Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Predictability: What is the human benefit of this constraint applied to the binary
combination of words?
The benefit is to come to an ‘implicit agreement with the other members of the species’ on
the possible combinations between entities and qualities. If this had not been possible ,
communication would have never come up.
The mind is genetically predetermined to cluster the impressions from the world into twos –
binary system- . This is the reason why giraffe matches with run and mismatches with fly; the
predication assigned to giraffe is to run. This mental mechanism is unconscious.
2. What evidence is there to tell that this binary organization has been created by
human species (HS) “to construct” reality?
The fact that the HS tend unconsciously to predicate / express some quality of entities in a
binary fashion was ‘created’ by the HS and it is not of a natural kind was proved through an
experiment carried out with children. It was then that children could break up the categories
within the binary system but not alter the structure of organisation. Children could come up
with this expression: “ dreams are tall”, which takes evidence that children regarded dreams
as objects on getting dreams to match tall. This evidence was proved via language use and
made it a fact that language worked as a classificatory mechanism.
Language, then, helps the HS classify the impressions coming from the environment. The HS
set constraints upon these impressions unconsciously ; conceptual analysis one of the most
salient rules. The HS is genetically endowed to do so, that is why this rule-governed faculty is
species- specific. This will lead to the ‘natural’ categorisation of objects being tall. Yet, we
should understand that this organisation is what will condition how we perceive reality.
Reality / Nature is the result of the way in which both our neurological system and our culture
have divided what is being perceived. As a matter of fact, the categories into which we have
been dividing nature do not exist in the real world but in our minds.
When a child comes up with the fact that dreams can be tall, what this tells is that the child has
created that in his mind. He has received some input from culture; this input has activated the
mapping operations in his mind; his mind has matched this pair : dreams / tall . What the mind
has done is to apply the constraint : any entity matches with one quality at a time. Thus, a
dream HAS TO MATCH with whatever. This ‘whatever’ has been filled in with ‘tall’ as a
probable result of cultural factors. This category , then, of dreams being tall has emerged out
of an interaction between nature and ourselves. Naturally, we organise nature in twos, this is a
fixed itinerary, yet what it is that we match depends on culture. This will explain why
metaphors exist.
5. To which extent does this constraint affect our representation of the world?
The fact that language enables us to organise information from the environment in a fixed
number of possible ways conditions the way in which reality is to be mentally represented.
Lexical words can be invented but grammatical words cannot. The latter is a closed set ,
whereas the former is an open set.
Nature has provided us with a ‘black box’ – a module / a map – that enables us to orient
ourselves in a sort of semi-simulacrum –based world that language , as a representational
tool, creates.
7. What relation does it exist between arguments and sentences in the mapping
process?
A sentence depends on the number of arguments a verb has. An argument is a phrase
referring to any participant involved in or directly related to an action ; a state or an event.
The participant is an obligatory argument in the verb pattern, whereas time, place and
instrument are optional.
The mapping process activated to arrive correctly at the meaning of a sentence depends on
the thematic roles of an argument. The arguments, at the same time, are to be determined by
the structural position they take up in a sentence. This process proceeds by putting the
highest available thematic role is the highest position. This processing and interpreting helps
us have a back up system which enables us to focus on what is said rather on how it is being
said.
Examples:
- The lion sleeps.
This is a sentence with one argument since the verb to sleep carries one participant: an agent.
The mapping process will pick up the verb and will retrieve the agent that ‘is expected’ from
the meaning of sleeping.
The thematic roles are: agent, patient/ theme , goal, source, instrument , beneficiary, time
and place.
The hierarchical order of thematic roles is:
1. Agent
2. Goal / patient / theme
3. Beneficiary
4. Instrument
5. Source
6. Time
7. location
It is often the case that verbs cannot govern the arguments directly , it is then that preposition
claim relevance. Prepositions , being mere grammatical particles , are necessary to both assign
meaning and a structure to these arguments.
Examples:
- The hunter shot at the lion .
The argument is governed by ‘at’. It links to shoot with the target : the lion. The mapping
operation will pick up the verb to shoot , then the agent , and then the scope of the effect of
the verb: at, probably indicating aggressive direction followed by a target.
If we exemplify this formula with the answer to question 7 above , we might say that the X
stands for the events or states the senses have perceived: a man shooting at an animal. The Y
stands for the mapping operations set in motion by our neurological frame. The mind will
organise the info from the senses into arguments applying a thematic role -grounded
hierarchy.
Language will constitute yet another level of representation, further distancing the creature
from its environment.
6. How does it compare the way in which human bowels behave with the way human
beings do?
The human bowels belong to a closed system that adjusts automatically to most factors
affecting it. Unlikely, our behaviour requires constant feedback to be properly adjusted. Input
from different sources should be evaluated for an optimal adjustment.
Three things are needed to form categories ( representations)
1) An object from the world;
2) Patterns of cell activity which can be directly or indirectly triggered by the
world object;
3) Reponse: internal and external to these cell activity.
7. What is the relationship between the representation of society and the path to
consciousness?
When neurons are fired by actions performed by members of own species , a new dimension
comes up. Certain kinds of representations are unlikely to arise outside of social species.
Creatures that depend on complex adaptations involving learning cannot be left to chance.
Also, the ones that need some active nurturance from their mother – communal foraging –
have to live socially before they can learn what it means to be an individual.
Each individual learns the strengths and weaknesses of each of the others ( what pleases
them, what makes them angry..) and in doing so, they become aware of others as unique
individuals. This is a necessary prerequisite to the discovery that one is oneself as individual.
8. When do Second Levels of Representation (SLR) emerge?
When the levels of PRS reach certain degree of sophistication , this makes it possible the
creation of a second level of representation. A second level upon which the ouput of the first
level will undergo greater refinement. This is the information coming from the basic mapping
operations in the mind will pass onto a secondary processing set of mapping operations. It is
then that the mind will process both data coming from the environment as well as data coming
from the mind itself. The mind has become a source of information itself.