generally accepted date . . . 1451 B.C.
From 0 till today . . . . . . . . 2017 A.D.
Grand total of estimated Earth age . . . . 6177 yrs
42
THE MOON DUST CONTROVERSY

(Following calculations are by Hans Pettersson, Swedish
Oceanographic Institute)
Every year there settles a certain amount (5,000,000 tons) of space dust
on the planets and moons. Calculating that the Earth is anywhere
around 5 billion years old, there should be 182 feet (55.5 metres) of
space dust on the moon.
These calculations are
outdated and have
received a lot of
criticism as new data is
now available. As I am
sure the Professor will
have studied the
subject too.
I thought it was
interesting to bring this
up as that was the
calculation at that time
and it was one of the main reasons that the Apollo 11 had long fold out
legs with big dishes at the end to prevent it from sinking in the dust.
However to everyones surprise there was only a quarter of an inch of
space dust on the moon, which is approximately 6 MILLIMETERS.
1. Genesis 5:3-29 & 7:6
The Apollo 11 team:

Note the long legs and big dishes Armstrong, Collins, Aldrin.
43
Objection, Your Honour, these are outdated statistics. I would like to

present the following.
Objection sustained. Professor, please speak!
The Professor stands up to read,

'NASA and the USSR have not ignored this technical issue (of space
dust) in the decades since landing on the moon. It is, after all, relevant
to the health of satellites and space stations. (In 1998, more than 600
satellites were orbiting the Earth.)
There have been theoretical calculations.
There have been measurements done by shining
lasers into space. There have been
measurements based on the chemistry of deep
sea sediments.1
And NASA put up a satellite, the Long Duration
Exposure Facility, LDEF. It went up in 1984, and
they retrieved it in 1990 to study the amount of
damage from years of tiny impacts. LDEF gave
us a figure of 40,000 tons per year - a long
way from millions.
Your Honour, I have nothing further to say on
the subject as science speaks for itself.
Your Honour, while the Professor was presenting this

material, I used my calculator and made the following
calculation according to what the Professor presented.
40,000 : 5,000,000 x 182 = 1.456 feet or 44 cm of spacedust on the moon.
This is still a big difference to the less than 1 cm which was discovered
by the astronauts on the moon.
If we take the evolution age of the Earth as 4.6 billion years
(4,600,000,000), we do the following calculation of 1 cm : 44 cm x
4,600,000,000 = roughly 100,000,000 (100 million) years.
44
1. http://carumbasblog.blogspot.co.uk/2009/02/amount-of-dust-on-
moon-does-not-show.html
Your Honour, if this is correct, it means that according to this

theory the world is 100 million years old, while the evolution
theory says it is 4.6 billion years and now 13.8 billion years old.
Anyway true or false, it would send the whole evolution theory in a
tail spin.
Your Honour, but I have here the latest from space.com
MOONDUST MYSTERY SOLVED WITH APOLLO MISSION

DATA- January 3, 2014. 1
A revisited trove of data from NASAs Apollo mission more than 40
years ago is helping scientist
answer a lingering lunar question:
How fast does moon dust build
up?
The answer;
IT WOULD TAKE 1000 YEARS
FOR A LAYER OF MOON DUST
ABOUT ONE MILLIMETER
THICK TO ACCUMULATE, the
researchers found - (0.04 inches)
The rate may seem slow by the
standards of Earth, but its 10 times
faster than scientists had believed
before, and it means moon dust
could pose big problems for astronauts and equipment alike.
The Lunar Dust Detector, (see photograph) attached to the leftmost

corner of this experiment package left by the Apollo 12 astronauts,
made the first measurement of lunar dust accumulation. As the
devices three solar panel became covered by dust, the voltage they
produced dropped.
Credit NASA
45
1. http://www.space.com/23694-moon-dust-mystery-apollo-data.html
'You wouldnt see it; its very thin indeed,' Brian OBrien, as
physicist at the University of Western Australia, said in a
statement. .'
(End of article space.com)
'Lunar dust is like velcro', said

David McKay. . .
'Understanding how the lunar
dust affects humans is
imperative to any future
missions', said Russell
Kerschmann, life sciences chief
at NASA's Ames Research
Center.
'How much of a problem this
is, we don't know, and that's a
problem.' 1
We have according to the measurements given,
1 millimeter - 1 mm of moondust per thousand years - 1000 yrs.
On this Apollo 17 photo, astronaut Harrison Schmitt is collecting

moondust samples. Here we observe that the layer of dust is more or
less a quarter inch, or 6 mm thick.
Watch this video clip on moondust - Schmitt kicking a rock - 2.
The math is very simple: there is about six mm of moondust.

1 mm accumilates every 1000 years.
THIS MAKES THE MOON ABOUT 6,000 YEARS OLD.
Your Honour, this is another thing that does not add up in relation
with the 4.6 billion years, or the present estimation of 13.8 billion years
of the Earth's evolution, but fits well with the writing of my client.
46
1. http://archive.wired.com/science/space/news/2005/04/67110
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-q0SD7cioY
Concerning the moondust, I am sure that someone will

develop a new theory with highly complicated and difficult
to understand terminology to undermine these facts.
It will be a language that I and other common people dont understand
so we give up reading, thinking we must be not be intelligent enough,
as we dont understand all these complicated theories and names.
For example we have:
Gharialis Curvirostris, Palaeoloxodon Namadicus, Dittmarites
Trailliformis, Orthis (Plectorthis) Spitiensis, Spriferina Stracheyi,
Achrochordiceras Balarama, Cyathophyllum Helianthoides,
Hemiptychina Crebriplicata, and then we have the Australopithecus
Africanus, which means the African Monkey.
My question is, 'Does anyone really know what we are talking about,
or are we playing hide and seek in a maze of illogical, complicated,
not understandable vocabulary and theories?'
Dr. Einstein said,
'If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.'
and
"If you can't explain it to a six-year-old, you don't understand it
yourself."
The Professor states that, 'It all started with a tremendous, unthinkable
explosion of a highly compressed miniscule grain of matter.'
From what we gather the force of the explosion orbited not only our
solar system into space but also the universe and the galaxies.
This is saying that something smaller than this dot . by exploding off
the page can create a whole new universe with suns, planets, earth,
moons, stars and eventually human beings.
My question is that in making this statement am I reducing myself, or
at least the size of my brain, to the magnitude of this dot?
Your Honour, it is not my aim to prove the Professor wrong, it is my
sole desire to establish the truth. Like my client wrote, that it is for me,
'to be kind, to rejoice and be happy with the truth.' 1

47
1. 1Corinthians 13:4-6
Objection, Your Honour, this is total rubbish. Things are not as

simple as Mr. N. Voy makes things out to be. Complicated analyses
are made by difficult highly complex scientific means of carbon dating and
the rubidium-strontium isochron technique.
That is the truth Mr. N. Voy should rejoice in.
Objection overruled! The court will take a 30-mintute recess and we

will start again at 3:30.
To remind you the door will close again at 3:25.
The Professor will then take the witness stand on behalf of evolution.
__________
48
CHAPTER 4
CARBON DATING, OXYGIN and OOPses
Professor E. Colog will take the stand on behalf of evolution.
Your Honour, I would like to bring to everyones attention that the

age of the Earth is not established by measuring some dust in outer
space, nor by the sum total of ages of some long gone generation in a
religious book.
These time frames are established by the scientific 14C method in which
there are three principal isotopes of carbon which occur naturally - C12,
C13 (both stable) and C14 (unstable or radioactive).
These isotopes are present in the following amounts C12 - 98.89%, C13 -
1.11% and C14 - 0.00000000010%.
Thus, one carbon 14 atom exists in nature for every 1,000,000,000,000 (1 in
a trillion) C12 atoms in living material.
The radiocarbon method is based on the rate of decay of the radioactive or
unstable carbon isotope 14 (14C), which is formed in the upper atmosphere
through the effect of cosmic ray neutrons upon nitrogen 14.
The reaction is:
14N + n => 14C + p
(Where n is a neutron and p is a proton).
The 14C formed is rapidly oxidised to 14CO2 and enters the Earth's plant and
animal life ways through photosynthesis and the food chain. The rapidity of
the dispersal of C14 into the atmosphere has been demonstrated by
measurements of radioactive carbon produced from thermonuclear bomb
testing.
14C also enters the Earth's oceans in an atmospheric exchange and as
dissolved carbonate (the entire 14C inventory is termed the carbon
exchange reservoir (Aitken, 1990)).
49
Taken and adapted from;
http://www.radiocarbon.com/PDF/LSC-Methodology.pdf
14Calso enters the Earth's oceans in an atmospheric exchange and as

dissolved carbonate (the entire 14C inventory is termed the carbon
exchange reservoir (Aitken, 1990)).
Plants and animals which utilise carbon in biological food chains take up
14C during their lifetimes.
They exist in equilibrium with the C14 concentration of the atmosphere,

that is, the numbers of C14 atoms and non-radioactive carbon atoms stay
approximately the same over time.
As soon as a plant or an animal dies, they cease the metabolic function of
carbon uptake; there is no replenishment of radioactive carbon, only decay.
The Justice and half the

Jury seem lost with the
explanation.
One of the Jury asks if
the Professor could put
it in simple terms that
she, not being a
scientist, will be able to
understand.
Not really, as this is the scientific process by which we date items

and the age of the Earth etc.
This is also strong evidence that the client of Mr. N. Voy is nothing but a
fancy fable and actually a childish hoax.
May I object, Your Honour? I would like to ask the Professor

to refrain from making personal derogatory statements about
my client.
Objection sustained! Please, Professor, let us simply stick to the

material on carbon dating. Anything that you would like to add,
Professor?
50
Yes, your Honour. I have never given a lecture like this to anyone
that did not understand me. It is difficult for me to defend scientists
and scolars that spent years of agony figuring out our origins.
Scientists that have gotten Nobel prizes
for this, and here I am defending their
work and theories to an, I am sorry to
say, ignorant audience that doesnt
understand even the simple formula of
carbon dating.
I could walk out of this courtroom right
now, but then I would leave the floor
totally to this religious fanatical
nutcase, which I do not want to do, as
their whole itinerary and objective is to
promote a God that does not exist. I have
spoken.
There is an awkward silence and it is totally quiet in the courtroom,

until someone on the right balcony works up the bravery to clear his
throat.
The Justice also clears his throat and looks towards the Jury asking,
How do you feel? Shall we continue, dear members of the Jury?
Yes, Your Honour. With the request that the case stays objective.
The Justice looks towards the Professor, but there is no
acknowledgement from his side, nor any sign of remorse.
Shall we continue? Mr. N. Voy please take the stand on behalf of

creation.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, carbon dating is used to

work out the age of organic material in effect, any living
thing. The technique hinges on carbon-14 (14C) radioactive dating,
which is applicable only to matter, which was once living and
presumed to be in balance with the present day atmosphere, taking
in carbon dioxide from the air for photosynthesis.
51
Measuring the amount of 14C in a sample from a dead animal,

a plant, a piece of wood or a fragment of bone provides
information that can be used to calculate when the animal or plant
died.
The amount of cosmic rays penetrating the Earth's atmosphere affects
the amount of 14C produced and therefore the dating system.
In other words:
The older a fossil is, the less 14C there is to be detected.
I hope this makes it more understandable. I myself did not understand
it and had to figure out what it all meant.
My client writes in the Book of Genesis . . . .
At this point the Professor throws up his arms and hisses,

Oh no, not again!
The Justice speaks soberly,

Professor, I just allowed your insult to the Jury to pass. However,
Professor, if you cannot and will not control your tongue we have to
ask you to leave the courtroom while Mr. N. Voy presents his material.
Then when he is done we will ask you to come back in and give your
presentation. This is my last and final warning, so that we can keep
order in this courtroom, while I preside over the case.
Your Honour, I do have to present my client's writing in

order to explain creation.
Like I said my client wrote in Genesis:
'And I made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the
firmament from the waters which were above the firmament:
and it was so.' 1
The waters above the firmament gave a greenhouse effect to the Earth
in those days before the flood.
52
1. Genesis 1:6,7
It also shielded the Earth and those living on it from the

damaging UV and 14C sun rays.
At that time the sun was not clearly visable as its direct sunlight was
filtered by the water/ice layer. Hence my client did not mention the
sun or moon before the flood, but wrote,
'the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light
to rule the night:' 1
The weight of the protective

translucent water/ice layer
increased the oxygen level
by more than half on the
Earth. This gave an amazing
Flora and Fauna, with huge
sub-tropical vegetation and
colossal animals.
One other interesting point

is that before the flood
people and the animals were vegetarians, as my client writes,
'I have given you every herb bearing seed, and every tree, in the which is
the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat - nourishment-
To every beast, fowl and to everything that creeps upon the earth, wherein
there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.' 2
In those days the increased air

pressure meant more oxygen gets into
the blood stream, which means better
health and longer life.
People, plants and animals could live
up to ten times longer than what is
possible today.
This is also the reason that these
massive dinosaurs could survive.
53
1. Genesis 1:16 2. Genesis 1:29, 30:
Compared to their enormous bodies the dinosaurs had

relatively small lungs.
However, when after the flood, the oxygen level dropped from 35% to
21%, the poor dinosaurs could not survive anymore with their
proportionally undersized lungs.
The Science Forum states,
Oxygen Deprivation Caused Dinosaur Extinction. 1
Minute bubbles of ancient air trapped by successive flows of tree resin
during the life of the tree are preserved in the amber.
Analyses of the gases in these bubbles show that
the Earths atmosphere contained nearly 35
percent oxygen compared to present levels of 21
percent. Results are based upon more than 300
analyses by USGS 2 scientists of Cretaceous,
Tertiary, and recent-age amber from 16 world
sites.
Your Honour, at present we have,
Hyperbaric OXYGEN THERAPY for Wound Healing
When injured we can put the patient or the athlete in a high oxygen
cabin. The wound and /or injury will recover much quicker.
We can also simply wrap a
plastic bag loosely around the
wound and fill it with a high
level of oxygen and the
process of healing has proven
much faster for the patient.
With the waters above the
firmament in place, the entire
atmosphere of the Earth
would have been shielded
from the intense levels of
cosmic radiation.
54
1. www.thescienceforum.com
2. United States Geological Survey
The 14C radio carbon atoms would have been missing or

barely present in the biosphere and in living organisms, such
as plants and animals from before the flood.
The less 14C is found in a fossil, the older it is estimated to be with
carbon-dating.
Hence, the fossils from before the flood will date much older than they
really are, as they have practically no traces of 14C, since the Earth was
shielded from the sun rays by the waters above the firmament.
In theory this 14C dating should work, but in practice this is not always
the case. As the Professor said, only one carbon 14 atom exists in nature
for every 1,000,000,000,000 (1 trillion) C12 atoms in living material, so it
is highly unlikely that carbon-dating can be accurate.
THE RUBIDIUM-STRONTIUM TECHNIQUE

This technique is for dating rocks and non-living matter, according to
the amount of Rubidium or Strontium element found in the matter.
The following shows that this technique is also not accurate.
'Geologist Dr. Steve Austin sampled basalt from the base of the Grand
Canyon strata and from the lava that spilled over the edge of the
canyon.
By evolutionary reckoning, the latter should be at least a billion years
younger than the basalt from the bottom.
'Standard Laboratories' analyzed the isotopes.
The rubidium-strontium isochron technique suggested that the recent
lava flow was 270 Ma* older than the basalts beneath the Grand
Canyon an impossibility. (* 1 Ma represents 1 million years)
In the study of the Grand Canyon rocks by Austin, different techniques
gave different results. Again, all sorts of reasons can be suggested for
the 'bad' dates, but this is again posterior reasoning.
Techniques that give results that can be dismissed, just because they
don't agree with what we already believe, cannot be considered
objective.
55
The belief system, of molecules-to-man evolution over eons

of time is so strongly entrenched, that it is not questionedit
is a 'fact'. So every observation must fit this pattern.
The researchers, who are supposedly 'objective scientists' in the eyes of
the public, select the observations to fit the basic belief system of
evolution.' 1
Your Honour, we are taught that ancient man was less intelligent and
modern man is much more advanced intellectually, but this makes no
sense in the light of these archeological discoveries.
The evolutionist puts modern man at about 400,000 years old, with
technological developments only within the past 40,000 years,
however, we find man-made designs in layers of rock and coal that are
according to Carbon Dating and evolution millions of years old.
I read from 'The Hidden History of the Human Race',
'Nordling wrote: 'I visited a friend's museum in southern Missouri.
Among his curios, he had the iron cup pictured on the enclosed
snapshot.'
Metal pot found in coal, which was carbon-dated

about 312 million years old.
56
1. https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=1465316558
At the private museum, the iron cup had been displayed

along with the following affidavit, made by Frank J.
Kenwood in Sulphur Springs, Arkansas, on Nov. 27, 1948:'
'While I was working in the Municipal Electric Plant in

Thomas, Okla. in 1912, I came upon a solid chunk of coal
which was too large to use. I broke it with a sledge hammer.
This iron pot fell from the center, leaving the impression or
mould of the pot in the piece of coal. Jim Stall (an employee
of the company) witnessed the breaking of the coal, and saw
the pot fall out. I traced the source of the coal, and found
that it came from the Wilburton, Oklahoma, Mines.'
According to Robert O. Fay of the Oklahoma Geological
Survey, the Wilburton mine coal is [dated by evolutionists
at] about 312 million years old.'
Your Honour, next I would like to refer to 'Jaredites: The Missing

Civilization X', by Jim Hendleman. 1
'In 1944, as a ten-year-old boy, Newton Anderson dropped a large
lump of coal (bituminous [black mixture of hydrocarbons, typically
used for roofing and asphalt] coal mined near his home in Upshur
County, West Virginia) in his basement. It broke open and he found
that it contained a brass bell with an iron clapper inside.
The bell is about 8-10 inches tall and generally resembles a school bell...
On the outside, the bell's apparent brass handle resembles the overall
native architectural features seen in Thailand, with an indistinct type of
seated person... The Institute For Creation Research submitted the bell
to the lab at the University of Oklahoma for analysis.
57
1. Author House, 2013, p. 347-348, ISBN: 9781481733205
The lab's nuclear activation

analysis revealed that the bell
contains an unusual mix of metals,
different from any known modern alloy
production...
COPPER, ZINC, TIN, ARSENIC, IODINE
& SELENIUM.'
Your Honour, we are taught that early
man did not have knowledge to produce
iron tools, however in the writings of my
client, he wrote in his first book,
'Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain,
Bell made of metal mixes that we
an instructor of every artificer
dont know in our modern industry.
in brass and iron:' 1
Tubalcain was teaching others iron working, and the evidence of that is
what we have just seen.
Evolutionists all over the internet do their best to disregard these
findings, many of them want these discoveries quickly buried.
They're often called OOP-Art, which is short for,
'Out-Of-Place-Artifact'.
OOPs! a very fitting name, as it shows up another fault. OOPs! in the
missing-link theory of evolution, OOPs!
Oops, I think I went overtime as it is nearing 5:00 o'clock.
The Justice announces,

Dear members of the Jury, ladies and gentlemen, this brings us to the
end of our first day.
The courtroom will open again tomorrow morning at 8:30 and the
doors will close at 8:55.
We will start again by 9 a.m. Please, be seated on time. Thank you.
__________
58
1. Genesis 4:22
CHAPTER 5
ICE TIME, FLOOD
All rise, this is the second day of the 'Evolution and Creation' case.
Presiding over the case is the Lord Justice, Dr. E. Dict.
The Lord Justice asks,

Professor, would you present us with your material?
THE ICE TIMES

I would like to present the following article: 1
The Pleistocene Epoch is typically defined as the time period that began
about 1.8 million years ago and lasted until about 11,700 years ago.
The most recent Ice Age occurred then, as glaciers covered huge parts of the
planet Earth.
There have been at least five documented major ice ages during the 4.6
billion years since the Earth was formed - and most likely many more before
humans came on the scene about 2.3 million years ago.
The Pleistocene Epoch is the first in which Homo Sapiens evolved, and by the
end of the epoch humans could be found in nearly every part of the planet.
The Pleistocene Epoch was the first epoch in the Quaternary Period and the
sixth in the Cenozoic Era. It was followed by the current stage, called the
Holocene Epoch.
At present we are in an interglacial periodthe Holoceneof the ice age

that began 2.6 million years ago at the start of the Pleistocene epoch,
because the Greenland, Arctic, and Antarctic ice sheets still exist.
59
1. http:/ /www.livescience.com/40311-pleistocene-epoch.html
In 'Science Daily' we learn: 1

Science has struggled to explain fully why an ice age occurs every 100,000
years. As researchers now demonstrate based on a computer simulation, not
only do variations in insolation play a key role, but also the mutual influence
of glaciated continents and climate.
I present the following photographs of circumstantial evidence.
MAMMOTHS
This skeleton of a
mammoth was
found recently in
Texas, which is
circumstantial
evidence that the
ice age was not
only happening
in the poles but
was worldwide.
60
1. Science News: August 7, 2013 Source: ETH Zurich
A huge array of ice age fossils, including the bones of mammoths, turtles and
horses, were uncovered at a California construction site this summer.
The fossils found in Carlsbad, California, are 50,000 to 200,000 years old.
Next, Your Honour, are Siberian scientists at work:
61
Exclusive: Siberian scientists announce they now have a

'high chance' to clone the woolly mammoth.1
Discovery of blood in a creature frozen for 43,000 years is seen as major
breakthrough by the international team. 'The data we are about to receive
will give us a high chance to clone the mammoth.'
Mr. Khayrullin also acknowledged that the mammoth cannot be identical to
the creatures that became extinct between 4,000 and 10,000 years ago.
'It will be a different mammoth to the one living 43,000 years ago, specially
taking into account that there will be interbreeding with a female elephant.
If and when experiments begin, an elephant will be the surrogate mother,
enabling the species to be brought back from the dead.
This is my presentation concerning the ice age, which I hope has convinced
the Jury that such a time period truly existed.
NOAH'S ARK?
As far as Noah's ark is concerned, I dont even want to waste my breath on it
as it is the greatest hoax of all times.
I will just read what Rudy Wittshirk writes:

To get a sense of the desperation behind the search for the wreck of Noah's
Ark, consider this:
It is wildly unlikely that Planet Earth was flooded, 4500 years ago, even up
to, for instance, the 13,000 foot level of this most recently claimed discovery:
Evangelists claim Noah's Ark found - Mount Ararat explorers: 'We think it
is 99.9 percent that this is it."
The ark, as described in the Bible, was a wallowing tub. Some speculate it
had rudimentary sails and "drogue anchors" (stones used as sea anchors)
for stability. Others account for its survival by claiming there is no mention
of stormy seas in the biblical story.
However, I would think the purported huge amounts of water welling up

from a crack in the Earth would have meant roiling, if not boiling seas.
62
1. Excerpts taken from The Siberian Times 13 March 2014 article by
Anna Liesowska
Indeed one discoverer of Noah's ark claims that his find was washed
up onto the mountain by a tsunami, not a flood. And somehow
everyone on board survived that tsunami - and the Ark still retained its
ship-shape after 4500 years.
It does seem rather unlikely that a wooden (or reed-construction) vessel
could have survived in recognizable form after 4,500 years on the side of a
snow-covered mountain. Just look what happens to log cabins in Alaska
after a few hundred years---they become as one with the Earth.
Nevertheless, the searches go on. The main purpose for most searchers is to
explicitly prove the existence of God.
Creationists like John Morris also hope that finding the lost Ark would
disprove evolution and prove the Bible.
Other searchers are just intrigued by the story.
It is a field ripe for deception
Thank you, Your Honour, this is all for now."
The court calls on Mr. N. Voy to take the witness stand and present
his material concerning creation.
MORE ON MAMMOTHS
Your Honour, members of the Jury, as I mentioned earlier, I
always ask a lot of questions and still do today.
I quote here from Science News:

The ice-age ice masses accumulate over tens of thousands of years
and recede within the space of a few thousand years.
Many mammoths were found, complete with sub-tropical vegetation
still in their mouths.
Maybe the mammoths were not very intelligent, but I cannot believe
that any mammoth in his right mind would happily be eating his
grass and subtropical vegetation, while ice was forming around him
and he or she was turning into a block of ice.
63
That somehow does not add up with me.

