Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Bulletin
of the Ecological Society of America.
http://www.jstor.org
Note: Dr. Harold Ornes is the comments on student papers and the lem with which you are having a
editor of Ecology 101. Anyone wish ses, they also reflect common prob hard time (for instance, organizing
ing to contribute articles or reviews lems in manuscripts I receive for re the structure of an argument in its
to this section should contact him at view. most effective form), it is legitimate
the Department of Biology and Geol 1) Know your audience and write to submit this for someone else's re
ogy, University of South Carolina for that specific audience.-Scien view with the problem highlighted as
Aiken, 171 University Parkway, tific and technical writing can almost a focused request for assistance. Oth
Aiken, SC 29801; (803) 641-3299; never be "general purpose"; it must erwise, submitting a piece of writing
Fax: (803) 641-3251; E-mail: be written for a specific audience. with known errors or problems
whomes(univscvm.csd. scarolina.edu. For the kinds of writing I address means either: (1) you do not consider
here, that audience will generally be your writing worth improving, (2)
Ken Lertzman (Assistant Profes the community of ecologists who you do not respect the reader enough
sion in the School of Resource and read a particular journal or study a to present writing that is as good as
Environmental Management at particular subject. For class papers, you can make it, or (3) you are inca
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, this community is represented by pable of improving the writing. At
British Columbia, Canada) has cre your professor. In all cases, you must some point, every piece of writing is
ated a list of 21 suggestions pertinent adopt the style and level of writing as good as its writer can make it
to writing within the discipline of that is appropriate for your audience. without outside review. That is the
Ecology. Whether you edit or grade Stylistic conventions and acceptable time to give it to your supervisor.
the writings of others or write for jargon can vary tremendously from 3) Do not turn in a first draft!
pleasure, profit, professional duties, one field to another, and to some ex Ever! Most people's first drafts are
or other reasons, I think you will find tent, from one journal to another. If terrible. I wouldn't make anyone
the following information useful. you are unfamiliar with the conven else suffer through mine. Don't
tions of a field, study them as they make others suffer through yours.
Harold Ornes are manifested in a selection of I've read early drafts of papers by
highly regarded papers and in the eminent ecologists whose final prod
"Instructions for Authors" for key ucts are jewels of English construc
NOTES ON WRITING journals. tion. Their first drafts are terrible
2) Your supervisor/professor is too. "Good writing is rewriting," and
PAPERS AND THESES
not here to teach you basic grammar you should make a serious effort at
Many theses and class papers and spelling.-The more time and editing, rewriting, and fine-tuning
share a common set of problems in emotional energy she or he spends before you give the manuscript to
their early drafts. In response to this on correcting basic English usage, anyone else to read. There are few
observation, I began a set of notes the less remains for issues of content things more frustrating to read than a
based on my repeated comments on or fine-tuning. You are responsible paper in which you know there are
student writing over a period of sev for mastering the basics of the lan pearls of wisdom, but where those
eral years. These notes eventually guage; save your supervisor's time pearls are hidden by sloppy and
grew into a document that I include for more substantive issues. A few ambiguous writing. The chapters of
as a part of course packages and give glitches and non-parallel tenses will my Ph.D. thesis had been through 3
to students preparing theses. I was slip through your own careful edit 5 drafts before anyone on my advi
surprised to discover that even ing, but there is no excuse for fre sory committee ever saw them. If
graduate students often find it diffi quent ungrammatical sentences. you need to put a piece of writing
cult to identify problems in their Similarly, with word processors and away for a few days before you can
writing and frequently lack tools to spell-checkers having become stan approach it dispassionately enough
deal with them effectively. The fol dard writing tools, typos or other to rework it, do so.
lowing 21 suggestions should be rel spelling errors should be very rare. It takes much longer to read poor
evant to both undergraduate and Use a spelling checker before sub writing than good writing. It is a
graduate students. Apparently few mitting anything for anyone else's waste of an advisor's or editor's time
students, at any level, have received reading. to read material that is not yet ready
much instruction in the strategies If you find you are about to sub to be presented and it is disrespect
and tactics for effective scientific mit a paper that you know contains ful to expect them to do so. When an
writing. Though the suggestions I poor writing, consider why you are advisor receives a thesis in which the
make here are based primarily on my doing so. If there is a writing prob writing is poorly developed, expect
June 1995 87
June 1995 89