Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1, February 1987 87
M. Akazaki
ABSTRACT
Particle-initiated breakdown characteristics of conical
spacers were investigated experimentally in N2 and 79% N2/21%
02 gas mixture to provide fundamental parameters determining
the breakdown voltage of a dielectric spacer contaminated by
metallic particles. Experimental results show that the break-
down voltage of a particle-contaminated spacer increases with
the value of 190-
1, while in contrary that of the clean spacer
decreases with the value of 190-G|
in the region of e of
0<j90-Oe<60 degrees where the spacer angle 0 is defined as the
angle between the spacer surface and the anode plane electrode.
With a given spacer the breakdown voltage reveals the minimum
value (MBDV) when a particle was placed very near the anode in
N2/02 mixture, and on or very near the electrodes in N2 gas.
At the particle conditions giving the MBDV, the corona stabi-
lization effect is less effective. The MBDV decreases with de-
creasing in the gas pressure and the wire particle diameter.
The critical particle length beyond which the breakdown voltage
is lowered by the particle depends on the spacer shape. Analysis
of the MBDV to include a minimum electric field necessary for
discharge propagation along the spacer surface and the effect of
the field enhancements due to particle on a cylindrical spacer
shows fairly good agreement with the experimental results.
the spacer, the influence of a metallic particle on surface and oriented in the direction of tangential
conical spacers placed between parallel-plane elec- component of electric field on the spacer. As pointed
trodes upon the breakdown voltage was investigated ex- by Blankenburg [6] and Laghari et al. [7], the break-
perimentally in N2 gas and 79% N2/21% 02 mixture. The down characteristic of insulating spacers in gaseous
shape and size of the particle and the profile of the surroundings is seriously affected by the existence of
spacer were changed widely. The obtained results are a microgap between the electrode and the edge of the
discussed on the basis of the discharge threshold field spacer. The final polish of the bottom and top sur-
strength and the electric field necessary for the dis- faces, therefore, was carefully carried out to avoid
charge propagation along the spacer surface. predischarges in the microgap. The spacer efficiencies
of clean cylindrical spacers were 98% in N2/02 mixture
2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP AND PROCEDURE and 99.5% in N2 gas, respectively. During the course
of the experiments, the spacer was checked and it was
The experiments were carried out in a test cell fill- verified that there was no damage on the surface due to
ed with commercially pure N2 gas as non-attaching gas, discharge. The spacer was replaced with a new one if
or with 79% N2/21% 02 mixture modeling dried air as any defect was found.
weakly attaching gas at room temperature which were
introduced to the desired pressure P after being evac- The diameter, length, and location of the particle
uated to about 100 Pa. A system consisting of two were changed to find the most severe condition with re-
parallel-plane electrodes bridged by a spacer, 20 mm spect to the particle contamination and denoted as ¢, 1
height, was placed in the test cell and dried by sili- and d respectively.
cagel to avoid the effect of humidity on the breakdown
voltage. The applied voltage is dc and was raised at the rate
of about 0.3 kV/s until breakdown. Approximately 2 min
The spacers used were the cylindrical and conical intervals were allowed between breakdowns to obtain re-
shape insulators of acrylic acid resin shown in Fig. 1, producible measured values. Six breakdown voltages
where the spacer angle e is defined as the angle were measured at a given experimental condition and the
mean breakdown voltage with respective maximum and mini-
mum values are illustrated as a point with vertical bars
in the Figures. After each experimental run at a given
particle location, the spacer surface was cleaned with
soft tissue saturated with ethanol to remove surface
and bulk charges, and was dried. Prebreakdown current
was observed on Tektronix 7633 oscilloscope, connected
to a measuring resister of 1 or 10 kQ so that the pulse
with small amplitude could be detected and the number
of electrons included in each corona pulse could be
estimated respectively. A complete set of results is
reported here at atmospheric gas pressure and results
at other pressures are explained briefly in Section 3.4.