I read the rest of the article of The Siberian Times that the Professor
presented about the possibility of cloning this mammoth.
I honestly stand in awe of the technology that science has discovered,
to able to attempt such a feat.
Further on in the same article we read:
'Radik Khayrullin said, 'the blood we have obtained is 'agonised' -
which means that the mammoth died an unnatural death, it must have
been in agony for 16, 18 hours. This is also confirmed by the position of
the body, with its back leg stretched in an unnatural way.
'We think this was a female mammoth that fell into an ice hole and
couldn't escape.'
My client writes:
'In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month,
the seventeenth day of the month,
the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up,
and floodgates of heaven were opened.' 1
Your Honour, for the sake of brevity I was going to leave the day and
month out, however this shows how exact my client is. He does not say
between 1,000,000 to 1,800,000 years ago.
No, my client gives the exact year, month and day.
As I explained yesterday from my clients writings there were waters
above the firmament, besides the waters under the firmament and
there were the waters of the deep.
This water above the firmament was in the form of ice crystals
suspended in space outside of the Earth's atmosphere and held in place
by the Earth's gravity just as the rings around the other planets are
held in place by the other planets' gravity.
This is not a strange phenomenon and is very possible, as Saturns
rings are known to be composed mainly of ice.
64
1. Genesis 7:11
HOW THE MAMMOTHS FROZE

When this protective layer was removed and the ice started
falling, the different climate zones came into existence: the colder polar
zones and the warmer climates. My client told Noah after the flood,
'While the earth remains seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and
summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease.' 1
The ice or hail that fell in the polar zones did not melt, but instantly
froze everything in its path, including the huge mammoths whose
climate changed from subtropical to an instant complete deep-freezer.
Just like we read earlier in The Siberian Times.

The mammoth died an unnatural death, it must have been in agony
for 16, 18 hours. . its back legs stretched in an unnatural way.
Obviously the mammoth could not support the weight of the ice and
its back legs slipped away and it died an agonizing death.
On the other hand the ice that fell in the tropical and subtropical
climates melted on its way down and it fell as rain. That is why it is
recorded in my clients writing as rain.
'And the rain was upon the earth forty days,' 2
65
1. Genesis 8:22 2. Genesis 7:17
Your Honour, it might be seen by some as a simplistic

explanation, but I like things not too complicated so I can
understand them.
MASS FOSSIL GRAVES?

'Sept. 8, 2015 - Mammoths, bisons
and turtles ... A huge array of ice
age fossils, including the bones of
mammoths, turtles and horses, were
uncovered... The fossils found in
Carlsbad, California.' 1
Did they decide, 'Hey guys, lets
cuddle up here and die together.'? photo of a mass fossil grave
I highly doubt it.
Or is it more likely that the violent flood waters swept them off their
feet and they ended up in a big heap?
Here we have
a photo of a
mammoth calf
discovered in
May, 2007.
I quote,
'The death
seems to have
occurred . .
when it froze
rapidly and
then it was
wrapped by
mud, a
process that
allowed the
preservation of the body. The mammoth calf is still frozen.' 2
66
1. www.huffingtonpost.com
2. Read more: http://news.softpedia.com
Your Honour, the ice coming down froze the calf instantly.
The fountains from the deep formed the mud and the calf
was instantly frozen and wrapped in mud.
If we can accept that my client meant what he said, then it becomes
straightforward.
To me this is circumstantial evidence that the flood really happened.
Thank you, this is all for now.
There will now be a 30-minute coffee break till 11:00 o'clock, after
which Mr. N. Voy will take the stand for creation.
Just to remind you the doors will close in exactly 25 minutes.
__________
67
68
CHAPTER 6
NOAH'S ARK
Mr. N. Voy please take the witness stand for creation.
Your Honour, Noahs Ark has

been a story for children that
has inspired many artists with drawings
of animals, boats and rainbows.
WHY THE FLOOD?

My client writes, I will read it in first person,
'And I saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that
every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
I was sorry that I had
made man, and it
grieved my heart. The
earth also was corrupt
The earth was corrupt
before me, and the earth
was filled with violence.
Filled with violence continually
And I said unto Noah,
The end of all flesh is before me; for the earth is filled
with violence; and I will destroy them with the earth. Man's heart- only evil
Make an ark of gopher wood; The length of the ark shall be three hundred
cubits (150 meters), the breadth of it fifty cubits (25 meters), and the height of
it thirty cubits (15 meters) . . . with lower, second, and third stories. .
And Noah did according unto all that I commanded him.' 1
Your Honour, my client knew how to build ships.
Modern day oil-tankers are still built according to the approximate
dimensions set by my client to build the Ark. (see drawings)
69
1. Genesis chapter 6
A longer vessel than the Ark was not built until 1858 when I.
K. Brunel produced the Great Eastern some 692 feet (211
meters) long. But this was made of steel.
The Ark is still the largest wooden vessel ever built.
Between 1856 to 1974 an estimated 200 people from 23 countries

claimed they saw Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat. (Balsiger & Sellier 1974
p. 203)
I quote Paul Zimansky, Professor of Archaeology and Ancient History,
Stony Brook University. (Ph.D., University of Chicago, 1980)
I dont know of any expedition that ever went looking
for the Ark and did not find it.
Objection, objection. Your Honour, we are getting carried away with

nothing but a bunch of religious slob.
Professor, I advise you to watch your words.
Your Honour, but this is quite stressful for me. Let me just read this
article, as the witness for creation is lying,
CIA report, April 28, 2013.

The search for physical remains of Noahs Ark has held a
fascination for many people since at least the third century. Despite
many expeditions, no material evidence of the ark has been found.
70
Your Honour, if the CIA cannot find it then I doubt the authenticity of
these so-called expeditions."
My client writes in Genesis 8:4,

'And the ark rested . . . upon the mountains of Ararat'
There is an anomaly (abnormality, something unusual) located on the
northwest corner of the Western Plateau of Mount Ararat
(approximately 394210N, 441630E) at about 15,500 feet (4,724
meters), some 2.2 kilometers west of the summit, on what appears in
photographs to be a steep downward slope. It was first filmed during a
U.S. Air Force aerial reconnaissance mission in 1949 - the Ararat massif
sits on the Turkish/Soviet border. 1
Your Honour, I will limit my circumstantial evidence to a few pages, as

the amount of evidence is overwhelming.
Flying parallel to
Mt. Ararat at
14.000 feet a U.S.
Air Force plane
on a low level
reconnaissance
mission first
photographed
the Anomaly on
June 17, 1949.
Picture of
the Ararat
anomaly
taken by
CIA, 1973.
Ararat is in Turkey near Armenian border,
close to Iran (16 km) & Azerbaijan (32 km)
71
1. www.armeniapedia.org
Photo by Chuck Aaron and Bob Garbe from a helicopter in 1989
1887
John Joseph Nouri, Nestorian Archdeacon, had visited the Ark, during
an expedition to the source of the Euphrates. The
wood was peculiar, dark reddish in color, almost
iron colored in fact, and seemed very thick. During
Chicago World Fair 1893, he tried to raise funds to
have the Ark disassembled, transported and
reconstructed at the Fair.
1890s
Arthur Chuchian, an American, claimed that his father Jacob Chuchian
saw the Ark numerous times during his childhood. The Ark, which
has a reddish-brown color, rests on a type of cleft or ledge near a steep
drop off and is surrounded by the other three sides by walls of rock
and lies north-south direction.
1902 1905
George Hagopian, an Armenian living in the USA, declared to have
visited the Ark twice during his childhood, once with his uncle, when
he was ten years old and another time on his own.
72
1916
Duran Ayranci from Adana, declared that six of his friends,
soldiers from the Turkish Army, saw the Ark.
1918
Guilford Officer flew around Mount Ararat in 1918
together with an Army pilot . . . at approximately
14,000 feet and turned south, they were surprised
to find themselves nearly level with a great ship. .
1943
Ed Davis, sergeant in the U.S. Army, was led to the
Ark by family Abas.
1954
Bill (William) Todd, Navy Photographer, took photos
of the Ark from out of an airplane.
It was a rectangular, slate-colored boat. Everyone
stated it was Noahs Ark. About 10 meters of the
structure was protruding from the ice.
From a 1996 interview; Bill: 'The whole squadron of
six mapping planes was abuzz about Noahs Ark and
everyday some plane 'accidentally' went by Ararat to see it. You
practically needed a control tower around Ararat that summer. After
seeing the photos, we
were convinced that the
structure was Noahs
Ark.'
2008
Here we see Ahmet
Ertugrul in the Ark, he
was born in the region of
Mount Ararat.
73
More interesting accounts at www.swartzentrover.com/cotor
2009
Hong Kong Ararat team
2014
(November) Sheila Bishop
and Philip Williams.
Photos 1- 5 from the

2009 Hong Kong
Ararat Team.
Wing-cheung
YEUNG
Team member
1
74
Interesting video clip inside the ark:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2949640/Noahs-Ark-
found-in-Turkey.html
The Turkish Central

Govt was to apply to
the U.N. to put
Noahs Ark on the
Unesco World
Heritage List. 3
UNESCO spokesperson
R. Amelan wrote that no
official request came
from Turkey and 'this
cannot be done
overnight.'
4
There seems to be a
general disinterest and
lack of concern for the
Ark.
75
Materials collected from:
www.arkinsight.nl and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article
Photos a, b and c c
show the ice-
covered walls and
wooden pins by
Sheila Bishop and
Philip Williams,
inside the Ark in
November 2014.
Your Honour, I do not know the

authenticity of this picture.
But this is what it would have looked
like, before it broke in two. In 1954 it
was still whole.
A team in 1974 said that the smaller
broken-off section was visible on the
ledge 30 to 50 feet below the main
structure.
HISTORIAN JOSEPHUS
The first century Jewish historian, who also
worked for the Roman Empire, Flavius
Josephus 1 covers much of the history in
his book Antiquities of the Jews and
mentions the following concerning Noah's
Ark:
The ark rested on the top of a certain
mountain in Armenia ...
However, the Armenians call this place,
'The Place of Descent'; for Josephus 37-100 A.D.
the ark being saved in that place, its
remains are shown there by the inhabitants to this day.
76
1. Titus Flavius Josephus born Joseph ben Matityahu
Now all the writers of barbarian histories make mention of this

flood, and of this ark; among whom is Berossus.
For when he is describing the circumstances of the flood, he goes on
thus:
'It is said there is still some part of this ship in Armenia, at the
mountain of the Cordyaeans; and that some people carry off pieces of
the bitumen, which they take away, and use chiefly as amulets for the
averting of mischiefs.'
Hieronymus the Egyptian also, who wrote the Phoenician Antiquities,
and Mnaseas, and a great many more, makes mention of the same.
Nay, Nicolaus of Damascus, in his ninety-sixth book, hath a particular
relation about them; where he speaks thus:
'There is a great mountain in Armenia, over Minyas, called Baris, upon
which it is reported that many who fled at the time of the Deluge were
saved; and that one who was carried in an ark came on shore upon the
top of it; and that the remains of the timber were a great while
preserved.' 1
(End of Antiquity of the Jews reading)
Consider the word for 'boat' and 'large boat' in Chinese:
'Then Noah and his (3) sons and his wife and his sons' wives with him
entered the ark (8 in total) because of the water of the flood.' 2
The Ark was a boat which carried eight persons, and the Chinese
character for 'large boat' is a boat with eight persons. 3
Mr. N. Voy, I can see that you did your home work.
77
1. Antiquities of the Jews, I.3.5-6, translation. William Whiston. (Wikipedia)
2. Genesis 7:7
3. http://www.watchmanmag.com
Your Honour, nothing is too good for my client. I would like

to close by presenting the following letter, which I came across,
because of the U.S. Government freedom of Information Act.
I have edited and highlighted it for brevitys sake.
It shows that the Ark is.
C00726484
20 July 92.
The Hon Duane P Andrews,
Assistant Secretary of Defense, C3 I
Department of Defense
The Pentagon, Room 3E 172
Wash DC 20301
Dear Mr. Andrews,

CBS and Sun International Pictures are producing a network
special called "The Secret of Noah's Ark" . . . . . . . .
As the tradition of the Ark is honored by the Moslem, Christian,
and Jewish faiths, there are many people throughout the world
who would be interested in evidence concerning its existence or
survival. Your assistance is requested in having such evidence
now in the hands of our intelligence services released, where
this can be done without compromising U.S. security.
Any assistance which you can render would be greatly
appreciated. Thank you for your consideration.
Raymond G Smith
Government Relations
APPROVED FOR RELEASE

DATE: FEB 2002
Thank you. The court now takes a one-hour recess for lunch and
refreshment.
In exactly one-hour, at 1:30 the court will resume.
The doors of the courtroom will close at 1:25.
__________
78
CHAPTER 7
SNAKES, 14C DATING, DINOSAURS
It is 1:30 and Professor it is your turn to take the stand.
Your Honour, it is not all as simple as the witness makes it out to be.
Things are more complex than a story of a boat on the water carrying
a family and animals.
Your Honour, to me it is beyond comprehension that people actually believe
this. The plant and animal world and the human development is far more
complicated than the childlike stories of Adam and Eve in a garden and
Noah and his family going with the animals in a boat. I think that as adults
we have outgrown this Sunday school nonsense.
SNAKES
I would like to show you something that one of my esteemed colleagues Dr.
David Martill, Ph.D.1 Martill says, The new snake hints at how these legless,
slithering serpents evolved from four-legged, striding lizards. Martill called
the creature Tetrapodophis: four-legged snake.
This little animal is the
Archaeopteryx of the squamate
world, he says. (Squamates are
the snakes and lizards.)
Archaeopteryx is the feathered
fossil whose mish-mash of
features hinted at the
evolutionary transition from
dinosaurs to birds.
In the same way, Martill says,
the new snake hints at how
these legless, slithering serpents Tetrapodophis hindlimb (Credit: David Martill)
evolved from four-legged, striding lizards.
79
1. Reader in Palaeobiology at the School of Earth & Environmental Sciences,
University of Portsmouth, U.K.
Jacques
Gauthier Ph.D.,
(Professor of Geology
and Geophysics,
Curator Vertebrate
Paleontology and
Vertebrate Zoology)
says about the
Tetrapodophis:
It maintains many
classic snake
features, such as a
short snout, long
Tetrapodophis forelimb (Credit: David Martill)
braincase,
elongated body, scales, fanged teeth and a flexible jaw to swallow large
prey. It also maintains the typical vertebrae structure seen in modern-day
snakes that allows for the extreme flexibility required to constrict prey.
The main, glaring difference is Tetrapodophis four limbs. 1
The newly discovered species Tetrapodophis amplectus, which lived during
the Early Cretaceous 146 to 100 million years ago.
Dr. Houssaye says in a BBC interview:

Two theories compete.
One points to a land origin in which lizards started to burrow, and as they
adapted to their subterranean existence, their legs were reduced and lost -
first the fore-limbs and then the hind-limbs.
The second theory considers the origin to be in water, from marine reptiles.
This makes the few known bipedal snakes in the fossil record hugely
significant, because they could hold the clues that settle this particular
debate. 2
Your Honour, Dr. Houssaye closes her interview with these words, This
study does not enable us to choose between the two hypotheses.
In fact, a true answer might not be brought before 10 years.
80
1. http://phys.org/news/2015-07-four-legged-fossil-snakes-
2. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment
Your Honour, the world of evolution is so complex and so fascinating,

that I have dedicated my life to assist in solving these intriguing and
fascinating problems of our origins in this world and the universe.
Being a professor is not easy, but to instruct the young inquisitive minds of
our students in the knowledge of our past is something that I am dedicated
to doing.
I see, Mr. N. Voy, that you would like to speak. The Professor is
finished, so please go ahead.
Your Honour, I was happily surprised that the Professor

would quote Dr. David Martill, as I actually also have a part of
that particular interview. It shows how both our researches overlap.
This particular part shows the excitement of Dr. Martill,
And then, if my jaw hadnt already dropped enough, it dropped right
to the floor. The little creature had a pair of hind legs. I thought: bloody
hell! And I looked closer and the little label said: Unknown fossil.
Understatement! I looked even closerand my jaw was already on the
floor by nowand I saw that it had tiny little front legs!
He says,
Fossil-hunters have found several extinct snakes with stunted hind
legs, and modern boas and pythons still have a pair of little spurs.
But no snake has ever been found with four legs. This is a once-in-a-
lifetime discovery.
Study puts new perspective on snake evolution.

January 5, 2015.
When combined with information from fossils, these findings indicate
that the direction of SNAKE EVOLUTION IS THE OPPOSITE of
what had been concluded from developmental genetics alone, Head
and Polly say. 1
I quote, 'Snakes . . . their evolutionary origins are obscure . . . no snake
has been described with four limbs, and the ecology of snakes is poorly
known.' 2
81
1. http://news.unl.edu/newsrooms/unltoday/article/
2. sciencemag.org
Dr. Hongyu Yi, of the University of Edinburgh's School of

GeoSciences, said: 'How snakes lost their legs has long been
a mystery to scientists. .'
Before I refer to my clients writing, I would like to refer to the

Professors presentation and the closing words of Dr. Houssaye in her
BBC interview,
This study does not enable us to choose between the two hypotheses.
In fact, a true answer might not be brought before 10 years.
What if we dont have to wait 10 years for the true answer?
My client writes; I will read his words in first person,
'And the woman said, The snake enticed me.
And I said unto the serpent, Because you have done this, you are cursed
above all cattle, and above every beast of the field;
upon your belly shall you go, dust shall you eat all the days of your life:' 1
This seems to indicate that before the flood, humans and animals could
communicate and converse, as otherwise the woman (Eve) would have
screamed and run away when the snake spoke to her.
I will not go into all the spiritual reasons why my client was upset with
the snake, but what if, what my client says is the truth, and this is the
true answer that Dr. Housaye is looking for?
The Professor bursts out in a loud laugh, This is total absolute

nonsense. Rubbish! I cant believe that we even listen to this! Adam
and Eve and the apple, where are your brains at?
82
1. Genesis 3: 13, 14.
ORDER IN THE COURT!

Professor, please leave the courtroom. You have had ample of
warnings. Please excuse yourself and I will call you back in when it is
your turn to speak.
Your Honour, that we even listen to this is beyond me. This is so

ridiculous this borders on childlike insanity. Adam and Eve and the
apple and the snake.
Professor, please excuse yourself, or otherwise I will have to ask the

security to assist.
The Professor gets up, red in the face and as he passes Mr. N. Voy he
scowls, You are a God-damned idiot. Do you know that?
The Justice sighs, You may continue Mr. N. Voy.
Your Honour, I know that these things might be hard to

believe, but I am not here to pick a fight, I am just here to
present the writings of my client and that is all there is to it.
It is not for me to prove him right. He is well capable of doing that
himself, however in this case I am only to present his writing.
I just felt sorry for the Professor that he called on my clients name
when he wished me ill.
83
Funny how my client is in peoples mind connected to the

negative. When bad things happen to us personally, or in the
world at large, my client often gets the blame for it, even by people that
say they dont believe he exists.
We truly are amazing creatures, Your Honour.
Concerning the four-legged snake I wanted to end with a quote again
from Dr. David Martill,
But no snake has ever been found with four legs. This is a once-in-a-
lifetime discovery.
I dont think fossil hunters will find many more as there were probably
only a few snakes in the Garden of Eden.
Actually I am amazed that this fossil was discovered in the museum in
Solnhofen, Germany, by Dr. Martill. I am happy for this precious fossil
find and that the Professor brought it up in the court case, because for
me it is another confirmation of my clients writings.
MORE ON CARBON-14 (14C) DATING

I am however still concerned about the dates given by means of carbon
14 dating, and I repeat, prior to the flood the Earth was shielded by the
waters above the firmament from the suns emission of carbon 14.
If very little carbon 14 is found in the fossils they are considered very
old.
Carbon 14 dating is measured according to todays environmental
conditions, which at present is radically different than the conditions
before the flood when it was practically totally carbon 14 free.
Hence these dates of millions and billions of years are incorrect.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, it goes like this:
If it has 100% 14C then it is 0 years old.
If it has 50% 14C then it is 5730 years old.
If it has 25% 14C then it is 11.460 years old.
If it has 12.5% 14C then it is 17.190 years old.
84
So every time the percentage (%) goes down by half, then you
add 5730 years.
14C comes to Earth in the sun rays. That is why dinosaur bones and
things that lived before the flood are practically 14C free, because of the
protective water/ice shield that protected the Earth from the harmful
sun rays before the flood.
Seeing that there is no 14C in these fossils, they are guesstimated to be
millions or billions of years old, while they are only approx. 4,500 to
6,000 years old according to my client.
I dont think that I can repeat this point enough, as this is a major
cornerstone of evolution, which holds no water.
CO-HABITATION OF MAN AND DINOSAURS
One last thing that I forgot to mention this morning about the
dinosaurs, which became extinct because of lack of oxygen.
Evolution teaches us that man evolved tens of millions of years after
the dinosaurs became extinct.
However since in 1908, George
Adams discovered 14 giant human
footprints beside 134 dinosaur
footprints in the limestone of
Paluxy Creek riverbed in Glen
Rose, Texas.
85
I had to laugh, as this is also

maligned as another hoax and that
these were 'carved' footprints. Who would
waste time to carve 14 human footprints,
each two feet length, double the size of
present day footprints, along at least 134
dinosaur tracks in a river bed?
Dr. Philip Kitcher, in his anti-creationist book Abusing Science, claims

that solid evidence that dinosaurs and man co-existed would 'shake
the foundations of evolutionary theory.' (1998, p. 121)
Your Honour, this is a part of a cave pictograph in the Amazon

Rainforest, depicting a Sauropod Dinosaur with nine hunters
encircling the dinosaur. Obviously the dinosaur is alive, as one of the
hunters raises his spear getting ready to strike. 1
Professor Strahler 2 writes on page 17 in Science and Earth History: The
Evolution / Creation Controversy, 'it is conceivable that a scientist will
someday discover human bones among dinosaur bones in such a
relationship that it is judged highly likely that humans and dinosaurs
lived at the same time. Such a finding would deal a crushing blow to
the widely favored hypothesis of a unique evolutionary sequence. .'
86
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4yt1WoDlYQ&feature=youtu.be
2. A. N. Strahler (1918-2002), professor geoscience, Columbia University
Your Honour, I trust that in your profession as a judge you

must have gained certain experience to see who is speaking
the truth and who is fantasizing, what is real and what is a persons
imagination.
That is all I have for this session, Your Honour, members of the Jury.
The Lord Justice Dr. E. Dict clears his throat,

It is now 2:43.
We will have 47 minutes recess and we will resume at 3:30.
The door wills close by 3:25. Please, be all seated at that time.
Thank you.
Dear members of the Jury, would you be so kind as to meet with me in
the office, so we can discuss how we will proceed with the case.
__________
87
88
CHAPTER 8
LANGUAGES, THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE
The clock in the courtroom shows 3:30.

