Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames
Abstract
The Paleozoic Acatlán Complex of southern Mexico comprises polydeformed metasedimentary, granitoid, and mafic– ultramafic rocks
variously interpreted as recording the closure of the Iapetus, Rheic, and Ouachitan Oceans. The complex is tectonically juxtaposed on its
eastern margin against Grenville-age gneisses (Oaxacan Complex) that are unconformably overlain by Lower Paleozoic strata containing
fossils of Gondwanan affinity. A thick siliciclastic unit (Chazumba and Cosoltepec Formations) at the base of the complex is considered part
of a Lower Paleozoic accretionary prism with a provenance that isotopically resembles the Oaxacan Complex. This unit is tectonically
overridden by a locally eclogitic mafic – ultramafic unit interpreted as a westward-obducted ophiolite, the emplacement of which was
synchronous with mylonitic granitoid intrusion at ca. 440 Ma. Both units are unconformably overlain by a deformed volcano-sedimentary
sequence (Tecomate Formation) attributed to a volcanic arc of presumed Devonian age. Deformed granitoids in contact with this sequence
have been dated at ca. 371 (La Noria granite) and 287 Ma (Totoltepec pluton).
Three phases of penetrative deformation (D1 – 3) affect the Cosoltepec Formation; the last two correlate with two penetrative deformational
phases that affect the Tecomate Formation. D1 is of unknown kinematics but predates deposition of the Tecomate Formation and likely
records obduction at ca. 440 Ma (Acatecan orogeny). A folded foliation in the Totoltepec pluton appears to record both deformational phases
in the Tecomate Formation, bracketing D2 and D3 between 287 Ma and the deposition of the nonconformably overlying Leonardian Matzitzi
Formation.
D2 records north– south dextral transpression and south-vergent thrusting and is attributed to the collision of Gondwana and southern
Laurentia (Ouachitan orogeny) at ca. 290 Ma, the kinematics being consistent with the northward motion of Mexico that is required by most
continental reconstructions for the final assembly of Pangea. D3, which produced broadly north– south, upright folds, is also attributed to this
collision and likely followed D2 closely in the latest Paleozoic. q 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Acatlán Complex; Paleozoic orogenesis; Totoltepec pluton
Fig. 1. Location and tectonostratigraphic setting of the Acatlán Complex in southern Mexico (from Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999). Index map shows Cenozoic
volcanic rocks of the Sierra Madre Occidental (SMOCC) and Trans-Mexican volcanic belt (TMVB).
evolution. For example, Yañez et al. (1991) related the that the Acatlán Complex lay adjacent to northwestern
complex to the Acadian belt of the Appalachians, South America throughout the Paleozoic on the southern
suggesting that both were deformed in a latest Silurian – margin of the Rheic Ocean and was not involved in
Middle Devonian collision (Mixtecan orogeny) between continent – continent collision until the Permo-Carbonifer-
eastern Laurentia and northwestern South America. Accord- ous assembly of Pangea.
ing to Yañez et al. (1991), the Acatlán Complex was then These contrasting tectonic models are based largely on
transported southward with Gondwana to a position near the pioneering regional mapping of the Acatlán Complex by
present-day Colombia and recollided with southern Laur- Ortega-Gutiérrez (1975) and are currently being tested as
entia during the late Carboniferous before moving to its aspects of the complex are reexamined in more detail.
present position following the breakup of Pangea. Recent geochronological studies have focused on the ages
On the basis of new age data interpreted to indicate an of the main tectonothermal events. For example,
earliest Silurian date for its deformation, Ortega-Gutiérrez Ortega-Gutiérrez et al. (1999) obtained an age of ca.
et al. (1999) proposed that the Acatlán Complex represents a 440 Ma for the Acatecan collision (originally thought to be
vestige of the Iapetus suture formed during a Late Early Devonian) by dating a granitoid body that they
Ordovician – Early Silurian collision (Acatecan orogeny) interpret as syntectonic. Similarly, by interpreting the
between eastern Laurentia and Oaxaquia, a crustal fragment emplacement of a younger granitoid body as synchronous
of Grenville-age in present-day Mexico (Ortega-Gutiérrez with the Mixtecan orogeny, Sánchez Zavala et al. (2000)
et al., 1995). In this context, Oaxaquia represents either a date this event at ca. 370 Ma (Yañez et al., 1991).