3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
3.1 Effect of Particle Location on Breakdown Voltage
(a)
(a) N2102 Mixture
The onset voltage of the first corona pulse for each
experimental run scattered very widely and was relative-
negstive plane ly lower than that of the successive one or of the self-
a ."15a A. maintaining corona. The successive corona pulses were
irregular if they appeared, or were not observed some-
times at atmospheric pressure until breakdown when the
particle length was shorter than a few millimeters.
}e. ; Typical current pulses observed with a particle of 5 mm
length are shown in Fig. 2.
The first pulse is a single smooth pulse, but the
successive pulses consist of large amplitude pulses and
dimension in mm
small amplitude pulse trains. As previously clarified
(b) by an experiment with a floating conducting particle in
air [8], the successive pulse is a superposition of a
Fig. 1: Arrangement of electrodes, spacer and positive streamer pulse and Trichel pulses appearing at
metallic parttcle and the measuring circuit the both ends of the particle. The first corona pulse
of prebreakdown current. R=1 or 10 kQD, C may be produced by self-suppressing corona due to
(stray capacity)=135 pF, S: surge absorber. charges deposited on the spacer.
(a) measuring circuit, (b) arrangement.
Typical characteristics of the breakdown voltage VBD
and the lowest onset voltage of the first corona pulse
between the cone surface and the anode plane el ectrode . VCF in each particle location are shown in Fig. 3 where
It was varied from 30 to 150 degrees. The narrow end a particle with 5 mm length and 0.18 mm diameter is
of the cone in diameter. A single particle
was 15 mm attached on the cylindrical spacer in the atmospheric
of copper wire with hemispherical caps was attached gas and %d is 100[d/(20-l)]. The breakdown voltage is
firmly by a thin adhesive insulating-tape on the spacer minimal (MBDV) when the particle is placed very near the
Hara et al.: Particle-initiated breakdown in gas under dc voltage 89
au I - /al
2
/ - 2
'v
2 --
' ' Li
L/ 1=5mm , f=0.18mm
a x o :mean value of VBD
ffi O 10¢ x :measured lowest value of VCF
t- 0t
50
1 ..
100 (c) lOvA/div, 50iis/div
0
% d [%] Fig. 4: Prebreakdown current in N2 gas. 1=5 mm,
4=0.18 mm, 0=90. (a) corona current from particle
Fig. 3: VBD and VCF as a function of particZe contacting with electrodes (d=0 mm, P=100 kPa,
location in N2/02 mixture. V=13.0 kV), (b) current pulse from particle away
from the electrode at about atmospheric pressure
(d=13.5 mm, P=100 kPa, V=16.0 kV), (c) current
anode. The MBDV is called "minimum breakdown voltage" pulse from particZe at high pressures (d=7.5 mm,
for the particle-contaminated spacer. At this particle P=700 kPa, V=45.0 klJ).
condition the corona stabilization effect is less ef-
fective. If the particle is in contact with the anode,
the breakdown voltage increases due to the corona sta- increases with the applied voltage. After the particle
bilization effect. Breakdown voltage also increases is placed away from the electrode, a rarely appearing
gradually as the distance between the particle and the corona pulse has a single smooth shape at atmospheric
anode electrode increases, but exhibits a small drop pressure as shown in Fig. 4(b), but becomes similar in
very close to the cathode. The onset voltage of the shape to that in N2/02 mixture at higher pressure as
first corona pulse shows a low value when the particle shown in Fig. 4(c). The corona pulse observed in es-
is attached to either one of electrodes. It is argued sentially non-attaching N2 gas is due to the quenching
that a stable corona is not observed at the particle effect of charges deposited on the spacer surface fdr
location giving MBDV if the particle length is shorter the corona extension.
than about 10 mm.
Although the active glow corona is developed from a
When the particle length, the gas pressure, and the particle in contact with the electrode, the corona sta-
spacer shape were changed, the general behavior of the bilization effect is not a pronounced as the results of
breakdown voltage remained as in Fig. 3. experiments in non-uniform field gaps, and the minimum
breakdown voltage appears when the particle is in con-
(b) N2 Gas tact with or very near the electrodes, Fig. 5. The
breakdown voltage for a particle in contact with the
When the particle is in contact with either electrode, cathode (GMBDV) is lower than that for a particle in
the steady current by glow corona as shown in Fig. 4 (a) contact with the anode (6MBDV). When the experimental
90 IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation Vol. EI-22 No.1, February 1987
L--j
Z:.