The Lord Justice speaks:
During the recess the
members of the Jury and
myself, as well as the Professor
and Mr. N. Voy have had
different discussions.
Seeing the controversy that is surrounding the case, as well as the
emotional occurences, the Jury and I came to the conclusion that for the
sake of the presentations and circumstantial evidences, both the
Professor and Mr. N. Voy need to be present in the courtroom.
However, for the smooth running of the case, each will have a security
person standing with him.
Both have have accepted this mandate and have promised to keep their
emotions under control.
Let the case resume. The court calls on the Professor to present his
material.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, I had some time to reflect and am
sure that people, who open their eyes, will see the difference between
science and religion.
CONTINENTAL DRIFTS
The next part of the evolution theory that I would like to present is how the
world developed and how the world was once one giant continent which
gradually drifted apart over a period of millions of years.
89
This simple drawing

shows how it all fitted
together:
We went from the late
TRIASSIC to the Early,
Mid and Late JURASSIC
Late time periods, from then
Triassic on to the Early and Late
CRETACIOUS periods.
With the continents drifting further apart, eventually these continental

shifts settled. Between 200,000 and 40,000 years ago, the Homo Sapiens
evolved into the human race and started branching out from Africa.
They slowly started populating the Earth. They became more inquisitive and
more driven to discover new things and some 12,000 years ago reached the
Americas.
The continents drifting apart, as it shows on the following chart.
90
LANGUAGES
Each group or family of Homo Sapiens developed their own
communication skills, which eventually became a spoken language and then
much later the more developed intellectual groups started writing these
languages in drawings and scripts.
One thing I forgot to mention concerning the Smithsonian Institute, that
it is administered by the Government of the United States, with affiliates
around the world and is a dedicated promoter of evolution.
I will read to the court the list of books concerning the origins of our present
day languages.
At present linguists estimate about 62 root languages.
Your Honour, this is a chart of the basic languages, and how they are
divided worldwide. This presents a total of 62 language families.
Much of the study of these family languages is taken from books of the
Smithsonian Institute".
The Justice interrupts,

Thank you, Professor, just hand us the list and we will keep it with
the evidence material.
The Professor passes the following list to the judge.

91
Boas, Franz (1911). Handbook of American Indian languages. Bureau of

American Ethnology, Bulletin 40. Volume 1. Washington: Smithsonian Institution,
Bureau of American Ethnology. ISBN 0-8032-5017-7.
Boas, Franz. (1922). Handbook of American Indian languages (Vol. 2). Bureau of
American Ethnology, Bulletin 40. Washington: Government Print Office
(Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology).
Goddard, Ives (Ed.). (1996). Languages. Handbook of North American Indians (W.
C. Sturtevant, General Ed.) (Vol. 17). Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian
Institution. ISBN 0-16-048774-9.
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1966). The Languages of Africa (2nd ed.). Bloomington:
Indiana University.
Harrison, K. David. (2007) When Languages Die: The Extinction of the World's
Languages and the Erosion of Human Knowledge. New York and London: Oxford
University Press.
Mithun, Marianne. (1999). The languages of Native North America. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-29875-X.
Ross, Malcolm. (2005). Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan
languages. In: Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Robin Hide and Jack Golson,
eds, Papuan pasts: cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking
peoples (PDF)
Ruhlen, Merritt. (1987). A guide to the world's languages. Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Sturtevant, William C. (Ed.). (1978present). Handbook of North American
Indians (Vol. 120). Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution. (Vols. 13, 16, 18
20 not yet published).
Voegelin, C. F.; & Voegelin, F. M. (1977). Classification and index of the world's
languages. New York: Elsevier.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, this is all for now.
The Justice looks at his watch and whispers something to the clerk,
who in turn addresses one of the security personnel.
The judge continues,

The court calls on Mr. N. Voy to present his material.
92
Your Honour, an interesting point is that after the flood the

oxygen level was 60% of what it was before, and the protective
water filter against the harmful cosmic rays was now gone. Thus my
client told Noah and his family that they should eat meat. This was for
extra protein and strength, as they were vegetarians till then. 2
Every moving thing that lives will be meat for you; even as the green herb 3
LANGUAGES
My client also told Noah and his three sons,
Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. 1
Now they pretty much all obeyed in multiplying, but not all obeyed to
scatter with their families throughout the Earth, which the Professor
explained was one large continent. Not all of Noahs children and
grandchildren wanted to pack up and go pioneering after the flood.
Many decided to stay together, just like we do nowadays, we crowd
together in cities, where money is quick and we can do as we like, as
we can disappear in the mass of humanity.
They decided under the leadership of Nimrod 4 to build a tremendous
high tower in the plains of Shinar in Iraq. This ministered to their
arrogance and pride and things got from bad to worse, so much so that
they imagined to build the top so high, that they could enter heaven.
Concerning the origin of the different languages, my client writes,
They have all one language; and this they begin to do: . . let us go down,
and there confound their language, that they may not understand one
another's speech. So my client scattered them abroad from there upon the
face of all the earth. . . Therefore is the name of it called Babel. 5
Your Honour, the linguists will tell us that all languages originated
from one language. The Professor shows that there are 62 major root
languages. I will not contest this, although from other supporting
writings I believe that there might have been 70 after my client
confused their language. 6
93
1. Genesis 9:1, 7 2. See pg. 53 (Gen.1:29,30) 3. Genesis 9:3
4. Genesis 10:9,10 5. Genesis 11:1-9
6. Apocryphal Book of Jasher 9:32 & 48:45
It seemed that for the tower he

opened up a huge sink-hole
into which a large part disappeared. 1
'Archaeologists hope to save the ruins of
the Biblical era Tower of Babel, located
in Iraq, and learn how it was built. . . .
All this is unexcavated. There is great potential at this site.' 2
THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE

Your Honour, my client confused their language and the population
split into families, tribes, and language groups to different parts of the
world. Shortly after that we have the continental divide.
My client mentions this continental drift. He does not say a lot about it
except that it occurred about a century after the flood.
The Professor cant help but laugh and was about to make a comment,
when the gentle, but strong hand of the security guard came to rest on
his shoulder.
The Justice, although noticing what happened, preferred not to

comment and was visibly relieved to be distracted by the security
person bringing in a big cup of take-away coffee, which the Justice had
to forego during the recess discussions.
Mr. N. Voy continues.

Your Honour, my client writes in Genesis,
'Shem. . begat Arphaxad two years after the flood: (Gen 11:10)
And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah: (Gen 11:12)
And Salah lived thirty years, and begat Eber: (Gen 11:14)
And Eber lived four and thirty years, and begat Peleg: (Gen 11:16)
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his
days was the earth divided; and his brother's name was Joktan.' (Gen 10:25)
(Joktan means that the ages of the people were diminishing)
This is a total of 101 years from the Flood till the Continental Divide.
94
1. Apocryphal Book of Jasher 9:38
2. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/141505
Seeing that a baby boy was born to Eber at that time, he

decided to call him Peleg, meaning division.
One thing it faithfully says about all these people is that they begat
sons and daughters.
In those days it was an honour to have a big family. One plus one did
not just make one or two, but at least one or two dozen.
On the charts we see before and after the division. The different
regions had already people living on them, before these land-masses
moved away. Thus certain populations on separate continents have
similar features as they originate from the same ancestors.
North America had beautiful, intelligent, warm-
hearted people, who lived rather peaceably,
hunting, smoking their peace-pipes and making
colourful clothes, until their European family
rediscovered them.
Some of the first new immigrants wanted
friendship and spoke of my client, for which the
native population was thankful as they only knew
my client as the Great White Spirit. They
interacted and helped each other, but then the greedy ones arrived
with their guns and armies.
And the peaceful heaven on
Earth became a living hell, as
they were slaughtered by the
greedy ones, who stole their
lands, hunting grounds, riches
and destroyed their culture.
95
A sad tale really! However, everyone will have to give

account one day, not only to my client, but also to the people
that they raped and slaughtered.
The Professor is getting edgy, but with the security man standing next
to him, he decides to hold it in.
HOW THE TECTONIC PLATES MOVE

Back to the great divide. I quote from Cosmos Feb. 16, 2015. 1
Any geologist will tell you the Earths crust is broken into tectonic
plates that 'float' around like gigantic rafts.
But just what these rafts have been floating on is a mystery until now.
A team of New Zealand scientists detonated tons of dynamite and
listened for echoes to reveal the underbelly of the Pacific plate.
They found a 10 kilometer thick channel of lubricating jelly-like
rock, which they say allows the plate to slide above it, according to a
report in Nature.
The jelly adds weight to the idea that gravity is the driving force
pulling the plates along. As one edge of the plate is being dragged
under, the low friction jelly layer means the rest of the plate just
slithers after it like a ski on snow.
Your Honour, here we see the San Andreas
Fault line. The next photo is the Mid
Atlantic Ridge. These are sliding boundaries
between the plates.
As the continents
moved apart other
tectonic plates were
being dragged under,
while the ocean tidal
waves and tsunamis
rolled into the spaces that were sinking down
like the present day Atlantic Ocean.
96
1. https://cosmosmagazine.com/geoscience
The collision of the Indo-Australian tectonic plate with the

Eurasian plate formed the Himalayas. Due to the continued
plate movement, the region experiences many earthquakes, as we saw
recently in Nepal.
Seeing that South America moved westward, it seems that the Nazca
plate slipped under it pushing up the Andes mountains.
In 1953 Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay climbed Mount

Everest of 29,030 feet, or 8848 meters high.
When they got up to the altitude of 26,000 feet, or 7924 meters,
they began to find sea shells. That is 3030 feet, or 924 meters, from the
summit.
How's that possible? Did mussels climb mountains?
Or else were the Himalayas
much lower, before the
tectonic plate movement,
during the time of the flood?
Seashells can be found on
any mountain.
Because of the violent waves,
the deposits of seashells
settled in the mud on the
Sir Edmund Hillary & Tenzing Norgay on the
mountains and the mountain summit of Mount Everest - 1953
bases.
Mount Everest was during the flood only 3,030 feet high, as 29,030 feet
minus 26,000 is 3,030 feet. Therefore from 26,000 feet upwards to the
top is where the shells can be found.
Then during the great continental divide and the collision of the Indo-
Australian tectonic plate with the Eurasian plate, the Himalayas were
forced and pushed to a much higher altitude, and Mount Everest in
particular was pushed up by 26,000 feet.
Hence we do not find seashells below 26,000 feet.
97
29,030 feet = 8,848 meters
26,000 feet = 7,925 meters
3,030 feet = 924 meters
On this photo
it shows how
the tectonic plates
pushed, and still push
against each other, to
form mountain ranges.
HOW HIGH WERE

THE MOUNTAINS AND THE FLOOD WATERS?
The Antarctic ice cap is about 13,123 feet, or 4,000 meters above sea
level. (see red part photo) 1
This would be how high the
waters of the flood were, as
the ice that came down
stayed frozen solid, and did
not recede like the rest of
the worldwide flood waters.
NASA research 2 states that
the ice cap thickens 0.7 inch
yearly. That means at the
end of the flood 4500 years
ago it was 4500 X 0.7 = 3150 inches or 263 feet less. So the height of the
flood waters was roughly 12,860 feet, or 3920 meters.
My client writes,
'. . all the high mountains . . . were covered. The waters rose and covered
the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits.' 3
More than 15 cubits is at least 23 feet, or 7 meters.
With simple math that makes the highest mountains 12,860 - 23 =
12,837 feet, or 3,913 meters high before the continental drifts.
The seashells were deposited on the lower mountains during the flood.
Then during the continental divide these were pushed up, or whole
sea-beds with shells could have been elevated to become mountains.
98
1. http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-
antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
2. http://news.yale.edu/2009/02/26/co2-drop-and-global-cooling-caused-
antarctic-glacier-form 3. Genesis 7:19, 20
It clearly shows that the highest mountain ranges were

formed with the shifting of the tectonic plates, during the
great continental divide a good hundred years after the flood.
The shifting of tectonic plates and the moving of the continents was a
tremendous upheaval, with whole cities and regions like Atlantis and
pyramids sliding underwater. We find them everywhere: off the coasts
of India, Greece, Japan, Portugal, Italy, Cuba, South America, etc.
Today we still discover new underwater structures that sank down
into the oceans.
Pyramid near the coast of Portugal City off the coast of Italy
This enormous pyramid is near

Yonaguni, Japan. The size of the
blocks shows that it was most likely
pre-diluvium, or from before the
flood, as in those days there were
'giants in the land' that were able to
move these enormous stone blocks.
Professor Masaki Kimura, geologist
at Ryukyu University in Okinawa, This could only have been done by
a people with a high degree of technology,. . . to have created such a
huge structure.
The people before the flood and right after the flood lived for centuries
and accumilated during their lifetime vast knowledge, and were able
to develop technologies and buildings that still baffle us, like the Great
Pyramid of Giza, built with a precision that our current technology
cannot yet replicate. 2
99
1. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/584483/Atlantis-lost-
continent-found-Indian-Ocean-Mauritia-theory-mystery-volcano-sea-sunk-city
2. https://www.ancient-code.com/25-facts-about-the-great-pyramid-of-giza/
The Bimini Highway, is a

manmade structure near
the North Bimini island in the
Bahamas.
The Road consists of a 0.8 km long
northeast-southwest linear feature
composed of roughly rectangular
limestone blocks.
Next:
we go to the
Bermuda
Triangle.
Pyramids
under the
waters off
the coast of
Cuba.
Discovered by Paul Weinzweig and Pauline Zalitzki. Many more

mysterious structures are in the Bermuda Triangle. Also named the
'Devils Triangle', because of the mysterious disappearances in the area.
In June 2013, Greek

archaeologists announced
ancient underwater city in
the gulf of Alykanas in
Zakynthos. The discovery
included huge public
buildings, cobblestone paving, 20 stone pillar bases, all '34 cm diameter
incision' and other antiquities.
100
The next photograph

is the entrance to an
ancient temple off the coast of
India.
Your Honour, I can guarantee
the court that it was not the
Homo Sapiens running
around with clubs, living in
caves that built these amazing
structures.
My client is often accused, that if he is so concerned for this world, then
why does he not do anything about the mess?
He has been constantly trying to stop the arrogance and murders and
violence, with floods, confusing the languages and by scattering the
people throughout the world, and sometimes allowing difficult things
in our life in order to see if we will want to change for the better.
He has been trying to pick good people that he could work with like
Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Moses to whom he gave ten simple laws, that
we as lawless should go by.
Then there were the prophets and finally my client sent his son, Jesus,
to show us how to live in love.
He has literally been trying to do his utmost to keep us somewhat
going in the right direction. However instead of being thankful we get
arrogant and show him the finger.
The Professor raises his hand,

Your Honour, can the witness keep to circumstantial evidence?
Objection sustained!
In order to go forward in the research concerning our origins we

need to drop these old fashioned mindsets, because as we can see and
hear the witness is obviously stuck in the past.
101
Anything else, Mr. N. Voy?
Your Honour, the comment of the Professor left me with a

question, that if I am 'stuck in the past', and I only go back a
good 6000 years, then where is the Professor stuck, who goes back 4.6
to 13.8 billion years?
However, I dont feel good about this tit-for-tat business, because we
need to be focusing on our origins and not on each other. Enough said.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, thank you very much.
The Justice speaks,

Gentlemen, let us keep this professional.
This brings day two of the 'Evolution and Creation' court case to a
close.
The court will resume tomorrow morning at 9:00.
Doors are closing 8:55.
Ladies and gentlemen, have a good evening.
__________
102
CHAPTER 9
FURTHER EVIDENCE, MISSING DAY, BIBLE CODE
All rise! This is day three of the 'Evolution and Creation' court case.
Presiding over the case is the honourable Lord Justice, Dr. E. Dict.
The Justice speaks,

Good morning, please be seated. We call on Mr. N. Voy, as he had
requested this time to present further circumstantial evidence from his
clients writing. The Professor excused himself from this session.
Sir, you have 1 hr 30 minutes.
Your Honour, the Israelites leaving Egypt, called 'the

Exodus' is by many seen as a fraud.
However when Moses led the children of Israel out of Egypt, my client
showed them as they went. He directed them step by step, but he could
only lead them after they had pulled up stake, and after they had
decided to leave, and thumb their nose at the powers that tried to
control them.
Only then my client could lead them to the Red Sea. It would have
been impossible to cross that Red Sea, which is about 500 to 2500
meters deep, with steep inclines.
But my client led them
to the only place in the
Red Sea where there is
a shallow crossing, and
brought them safely
across the underwater
land bridge at
Nuweiba, Egypt.
103
Yet, it was deep enough to drown the Egyptian army.

'And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the
dry ground: and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand,
and on their left.
And the Egyptians pursued, and went in after them . . and my client
troubled the host of the Egyptians . . And took off their chariot wheels . .
Moses stretched forth his hand over the sea . . And the waters returned,
and covered the chariots . .' 1
The wheels of the Egyptian army chariots are still being discovered as
we can see from these photographs. 2
104
1. Exodus 14:22-28
2. Archeological research and photographs by Ron Wyatt
The Missing Day - 23:20 + 40 mins.