microcontinent or part of the Columbian margin of This paper examines the deformational and kinematic
Gondwana. In contrast, Keppie and Ramos (1999) proposed history of the Acatlán Complex by focusing on the structural
J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524 513
Fig. 2. Simplified geological map and cross-section of the northern part of the Acatlán Complex. Outlined region shows study area and its division into
structural subareas (modified from Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999).
history of two of its principal metasedimentary units, the slices unconformably overlain by a sequence of deformed
Cosoltepec Formation (deposited prior to the proposed Late metasedimentary rocks. Ortega-Gutiérrez (1993) later
Ordovician –Early Silurian collision) and the Tecomate assigned the rocks of the lower and upper plates to the
Formation (deposited following this event). Our results Petlalcingo and Acateco subgroups, respectively, and
show that the complex has experienced three periods of interpreted the lower as an obducted accretionary prism
penetrative deformation, one of which is assigned to the and the upper plate as an ophiolitic sequence.
Late Ordovician –Early Silurian Acatecan event, whereas
the other two are of Early Permian age and synchronous 2.1. Petlalcingo subgroup
with the Ouachitan orogeny of the southern United States
and an unnamed orogenic belt in northwestern South The lower plate of the thrust nappe, or the Petlalcingo
America. subgroup (Fig. 3), comprises a thick sequence of siliciclastic
rocks derived from a Grenville-age provenance that
isotopically resembles the Oaxacan Complex (Yañez et al.,
2. Acatlán complex 1991). The subgroup is divided into two formations: a lower
Chazumba Formation of alternating psammitic and pelitic
Understanding of the geology of the Acatlán Complex rocks and an upper Cosoltepec Formation dominated by
(Fig. 2) is based largely on the doctoral work of quartzose phyllites. Metamorphosed to the amphibolite
Ortega-Gutiérrez (1975), who identified its principal facies, the Chazumba Formation is dominated by quartz-
lithologic units and recognized within it two major thrust rich biotite schists that contain occasional garnet, staurolite,
514 J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524
Fig. 3. Simplified tectonostratigraphic column for the Acatlán Complex (modified from Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999).
and sillimanite and, at the highest grade, are transitional Miguel dikes at 173 ^ 0.3 Ma (Rb/Sr whole-rock isochron;
with the underlying Magdalena migmatite. Ruiz-Castellanos, 1979).
The Chazumba Formation is overlain by the Cosoltepec
Formation, which makes up more than 90% of the exposed 2.2. Acateco subgroup
Acatlán Complex. The Cosoltepec Formation is not thought
to have experienced more than greenschist facies meta- The upper plate of the thrust nappe, or the Acateco
morphism and is dominated by phyllitic quartz –chlorite – subgroup (Fig. 3), consists of high-grade, mafic – ultramafic
phengite schists with occasional retrogressed biotite and and interlayered pelitic and siliceous metasedimentary
abundant quartz veins. Other components locally include rocks (Xayacatlán Formation) that are structurally overlain
pillowed greenstones, metachert, massive quartzite, serpen- by high-pressure metagranitoids and migmatites (Esperanza
tinite, and manganiferous rocks (Ortega-Gutiérrez, 1993). granitoids). The Xayacatlán Formation includes micaceous
The nature of the contact between the Cosoltepec and schists, gneisses, porphyroblastic amphibolites, sepenti-
Chazumba Formations is uncertain, though its association nites, and related ultramafics that are commonly mylonitic
with amphibolite bodies suggests it may be tectonic. and locally preserve relict eclogite facies mineral assem-
On the basis of its siliciclastic composition, extreme blages (Ortega-Gutiérrez, 1975, 1993. The sheet-like
thickness, and the presence of inferred ocean floor mylonitic Esperanza granitoids comprise megacrystic K-
fragments, Ortega-Gutiérrez et al. (1999) interpreted the feldspar augen gneiss, migmatite, schist, and minor
Petlalcingo subgroup as the parautochthonous trench and amphibolite. On the basis of a mineralogy that includes