Cl
im
X:
co
(D az
[mm]
(a)
30.
(a)
20~
P=lOOkPa
co M o~~~~~~=900
2:
10
I §: (D MBDV
I : i) MBDV
---:calculated according to
30 the streamer criterion
20 UA I I
2e
(K=7.3)
(I 1; 3
: 80
azI
c
co
~;
A6
1 [n]
(a)
P [kPa]
(a)
UU
inn-r 1- . -
anode(Particle condition
. I
Particle near or on
a&:9=60° giving 0®MBDV)
0:e=900
80f_ v :0=120'
Particle contacting with cathode
a: (Particle condition
G aMBDV)
0 60 giving
A
:0e=600
c0
40 _- 0:8=900
/z Y ¢~~~~~=0.1 8mm
20 _ - -
-:calculated according to
the streamer criterion
K=7 .3
0 200 300 400 500 600 700
1 [mn] 100
(b) P [kPa]
fin.
UV
6=900 N2
(b)
L -S% P=1 OOkP)a
=60C rni Fig. 10: Breakdown voltage as a function of gas
X=0 .1 8m
pressure. (a) VBD in N2/02 mixture, (b) VBD in
N2 gas.
40 -
0-
The pressure tendency of VBD does not coincide with
01
30 that observed in particle-initiated breakdown in the
absence of spacers where the breakdown voltage shows
the saturation with the SF6 gas pressure [15].
20- Particle location
1. DISCUSSION
10 4. 1 Discharge Mechanism
'>zz/-/zZ/, sR~~~~
believed from the observation of the prebreak-
O i i | _It is
of corona pulses from a 5 mm particle positioned at 4.2 Discharge Threshold Field and Critical Field
d=13.5 mm on the cylindrical spacer under an app]lied Strength for Discharge Propagation
electric field of 11.5 kV/cm, the number of electtrons
in a single streamer pulse and Trichel pulse weree about Factors determining the MBDV are considered here. In
2.64X109 and 6.29X107 respectively. When a prolaate order to establish a complete breakdown, the following
spheroidal particle with charge Q is placed in a uni- two successive events should materialize: the discharge
form field Eo, the electrical field strength alorng the incepts at the main gap side of the particle after the
particle axis is given by microgap between the electrode and the particle is link-
ed by a conducting discharge and a spark bridges over
the main gap. As stated in Section 4.1, Srivastava's
-arctanh a2bb2
x2
a 2 b2X2 model can be applied at the particle conditions giving
the MBDV and the discharge inception voltage at the main
+ gap side of the particle can be estimated by using the
arcta - b a2- b2 streamer criterion on the particle protrusion on the
a2 a2 electrode, i.e.
(1)
+ -~ Q JX (a-n)dx = K (2)
4qc0(x2- a2+ b2)
where, XO is the particle tip and X is the position
where a is the major semi-axis, b the minor semi-axis giving cx=q for N2/02 mixture and 20-Z for N2 gas. Cal-
of the particle, and x the distance from the particle culating the electric field around the particle by the
tip. If the present particle having Z mm length and ro charge simulation method and using
mm tip radius is simulated by the spheroid with major-
axis of 2a and tip radius ro, then a and b are express- a =
2. 2X104 (EP - 2. 44X10-4) 2 2.44x10 -4<<5. oXi -4
ed by a=l/2 and b=/vZirO. Using Eo, measured values of P
the number of electrons in a corresponding corona pulse
and Eq. (1), the values of the first and second terms p
P
= 5.0x102.75 (EP -2.44X10-4)Y75 5.Oxl0-4<E . 2xlO3
at x=O in Eq. (1) become 221.6 and 169.2 kV/cm for the P
streamer pulse, and 221.6 and 4.0 kV/cm for Trichel 2t= 17.7 (E)-7. 25xl10 1.2xl0-3<-2. 5 xl0- 3
pulses, respectively. This means that the perturbation P P
of electric field by charges flowing into the particle
reaches tens of percent for the streamer and a few per- =102x101 exp{-2.7lx1O-3/Q)} 2.5X10
at =1.102X10-1
p
3<E (3)
cent for Trichel pulses at the particle tip.