As told by Mr. Harold Hill
At NASA, Green Belt, Maryland, they

were checking the position of the sun,
moon, and planets out in space, where
they would be 100 years and 1,000 years
from now. . . We have to lay out the orbits
in terms of the life of the satellite, and
where the planets will be, so the whole
thing will not bog down.
They ran the computer measurements back and forth over the
centuries and it came to a halt. The computer stopped and put up a red
signal, which meant that there was something wrong either with the
information fed into it or with the results as compared to the
standards.
They found there is a day missing in space over the measurements in
elapsed time.
They searched and searched for a solution. But after many days there
was no answer to be found.
Finally, someone on the team said, You know, one time I was in
Sunday School and they talked about the sun standing still. While the
others didn't believe him, they didn't have an answer either, so they
said, Show us.
They found where Joshua asked the Lord to make the sun stand still!
'The sun stood still and the moon stayed, and hasted not to go down
about a whole day!' 1
They checked the computers going back into the time.
The elapsed time that was missing back in Joshua's day was 23 hours
and 20 minutes--not a full 24 hour day.
They read it again and it said 'about a day.'
If you cannot account for 40 minutes, you'll still be in trouble 1,000
years from now. The 40 minutes had to be found, because it can be
multiplied many times over in orbits.
105
1. Joshua 10:13
That same employee remembered that somewhere it was

written in the Bible that the sun went backwards.
The scientists told him he was out of his mind.
However they decided to check it out and they read the following in
2nd Kings. King Hezekiah, on his deathbed, was visited by the prophet
Isaiah who told him that he was not going to die. Hezekiah asked for a
sign as proof. Isaiah said,
'Do you want the sun to go ahead 10 degrees?'
Hezekiah said,
'It is nothing for the sun to go ahead 10 degrees, but let the shadow return
backward 10 degrees.' 1
Isaiah spoke to my client and he brought the shadow ten degrees
backward! Ten degrees is exactly 40 minutes!
Twenty-three hours and 20 minutes in Joshua, plus 40 minutes in 2nd
Kings make the missing day in the universe!
Mr. Harold Hill used the missing day in his

speeches throughout the sixties.
James S. Lacy, from the Office of Public

Relations for NASA, wrote in a letter that the
only trace they could find of a Harold Hill
having any connection with NASA was a
person who was involved in contracting for the
operations and maintenance of some diesel
engine operations.
Mr. Harold Hill
Mr. Hill has been called a hoax and maligned as a fraud on the internet
and that his story is a lie.
Dr. Wernher von Braun was the director of NASA. It was under his
leadership that the moon-landing of the Apollo 11 took place in 1969.
This was during the time that Harold Hill was using the missing day
story in his speeches.
106
1. 2nd Kings 20:9-11
NASA has no records (for the

public?) about a Missing Day
and hardly any records of who Mr.
Harold Hill is.
IT IS CONVENIENTLY AVOIDED
THAT MR. HAROLD HILL WAS A
FRIEND OF DR. WERNHER VON
BRAUN.
Why would Dr. von Braun with his
outstanding reputation and integrity,
keep friendship with a liar and crook
like Hill, unless maybe Mr. Hill did
speak the truth? 1964 Father of Rocket Science
Dr. Wernher von Braun, as director of NASA
Marshall Space Flight Centre.
That Mr. Hill was no stranger to NASA
shows in the fact that both Dr. Wernher von Braun and the astronaut
James Irwin, wrote a heartwarming foreword in Mr. Hills book 'From
Goo to you by the way of the zoo' published in 1976.
James Irwin wrote, 'It was only after my return to Earth that I realized
the importance of a spiritual dimension to life.'
Dr. von Braun ended with: 'When astronaut Frank Borman returned
from his Apollo 8 flight, 1968, he was told, a Soviet cosmonaut, recently
returned from a space flight, had commented that he had seen neither
God nor angels on his flight. Had Borman seen God? The reporters
inquired. Frank Borman replied, No, I did not see Him either, but I
saw his evidence.'
SUPPORTING HISTORICAL RECORDS on missing day:

Aztec priests related to the Spanish scholar Bernadino de Sahagun
(1499-1590) that the sun had acted in a most unusual way in the
ancient past. He wrote that the Aztecs reported that in ancient times
both the sun and the moon stood still shortly after sunrise. (Bernadino
de Sahagun Historia General de las Cosas de Nueva Espana, VII,2 -1946)
107
Professor P. Jensen reported that the ancient Babylonians

have an account of a day twice the natural length (P. Jensen Die
Kosmologie der Babylonier, 39 -1890)
In the sixteenth century Mexican text Annals of Cuauhtitlan, which
records the history of the Culhuacan empire in ancient Mexico, there
is a record of a night that extended far longer than normal. (Annals of
the Cuauhtitlan, trans.)
Professor Olcot in his book on exploring the history of the Peruvians
reported that there is an ancient account of a day that lasted twice the
normal time. (Olcot, The Historical Lore of the Peruvians, 206 -1914)
The Greek historian Herodotus wrote that Egyptian priests had
reported a most unusual solar event that occurred in the distant past.
The sun, however, had within this period of time, on four several
occasions, moved from his wonted course, twice rising where he now
sets and twice setting where he now rises. (Herodotus, The History of
Herodotus trans. Chpt. 2)
The Quich Mayans of Guatemala wrote about the peoples reaction
to a long night: They did not sleep; they remained standing and great
was the anxiety of their hearts and their stomachs for the coming of
the dawn and the day. (Popol Vuh Part III, pp. 172-190.)
THE BIBLE CODE

I will read the following excerps from
'The Bible Code' by Michael Drosnin.1
Drosnin writes, in his no.1 bestseller book,
as an investigative reporter, Ive spent five
years checking out the facts. Nothing is
taken on faith. . . Only one test - the truth.
The code was discovered by the Israeli
mathematician Dr. Rips . . . . confirmed by
famous mathematicians at Harvard, Yale
and Hebrew University.
108
1. The Bible code is available at http://www.amazon.in/Bible-Code-
Michael-Drosnin/dp/0684849739
It has passed three levels of secular peer review at the leading

US math journal and a senior code breaker at the US dept of
Defense.
Sir Isaac Newton was certain that there
was a hidden code in the Bible that would
reveal the future. . he considered it more
important than his Theory of the
Universe. . .
The hidden text of the Bible was encoded
with a kind of time-lock. It could not be Sir Isaac Newton
1642-1726
opened until the computer had been
invented. The code is that hidden information is woven into the text of
Genesis in the form of equidistant letter sequences. The effect is
significant at the level of 99.998%
Harold Gans 1 was certain he could prove that the code did not exist. . .
It sent a chill up my spine recalled Gans . .
At first I was 100% skeptical said the Pentagon code breaker. I set out
to disprove the code, and ended up proving it.
The Bible is constructed as a giant crossword puzzle. . Skip X spaces,
and another X spaces, and another X spaces, and the hidden message is
spelled out. There is a Bible beneath the Bible.
The Bible is not only a book it is also a computer program.
It was first chiseled in stone and handwritten on a parchment scroll,
finally printed as a book, waiting for us to catch up with it by inventing
a computer. . .
In experiment after experiment the crossword puzzles were found only
in the Bible.
Not in 'War and Peace', not in any other book, and not in ten million
computer generated test cases.
Yitzhak Rabin 1 appeared with a skip sequence of 4772. Crossing the
name. . we found the words assassin will assassinate, the year 5756.
109
1. Senior code breaker for American intelligence at the Pentagon
The year 5756 is 1995-96, Tel Aviv.

Later we discovered the name of his
assassin Amir.
Michael Drosnin warned Mr. Rabin.
He writes, We had not been able to save
Rabins life. But suddenly, brutally I had
absolute proof that the Bible code was real.
We found Economic collapse Depression
stocks 5690, (which is 1929) encoded in the
Yitzhak Rabin 1922-1995
same place.
Hitler and Nazi were encoded together with slaughter in
Germany. . etc., etc., etc.
The Yale professor mathematician Piatetski-Shapiro was startled,
There is no way in the known laws of mathematics to explain seeing
the future . . . What we are talking about here is some intelligence that
stands outside.
Rips, the Bible code contains more information than we could even
count, let alone find, in several lifetimes.
(End of The Bible Code summary and reading)
No wonder 'The Bible Code' was the Number One Bestseller.

Your Honour and members of the Jury, this is it for now. Thank you
for listening.
The court will now stop for recess and coffee and we will resume the
court case at 11:00.
Courtroom doors will close at 10:55.
__________
110
1. Yitzhak Rabin served twice as Israeli President 197477 and from 1992
till his assassination November 4th 1995 he came close to forging a
durable reconciliation with the Palestinians.
CHAPTER 10
OUR ORIGINS ACCORDING TO EVOLUTION
Professor, please take the witness stand and present your evidence.
Your Honour, so far we have not spent much time on the actual Big
Bang process and
how this explosion put
the different processes
into action.
The explosion of a grain

of compressed matter so
miniscule was the start
of the different
evolutionary processes.
The force of the
explosion orbited not
only our solar system
into space but also the
universe and the
galaxies.
For three years, a team
of astronomers led by Harvard-Smithsonian researcher John Kovac braved
the elements to point a brawny telescope known as Bicep2 (an acronym for
the less euphonious Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic
Polarization) at a patch of the southern sky.
In March, the team released its results. Should the conclusions stand, they
will open a spectacular new window on the earliest moments of the
universe, and will deservedly rank among the most important cosmological
findings of the past century.
111
Less than a mile from the South Pole, the Dark Sector Labs Bicep2 telescope (at left)
searches for signs of inflation. (Steffen Richter / Harvard University)
The theory of http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/history-big-bang-theory-180951168/#Swktbw8pFHYdf8l8.99

Read more: evolution by natural selection, first formulated in Darwin's
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
book On the Origin of Species in 1859, is the process by which organisms
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral

traits.
MUTATIONS AND NATURAL SELECTION

Mutations can be caused by random errors in DNA replication or repair,
or by chemical or radiation damage.
Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral, but in rare instances a
mutation might prove beneficial to the organism.
CONTROVERSY 1
Despite the wealth of evidence from the fossil record, genetics and other
fields of science, some people still question its validity.
Some politicians and religious leaders denounce the theory, invoking a
higher being as a designer to explain the complex world of living things,
especially humans.
112
1. http://www.livescience.com/474-controversy-evolution-works.html
School boards debate whether the theory of evolution should be

taught alongside other ideas, such as intelligent design or creationism.
Mainstream scientists see no controversy.
A lot of people have deep religious beliefs and also accept evolution,
Pobiner said, adding, there can be real reconciliation.
If someone could really demonstrate a better explanation than evolution
and natural selection, [that person] would be the new Darwin, Richmond
said.
Evolution is well supported by many examples of changes in various species

leading to the diversity of life seen today.
The last shore-dwelling ancestor of modern whales was Sinonyx, top right, a
hyena-like animal.
Over 60 million years, several transitional forms evolved: from top to
bottom, Indohyus, Ambulocetus, Rodhocetus, Basilosaurus, Dorudon, and
finally, the modern humpback whale.
Credit: NOAA
113
Modern understanding:
Darwin didn't know anything about genetics, Pobiner said.
He observed the pattern of evolution, but he didnt really know about the
mechanism.
That came later, with the discovery of how genes encode different biological
or behavioral traits, and how genes are passed down from parents to
offspring.
The incorporation of genetics and Darwin's theory is known as modern
evolutionary synthesis.
The physical and behavioral changes that make natural selection possible
happen at the level of DNA and genes.
Such changes are called mutations. Mutations are basically the raw
material on which evolution acts, Pobiner said.
As I mentioned earlier, mutations can be caused by random errors in DNA
replication or repair, or by chemical or radiation damage.
Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral, but in rare instances,
a mutation might prove beneficial to the organism.
If so, it will become more prevalent in the next generation and spread
throughout the population.
In this way, natural selection guides the evolutionary process,
preserving and adding up the beneficial mutations and rejecting the
bad ones.
Mutations are random, but selection for them is not random, Pobiner said.
But natural selection isn't the only mechanism by which organisms evolve,
she said.
For example, genes can be transferred from one population to another when
organisms migrate or immigrate, a process known as gene flow. And the
frequency of certain genes can also change at random, which is called
genetic drift.
Even though scientists could predict what early whales should look like, they
lacked the fossil evidence to back up their claim.
114
Creationists took this absence as proof that evolution didn't occur.

They mocked the idea that there could have ever been such a thing as
a walking whale.
But since the early 1990s, that's exactly what scientists have been finding.
The critical piece of evidence came in 1994, when paleontologists found the
fossilized remains of Ambulocetus natans, an animal whose name literally
means 'swimming-walking whale'.
Its forelimbs had fingers and small hooves but its hind feet were enormous
given its size. It was clearly adapted for swimming, but it was also capable
of moving clumsily on land, much like a seal.
When it swam, the ancient creature moved like an otter, pushing back with
its hind feet and undulating its spine and tail.
Modern whales propel themselves through the water with powerful beats of
their horizontal tail flukes, but Ambulocetus still had a whip-like tail and
had to use its legs to provide most of the propulsive force needed to move
through water.
In recent years, more and more of these transitional species, or missing
links, have been discovered, lending further support to Darwin's theory,
Richmond said.
THE EXPANDING UNIVERSE

It was the work of a Belgian priest, Georges Lematre, who also held a
doctorate in physics, that advanced the story were following.
In 1927, Lematre applied Einsteins equations of general relativity not to
objects within the
universe, like stars
and black holes, but
to the entire universe
itself.
The result knocked

Lematre back on his
heels. The math
showed that the
universe could not be static.
115
The fabric of space was either stretching or contracting, which

meant that the universe was either growing in size or shrinking.
When Lematre alerted Einstein to what hed found, Einstein scoffed. He
thought Lematre was pushing the math too far.
So certain was Einstein that the universe, as a whole, was eternal and
unchanging, that he not only dismissed mathematical analyses that attested
to the contrary, he inserted a modest amendment into his equations to
ensure that the math would accommodate his prejudice.
And prejudice it was.
In 1929, the astronomical observations of Edwin Hubble, using the powerful

telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory, revealed that distant galaxies are
all rushing away.
The universe is expanding. Einstein gave himself a euphemistic slap in the
forehead, a reprimand for not trusting results coming out of his own
equations, and brought his thinkingand his equationsinto line with the
data.
As Lematre had pointed out, if space is now expanding, then by winding the
cosmic film in reverse we conclude that the observable universe was ever
smaller, denser and hotter ever further back in time.
The seemingly unavoidable conclusion is that the universe we see emerged

from a phenomenally tiny speck that erupted, sending space swelling
outwardwhat we now call the Big Bang.
But if true, what sent space swelling? And how could such an outlandish
proposal be tested?
THE INFLATIONARY THEORY

If the universe emerged from a sweltering hot and intensely dense primeval
atom, as Lematre called it, then as space swelled the universe should have
cooled off. Calculations undertaken at George Washington University in the
1940s, and later at Princeton in the 1960s, showed that the Big Bangs
residual heat would manifest as a bath of photons (particles of light)
uniformly filling space.
116
The temperature of the photons would now have dropped to a mere

2.7 degrees above absolute zero, placing their wavelength in the
microwave part of the spectrumexplaining why this possible relic of the
Big Bang is called the cosmic microwave background radiation.
In 1964, two Bell Labs scientists, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson, were at
wits end, frustrated by a large ground-based antenna designed for satellite
communications.
Regardless of where they pointed the antenna, they encountered the

audiophiles nightmare: an incessant background hiss. For months they
sought but failed to find the source. Then, Penzias and Wilson caught wind
of the cosmological calculations being done at Princeton suggesting there
should be a low-level radiation filling space.
The incessant hiss, the researchers realized, was arising from the Big Bangs
photons tickling the antennas receiver. The discovery earned Penzias and
Wilson the 1978 Nobel Prize.
The prominence of the Big Bang theory skyrocketed, impelling scientists to
pry the theory apart, seeking unexpected implications and possible
weaknesses.
A number of important issues were brought to light, but the most essential
was also the most basic.
The Big Bang is often described as the modern scientific theory of creation,
the mathematical answer to Genesis. But this notion obscures an essential
fallacy:
The Big Bang theory does not tell us how the universe began. It tells us
how the universe evolved, beginning a tiny fraction of a second after it all
started. As the rewound cosmic film approaches the first frame, the
mathematics breaks down, closing the lens just as the creation event is
about to fill the screen.
And so, when it comes to explaining the bang itselfthe primordial push
that must have set the universe headlong on its expansionary course
the Big Bang theory is silent.
117
It would fall to a young postdoctoral fellow in the physics department

of Stanford University, Alan Guth, to take the vital step toward filling
that gap. Guth and his collaborator Henry Tye of Cornell University were
trying to understand how certain hypothetical particles called monopoles
might be produced in the universes earliest moments.
But calculating deep into the night of December 6, 1979, Guth took the work
in a different direction.
He realized that not only did the equations show that general relativity
plugged an essential gap in Newtonian gravityproviding gravitys
mechanismthey also revealed that gravity could behave in unexpected
ways.
According to Newton (and everyday experience) gravity is an attractive
force that pulls one object toward another. The equations were showing
that in Einsteins formulation, gravity could also be repulsive.
THE FIRST LIFE ON EARTH

The Earth was able to support life only after the planet had cooled enough
for a rocky crust to solidify.
Once that happened, water vapor from volcanoes condensed in the

atmosphere, fell as rain, and collected on the Earths surface.
Besides water vapor, volcanoes also produced gases rich in the basic
ingredients of life: carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen. Toxic gases such
as ammonia and methane were common.
At this point, the Earth's early atmosphere consisted entirely of these

volcanic gases, and there was no free oxygen.
In the primordial soup of the early seas, organic molecules concentrated,

formed more complex molecules, and became simple cells.
The transition from complex organic molecules to living cells could have
occurred in several environments.
Small, warm ponds are one possibility, but recent work has suggested that
deep-sea hydrothermal vents.
118
Hydrothermal vents such as those found along mid-ocean spreading

centres today, may have been the cradle of the Earth's life.
These environments contain the chemicals and the source of energy needed
to synthesize more complex organic structures.
Although scientists have not succeeded in creating life from organic

molecules in the laboratory, they have reproduced many of the
intermediate steps.
So what were the first living things and when did they appear? Studies of
genetic material indicate that a living group of single-celled organisms
called Archaea may share many features with early life on Earth.
Many Archaea now live in hot springs, deep-sea vents, saline water, and
other harsh environments.
If the first organisms resembled modern Archaea, they also may have lived
in such places, but direct evidence for early life is controversial because it is
difficult to distinguish between complex inorganic structures and simple
biological ones in the geologic record.
The oldest evidence for life may be 3.5-billion-

year-old sedimentary structures from Australia
that resemble stromatolites .
Stromatolites are created today by living mats of
microorganisms (mostly cyanobacteria, or blue-
green algae).
These primitive organisms trap thin layers of
sediment with their sticky filaments and grow
upward to get light for photosynthesis.
Stromatolites
Modern-day examples of stromatolites can be
found in waters off Australia, the Bahamas, and Belize.
In the Archean structures, layers similar to those seen in living stromatolites
are evident, and secondary structures interpreted as simple filamentous
microfossils have been recovered from the layers.
The biotic origin of the structures has, however, been questioned. Both
the supposed Archean stromatolites and the microfossils may have
been produced by inorganic processes.
119
Regardless, uncontested microfossils and chemical traces of life were

present at least by 2.7 billion years ago. Stromatolites that were
produced by microorganisms are abundant later in the Archean and
throughout the Proterozoic.
These sedimentary structures, formed by organic processes, provide
important evidence of early life.
At present, we can say with certainty that life had evolved by 2.7 billion
years ago, and possibly as early as 3.5 billion years ago.
Introduction to Biological Processes

Evolution is a multifaceted process and is, perhaps, the most important
process in the history of life.
Extinction also plays an important role in shaping the history of life,
eliminating even dominant species and reshaping the nature of the
biological world.
Both evolution and extinction occur in the context of ecologythe study of

the relationships between organisms and the environment.
The physical and biological processes that take place on the Earth are
interrelated. The physical changes that shape the planet also affect its living
organisms. This link has been documented throughout Earth history, and we
see evidence of it even today.
For example, animals and plants display obvious adaptations to

particular climates & environments, as in the cacti of the deserts of
western North America or the streamlined bodies of fish, whales, and
dolphins.
Less well appreciated is the fact that living organisms can alter the physical
Earth as well.
One such example is the 'oxygen crisis' that occurred some two billion
years ago, when newly evolved photosynthetic organisms produced oxygen
in sufficient quantities to permanently change Earths atmosphere.
Clearly, it is not possible to understand the histories of life and of the
Earth as separate stories.
120
Therefore, although this section focuses on the biological processes

associated with living organisms, many of these processes have explicit
connections to geological processes as well.
Lets begin with an introduction to the basic qualities of life itself, including
its origin. The basic structures of living organisms form the building blocks
for all subsequent biological processes.
Once life appeared on the early Earth, the challenges presented by the
physical environment immediately began driving the process of evolution,
which continues unceasingly today.
EVOLUTION
Evolution is the biological process that creates new adaptations and
(ultimately) species by favoring individuals with genetic traits that give
these individuals and their offspring higher reproductive success.
The fittest individuals are most able to meet the challenges of a constantly
changing physical and biological world, surviving to pass their genes to new
generations.
When mutations occur in these genes, this can lead to the evolution of a
new species.
Evolution is thus the process of change through time in the chain of life--
what Charles Darwin called 'descent with modification.'
Today we understand that fossils are one of the central lines of evidence
for evolution. Prior to the development Darwins theory, however, the many
lines of evidence that support it were not clearly understood or their
significance appreciated.
In the middle of the nineteenth century, Charles Darwin developed the

theory of 'evolution by natural selection.'
On his visit to the Galapagos Islands, Charles Darwin discovered several

species of finches that varied from island to island, which helped him to
develop his theory of natural selection. The birds vary in size from 10 to
20 cm and weigh between 8 and 38 grams. The smallest are the warbler-
finches and the largest is the vegetarian finch.
121
The most important

differences between
species are in the size and
shape of their beaks, and the
beaks are highly adapted to
different food sources.
This theory accounted for
the vast diversity of life on
Earth and provided a
mechanism to explain how
new species come into being.
Its most profound implication was that all life had descended from a
single common ancestor. Through time, species changed gradually,
ultimately giving rise to new forms. Darwin believed that competition for
limited resources (natural selection) was the main driving force of this
change within a lineage of organisms. Driven by competition new species
appeared and others went extinct.
Darwins original theory has been greatly modified over time. He did not, for
example, have any knowledge of genetics as we currently understand it.
Growth in our understanding of the cell and of the genetic machinery that
controls cells and organisms has in turn greatly refined our understanding
of how evolution works.
Currently this theory is the best explanation for the relationships we
observe between all living and fossil life forms.
Scientists are still uncovering the specifics of how, when, and why
evolution produced the life we see on Earth today.
These discussions concern the mechanisms and timing of evolution,
not whether descent with modification has occurred.
Most importantly, the process of descent with modification produces the
pattern that scientists call the 'Tree of Life.'
This tree describes the relationships of organisms to one another. The
branching pattern of relationships that results from the evolutionary
process is called the phylogeny of life.
122
the process of descent with modification produces the pattern

that scientists call the 'Tree of Life.'
123
This 'tree' describes the relationships of organisms to one another.

The branching pattern of relationships that results from the
evolutionary process is called the phylogeny of life.
Scientists have used these evolutionary relationships to develop a system of

classification. Within this system, organisms have been identified, named,
and classified in order to permit scientists to communicate easily about
them.
The species is the 'working unit' of evolution. A species is a collection of

populations, all genetically related.
These populations are composed of individual organisms that are capable of
breeding with each other to produce fertile offspring, thus passing genetic
information from one generation to the next.
Through descent with modification (mutation and natural selection) a

population will accumulate genetic changes until it is so different from
other populations of the parent species that interbreeding is no longer
possible. In this way, a new species has formed.
Speciation is the term biologists and paleontologists use to describe such

an event.
How does speciation occur? Evolution has two basic components: the
origin of new variation, which occurs primarily through mutation of genetic
material (DNA), and the sorting of new mutations by natural selection.
Mutation is largely a random process, meaning that the mutations do
not occur in response to needs on the part of the individuals in which they
occur.
Most mutations, in fact, are either harmful or neutral.
Only rarely is a mutation beneficial to the offspring of the organism in

which the mutation occurred.
In any population, mutations occur that make some individuals different
from others.
Natural selection is the means by which helpful and harmful mutations

are sorted out.
124
Because organisms must compete for resources, natural selection

favors those individuals with beneficial mutations, permitting them to
reproduce more than other organisms.
Over time, the genes that confer these advantages become more common in
the population.
Natural selection works through such mechanisms as competition for
resources, different abilities to tolerate physical conditions, and so forth,
resulting in differential reproductive success. But competition is not always
a physical battle.
For example, an individual with a longer neck might be able to reach more
food.
In a year when resources are limited, this adaptation would allow the
production of more offspring than other individuals in the population.
Over time, the average length neck in the population would shift toward
longer necks.
If these selective pressures persisted for some time, the population would
become significantly different from other populations in the species.
Then, if this population became isolated from the other populations of the
species, either through later physical isolation or through associated
mutations that limited cross-breeding with other individuals, an entirely
new species would appear.
The rate of evolution has been debated for decades.
One of Darwins key points was that evolution worked very slowly, over
millions of years of geological time, through the gradual, incremental
acquisition of small differences.
While not denying that much of evolution is indeed slow and gradual, it was
suggested that slow change was not the underlying process that gave rise to
most new species.
PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM
Punctuated equilibrium helped to explain why many transitional forms
apparently were missing from the fossil record.
125
According to the hypothesis of punctuated equilibrium, transitional

forms existed for brief periods of time, and so were unlikely to
become fossils.
This view has not been universally accepted, by paleontologists or biologists

working with modern species. Some, such as paleontologist Philip Gingerich,
have argued that many mammal species indeed evolved gradually, without
any apparent episodes of rapid change.
Others have argued that small mutations could not produce the large
changes in organismal structure needed to drive the process of punctuated
equilibrium.
However, the discovery of Hox genes--which code for entire structures,

rather than single components--identified a potential mechanism for rapid
evolutionary change.
This relationship between a structure (such as a long neck) and a function

(such as feeding) is important to understanding its evolutionary origin. If, in
the course of its evolution, a structure was very closely tied to a specific
function, it is called an adaptation.
Many structures are not closely linked to particular adaptations, however.

