John Mark Villena found the Clinical Epidemiology Course from last year challenging to apply in practice. However, he felt Clinical Epidemiology 3 made the real-world application clearer through role-playing and critically appraising articles. He learned how to properly search literature on PubMed and apply the PIOM framework. Presenting other groups' critical appraisals also helped him understand concepts he can apply when presenting. To address areas he still feels rusty, he will read literature on evidence-based appraisal and ask questions during discussions.
John Mark Villena found the Clinical Epidemiology Course from last year challenging to apply in practice. However, he felt Clinical Epidemiology 3 made the real-world application clearer through role-playing and critically appraising articles. He learned how to properly search literature on PubMed and apply the PIOM framework. Presenting other groups' critical appraisals also helped him understand concepts he can apply when presenting. To address areas he still feels rusty, he will read literature on evidence-based appraisal and ask questions during discussions.
John Mark Villena found the Clinical Epidemiology Course from last year challenging to apply in practice. However, he felt Clinical Epidemiology 3 made the real-world application clearer through role-playing and critically appraising articles. He learned how to properly search literature on PubMed and apply the PIOM framework. Presenting other groups' critical appraisals also helped him understand concepts he can apply when presenting. To address areas he still feels rusty, he will read literature on evidence-based appraisal and ask questions during discussions.
The Clinical Epidemiology Course last year (ClinEp2) was
somewhat challenging for me, as I couldn’t really grasp the real-world application that much. Yes, I understood the lectures, I was able to answer the examination questions and in theory I know the application but it remained at that. Until this year, in Clinical Epidemiology 3, I felt the department really made it possible for students like me to understand the concrete application of what we learned last year and are continuing to learn this year. I felt the role- playing portion and us actually appraising an article really made a difference. I learned the proper way to search for literature on PubMed, on the specifics of the different search parameters in applying the PIOM, using MeSH and more importantly I learned a lot from the other group’s presentations of their critical appraisal, concepts that we will surely apply when it will be our turn to present. Some topics I admit I am a little rusty on and there are some concepts during presentations that I do not follow that well. To address this I will read on the book we bought during our first year from the department and study how to properly appraise an article using different Evidence-Based Medicine Critical Appraisal literatures then ask during the discussions the things I still can’t quite understand.
The Most Effective and Responsible Clinical Training Techniques in Medicine: Alternative Types of Learning in Clinical Specialty-Interest Areas of Family-Practice Medicine (Second Edition)