Du
[__-~..~ a:calculated according to the
streamer criterion(K=10)
50 _ b:calculated by using E00
§:experimental
40
)._
30
a'
2/21 %02
-1C:
20
79%N
P=1OOkPa 0-.
a'
6=90' b _
10 _=0;181
J?
0.1 0.2
1 1
0.5 1 2 5
I
10
Ao
2I20
1 [nun]
(a)
e [degree]
79%N2/21 %02 N2
0:1=0 (clean spacer) * :1=0 (clean spacer)
7:1=5mm v:1=5mmr; near or on anode
&:1=10mm * :1=lOmm; near or on anode
v :1=5mm; contacting with cathode
4. 3 Pressure and ParticZe Diarmeter Effects propagation and the breakdown voltage is determined by
the discharge threshold conditions, and at larger
In the presence of a free conducting particle, the particles the relationship reverses.
microdischarge threshold voltage between the particle
and the electrode has no pronounced pressure depend- 6.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ency in air [14] and the complete breakdown voltage
shows a complex pressure dependency in electronegative Mr. F. L. Mao is a visiting research fellow at Kyushu
gases [15]. This is the reason why the breakdown volt- University from China.
age is determined by two factors: the particle motions
and the discharge mechanisms. 7. REFERENCES
In the case of a fixed particle giving the MBDV, the [1] I. E. S. Maizelb, "Studies of Breakdown of
corona stabilization effect is less effective as stated Spacer in Compressed Gas in Coaxial Cylinder (in
in the earlier Section, the pressure and particle diam- Russian)," Electrichestvo, No. 12, p. 19, 1969.
eter dependencies of the MBDV may be estimated accord-
ing to Eq. (2). The dotted lines in Figs. 8 and 10 are [2] C. M. Cook and J. D. Trump, "Post-type Support
calculated values on the base of the streamer criter- Spacer for Compressed Gas-Insulated Cables,"
ion. The calculated value shows relatively good agree- IEEE, PES Winter Meeting, T 73, 121-1, 1973.
ment with the measured MBDV except for the case of a
very thin particle in Fig. 8. The discrepancy for the [3] T. Takuma, T. Watanabe and K. Kita, "A Study
very thin particle may be due to the following: one on The Ideal Profile of Spacers in The Gas
is a very high electric field strength at the particle Insulation System," CRIEPI Report, No. 72115,
tip where the Eqs. (3) and (4) would not be valid and 1973.
the other is the charge deposited near the particle
tip on the spacer which suppresses the discharge propa- [4] T. Hara, N. Sugiyama and K. Kita, "Improved
gation more effectively than for the case of thicker Surface Flashover Characteristics of SF6 Gas
particles, because of the short distance between the Spacers Contaminated by Conducting Particles,"
particle tip and the spacer surface. Proc. of 4th ISH, No. 34.01, 1983.
From comparison of calculated VDB and the measured [5] F. Endo, T. Yamagiwa, T. Ishikawa and M. Hosokawa,
MBDV in Fig. 10 the corona stabilization effect is "Particle-Initiated Breakdown and Reliability
believed to appear slightly at 400 to 700 kPa of Improvement in SF6 Gas Insulations," 1985 IEEE
N2/02 mixture. PES Summer Meeting (to be presented).
[14] M. Hara and M. Akazaki, "Analysis of Microdis- Manuscript was received on 16 September 1985, in
char.ge Threshold Conditions Between a Conducting revised form 11 March 1986.
Sphere and Plane," J. Electrostatics, Vol. 13,
p. 105, 1982.