They may have evolved for other purposes, and were later co-opted (or
'exapted') for a new function. Or they may simply be the by-products of
evolutionary selection on another structure to which they were connected.
Structures in different species that were inherited from a common ancestor

are described as homologous.
Homologous structures may look similar (such as the legs of elephants
and rhinos), or different (such as the legs of elephants and whales), but they
always share this quality of common ancestry. In contrast, analogous
structures are always superficially similar (such as the fins of fish, whales,
and ichthyosaurs) but evolved independently.
The common ancestor of these animals did not have fins, and so they were
not inherited and must have evolved independently.
126
Analogous structures are the product of convergence. Convergence

occurs when similar structures evolve in species that are not closely
related.
For example, wings have evolved a number of times in the course of the
history of life. In each instance of independent appearance, the structure is
unique. Insects, reptiles, birds, and mammals have all evolved wings, but
they are constructed of different materials. This convergence has occurred
because genetic mutations combined with natural selection created
structures that permitted flight in different organisms. The wings of these
different forms are really only similar in superficial ways, but they have
similar functions.
In order to fly, an organism must obey the laws of aerodynamics. (Even
though the organisms themselves dont understand them or know that they
exist, such physical laws control the flight of an airplane as surely as they
control that of a dragonfly.) Physical factors thus constrain the shape of a
successful wing.
CO-EVOLUTION
Co-evolution occurs when two unrelated species evolve in tandem. In
effect, the species become linked through a period of sustained ecological
interaction such as the need for food and the need for pollination that link
certain insects and flowers. An evolutionary change in one of the two species
will often favor the survival of mutations that cause a change in the other.
In predator-prey interactions, the evolution of prey defenses in one species
can result in the subsequent evolution of a means to foil these defenses in
the other. This is often referred to as a co-evolutionary arms race. Co-
evolution also occurs in mutualistic relationships, where two species have a
mutually beneficial dependence on one
another.
For example, one species of acacia tree has
evolved features in tandem with a
particular species of ant.
The acacia provides shelter by producing
hollow thorns in which the ants can live.
127
The trees also produce nectaries on their leaves that feed the ants, but
that also ensure that the ants will visit parts of the tree.
The ants in turn create a space around the base of the tree by trimming
encroaching vegetation that might shade the acacia or compete for its food
resources.
The ants will also attack any organism that enters this space.
Your Honour, as you can see, evolution and our origins is a broad and
fascinating subject.
At present we are still finding out new things of how it all came about and
how it all happened and we are still learning and discovering new theories
and although we dont know everything, one thing we do know for sure,
Your Honour, is that it did not happen as written in the childs story book of
Mr. N. Voy's client.
One thing we can say with certainty is that creation is the biggest load of
nonsensical rubbish that we have ever been told.
Is that all then from your side, Professor?
Like I said, Your Honour, I can go on for much longer, but I will leave
it at this.
It is now 12:26.
We will stop for lunch till 1:30.
After lunch Mr. N. Voy will take the stand on behalf of creation.
__________
128
CHAPTER 11
FILTER, NATURAL SELECTION, MUTATIONS, HYBRIDS
All be seated. Mr. N. Voy, please take the stand and present your
materials. Your session will close at 3:00 for recess.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, I would like to start with

what the Professor shared with us,
Clearly, it is not possible to understand the histories of life and of the
Earth as separate stories.
I dare to differ with the Professor concerning his statement.
The Professor said further,
Scientists are still uncovering the specifics of how, when, and why
evolution produced the life we see on Earth today.
These discussions concern the mechanisms and timing of

evolution, not whether descent with modification has occurred.
What this says, is that all the evidence concerning creation is
automatically rejected, as this does not fit the process of modification,
or the evolution theory.
I am sorry, Your Honour, but that is no open scientific mind. That is
saying, Dont confuse me with the facts, because my mind is made up.
We will not accept any other evidence than what fits the evolution
theory. Hence everything else will be labeled as false evidence and a
hoax. We will not even consider it!
This is ten times worse than racism and segregation and apartheid all
put together, as it is saying,
'You are not allowed to enter, not because you look different, but
because you think differently and whatever you say will be
automatically rejected by us. You are not allowed in here!'
129
EVIDENCE ELIMINATING FILTER

Your Honour, I would like to refer to Cremo & Thomspon,
who are both evolutionists.
They state in their book 'The Hidden History of the Human Race',
The primary point we are trying to make . . . .
there exists in the scientific community a knowledge
filter that screens out unwelcome evidence.
This process of knowledge filtration has been going on for well over a
century and continues to the present day . . . there also appear to be
cases of more direct suppression.
In the early 1950s . . . Lee was hounded from his Civil Service position
into prolonged unemployment; . . . tons of artifacts vanished into
storage bins of the National Museum of Canada; the Director of the
National Museum . . . was himself fired . . .
According to David Duckworth, who was employed in the vertebrate
paleontology section of the Smithsonian Institution it seems that in the
fall of 1968 crates marked:
'MT ARARAT -- National Geographic / Smithsonian Expedition'
disappeared in the Smithsonian storage bins.1
This is not science, this is a cover-up job, and a bad one at that.
All fossils or evidence that dont fit evolution are rejected.
However there are no fossils that support the mutation of species . . .
Hence we have come up with a new theory called the hypothesis of
punctuated equilibrium,2 meaning that
transitional forms existed only for brief
periods of time, and so were unlikely to
become fossils.
The 'fittest' individuals are most able to
meet the challenges of a constantly
changing physical and biological world,
surviving to pass their genes to new The survival of the fittest
generations.
130
1. www.home.earthlink.net/~arktracker/ark/Quotes.html
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium
As the Professor explained, 'When mutations occur in these

genes, this can lead to the evolution of a new species.'
So Your Honour, members of the Jury, meet my
latest theory; the Homo Piscibus (the Fishman).
An evolutionary development of the pearl diver,
who because of thousands of years and
generations of pearl diving are becoming now
fish men.
If I showed this to the pearl-divers, they would
laugh hysterically, or drown me on the spot.
EACH AFTER THEIR KIND

My client made the animals each after their kind: dogs, horses, cows,
cats, lions, tigers, dinosaurs, goats, sheep, donkeys, elephants, giraffes,
etc. Then there are the birds of the air, doves, geese, ducks, sparrows,
ravens, eagles, etc.
These animals all mix and mate within their kind.
A Shire horse can mate a Shetland pony. Consequently there are
all types of horses from the Arabian horse to the Lipizzaner.
A Doberman can mate a German Shepherd. We have all types of
dogs; from Great Danes to Pekinese.
A Frisian cow can mate with a Hereford bull,
A Swiss mountain goat can mate a Nigerian dwarf goat.
Although there are sheepdogs, they are not a hybrid of sheep and
dogs. My client has put barriers in between the different species as
he said,
'each after his kind.' 1
Your Honour, even Mr. Charles Darwin stated that,
Everything in Nature is the result of Fixed Laws.
All these animals after their kind will adjust to the different climates
and change according to the survival that is needed in that part of the
world.
131
1. Genesis 1:24,25
As the Professor stated, animals and plants display obvious

adaptations to particular climates and environments, as in the
cacti of the deserts of western North America
I am not contending NATURAL ADAPTATIONS;

Huskies and saint Bernards have thick fur for their climates.
Polar bears and brown bears started differing in colour according to
their survival needs. We have bred many types of cats, ducks and
chickens. Then we have the humans with other human races -
Some of the most beautiful and handsome people are of mixed races.
The Natural Adaptations of the Fox after his kind.

Many different foxes developed because of Natural Adaptations.
132
What I am contending is MUTATIONS

The fabrication that through mutation dogs can develop into
horses. A sinonyx changes into a indohyus,
or a tiger into a rat and frogs into birds, and
that we all came from a chemical soup many
millions of years ago. This is an amazing
fantasy world, but no science!
The Professor stated: 'Mutations can be caused by random errors in
DNA replication or repair, or by CHEMICAL OR RADIATION
DAMAGE. Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral, but in
rare instances, a mutation might prove beneficial to the organism . . .
Mutations are material on which evolution acts.'
Evolution is based on the assumption that millions of mutations have
been beneficial and that the bad ones died out because of Natural
Selection. If it was rare to have beneficial mutations and there were
millions of them, then the Earth should be filled with quadrillions of
fossils with harmful or neutral mutations. The Professor said, 'fossils
are one of the central lines for evolution evidence.' Where are they?
CHEMICAL & RADIATION DAMAGE MUTATIONS

Your Honour, remember the dire photos of thalidomide Chemical
Mutations of the Softenon babies in the nineteen seventies.
And recently how harmful the Radiation Mutations have been for
babies born in Middle East warzones. Radiation of DU (Depleted
Uranium) 2 used in bombs, causing ghastly birth defects. I do not
have the heart to look at them, nor show the images to the court.
Babies without arms, no legs, one eye, open insides, double heads,
horrific deformities, that shake my whole inner being to the core.
Not one mutation proved chemical or radiation damage beneficial.
Your Honour, there are hundreds of images and I will hand you here a
few in this envelope. Please be warned.
The Lord Justice takes a quick glance at some of the photos and with a
disturbed look puts them back in the envelope.
133
1. New Scientist. Retrieved 2006-02-24.
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium
As the Justice holds up the envelope, he notifies the scribe,

These will be given to the Jury, but are not for publication with the
transcript. You may publish the links of the chemical 1 and radiation
damage 2 mutations only with the warning that these are very
disturbing and highly disturbing images.
Mr. N. Voy please proceed.
HYBRIDS
Next, Your Honour, chimpanzees and humans are closely
related (sharing 95% of their DNA sequence and 99% of
coding DNA sequences)
Joseph Stalin financed a scientist, Dr. Ivanoff, with 200,000 dollars to
find out if it was possible to create a human-ape hybrid, the
Humanzee. Dr. Ivanoff ended up getting exiled to Siberia.
Although it is a contested speculation that a human-ape hybrid is
possible and, believe me, scientists have tried to mix and match these,
to prove evolution over and over again. . . I think finally they
produced a litte humanzee.
The photo I saw was that of a feeble, pathetic, sickly looking newborn
creature, which definitely does not fit 'the survival of the fittest'.
The barriers my client has put are clear and nature adheres to these
barriers, unless we try to break them.
I quote Einstein, 'Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting different results.'
I repeat what Mr. Darwin said,
'Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws.'
Another example to support evolution is that of ANIMAL HYBRIDS.
A male horse and a female donkey have a hinny.
A female horse and a male donkey have a mule.
But hinnies and mules can't have babies of their own. They
are sterile because they cannot produce sperm or eggs.
Bottlenose dolphins and a fish similar to a killer whale occasionally
produce a mixed offspring known as a wholphin.
134
1. Very disturbing images of Chemical mutations (Softenon babies, 1970s)
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=softenon+babies
2. Highly disturbing images Radiation mutations (Middle East babies, recent)
www.google.co.uk/search?tbm=isch&q=depleted+uranium+middle+east+babies
Their offspring will be sterile
Ligers and Tigons have no conservation

value to justify the cost of their extensive
health issues. Their fragility is a cause for
concern.
These hybrids will only
be 'SIDESHOWS' and
'FREAK OF NATURE',
curiosities, because their
infertility and sterility
dooms them to a
complete dead end.
Ligers and Tigons are
huge, but very sickly
and are too expensive
to keep and care for.
Zonkeys arent the only hybrid possible

with a zebra. The stripy creatures are
closely related to horses and donkeys
they all belong to the same genus, Equus.
While two equine species may be
compatible enough to breed, the offspring
are sterile.
LIVING IN HARMONY
Your Honour, I know of a community of roughly 60 to 90 thousand
inhabitants all working together without any problems.1 They have no
police force, nor prisons. They have a level of civilization far above that
of ours. This is a highly scientific community.
In their city, the pathways are designed so that always two can pass
each other in the opposite direction.
135
Sections of pgs. 134 -137 are adapted 'From goo to you by the way of the zoo'
by Harold Hill.
Their food storage spaces are constructed in a 4 to 5 degree

angle, so the food does not spill. They are in hexagonal
design, so no space or materials are wasted.
Each of the inhabitants takes mutual roles: sanitation, nursemaid,
builder, admin, security and harvester.
Each inhabitant has a daily inspection routine.
May I introduce, the honey bee.
Their modus operandi is so
complicated, that even a tiny part of
it happening by chance is just
astronomical.
According to evolution the bees
inherited the traits from their
ancestors and the fittest survived
and adapted.
That could sound logical, however worker bees are born, do their
work and die, without ever reproducing their kind.
However, if someone says that it must have been by the process of
Intelligent Design, he is labeled a nave, brainless fundamentalist and
stands a very good chance of losing his job as a scientist, lecturer or
teacher.
Your Honour, I am open for any other explanation, but telling me,
Oh it just happened. I am sorry to say is an insult to my limited
intelligence. When I ask my children, 'Who did it?' And they say, 'Oh,
it just happened.'
Then I know without any doubt that they are not telling me the truth.
If they would try to make it sound scientific, that makes it even worse,
and it definitely will not sell with me and I know neither will it with
you, Your Honour.
'Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I
am not so sure about the universe.' 1
On a brighter note; allow me tell you about a little birdie.
136
1. Dr. Albert Einstein
There is a little bird that spends the summer in Europe, called

the warbler. Here they raise their young and then take off for
central Africa, leaving the baby birds behind in the nest, until they are
able to make the long flight also.
Then a few weeks later they actually take off to Africa and meet up
with their parents. They have not
been trained by their parents as
evolution would advocate.
Except when the little baby
warblers emerge from their eggs,
they are fully programmed,
including the amazing task of
stellar navigation, the same
unfailing accurate system used by the astronauts.
A bit of science distances one from God; but much science

nears one to Him . . . The more I study nature, the more I stand
amazed at the work of the Creator. 1
NO CHANGE - THE ANTS 2

'The common scientific belief has been that the army ants originated
seperately on several continents over millions of years. Now it is found
there was one evolution. Using fossile
data and the tools of a genetics
detective, a Cornell University
entomologist has discovered that these
ants come from the same ancestor,
because since the reign of the dinosaurs,
about 100 million years ago, army ants
in essence have not changed a bit.
With jaws still locked together, a vicious
fight between two ants 100 million years
ago has been frozen in time in a piece of
amber discovered in Myanmar (Burma).
137
1. Louis Pasteur
2. Taken from http:/ /www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete#ixzz42ALrrSsT
The tiny insects were encased in tree sap as they wrestled,

causing them to be preserved within the material as it
fossilized into amber.
Scientists believe the two ants are from different species, which were
alive while the dinosaurs still roamed the planet, and may have been
fighting over food or during a raid on a nest.'
Your Honour, what this shows it that ants are still the same and did
not change since the dinosaurs. Yet the ant did not evolve in all these
years.
I was visiting a friend who has a precious and semi-precious stone
shop in India.
He showed me a
mosquito in a
piece of amber. It
was however not
carbon-dated.
He told me that
in Mexico he saw
a real special
amber piece with
a frog in it.
The mosquito in the amber, that he showed
me under his magnifying glass, looked identical to the one that I
swatted last week.
EXTINCT BUT STILL ALIVE

The Coelacanth,1 was once
only known from fossils and
were thought to have gone
extinct during great extinction
when the dinosaurs vanished
65 million years ago.
It got rediscovered 1938.
138
1. http://animalmozo.com/2015/10/24/23-extinct-animals-found-alive-today/1/
This nocturnal type of ant 1 of only

approximately 4 millimeter, was
thought extinct 20 million years ago, but it
was discovered back in 2006. They usually
live in underground colonies and are found
in South America.
This rare frilled shark 2 discovered off the
coast of Portugal in 2017 has remained
unchanged for 80 million years, since the
time of the dinosaurs. Scientists are dating it
back to the Cretaceous Period, a time when
the Tyrannosaurus Rex roamed the planet.
Could this indicate that creation might be true and that my client
made them just like they are and have always been since creation?
RANDOM OR DESIGN?
To name just a few:
There is the remarkable elephant
trunk. 3 The trunk consists of approx.
40,000 muscles, which group
themselves around the nose tubes.'
'According to all known laws of aviation, there

is no way that a bee should be able to fly. Its
wings are too small to get its fat little body off
the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyways,
because bees don't care what humans think is
impossible. They beat their wings over 11,000
cycles per minute and off they go.' 4
Is there any evolutionary theory why there are no two

snowflakes identical?
139
1. http://animalmozo.com/2015/10/24/23-extinct-animals-found-alive-today/2/
2. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/dinosaur-era-shark-found-in-
portugal/ar-BBEQcHN?li=AAnZ9Ug&ocid=mailsignout#image=1
3. http://www.upali.ch/trunk_en.html
4. http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/823379
Penguins have a unique organ

above their eye called the
'Supraorbital Gland'.1 When the
penguins drink salt seawater this organ
turns the saltwater into freshwater.
There are countless extraordinary facts, but I'll leave it with this.
EVOLUTION, A LONG TIME THEORY

Your Honour, I read last week that the evolution theory is something
of the last few hundred years, after Charles Darwin, and because
science has progressed.2
Science has progressed, but evolution has been around a long time. My
client already wrote over 2500 years ago;
'Who say to a tree, you are my father;
and to a stone, you have brought me forth.' 3
Isn't this the same thing that we are trying to teach our children with
creating more and more 'scientific theories', scrambling frantically to
prove evolution to be 'true'?
Your Honour, I hope that common sense will prevail.
Then we will have a short 30-minutes break and we will be here

again by 3:30, as you know by now, the doors will close at 3:25.
__________
140
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supraorbital_gland
2. www.scientificamerican.com/article/ & http://undsci.berkeley.edu/
3. Jeremiah 2:27
CHAPTER 12
SUPERATOM, STERILIZATION, THE CHALLENGE
It is 3:30. Mr. N. Voy, please take the witness

stand on behalf of creation.
THE BIG BANG EXPLOSION

Your Honour, the biggest explosions
that we have known on this Earth were the atomic
explosions. George Lematre,1 by many hailed as
the greatest scientist that you have ever heard of, George Lematre
was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of 1894-1966
physics at the University of Leuven.
He proposed the theory of the expansion of the universe.
He suggested that the expansion of the universe had resulted from the
explosion of this superatom, that hurled materials in all directions, and
set the universe in motion.
The expansion of the universe is a fascinating scientific

discovery that even caught Einstein by surprise.
Your Honour, it is a certainty that explosions are destructive, and this

is no 'Rocket Science'. This is common sense.
My aunt got killed in an explosion. Activate one hundred thousand
explosions and they are all destructive, without exception, not one will
be creative or life giving.
We have all seen the results: dead, maimed or burned bodies and
surroundings, whether they are test explosions, gas cylinder
explosions, booby trap explosions, science lab explosions, suicide
explosions, pressure cooker explosions or battlefield explosions.
141
1. https://www.pinterest.com/pin
Every single one is destructive.

The explosions in Nagasaki and Hiroshima were atom bomb
explosions. These were normal atoms, I wonder, what if they had been
superatoms, like the one in the proposed theory of George Lematre?
Either Japan would be no longer, or if it was a creative superatom, then
Japan would have become a tourist attraction with all kinds of new life
forms and species.
The definition for Science is,
to discover FACTS . . to formulate laws and principles
based on these FACTS . . . that can be verified
or tested by further investigation. 1
Another definition,
A primary aim of science is to collect FACTS (data). An

ultimate purpose of science is to discern the order that
exists between and amongst the various FACTS. 2
The FACTS are that every explosion is destructive, tested, tried and
proven. Maybe we need a new scientific formula: EP=H+D, meaning
the amount of Explosive Power equals the amount of Harm and
Damage caused, depending on the surroundings. Yet we are led to
believe that the greatest explosion of all times was a creative one.
This is totally opposite of any reasoning science, which is supposed to
be based on facts, tests, proven results and formulas.
THIS IS NO FACTUAL SCIENCE, BUT CLEARLY IMAGINATIVE,
THEORETICAL, 'LETS SUPPOSE' SCIENCE.
This literally takes the lid off Pandoras box as no proof or evidence is
needed to support this science.
A 'Pandora's box' has come to signify the source of

endless complications or trouble, one whose origin is
deceptively simple. 3
142
1. Academic Press Dictionary of Science & Technology.

