Has anyone implemented the patch for...

user8340928 8 posts since Jan 24, 2014

Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Sep 15, 2015 7:26 PM
We are implementing the Mexico Electronic Accounting patch for our Mexican subsidiary (Patch 20986633)
and the setup doc as detailed in document ID 1934128.1 on Metalink has a few vagaries/inconsistencies that
I need clarification for. The screenshots don't always tie into one another from 1 step to many steps later.
Step 8 refers to setting up rollup groups. I initially thought that it would be associated with the value set created
for the SAT chart of accounts, which is the target COA for the setups. Yet the screenshot for this step does
not reference the value set name that was created for the SAT COA in step 5. So I am wondering if the rollup
group setup needs to be created and associated with the source value set for the main chart of accounts.

Also, what makes me think the rollup groups are to be associated with the source COA, and not the target
COA, is that the screenshots for step 8 show a value set with Parent accounts. Step 5 specifically states NOT
to create Parent accounts for the SAT COA.

If anyone has implemented this patch successfully, any guidance, direction and lessons learned would be
appreciated.

Thanks,
Rodney

2988295 2 posts since Jul 9, 2015

Re: Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Sep 28, 2015 10:20 PM
Hello,
I am having the same issue trying to implement this patch. The rollup seems to be at the global chart of
account level and not at the new SAT chart of account. This has higher risk where companies dont like to
have any impact on the global COA. I was also not able to produce the Chart of account report as desired with
different level following the guide.
If anyone has guidance on this, it would be great. Plus we dont have account hierarchy implemented with my
company.

thanks,
kamal.

Mitani-Oracle 780 posts since Jan 10, 2001

Re: Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Sep 29, 2015 5:48 PM
Q1. At what level we should you properly assign this functionality on the SAT catalog?

1
Has anyone implemented the patch for...

A1. Not sure I understood... You need to ´map´ the accounts from your company´s account hierarchy to the
SAT accounts (levels 1 or 2). It will all depend on how your account hierarchy is/was defined. Your company
account hierarchy can have 1 to N levels. You need to identify which account levels must be mapped to SAT
level 1 and level 2 accounts. For example, you might need to map account level 3 to SAT level 1, and account
level 4 to SAT level 2 (this is just an example).

Q2. Accountable Catalog AI for organizations?

A2. Please clarify..

Q3. The Qualifier against, should be assigned to the two catalogs? or which one?
A3. The ´Contra Account´ qualifier must be defined and assigned to (contra) accounts that belong to the
Company´s Chart of Accounts only.

Q4. For the SAT catalog, the account qualifiers should be on all or NOT?
A4. SAT accounts do not require any user-defined qualifier... (not sure I understood the question)

Q5. Whats the correct setup, if we have 14 legal entities setup for one accountable catalog?
A5. If you have a ´shared´ implementation where different BSVs correspond to different LEs, all under same
Ledger and Charto of Accounts, then follow the Summary Template examples provided in the documentation
where the´Company´segment must be defined either as ´D´ (1 LE:1 BSV) or BSVRollupGroup (1:N)
association between LE and BSVs.

2988295 2 posts since Jul 9, 2015

Re: Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Sep 29, 2015 7:11 PM
in response to Mitani-Oracle
Hello Mitani,

We have flat account hierarchy but SAT account has 2 level. How do we achieve the correct mapping if Trial
balance and COA report has to show structure/balance as per SAT requirement? The only way I see it is by
adding values to the existing Global COA account segment. Doing so I still see duplicate values in the COA
report. Has anybody achieved this in a simple way?

thanks,
kamal

Mitani-Oracle 780 posts since Jan 10, 2001

Re: Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Sep 30, 2015 4:12 AM
in response to 2988295
The SAT Chart of Account is created solely to serve as the ´target´ in the mapping associaotion between
company´s COA and SAT COA. Steps 5 and 6 clearly indicate how the SAT COA can be defined. All other

2
Has anyone implemented the patch for...

setup steps, including creation of Qualifiers, Rollup Groups, Summary Templates, etc. apply to Company´s
COA.

Regards

Mark response Correct or Helpful

Deepika-OC 116 posts since Jun 6, 2011

Re: Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Jul 14, 2016 4:53 PM
in response to 2988295
Hello,

Did you ever figure out how to set this up, avoiding the creation of new values to your to the existing Global
COA account segment??
Thanks and Regards.
D

3004912 3 posts since Aug 3, 2015

Re: Has anyone implemented the patch for Mexico Electronic Accounting? Sep 13, 2016 6:42 PM
Hi All,

Does Mexico Electronic Accounting implementation needs Mexican localization to be implemented first? OR
can we apply the patch to existing R12 application with no localizations and start working with XML generation?

I know this question may sound silly but would need some advise so that we can move forward.

Any inputs are appreciated.

Thanks,
Sriram