2. Dr. S. Gottlieb lecturing at the University of South Alabama.
3. ancienthistory.about.com
Your Honour, this is the kind of science that my client warned

us about, two millennia ago,
'avoid profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of
science falsely so called.' 2
STERILIZATION
The Professor states that, The Earth was able to support life only after
the planet had cooled enough for a rocky crust to solidify. . . .
Maybe this cooling process might have taken a million years or maybe
a thousand, but let's be generous and say one day, or even one hour.
I have lived in the tropics and there were many water borne diseases,
which I personally was subjected to.
However to kill all the bacteria and amoebas and any life form in the
water, science had proven that we should bring it to a boil.
We wanted to make sure, so my wife and
I decided to boil it for twenty minutes to
erase any life form in the water, as we
wanted to be a 100 percent sure. So we
did and were fine.
The Earth was much hotter than the
boiling point of water, so even if it took
only one hour to cool down, it would
have completely eradicated any chance
for any life form whatsoever to survive.
Everything that might have had any chance to procreate would have
been obliterated in the heat.
Hence the Earth was completely sterile just like we sterilize needles,
syringes and scalpels in heat.
Sterile means,
free from bacteria or other living micro-organisms; totally clean.2
Science has proven that heat or boiling sterilizes, it kills bacteria,
viruses, protozoans, parasites, all life forms!
143
1. 1Timothy 6:20
2. www.encyclopedia.com/topic/sterile.aspx
The Professor says that in the primordial soup of the early

seas, organic molecules concentrated, formed more complex
molecules, and became simple cells.
Your Honour, we have established
that the world was absolutely sterile,
hence there was only non-living
matter.
Okay, lets accept that the Big Bang
happened and somehow as the
Professor says 'a swamp of bubbling
primordial 'soup' formed on Earth'.
Maybe I should explain it more realistically.
No chicken will crawl out of my chicken soup, not in 4.6 billion years,
although it has all the organic molecules and cells, life forms and
ingredients needed to create a chicken, and even if I put a fertilized
chicken egg in the pot, before it comes to a boil.
Hundreds of thousands of cooks worldwide have proven that soup
only decays and starts rotting and stinking, more so after a billion
years.
It is not possible that primordial soup can turn into life, because it has
been boiled and has become sterile, even if all the proteins and amino
acids needed for life are present. It will not develop into life, not in a
100 billion years, because any life form in it has been destroyed by the
heat.
Another definition of STERILE, 1
not abl e to pr od uce cr ops or pl ants .
not abl e to pr od uce chi ld ren, y oung ani mal s, etc.
not abl e to g r ow or devel op .
I will repeat of what the Professor just told us,

Although scientists have not succeeded in creating life from organic
molecules in the laboratory, they have reproduced many of the
INTERMEDIATE STEPS.
144
1. (simple) Merriam Webster dictionary
What can those intermediate steps be? Things are either dead
or alive. There is no half-dead or half-alive.
There is NO HALF-ALIVE MATTER, besides some heartbreaking
humans that look like any life form has left them, who still walk
around, those sad cases who die at thirty, and get buried at sixty.
SPONTANEOUS GENERATION
In 1668, an Italian physician, named Francesco
Redi, disproved the idea of spontaneous
generation.
In 1859, Louis Pasteur experimented with the
idea of spontaneous generation. Scientists have
tried it for hundreds of years and have come to
Louis Pasteur 1822-95 the conclusion that only life can produce life.
Louis Pasteur formulated the Law of Biogenesis that, 'living things
come only from other living things.'
This law has been criticized and contradicted, because it does not fit
the evolution thought pattern of spontaneous generation.
Although contradicted and criticized because of
'advances in germ theory and cell theory'.
These are all theories and not one single scientific
experiment has proven the 'Law of Biogenesis'
wrong. 1
Pasteur said, 'Spontaneous generation is a dream fantasy.'
He was so convinced that he was right, that he stated in 1864,
'Never will the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover
from the mortal blow struck by my simple experiment.'
AMAZING COMPLEXITIES
Some things that we take for granted:
When you cut yourself you begin to bleed, but if the cut is not too big,
then shortly afterwards the flow of blood automatically discontinues.
145
1. http://science.jrank.org/pages/6408/Spontaneous-Generation.html
A clot forms, which is a protein mesh that stops the blood

cells, and eventually closes up the wound entirely, and it also
prevents the plasma from escaping.
This seemingly simple process involves over
a dozen different proteins such as; thrombin,
fibrinogen, Christmas, Stuart, accelerin, etc.
Some help to form the clot, while others are
responsible for regulating clot formation.
Regulating proteins are important as we
only want clots forming on a wound and not
in our arteries.
Vital microscopic 'hairs' that we take for granted: the Cilia are tiny
hair-like structures on the outside of cells that either help move fluid
over a stationary cell, such as the cells in your lungs, or serve as a
means of propelling a cell through water, as in the single-celled
paramecium. 1
Your Honour, we are so amazingly complex
and I am glad that there are scientists that can
study these matters.
So many stand in awe whether they believe in
my client or not.
They are amazed at the complexity and beauty of it all and how it all
works together in unison.
Molecular biologists have learned
about the sophisticated coding
within DNA.
It is not possible for an honest
scientist not to stand in wonder,
when observing the complexity of
what goes on in a human cell or in
the universe, whether we look
through a microscope or telescope.
146
1. www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/darwinbx.html
1.
2.
Someone who would say the following would be considered a

creationist and a person with little or no intelligence,
'The impossibility that this grand and wondrous universe, with

our conscious selves, arose through chance, seems to me the
chief argument for the existence of God.'
Who would say something like this? It was the Professors client
himself, Mr. Charles Darwin .
Let us take a quick look at the eye. The lens of our eye is critical in
forming a sharp image; however, this is one of the most amazing
features of the human eye that it can adjust so quickly when focusing
objects at different distances.
This process of adjustment is
known as accommodation.1
Besides other things working
together such as the aqueous
humor and the vitreous
humor, a muscle known as the
ciliary muscle changes the lens
shape, so that we can focus on
close by or far away. 2
I'll read the following quote.
'To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for
adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting the
different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical
and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural
selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest
possible degree.'
Your Honour, this was said in 1872 by none other than again Mr.
Charles Darwin himself.
I repeat,
147
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accommodation_reflex
2. http://physics.bu.edu/~duffy/semester2/c29_eye.html
To suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by

NATURAL SELECTION, SEEMS, I FREELY CONFESS,
ABSURD IN THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE DEGREE.
If Mr. Darwin says this of the eye, wait till we get to the DNA and the
human brain.
Your Honour, if these are Mr. Darwins sentiments, then what are we
having this whole court case for? And why did the Professor and I
spend so much of our precious time investigating for both our clients,
or could it be that our search for answers leads us to the same
destination.
REFUSING TO ACCEPT EVIDENCE

Dr. Einstein said there are three kinds of people
1. Those who see,
2. Those who see when they are shown,
3. Those who do not see.
I like to add number four,
4. There are none so blind, as those who refuse
to see.
Marie Curie added the fifth, when she stated:
5. There are sadistic 1 scientists who hurry to Marie Curie
1867-1934
hunt down errors instead of establishing the truth.
It is the fifth, the last and lowest level, which is doing the most damage
to the reputation of science.
Those who refuse to accept my client's involvement, or by finding
minor flaws in the reputation or character of others, be they scientists
or otherwise, will stoop so low as to say anything to defend their
personal doctrines and theories, be they true or false, such as:
Concerning Noahs Ark:
Dr. Price, director of the Center for Judaic Studies, at Liberty
University at Lynchburg Va., has reason to believe, that a group of
local Kurdish men had taken wood from an old structure in
the Black Sea area, and trucked the wood up to the mountain.
148
1. Dictionary for sadistic: aggressive, brutal, cruel, vicious.
They staged an elaborate hoax for the Chinese expedition. 1

The Chinese expedition was in 2009. The Black Sea is
approximately 500 km from Mount Ararat.
There are no roads or paths on Ararat to truck things up the
mountain, besides the Kurds are fighting a war and they dont have
time for such incredible, unbelievable nonsense.
The Yonaguni underwater city: (photo on pg. 98)
The Yonaguni site consists of huge stone blocks which fit together
perfectly, right angled joins, carvings and what appear to be stairways,
paved streets, crossroads and plazas.
Despite the unusual features displayed, there remain some scientists,
such as Geologist Robert Schoch of Boston University, who have
studied the formation and who are adamant that the large blocks
formed naturally as a result of tectonic movement. 2
The ancient underwater city in the gulf of Alykanas in Zakynthos,
Greece: (photo on pg. 98)
According to the Underwater Antiquities Department, the discovery
included huge public buildings, cobblestone paving, bases for pillars
and other antiquities. Of particular significance were the 20 stone pillar
bases, all of which feature a '34 cm diameter incision'.
A study released in December claimed that the artifacts are not
remnants of an ancient city at all, but simply a unique natural
phenomenon. 3
Your Honour, Im sorry to say, these are no studies! Anyone can see
that this is the purest nonsensical figment of someones imagination.
Adolf Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf,

'It would never come into the heads of the broad
masses to fabricate colossal untruths, and they
would not believe that others could have the
impudence to distort the truth so infamously. . . .
They will still doubt and waver and will continue
to think that there may be some other explanation.
149
1. https://xenophilius.wordpress.com/2010/04/27
2. www.ancient-origins.net/.../mysterious-
3. www.ancient-origins.net/ancient/ten-incredible-underwater-discoveries
For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it,
even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to
all expert liars in this world.'
What Hitler is really saying,
If you tell a lie, tell a big one. Keep repeating it, and they will
believe you, because no one would think that you had the nerve
to tell something so big, if it was not the truth.
Isnt that how it works when the media is predisposed?

Isnt truth usually the first victim in war also?
I know this court case will also get its share of biased coverage. You,
Your Honour, the Professor, myself, and the scribe that is recording
this case, we all run the risk to be at the receiving end of it.
THE CHALLENGE
The Professor interrupts, and with a
determination, not natural to his
personality, he daringly proclaims,
Your Honour, I challenge Mr. N. Voy, to
explain to the court in scientific terms how
his client, or let us call a spade a spade, how
this so-called God of his, made the world, and
that in six days?
I challenge him to explain in scientific
terms, with proper formulas how this
quote unquote God created the world
and the universe.
If he can explain it clearly then I might consider, with the emphasis on
might, that there is an intelligent design behind it after all.
Your Honour, although this has been a closed case, I ask that you will invite
the press into the courtroom, when Mr. N. Voy gives his explanation on how
it all happened.
150
I would like to once and for all put an end to this. It is either evolution
or creation and if Mr. N. Voy cannot come up with a proper scientific
explanation, then I will stay absolutely convinced that our origins lie in the
process of evolution, no matter how many missing links, closed-minded
scientists, or flaws there might be.
If Mr. N. Voys client is what he makes out to be, then he must have a
scientific explanation for the creation process, as he is supposed to be
omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient.
Omniscient meaning he knows all the science possible and all the
scientific formulas.
This is my challenge to Mr. N. Voy, to the court and to myself.
The honourable Justice breathes deeply, and there is a moment of quiet

thought before he speaks in a calm and collect voice,
If Mr. N. Voy will accept the challenge, then the court will resume on
Monday morning 9:30 a.m.
I will discuss with the Jury concerning the press entering the
courtroom, which I personally would prefer not to.
However seeing we all need to have an open mind I will discuss the
attendance of the press with the members of the Jury.
So Mr. N. Voy, do you accept this challenge?
There is a long pause. Mr. N. Voy seems in deep thought,

tapping his lips with his index finger.
I cant help but find this rather biased against my client, as there are
no scientific formulas given for the evolution theory. Nevertheless I
have this weekend ahead of me to prepare, so yes, Your Honour,
members of the Jury, and dear Professor, I do accept this challenge and
would have no objections if the press was present.
However all this is on one condition, that I may give my rhetoric
without interruption, except from you, Your Honour.
I also ask the court for a white board and marker, in case clarification is
needed.
151
The court is now closed and the case is adjourned to Monday morning
9.30 a.m., half-an-hour later than usual, due to Monday morning rush
hour.
Members of the Jury, would you please be so kind as to meet with me
in my office?
__________
152
CHAPTER 13
SCIENTIFIC ACCOUNT OF DESIGNED ORIGINS
It is Monday morning and the clock shows 9:30.

All rise! This is the last day concerning the case 'Evolution and
Creation'. Presiding over the court is the honourable Lord Justice, Dr.
E. Dict.
The honourable Lord Justice speaks,

To all present, including the press, I would like to reiterate that this is
a criminal case. This is only the second time in my career that I have
invited the press into the courtroom.
The ladies and gentlemen of the press will not be allowed to interview
the witness for evolution and the witness for creation until after the
case if they so wish. However, no harassment or questioning during
the case will be allowed. This is not an infringement on the freedom of
speech, this is to keep order in the court.
A complete word-for-word transcript of the case will be available
shortly in a free download publication named,
'In the Beginning . . . then What? - 'Evolution and Creation'.
Ladies and gentlemen, if order cannot be kept the security guards are
here to escort you out of the courtroom. I hope that I have made myself
clear.
Mr. N. Voy, please take the stand. Some of your explanations have
been in great detail, but this session will close by 12:00 sharp.
After lunch at 1:30, both you and the Professor will give your final
presentation and defense before the Jury.
153
I will do my best, Your Honour.

The question is, how did the world come about in scientific
terms?
As a child I was intrigued by
what my physics teacher told
us in class. He explained that
he could not understand why,
when we clap our hands, our
hands dont pass through one
another.
He gave details how we are
made up out of molecules
and that the molecules are
made of atoms. Atoms consist
of neutrons and protons,
which have no mass but are
energy.
I was only 9 or 10 years old, but was absolutely fascinated by his
explanation.
QUANTUM PHYSICS
I quote, What we perceive as our physical material world, is really
not physical or material at all, in fact, it is far from it. This has been
proven time and time again by multiple Nobel Prize (among many
other scientists around the world) winning physicists, one of them
being Niels Bohr, a Danish
Physicist who made
significant contributions to
understanding atomic
structure and quantum
theory.1 Niels Bohr
'If quantum mechanics hasnt profoundly shocked you, you havent

understood it yet.
154
1. www.collective-evolution.com/.../this-is-the-world-of-quantum-physics
Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be

regarded as real.' Niels Bohr
Scientists began to recognize that everything in the Universe is made
out of energy!
Atoms are made out of invisible energy, not tangible matter.
Quantum physicists discovered that physical atoms are made up of
vortices of energy that are constantly spinning and vibrating, each one
radiating its own unique energy signature.
'Therefore, if we really want to observe ourselves and find out what we
are, we are really beings of energy and vibration, radiating our own
unique energy signature - this is fact and is what QUANTUM
PHYSICS has shown us time and time again.'
We are much more than what we perceive ourselves to be, and its time
we begin to see ourselves in that light.
'Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is
immaterial It is mental and spiritual' Richard Conn Henry,
Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University.
(quote taken from The Mental Universe)
The revelation that

the universe is not
an assembly of
physical parts,
suggested by
Newtonian physics,
and instead comes
from a holistic
entanglement of
immaterial energy
waves, stems from
the work of Nobel
Prize winners:
Albert Einstein, Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg, among others.
155
This is exactly what my client wrote two millennia ago.

'so that things which are seen
were not made of things which do appear.' 1
Your Honour, in other words we are made up out of nothing but
energy and yet here we are. Truly amazing!
At present we are limited, or I would say locked in to our four
dimensions: time, length, width and height, but there is more to it than
meets the eye. Werner Heisenberg said, "Only a few know, how much
one must know to know how little one knows."
An omniscient mastermind, with an unreasonable, artistic passion to
create something beautiful brought this about and is what literally
holds us together.
Our modern technology sheds some light on how my client went about
it. My client writes, I will read in first person:
'In the beginning I created the heaven and the earth' 2
The literal translation by Young states:
'In the beginning I PREPARED the heaven and the earth' 2
This is in the beginning, or
before time was, he prepared
it all just like we prepare a
product, whether it is a
website, a car, an interactive
software application, or a
book.
At present we are limited to
our four dimensions: time,
length, width and height. The lack of these four-dimensional
parameters is beautifully described in the next verse,
'The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of
the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.' 3
156
1. Hebrews 11:3 2. Genesis 1:1 3. Genesis 1:2
It could have taken my client a millisecond or billions of years

ad infinitum to prepare his creation, as time did not yet exist.
I will read from his writing,
'I made the earth and the heavens, and every plant of the field before it was
in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew:' 1
The spirit of wisdom speaks of this preparation time,
'Oh you simple. . I wisdom . . speak truth. . When he had not yet made the
earth, nor the fields . . Before the mountains were settled . .
When he prepared the heavens, I was there. . When he appointed
the foundations of the earth. . then I was by him . .' 2
He took his time to plan it and prepare it in such detail that we still
constantly discover new things concerning it through science.
Deep down inside, whether we are atheists, agnostics or believers, we
all know that things could not just have come together like this out of a
random explosion.
Professor Stephen Hawkins, who is not exactly a promoter of my
client, writes, The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers
seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the
development of life.
MODERN TECHNOLOGY EXPLAINS CREATION

My client was preparing, designing, philosophizing, creating and
weighing out the pros and cons of his design.
When everything was ready and his whole
preparation to the minutest detail was in
place and it was ready to be uploaded or
launched into our four dimensions that we
understand, he simply spoke his design into
being.
It is a system that we have not yet developed
because it prints as it is uploading our design or creation.
157
1. Genesis 2:4,5 2. Proverbs 8:5,7,25,27,29,30
My clients voice recorder activates his computer and as it

uploads his data, it simultaneously prints and creates what it
launches.
Nowadays we have 3D printers, with which we are experimenting to
try to print human organs.
My clients printer is not just a 3D printer, but a fascinating 8D printer.

A printer that can print plants, trees, fruits, seeds and flowers with
their feelings as well as the galaxies and their orbits. It can print birds,
fish and animals each different one from the other and each with their
own instinct. All made up out of pure energy.
Each 6 steps of uploading took less than a 24 hour day. We see that my
client spoke his creation into being. Each new day in Genesis 1 starts
with,
'And I said, let there be. .'
ENERGY & KINETIC ENERGY

Energy alone cannot create, it has to be active or kinetic energy.
When my client speaks and goes into action, then his word becomes
the active kinetic energy.
He is action, he works from simply changing
hearts and minds to expanding the universe.
My client actually revealed the simple formula on
which his printing system operates to a humble
man, in a patent office in Bern, Switzerland.
This formula made him famous. When asked about his genius, he
answered, I am nothing but a product of my parents and teachers.
158
It is humble people like that, that my client likes working with.

Not the high and mighty know-it-alls.
The Danish scientist le Rmer, was only 21 when he made his
discovery concerning the speed of light. He then calculated the speed
of light by observing the eclipses of Jupiter's moon during the years
16681674.
This simple clerk in Bern, who was studying all these scientific papers
that were submitted for patent copyright, wanted to find a simple
formula by which everything exists.
A formula that governs all mass and everything
that is. Of course now we know the Theory of
Relativity formula of Dr. Albert Einstein:
E=mc2
Energy (E) equals mass (m) times speed of light
If the solution is simple,
God is answering. 1 (c) to the square.
The First law of Thermodynamics states that 'Energy cannot be
created nor destroyed', so it is and will always be. My client wrote:
'I am, that I am.2. . . I am the Alpha and the Omega,
the beginning and the end.' 3
Your Honour, my client is the energy that always is. Thus creation
becomes very simple: my client, being energy, spoke and his word
became the active 'kinetic energy', which equals that mass was
produced instantly, by his word, at the speed of light to the square.
His word was needed for creation to take place.
When my client had his plan ready, all he needed to do was speak the
word and the word did the rest.
'In the beginning was the word . . and without the word was not anything
made that was made . .The word was made flesh and dwelt among us . .
He was in the world that was made by him, and the world knew him not.' 4
Our four dimensional mindset cannot yet fully grasp the importance of
this word for discovering our life's plan, goal and fulfillment.
159
1. Dr. Albert Einstein 2. Exodus 3:14
3. Revelation 1:8, Rev. 21:6 & 22:13 4. John 1:1,3,14,10
E=mc2 also shows that mass, cannot exist without energy,

without my client. This means that without my client, or
energy, there is absolutely nothing.
Nothing can exist, nothing can be, no big bang explosion, nothing can
take form or be mass, as only mass can exist because of energy.
THE ACTION STARTS - FIRST OUR FOUR DIMENSIONS

Seeing that nothing exists without time in our four dimensions, he first
had to upload time. For time to exist he was required to create light.
This light had to be separated from the darkness, to
distinguish the days and to give colours their beauty:
'And my client said, Let there be light: and there was light.
he divided the light from the darkness.. . the
evening and the morning were the 1st day.' 1
Now TIME was in place. Next is LENGTH, WIDTH and HEIGHT.
'And he said, Let there be a firmament . . . and divided the waters which
were under the firmament from the waters which were above the
firmament. . . the 2nd day.' 2
Firmament is Length and Width, while under and above is Height.
NEXT - GRAVITY
Next he uploads gravity to dry
the land, and uploads plant life;
'And my client said, Let the waters
under the heaven be gathered
together unto one place, and let the
dry land appear.'
This means GRAVITY is in place.
'And He said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the
fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth:
and it was so. . . . the 3rd day.' 3
160
1. Genesis 1:3-5 2. Genesis 1:6-8 3. Genesis 1:9-13
Here we see clearly that the days are 24-hour days, measured
according to time as we know it, as grass and vegetation cannot
exist without the sun, which my client created, decreed, launched or
uploaded the next day.
THEN - THE MYSTERIOUS UNIVERSE:

'And my client said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to
divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons,
and for days, and years:
And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the
lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
And set them in the firmament of the heaven
. . . to give light upon the earth. . . the 4 th day.' 1
This morning, Your Honour, I woke up at 2:30 and was wondering

why my client made the Earths gravitational pull with the grass and
vegetation, before he created the firmament of the heavens or the
universe with the sun etc.?
It somehow did not make sense to me, and he should have made
these before he made the vegetation . . . because sunlight is needed for
plant life.
However the thought crossed my mind . . . could it be that the Earths
gravitational pull was first and afterwards the universe as the
gravitational pull holds the whole universe together and the Earth is
the actual centre of the universe?
I tried to push it aside as entire
nonsense and that this could not be
and was totally crazy and not in line
with Copernicus, who already did
away with this around the 1500s.
Everyone will say that I'm utterly out
of my mind, that I come out of the
dark ages and that I should update
myself, or get a brain-scan. Nicolaus Copernicus 1473-1543
161
1. Genesis 1:14-19
I realized though that it was my client trying to get a message

across to me, as I could not go back to sleep, so I took some
notes.
It was previously thought that the Earths gravitational pull

weakens or diminishes at the rate of about 5% per century,
more recently it's estimated to be about 5% every decade.1
Like I said before concerning Lematre,

The expansion of the universe is a fascinating scientific discovery that
even caught Einstein by surprise.
So the question is:
Seeing that the universe was made after the Earths gravity, could it be
that the Earths gravitational pull holds it all together, and
COULD THE WEAKENING OF THE EARTHS GRAVITATIONAL
PULL HAVE A DIRECT INFLUENCE ON THE EXPANSION OF
THE UNIVERSE, AND ARE THE TWO INTERRELATED?
I stayed up, did research and came across this article:
'In 1929 Edwin Hubble announced that he had measured the speed of
galaxies at different distances from us, and had discovered that the
farther they were, the faster they were receding. . . This might suggest
that we are at the centre of the expanding universe.
The article ends with: 'We still have no real answer to the question,
Where is the centre of the universe?' 1
Hubble discovered that the farther the galaxies
were, the faster they were receding.
This makes total sense, if the Earths gravitational
pull is somehow holding the universe together, as
the Earth is losing its gravitational strength, the
farther away the galaxies are the weaker the
Edwin Powel Hubble
gravitational pull, so the faster they will recede or
move away.
Next I came across this following shocking, jaw-dropping article.
162
1. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics
Physics Professor John Hartnett, with Australia's

University of Adelaide, studied, the locations of some
400,000 GALAXIES from the 2005 Sloan Digital Sky
Survey and was astounded to see a surprising form
and pattern in how they're arrayed,
ALL WITH EARTH AT THE CENTER.'
'As if the galaxies preferred to lie at some John Hartnett

periodic spacing out from the Earth,'
Hartnett explains in the documentary.
'This is sort of like saying that our galaxy
is somewhere near the center of the
universe, and when you look at the
galaxies arrayed all around us, they're on
sort of like gigantic shells.' 1
There is a movie or documentary made about it called 'the principle'.
It is so shocking to the world of science, that even some scientists said
afterwards, 'I have no idea how I ended up in that stupid geocentrism
documentary.'
That is the weakest excuse I ever heard. Was that scientist drugged,
that he refuses to take responsibility for what he did?
He continues with, 'The best thing we can all do when faced by
nonsense like that, or equivalent silliness promoted by biblical
fundamentalists who claim that science supports a literal interpretation
of the Bible, is to ignore it in public forums, and not shine any light on
the authors of this trash.'
Is he the kind of scientist that Marie Curie was referring to when she
said, 'There are sadistic scientists who hurry to hunt down errors,
instead of establishing the truth.'
One shred of fact and objective evidence, that it is not true, is all that
is needed.
We dont need to abase ourselves to subjective, gutter-level, name
calling.
163
1. http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/healthscience/2014/October/Film-
Shocker-Does-the-Universe-Revolve-Around-Earth
http://oregonoptimist.com/news/shocking-new-documentary-proposes-
universe-revolves-around-earth/
We dont have to be educated scientists to shout: 'Rubbish,

Nonsense, Stupid idiots, Ridiculous, No-Brains, Trash, Fools,
Fundamentalists, God-deluded, Bible-bashers, etc.'
Any uneducated rogue can do that.
I do feel sorry for people like that, because in the end they only harm
themselves. Once we promote what we know is not the truth then we
start convincing ourselves.
And in the end we get more and more confused and start hiding
behind a faade of seniority and 'dont confuse me with the facts,
because my mind is made up.'
In order to defend ourselves we end up throwing dirt, barking and
howling, 'Look at these dumb, fuddy-duddy, religious zombies,
contradicting our scientific theories.'
In doing so, we fulfill the proverb, 'It's the hit dog that howls.'
It is what we think we know that keeps us from learning. 1A
I want to know Gods thoughts. The rest are details. 1B
Your Honour, I cant understand what upsets people so about my
client, he really is cool, has a head on his shoulders, a great sense of
humor, down-to-earth, hes a great problem solver, he knows what is
going on, he does not pretend, he is generous, he has got a heart of
gold, keeps his word and he is the most amazing soul-mate.
I tell him everything good and bad, and he loves me for it and in spite
of it.
However, I must say that he definitely has a mind of his own, he does
not cow-tow to opinions, he knows what he wants and sees his project
through, no matter what you or I say or do, but he does listen to
reason.
Back to the universe, A few months ago I came across this article:
IS OUR UNIVERSE A HOLOGRAM?

UNIVERSE COULD BE A MERE PROJECTION
164
1A & 1B. Dr. Albert Einstein
In December, 2015, Japanese researchers attempted to tackle

this problem by providing mathematical evidence that the
holographic principle might be correct.
The holographic principle suggests
that, like the security chip on a credit
card for example, there is a two-
dimensional surface that contains all
the information needed to describe a
three-dimensional object - which in
this case is our universe.
We are living in a giant hologram,
and everything we see around us is a
projection of a 2D surface. 1
This could very well be true as my client wrote,
'And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together' 2
A scroll is two-dimensional, so it does seem that the Japanese scientists
are on to something.
The word UNI-VERSUM

Scientists have been baffled with the immensity of the universe since
the beginning of civilization. The Professor states that the Big Bang is
silent concerning how the universe began.
But let us look simply at the word universe. Universe is a contraction
of two Latin words UNI, meaning One, and VERSUM, is verse or
sentence. In other words one short sentence spoken by my client and
there it was the Universe at the speed of light to the square.
The concept of TIME

At present we are limited to our four-dimensional world, and we dont
yet comprehend infinity, limitless, perpetuity and without end, eternal
time-less. It does not fit within the parameters of our four-dimensional
mindset and boxes. Time is only four-dimensional.
165
1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3057957/Are-living-
HOLOGRAM-time-scientists
2. Revelation 6:14
'The latest research from Washington University suggests

that in the quantum world time runs both backward and
forward whereas in the classical world it only runs forward.' 1
Einstein wrote, '.. for us physicists believe the separation between past,
present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one.'
My client wrote two millennia ago, that there will come a time that,
'there should be time no longer.' 2
When time comes to an end, and we leave our four-dimensional
parameters, then we will experience reality as it actually, truly is.
I think that we might be so sorry then that we kept up our four-
dimensional delusions of hiding our selfishness, corruption, lust for
power, and our lack of concern for others, behind Religious Piety,
Noble Politics, and Just Wars, etc.
But let me continue with creation, as next my client is getting into it

and we start seeing some amazing action:
These are no Sunday school fairy tales, this is;
SCIENCE TO THE MAX

'And he said, Let the waters
bring forth abundantly the
moving creatures that have
life. . and the birds that they
may fly. . . after their kind.
. the 5th day' 3
These five days are
followed by the big day:
'And he said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind,
cattle, and creeping things, and beast of the earth after his kind:
and it was so.' 4
166
1. Mailonline science and tech June 16, 2016
2. Revelation 10:6 3. Genesis 1:20-23 4. Genesis 1:24,25
I will share a few lines from my clients writing when he was

talking to Job. Job was not too happy, arguing with my client,
as he thought, like many of us, that he was such a righteous or good
man and he objected to the testing of his character.
My client answered Job, Will you condemn me, that you may be righteous?
Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?
Do you know the ordinances of heaven?
Can you send lightnings? Did you give the goodly wings unto the peacocks?
Have you given the horse strength?
Does the
hawk fly
by your
wisdom?
Then Job answered . . I uttered that I

understood not; Wherefore I abhor
myself, and repent in dust and ashes.
In other words I did not know what I was talking about, I feel so
stupid, and I am very sorry for my big mouth
'My client blessed the end of Job more than his beginning.' 1
NO RUSH, HE TOOK HIS TIME

As for his creation, my client took his time with using six 24-hour
days to upload his prepared design. He could have rattled the whole
thing off, at the speed of light to the square.
This option is according to more recent research a definite possibility.
'If it is verified, the discovery will prove the theory that the universe
expanded incredibly rapidly in less than a trillionth of a second after
it was formed. Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at MIT, told the New York
Times: "If this stays true, it will go down as one of the greatest
discoveries in the history of science." 2
167
1. Job chapter 38 - 41
2. http://www.theweek.co.uk/health-science/57759/big-bang-does-
extraordinary-discovery-prove-theory-right
British scientist, Dr. Jo Dunkley, of the European Planck

Space Agency, commented, 'I can't tell you how exciting this
is. Inflation sounds like a crazy idea, but everything that is important,
everything we see today - the galaxies, the stars, the planets - was
imprinted at that moment, in less than a trillionth of a second. If this
is confirmed, it's huge.' 1
Your Honour, my client spread it out over six days, he took his time,
he went slow and sat down at the end of every day, as he wrote,
'and I saw that it was good.' 2
So obviously he took the time to enjoy what he was creating and to see
if it was exactly how he wanted it.
HIS 'MAGNUM OPUS'

Now that he had everything in place, the stage was set for his ultimate
creation, his ultimate work of art. This he did not want to speak into
being This final creation he wanted to make with his hands.
Like the artist who becomes a part of his artwork, by putting his heart
and soul and everything of himself into his creation and has pride in
the work of his hands, so my client put his heart and soul into
creating his final masterpiece, his
'Magnum Opus'.
I will read the first person,
'So I created man in my own image, in
my personal image I created him; male
and female created I them.' 3
The Ultimate Masterpiece the reason for it all: MAN!

'And I formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils
the breath of life; and man became a living soul.' 4
He created us in the four dimensional realm, yet 'he breathed into us

the breath of life and man became a living soul. Our soul sets us apart
from animals. No matter what anyone says, or tries to match DNA's.
168
1. http://transudationism.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/the-big-seed.html?m=1
2. Genesis 1:10, 12, 18, 21, 25, 31 3. Genesis 1:26,27
4. Genesis 2:7
4.
Although we are presently limited to our four dimensions, as

humans we have received a measure of my client's love, his
freedom, and spirit, as our soul, which is from a much higher
dimension. Hence many of us feel like caged birds, as we are restricted
to four dimensions, while our soul seeks to break free from these
limitations, craving for love and freedom. This freedom we rediscover
when we connect again with the source.
Now a brief look at our four-dimensional physical body.
THE HUMAN CELL:

The human cell has a genome. It is amazing how many different
proteins and other functions the genome contains.
The genome has a complete set of DNA,
which contains around 3.2 billion
DNA base pairs.
The genome is arranged into 23 pairs
of chromosomes and is estimated to
contain 20,000-25,000 genes, which
pretty much determine our physical
and hereditary make-up.
In 2012 scientist discovered that the human
cell has around 4,000,000 switches
connected to the organs and different parts
of the body.
Thus the human cell is far more complex
than London or Mumbai and we consist of
37.2 trillion cells 1 all working together.
THE HUMAN BRAIN:

Neuroscientist Jeff Lichtman2 lectured
at Harvard, that if we try to index our
1 kg human brain we need several
billion petabytes 3 of data storage.
169
1. https://wonderopolis.org/wonder/how-many-cells-are-in-the-human-body
2. Jeffrey Lichtman, MD, PhD, Prof. molecular & cellular biology Harvard
3. 1 petabyte = 1000 terabytes = 1.000.000 Gigabytes.
As of July 2013, the internet

was approximately 5,000
petabytes.
Google used 200 terabytes of this or
0.04%. (07/2013 - D. Schilling)
Hence to attempt to index our brain,
we need at least 2 billion petabytes,
which equals 100 million times all the Google data, as of July, 2013.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, if I insist and tell you in all
sincerity, that there occurred an explosion in a print shop, and
consequently the 32 volumes of 'Encyclopedia Britannica' came
together as a result, then obviously I have lost my reasoning senses and
you will advise me to see a psychiatrist, and you should.
Yet, the Encyclopedia Britannica is
non-living matter, which has much
greater probability to be assembled
from non-living matter, than living
matter evolving from non-living
matter.
To index the encyclopedia takes 1
(one) Gigabyte. To index our brains, I
am not even talking about the rest of
our body, takes at least 2 quadrillion Gigabytes.
Hence although my theory of the Encyclopedia Britannica evolving
from a print-shop explosion is nonsensical and ludicrous, yet it is
2,000,000,000,000,000 times more probable than my brain coming
together from an explosion in space.
Your Honour, talk about brains, talk about science, talk about amazing
still-to-be-discovered technology, scientific formulas, my client is the
ultimate.
My client knew exactly what he was doing, as Einstein said, 'God
doesn't play dice.'
170
BIOLOGICAL DATA STORAGE

Your Honour, one human cell can store 1.5 GB (gigabytes)
data in its DNA.1 The digital size of the Encyclopedia Britannica is
approx 1 GB. 2 Therefore one human cell can easily hold the data of all
32 volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica.
I quote, 'The work, carried out by George Church and Sri Kosuri,
basically treats DNA as just another digital storage device.. . . . DNA
can survive for hundreds of thousands of years in a box in your
garage . . . . . in a droplet of DNA that would fit on the tip of your
pinky. To store the same kind of data on hard drives the densest
storage medium in use today youd need 233 3TB drives, weighing
151 kilos. . . . Biological storage allows us to record everything..' 3
With unbelievable complex DNA biological data storage taken from
living creatures, there is no doubt in my mind that my client is the
unquestionable, absolute pinnacle of science.
RESURRECTION - CLONING NEW BODIES

In Turin, northern Italy, is one of the most controversial, puzzling, and
studied pieces of cloth in human history. The shroud of Turin is
preserved in the 'Chapel of the Shroud' in the Turin Cathedral, and is
deemed to be the 'grave cloth of Jesus'.
In it we see his inflicted wounds, his
swollen eye, the stripes on the back of his
body, the cut marks of the crown of thorns
on his head and the spear wound in his
side.
Although many have tried to prove that it
is a fraud, as of today hundreds of scientists
have found no explanation for the image on
the shroud. All the theories from radiation
to scorching to the bioplastic coating and
from painting to vaporographic theories
have been ruled out.
171
1. http://bitesizebio.com/8378/how-much-information-is-stored-in-the-genome/
2. https://www.reddit.com/r/theydidthemath/comments/2pamj3/request_how
3. www.extremetech.com/extreme/134672-harvard-cracks-dna-storage-
The only alternative is that the image on the shroud was the
result of the resurrection of his body. With Einsteins simple
scientific formula, E=mc2, it all falls into place.
In other words, when my client raised his sons dead body mass at the
speed of light to the square, in that moment of time, the speed of light
to the square burned his image onto the fabric that covered him, and it
left us the physical, material proof of his resurrection on his grave
cloth.1
'Look, I show you a mystery. . In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye (c2),
at the last trump: for the trumpet 2 shall sound, and the dead shall be raised
incorruptible, and we shall be changed. . .' 3
Even this formerly unattainable feat and 'religious nonsense' now
becomes possible as our DNA is almost impossible to be destroyed.
Even if our physical DNA is destroyed, according to quantum physics
we are spiritual beings.
I repeat: 'Quantum physicists discovered that . . if we really want to
observe ourselves and find out what we are, we are really beings of
energy and vibration, radiating our own unique energy signature -
'Get over it, and accept the inarguable
conclusion. The universe is immaterial It
is mental and spiritual.' 4
People on Earth with severe handicaps
have time-travelled and seen themselves
completely whole in the heavenly realm.
Hence our soul will join our body again, as
my client clones our personal body in a
new incorruptible body at the speed of
light to the square, seeing our personal
DNA or 'our own unique energy signature'
is recorded in an indestructible file, called,
'the Book of Life' 5

172
1. for more details see: www.shroud.com
2. last trumpet announces the return of Jesus. 3. 1Corinthians 15:52,53
4. www.collective-evolution.com/.../this-is-the-world-of-quantum-physics
5. Revelation 3:5, Rev. 20:12, Rev.21:27, Rev.22:19.
For this reason, Your Honour, what we are learning will never
be wasted, but will stay with us in our DNA forever after our
resurrection.
Resurrection means in scientific terms that when my client acts and
becomes kinetic energy he will clone our personal DNA into a new
body mass, at the speed of light to the square, while all that we
learned will automatically be part of us.
This time, when our soul will join our body mass again, the body mass
will be a new 'out-of-this-four-dimensional-world' body, similar to the
one that Jesus had after his resurrection. He could freely shift in and
out of our four-dimensional parameters. He could eat, walk through
walls, disguise himself and was not subject to gravity.
Everyone else is raised on the day of judgment. My client has to allow
things to take its full course, to see what character we each develop.
Did I choose love, or look the other way? Did I heal or hurt, care or
curse, give or grab? Nothing will be swept under the carpet.
'I saw the dead, small and great . . and the books were opened : and
another book was opened , which is the book of life: and the dead were
judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to
their works.' 1
A child born in a war-torn country that saw her mother being raped
before both her parents got killed, will get a much different ruling then
those who instigated the war for greed.
'The day when God will judge the secrets of men' 2
My client relates very much to what Steve Jobs
said: 'Maybe its because I want to believe in an
afterlife, that when you die, it doesnt just all
disappear. The wisdom youve accumulated,
somehow it lives on, but sometimes I think its
just like an on-off switch. Click and youre gone.
And thats why I dont like putting on-off
switches on Apple devices.'3
173
1. Revelation 20:12 2. Romans 2:16 1955-2011
3. 1. www.thewire.com/technology/2011/10/
I think my client blessed him for that statement, because he

departed from the world with this sense of wonder, saying,
'Oh wow. Oh wow. Oh wow.' 1
If Steve Jobs does not like on-off switches, neither does my client. He
will not just flip the switch on us.
Time and again we use our intelligence to prove ourselves
right. However if we can relax and open up to the beautiful
things around us, then life becomes an amazing journey.
But let us travel back in time to my client's original creation, his

Magnum Opus.
My client also said to Adam:
'you return unto the ground; for out of it you were taken: for dust you are,
and unto dust shall you return.' 2
A decomposing body significantly alters the chemistry of the soil
beneath it, it causes changes that may persist for years Eventually the
whole process creates a highly concentrated area of organically rich
soil, as well as releasing nutrients into the wider ecosystem. 3
Your Honour, isnt it time we grow up out of our rebellious immature
stage. If geniuses like Newton, Pasteur, Planck, Einstein, Wernher von
Braun all believed in a designer and even Charles Darwin said, To
suppose that the eye . . . could have been formed by natural selection,
seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree, isnt it
time we wizen up?
POSITIVE ENERGY
My client is energy in the purest, most
positive form, which is love.
Love that is manifested on Earth in creativity.
Gravitation is not Love creates art, sculptures, paintings, music
responsible for people
and babies - all which fill us with such
falling in love. 4
exhilarating glee.
174
1. http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/last-words-of-famous-people
2. Genesis 3:19
3. gizmodo.com/what happens to your body after you die.
All of nature is there to bring us his positive energy.
Go for a walk and enjoy it.

Ride a horse, itll thrill you.
Hold a girl, it will change you.
Go for a swim, it will renew you.
It is all put there by my client for us to
enjoy, because he only wants the very
best for us.
In enjoying it we partake of his life-giving energy and we get renewed,
reinvigorated and get that spring back in our step.
Our insurmountable problems and
disastrous obstacles will turn into
challenges that we want to conquer and
find answers for, because his positive
energy will help us tackle it.
Remember,
'No problem can be solved from the
same level of consciousness that created
it.' 1
Tap into my client and nothing becomes impossible! 2
Seeing that we are all made out of pure energy, let us make sure that
we tap into the right energy source. The positive one, which will lift us
above the mundane and helps us find solutions.
BLACK HOLES
On the contrary, the negative energy can
suck you into a black hole vortex of despair
and hopelessness.
Black holes are very real and inside each star
in the universe there is a battle royal going
between the gravitational pull of the star
pulling inwards on the one side, and explosions pushing outward.
175
2. Luke 1:37; 18:27
These nuclear explosions inside the star that are pushing

outward are creating pressure to balance against the
gravitational pull of drawing the star inwards, to make it a black hole.
When the energy of the star has died out, the star collapses under its
own weight and it becomes a black hole. 1
My client compares us to stars. He says,
'They that are wise shall shine as the
brightness of the firmament and they that turn
many to righteousness as the stars
forever and ever.' 2
My client on
the one side is
the positive
energy of our
star and if we partake of that energy we
get renewed, inspired, and reinvigorated
with positive explosions pushing and
thinking outwards towards others and
how we can be of help to them.
On the other hand with the negative,
gravitational pull inwards, we acquire a negative mindset where
egotism, frustrations, fear, stress, discouragement, depression, and
eventually suicidal tendencies will gain the upper hand.
We become a black hole to those around us,

sucking in their energy with our negative
inward pull of gloomy self-absorption.
I quote: 'Black holes can also consume material
torn from nearby stars. In fact massive black
holes can swallow stars whole.' 3
This shows we need to be very careful
concerning the company that we keep, and not
allow ourselves to get sucked in to their negative pull.
176
1. extracted from the following:
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/how-do-stars-form-and-
evolve http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/faq/answer.php.id=56&cat=exotic
2. Daniel 12:3
3. http://hubblesite.org/explore_astronomy/black_holes/encyc_mod3_q9.html
This negative gravitational pull inside us strengthens itself

when we absorb negative vibrations, through horror movies,
depressive music, violent video games, etc.,
and allow them to become part of us.
It is very difficult to get out of that sucking,
negative vortex, unless you invoke my clients
help, who will assist those that genuinely
come to him and earnestly seek his help.
However we cannot blame our fears and
negativity on the violent video games, the
depressive music or the horror movies, as we
are personally responsible for what we watch, play and do.
Just like I cannot blame the TV for wasting my time with a useless, bad
programme, while I have the remote control with the on-off switch in
my hand.
I can waste my time, or turn it off and do something
positive, that is not the TV's decision, nor my clients
decision, but that decision is one hundred percent
mine.
My personal on-off switch is my freedom of choice.
That is my right!
'Rebellion is not what most people think
it is, rebellion is when you turn off the
TV and start educating yourself and
thinking for yourself.' 1
THINK OUTSIDE YOUR PRE-

PROGRAMMED BOX!
Your Honour, I would like to end with what Max Planck said,
'As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clearheaded
science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research
about the atoms this much: There is no matter as such!
177
1. Gavin Nascimento
All matter originates and exists only by

virtue of a force which brings the particles
of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute
solar system of the atom together. . . . We must
assume behind this force the existence of a conscious
and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix 1 of all
matter.' 1858 - 1947
As Planck wrote Mind with a capital letter, so Einstein wanted the E of
energy in E=mc2 to be a capital, because they were both well aware that
they were referring to my client, confirming the scriptures that,
'by him all things consist.' 2
Your Honour, thank you for reminding me of the time, I see that it is
almost 12 o'clock. Thank you for listening and thank you also for
supplying me with a white board. As you saw I took some notes while
explaining. Before I give it to the recorder I will write my last thought
as final conclusion on the white board.
'Insanity is to think that my client and science are at war!'
178
1. Dictionary matrix: the environment in which something develops, uterus
within which, or from which, something originates, takes form, or develops.
2. Colossians 1:17
The Justice speaks,

Mr. N. Voy you may be seated.
We will now have our lunch recess.
The court will resume at 1:30.
Doors of the court will close at 1:25 and both the witness for evolution
and the witness for creation will give their final defenses.
For this last and closing session the ladies and gentlemen of press will
again have permission to be present in the courtroom.
__________
179
180
CHAPTER 14
THE FINAL DEFENSES
Members of the Jury, ladies and gentlemen. This is the final session of
'Evolution and Creation' court case.
We call on the Professor to make his defense on behalf of evolution.
THE EVOLUTION DEFENSE

Your Honour, last Friday I challenged Mr. N. Voy to prove
scientifically how creation happened. I must say he has tried, but it has left
me with a lame feeling.
His simplistic explanation does not fit my framework of scientific thinking.
I have had several meetings over the weekend with other university
professors and I can only say, dear Jury, that it is an absolute, nonsensical,
childish and simplistic explanation of our origins.
We scientists stand by the facts of carbon-dating, we hold on to facts
already established by Copernicus in the 1500's that the Earth is not the
centre of the universe.
Your Honour, what we have seen and heard here is that Mr. N. Voy wants to
take us back to the dark ages, way before there was any enlightment of facts
whatsoever.
I ask you to put aside all this so-called evidence and all the words that are
spoken and listen to your heart.
Put aside all the questionable photographs, which I would say are
downloads from dubious blogs and websites.
These are websites that are insinuating that some conspiratory secret
organization is responsible for unexplained events.
Where is this Mr. D.Vine, or so called God? He is nowhere to be seen, however
to the contrary where do we find Mr. Charles Darwin?
181
He is in every textbook that we teach to our children, who are the hope
of our future. The process of evolution has become the corner stone of
science.
Dear Jury, may I ask you to look in
your purse?
Mr. Darwin is there on our ten-pound
note. He is judged by society at large
on the same level as our beloved
Queen, as they are both present on
the same ten-pound bill.
These are not just words or photographs from untrustworthy blogs, these
are facts.
The Royal Society has created in memory of Mr. Charles Darwin the Darwin
Medal which is awarded every alternate year, with a monetary reward of
1,000,- for work of acknowledged distinction in the broad area of biology,
notably in evolution,1 population biology, organismal biology and biological
diversity.
I present you with facts and that, for me, ladies and gentlemen, is
circumstantial evidence enough.
Mr. Darwins evolution has debunked the simplistic idea of creation which is
put forth in a naive storybook. Mr. Darwin studied the writings of Mr. D.
Vines storybook.
He held a degree in theology as a young student, but, Your Honour and dear
jury, he got wiser, he grew up and started listening to his heart and started
seeking for hard evidence, instead of stuffing his mind with stories that
sound good, but have no intrinsic value.
Therefore, Your Honour and members of the Jury, I want to petition you to
ban Mr. D. Vines storybook, which goes under the pretext of the Greek word
biblos or in our language Bible.
It should be prohibited from all educational institutions, as it brings
confusion to the minds of the younger students and the more vulnerable
among the populus.
I have but one request, that you will follow your heart in this serious matter.
182
1. https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/evolution
I ask, that you will make a sound judgement not based on fairy tales
from the dark ages, but on scientific and biological research led by
enlightened minds of science based on facts that we hold dear to our hearts.
This is all I have to say: Listen to your heart, see the facts of carbon-dating,
instead of religious Sunday school stories.
Science and knowledge is the only way forward. I trust that you will make
the right decision and not be scared off by some religious deity, who will
punish you if you dont believe in his stories of which creation is the worst.
There is silence.
Are you finished, Professor?
Yes, Your Honour, there is nothing more that I can say.
Then the court calls on Mr. N. Voy to make his final defense for
creation.
THE CREATION DEFENSE

Ladies and gentlemen of the Jury, I would like to reiterate
that we are not talking about rewards or banknotes.
If that would be the case I would
like to show the scientist
Michael Faraday, a staunch
believer in the creation process,
not on the ten-note but on the
twenty-note bill.
However, Your Honour, we are not politicians trying to outsmart the

other party with clever remarks. We are serious, responsible citizens
and parents of children, who are trying to establish our origins and the
truth concerning that, either by the process of evolution or creation.
Truth is truth.
183
This has to be the foundation of the education that we give our

children, otherwise we spin a web where lies are considered
truth and truth is considered lies.
We will create a generation of liars and cheats, because this is what
they have been taught in school.
Everything becomes meaningless and futile and we shall end in total
confusion, deteriorating in disorder and violence, because what is the
use if we are just pieces of living human waste, washed ashore among
the rubbish of humanity?
Your Honour, I would like to quote from Mein Kampf again. Hitler
was firm believer in evolution, the survival of the fittest and the
supremacy of the German race.
It would never come into the heads of the broad
masses to fabricate colossal untruths, and they
would not believe that others could have the
impudence to distort the truth so infamously. . . .
They will still doubt and waver and will continue to
think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind
it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is
known to all expert liars in this world. . .
I request that, due to circumstantial evidence that was presented to the
court that the writings of my client, also known as the Bible will be
declared as factual concerning our origins.
In view with the human right of religious freedom, where everyone is
free to believe as one wishes, that the theory of evolution be
officially declared a religion.
I would also like to thank the Professor for his presentations.
Although I have only presented circumstantial evidence, I would like
to add a word of caution, seeing our individual verdict could
determine where each of us would personally spend eternity, in a
bubbling chemical soup with slimy sliddering creatures?
184
Or with a creator who is motivated by love, a soul-mate, who

has so much trust and faith in each of us that he left us with a
reasoning mind and the freedom of choice to make our personal
decisions concerning our personal future.
The Professor pushes aside his security guard and shouts,

I object, object, object! The witness is trying the scare tactics of his
client again. His last statement is
a load of rubbish as when our life
ends, it ends and is finished.
To believe this insane, stupid
nonsense that there is life beyond
the grave is a scare tactic to
make us want to behave and
become some slimy, ever hopeful,
religious lunatic. I hate these #&@ %*^, stupid, @#$& idiots.
Shouting from the balcony, Yeah, good for you Professor, I am so glad
that finally someone is telling the truth about these rotten idiots, I hate
this whole, f&*^%$#, stupid, idiotic, religious nonsense.
The cameras are zooming in to this man and to the Professor.
The Justice is pounding his gavel and raises his voice,
SECURITY, PLEASE CLEAR THE PERSON THAT MADE THE
COMMENT ON THE BALCONY.
Professor, if you do not control your tongue, then Security, please
escort the Professor out.
I dont care, I have sat through this day's sessions and it is enough for
me. I am sick of the whole rotten stupidity of this court and the
witness of Mr. N. Voy. It is just too much for me.
The Professor practically collapses in his chair and starts gasping for
breath. It seems that the stress and excitement is proving too much for
him.
185
He is breathing heavily and bending over while he clutches his heart in

obvious pain. The security guard is wiping the Professor's brow, to the
obvious irritation of the red faced Professor.
Are you okay, Professor? asks Mr. N. Voy, Is there

something we can do for you? Could we get you a glass of cold
water?
The Professor screeches,

You stay away from me! I need fresh air!
The Justice nods to the security guard next to the Professor to see if he
can take him out of the courtroom.
I think it will be appropriate to call an ambulance.
Whilst this was going on floor of the courtroom, on the balcony, the
two security guards are having a tougher time, as the person has
handcuffed himself to the balcony railing-bar and keeps screaming
profanities.
The press is delighted with
these developments.
As the Justice is looking
around at a the commotion,
he announces with a slight
smile, while pounding his
gavel,
We will take a 30-minute recess till 3:20.

In between time the court maintenance can cut the handcuff.
The doors of the courtroom will close again at 3:15.
__________
186
Thirty minutes later.

Everyone, please, be seated.
The Justice is pounding his gavel and raises his voice,
ORDER IN THE COURT!
This is the exact reason why I preferred not to have the press in the
courtroom, because some people, by doing something outrageous, can
get their picture taken and even end up on the front page of a
newspaper.
I would soon like to bring this case to closure.
Was there anything else Mr. N. Voy that you wanted to say before you
got interrupted?
Yes, Your Honour. I was going to present the court with a

report from Science Digest stating that:
Scientists who utterly reject evolution may be one of our fastest
growing controversial minorities . . Many of the scientists supporting
this position hold impressive credentials in science.
I will give the list to the court recorder.
From Science Digest:
'Over 600 voting scientists of the Creation Research Society. Voting
membership requires at least an earned master's degree in a recognized area
of science.
(Note: The following list is very incomplete. Inclusion of any person on this
list is in no way an endorsement, nor does it necessarily indicate anything
about their religious beliefs.)
Gerald E. Aardsma (physicist and radiocarbon dating)
Louis Agassiz (helped develop the study of glacial geology and of
ichthyology)
Alexander Arndt (analytical chemist, etc.) *
Steven A. Austin (geologist and coal formation expert) *
Charles Babbage (helped develop science of computers / developed
actuarial tables and the calculating machine)
Francis Bacon (developed the Scientific Method)
187
Thomas G. Barnes (physicist) *

Robert Boyle (helped develop sciences of chemistry and gas
dynamics)
Wernher von Braun (pioneer of rocketry and space exploration)
David Brewster (helped develop science of optical mineralogy)
Arthur V. Chadwick (geologist) *
Melvin Alonzo Cook (physical chemist, Nobel Prize nominee) *
Georges Cuvier (helped develop sciences of comparative anatomy and
vertebrate paleontology)
Humphry Davy (helped develop science of thermokinetics)
Donald B. DeYoung (physicist, specializing in solid-state, nuclear
science and astronomy) *
Henri Fabre (helped develop science of insect entomology)
Michael Faraday (helped develop science of electromagnetics /
developed the Field Theory / invented the electric generator)
Danny R. Faulkner (astronomer) *
Ambrose Fleming (helped develop science of electronics / invented
thermionic valve)
Robert V. Gentry (physicist and chemist) *
Duane T. Gish (biochemist) *
John Grebe (chemist) *
Joseph Henry (invented the electric motor and the galvanometer /
discovered self-induction)
William Herschel (helped develop science of galactic astronomy /
discovered double stars / developed the Global Star Catalog)
George F. Howe (botanist) *
D. Russell Humphreys (award-winning physicist) *
James P. Joule (developed reversible thermodynamics)
Johann Kepler (helped develop science of physical astronomy /
developed the Ephemeris Tables)
John W. Klotz (geneticist and biologist) *
Leonid Korochkin (geneticist) *
Lane P. Lester (geneticist and biologist) *
Carolus Linnaeus (helped develop sciences of taxonomy and
systematic biology / developed the Classification System)
Joseph Lister (helped develop science of antiseptic surgery)
Frank L. Marsh (biologist) *
188
Matthew Maury (helped develop science of oceanography /

hydrography)
James Clerk Maxwell (helped develop the science of electrodynamics)
Gregor Mendel (founded the modern science of genetics)
Samuel F. B. Morse (invented the telegraph)
Isaac Newton (helped develop science of dynamics and the discipline
of calculus / father of the Law of Gravity / invented the reflecting
telescope)
Gary E. Parker (biologist and paleontologist) *
Blaise Pascal (helped develop science of hydrostatics / invented the
barometer)
Louis Pasteur (helped develop science of bacteriology / discovered
the Law of Biogenesis / invented fermentation control / developed
vaccinations and immunizations)
William Ramsay (helped develop the science of isotopic chemistry
/discovered inert gases)
John Ray (helped develop science of biology and natural science)
Lord Rayleigh (helped develop science of dimensional analysis)
Bernhard Riemann (helped develop non-Euclidean geometry)
James Simpson (helped develop the field of gynecology / developed
the use of chloroform)
Nicholas Steno (helped develop the science of stratigraphy)
George Stokes (helped develop science of fluid mechanics)
Charles B. Thaxton (chemist) *
William Thompson (Lord Kelvin) (helped develop sciences of
thermodynamics and energetics / invented the Absolute Temperature
Scale / developed the Trans-Atlantic Cable)
Larry Vardiman (astrophysicist and geophysicist) *
Leonardo da Vinci (helped develop science of hydraulics)
Rudolf Virchow (helped develop science of pathology)
A.J. (Monty) White (chemist) *
A.E. Wilder-Smith (chemist and pharmacology expert) *
John Woodward (helped develop the science of paleontology)
A more thorough list of current (and past) creationist scientists is not

provided for two reasons:
189
A complete list would be extremely lengthy, and some

scientists would rather not have their name made public due
to justified fear of job discrimination and persecution in today's
atmosphere of limited academic freedom in evolutionist-controlled
institutions.'
Concerning the list it says, nor does it necessarily indicate anything
about their religious beliefs.
Your Honour, but it does indicate that they have common sense, which
is not too common these days.
And the list keeps growing:
At CERN (Conseil Europen pour la Recherche Nuclaire),

German nuclear
physicist and
professor at the
Department of
physics at the
Swiss Federal
Institute of
Technology in
Zurich (ETHZ),
Gunther Scheizle .
. . told . .
'I once threw a
heavy physics
book at one of my students just because he even mentioned
the possibility of Intelligent Design in the universe . .'
A 'powerful and divine vision of luminous beings' hit the 57-year-old
nuclear physicist during tests on the large hadron collider last month,
forcing him to reconsider his 'previous understanding of life and the
universe. . . All my preconceived notions of reality were permanently
destroyed. . . may God help us find the true meaning of life, be it
through prayer or science.' he concluded. 1
190
1. http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/cern-scientist
I quote Dr. Arthur E. Wilder-Smith FRSC 1,

Ph.D., an honoured scientist with three earned
doctorates,
'The evolutionary model says that, it is not necessary to
assume the existence of anything, besides matter and
energy, to produce life. That proposition is unscientific.
1915 - 1995
We know perfectly well that if you leave matter to
itself, it does not organize itself in spite of all the efforts in recent
years to prove that it does.
Your Honour, members of the Jury, if as detectives we want to find out

'Who did it?', then we look for fingerprints. My client left his
fingerprints all over the place.
We have two kinds of detectives those who see and those who do not
see. Those who see, find evidence galore.
Those who dont see, cant find a single fingerprint. Yet they produce
complicated theories that it just happened, in order to cover up their
incompetence that they cannot find out 'Who did it?'.
I quote Dr. Steven M. Holland, Professor geology at the university of
Georgia, 'We [scientists] wouldn't know truth if it jumped up and bit
us in the ass.'
Dr. Holland gives the exact reason why my client is no longer believed
because as he says, 'we scientists wouldn't know truth . . .'
My client does not distort the truth, because he is truth.
Upon accepting this, the pieces of the puzzle fall into place.
He stands accused of writing foolish, childish fables.
Unless the accusers can produce one shred of solid, scientific
evidence, based not on theories but on facts, that what they say about
my client is true - until then the fact remains that they themselves
are, what they make my client out to be; the authors of foolish,
childish fables.
Your honour, I came accross this caricature 2 which sums it all up!
191
1. Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
2. https://www.thewordofthelord.in
Grasping what the out-of the-boxers try to tell us is not easy for us
box-heads, as we'll defend our being boss within our parameters of:
Hey Crackpot,
I see nothing
outside my box!
Stay
Out!
That is all, Your Honour, members of the Jury, thank you very much
for your patience.
The members of the Jury will now withdraw for 30 minutes and
determine their verdict.
Doors will close at 4:15, so we will all be seated again by 4:20 to hear
their verdict and then I will give my ruling.
__________
Cameras are clicking as the press rushes towards Mr. N. Voy sticking
several microphones in his face. A smart looking lady asks,
Sir, the Professor said that you got your information from websites
that are insinuating that some conspiratory secret organization is
responsible for unexplained events.
What is your response to that?
Dear madam, let this go on record that I have no interest in
websites that are insinuating that some conspiratory secret
organization is responsible for unexplained events. I have used the
same websites as the Professor and all the links are recorded in the
transcript of the case, so you are welcome to see for yourself.
If you would be so kind as to excuse me as nature is calling.
With this Mr. N. Voy makes a quick escape to the bathrooms.
192
CHAPTER 14
THE JUDGMENT & RECOMMENDATION
All be seated. Members of the Jury, would you please pass me your
verdict?
The Lord Justice reads quietly . . . and then clears his throat,
The Jury is divided and could not come to a unanimous verdict. In the
eventuality that this would happen, I had spoken beforehand with the
court recorder for a suitable solution.
Thus, as presiding Justice over this court, I advocate that those who
have been present at the case and have formed their opinion from all
the material presented by both parties, accept the responsibility to give
their personal judgment. This request also pertains to those who have
read this transcript of the case.
With the verdict still pending I urge you to pass your vote to the scribe
of this case, Mr. Peters.
He has a comment box available on his website at the bottom of the
homepage.
Please be so kind as to give your vote online at:
www.johanpeters.in
Myself, as Justice, along with the members of the Jury, and both the
witnesses are looking forward to your vote so this case can find
closure, which is of utmost importance.
As Justice presiding over this important case, I give the following

recommendation;
193
Until the final judgment is given, I recommend that

the transcript of this court case, named,
'In the Beginning . . . then What?'
becomes an unbiased student and teacher guide
in our educational intitutions, concerning subjects
relating to Evolution and Creation.
This is with the aim that our young minds can form
their personal opinions, after studying both sides.
With this the official hearing of the case 'Evolution and Creation' is
now closed. Judgment is pending, ladies and gentlemen, according to
your vote.
Ladies and gentlemen, members of the Jury, defendants, scribe and

security staff, thank you very much.
_______________
With this the honourable Lord Justice leaves the courtroom and
withdraws to his office.
The press is clamouring and chasing Mr. N. Voy with questions and
microphones.
The same lady asks Mr. N. Voy,
Sir, are you happy with the recommendation of the judge?
Ma'am, I am happy that the judge made this unusual

recommendation, so that those attending and those reading
the transcript of this 'Evolution and Creation' case, will give their
personal verdict, concerning what each one feels is truth. This of course
also includes you, madam,
194
A security guard takes Mr. N. Voy by the arm, motioning to follow

him. Around the back of the bathrooms they come to the backdoor of
the Justices office.
Did you want to see me, Sir?
Yes, it is concerning the members of the Jury. . . .
To be continued in. . . .
195
Other publications of Johan Peters
The above eschatology books are a scriptural alternative to the

many theories concerning the Lord's second coming. The books are
made available free of cost, because of the contents importance.
From the author,
"I wish more than anything to be in the wrong concerning the
unexpected times ahead. Nonetheless, taking all things into
account I felt concerned that you should at least be informed in
case the future does unfold as predicted in the scriptures."
ALL BOOKS ARE FREE DOWNLOADS

196
at
johanpeters.in and Issuu.com
From the author,

"My material possessions are few, yet I
feel like a rich man, striking gold.
Ever since childhood I wanted to know
why and how it all fits? I was one of those
youngsters that pesters grown-ups with
the question - but why?
I still pester and probe to discover some
out-of-the-ordinary answers.
Part one, 'In the Beginning . . . then What?' is a heated court case
dealing with questions concerning our origins; the dinosaurs,
ice-periods, fossils, natural selection, theory of relativity, carbon
dating, quantum physics, and how it all comes together.
Part two, 'My Controversial Client' addresses hard-hitting
questions about religion, natural disasters, is there truth in the
major world religions? Is Christ what he is made out to be? Hot
topics and views ranging from sex, divorce and predestination
to religious blindfolds, God, and can we save the planet?"
The books are available as FREE DOWNLOADS at Issuu.com
and johanpeters.in
Johan Peters
With his down-to-earth and straightforward, yet insightful
approach, the author has taken on complicated and much
debated topics. He is obviously not a religious person, neither is
he politically correct. Although some may find his unconventional
style surprising his arguments leave us thinking, What if?
F. Sharon (Fine Arts U.K.)
197

'In The Beginning - . Then What?' (Johan Peters)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

'In The Beginning - . Then What?' (Johan Peters)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

In the Beginning . . . . then What? www.johanpeters.in

Individual pages or chapters of this book may not be reproduced or transmitted

Revised August 2017

Copyright June 2016 Johan Peters

Layout and typeset Author

WHY THIS BOOK?

During recent philosophical discussions

I invite you to attend this controversial court case and it is my desire

In the Beginning. . . then What? is a study guide as well as a teaching

For those interested in the evolution explanation, the related sections

For those interested in the creation account, the associated texts

WHY PART TWO?

"This is a book for students and serious thinkers. I'll be forwarding it to

"I'm reading your book. Learning lots. It is having an impact and

Pages Chapter Subject

11 Chapter 1 - All Rise, Introduction.

THE JOHN SCOPES TRIAL - 1925

The Scopes Trial, formally known as The State of

The case was thus seen as both a theological contest and

Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws.

ALL RISE, INTRODUCTION

The Lord Justice speaks:

The main person

Mr. Darwin is not present,

The witness for evolution is Professor E. Colog, Ph.D.

His related pages and

The twelve international members of the Jury will go by the

THE MAIN RESPONSIBILITY OF THE JURY IS TO DECIDE

In criminal law circumstantial evidence is used in courts to establish

The Lord Justice continues: I quote the cases of,

The State v Busak, where the court stated:

Witnesses from both sides shall present their evidence in accordance to

The case 'Evolution and Creation' is now officially reopened.

Witnesses, please introduce yourselves in brief and give an

Your Honour, honourable Jury, I am Professor E. Colog at the

I would like to present my case in three parts:

Let the witness on behalf of creation introduce himself.

The honourable Justice speaks:

We call on the Professor to take the witness stand for evolution.

Honourable Justice and Jury, I present a

Time, Energy (or Force), Action, Space and Matter.

Someone shouts from the balcony: Yeah, Yeah. It is so good that

ORDER IN THE COURT

I object, Your Honour, I object to the Professor making

Objection on behalf of creation sustained! I

Let Mr. N. Voy speak on behalf of creation.

Your Honour, members of the Jury, I want to expound on

The Professor stands up,

Not on this point, Your Honour, except the Professor

We will now take a 30-minute recess.

The clock shows 11:00.

Your Honour, until recently we understood the world to be 4.6 billion

Objection, Your Honour, there are too many flaws in this

On the Earth due to the circumstances of the climate, life started

The following is an evolution chart concerning the

Around 7 million years ago we saw the development of the primate

The Smithsonian Institute

Secondly I would present a second chart for Study and

According to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History:

The following reconstructions are by

The Homo Group

Homo Erectus average height from