forearc deposits of a convergent continental margin. The high-silica phengite, grossular-rich garnet, pseudomorphs of
Magdalena migmatite, formerly thought to form the base of zoisite or epidote þ phengite þ albite ^ garnet after plagi-
the lower plate (Fig. 3), has recently yielded a concordant oclase, and relict rutile, the granitoids are considered to have
U – Pb crystallization age of 170 ^ 2 Ma and is now experienced eclogite facies metamorphism and are inter-
attributed to Jurassic extension (Powell et al., 1999) coeval preted to be syntectonic with respect to the emplacement of
with the posttectonic emplacement of the granitic San the thrust nappe at 440 ^ 14 Ma (U –Pb zircon lower
J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524 515
Fig. 4. Geochemistry of the Totoltepec pluton. (a) Jensen cation plot (Jensen, 1976) for rock classification. Fields: PK ¼ peridotitic komatiite; BK ¼ komatiitic
basalt; HFT ¼ high Fe tholeiitic basalt; HMT ¼ high Mg tholeiite basalt; TA ¼ tholeiitic andesite; TD ¼ tholeiitic dacite; TR ¼ tholeiitic rhyolite;
CB ¼ calc-alkaline basalt; CA ¼ calc-alkaline andesite; CD ¼ calc-alkaline dacite; CR ¼ calc-alkaline rhyolite. (b) Chondrite-normalized REE abundances
for felsic and mafic components of the Totoltepec pluton. Normalizing values after Sun (1982). (c) Mantle-normalized trace element abundances for felsic and
mafic components of the Totoltepec pluton. Normalizing values after Sun and McDonough (1989). (d) Variations of Nb (ppm) versus Y (ppm) in the felsic
rocks of the Totoltepec pluton (Pearce et al., 1984). VAG ¼ volcanic arc granites; syn-COLG ¼ syn-collision granites; WPG ¼ within-plate granites;
ORG ¼ ocean ridge granites.
intercept age; Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999). The relative the Acatlán Complex, the volcano-sedimentary Tecomate
displacement of the upper plate, according to its outcrop Formation. On the basis of poorly preserved fossils, this unit
pattern, exceeds 200 km and is attributed to westward- is thought to be of Devonian age (Ortega-Gutiérrez, 1993)
vergent thrusting during the Late Ordovician – Early Silur- and represents the earliest overstep across the upper and
ian Acatecan orogeny. The upper intercept age of the lower plates of the thrust nappe (Fig. 3). The formation is
metagranitoids (1161 ^ 30 Ma), as well as their peralumi- mildly metamorphosed but strongly deformed and consists
nous composition, depleted mantle model age ðTDM ¼ 1:50 of thinly bedded pelitic and psammitic sedimentary rocks,
GaÞ; high initial strontium ratio ð87 Sr=86 Sr ¼ 0:7189Þ; and occasional marbles and pebble conglomerates, and volca-
negative epsilon neodymium value (e Ndð0Þ ¼ 210:0; niclastic units of basaltic – andesite and less common felsic
Yañez et al., 1991), suggest a Precambrian source composition (Sánchez Zavala et al., 2000). Metagranitic
(Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999). The Acatecan subgroup is clasts, common in the conglomerates and thought to be
inferred by these authors to represent an obducted slice of derived from the ca. 440 Ma Esperanza granitoids (Yañez
oceanic and continental lithosphere. et al., 1991), provide a maximum depositional age for the
Formation. A minimum depositional age of ca. 370 Ma is
2.3. Tecomate Formation provided by the deformed La Noria granite, which is
reported to intrude the formation (Ortega-Gutiérrez et al.,
Both the Petlacingo and Acateco subgroups were 1999). Zircons from this granite have yielded upper and
exhumed before the deposition of the uppermost unit of lower intercept ages of 1116 ^ 44 and 371 ^ 34 Ma
516 J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524
SiO2 (wt%) 74.40 66.97 73.79 56.76 48.72 56.15 2.4. Totoltepec pluton
TiO2 0.12 0.31 0.10 0.75 0.78 0.66
Al2O3 14.89 16.43 16.32 17.06 17.74 14.28 The Tecomate Formation is tectonically overridden by
Fe2O3 0.92 3.36 0.87 8.75 10.86 8.09
the foliated Totoltepec pluton along the pluson’s mylonitic
MnO 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.12 0.18 0.13
MgO 0.37 1.46 0.45 4.87 7.79 4.29 southern margin. Zircons from the more felsic component of
CaO 1.26 2.74 2.77 6.43 8.39 5.48 this body have yielded a concordant U – Pb zircon age of
Na2O 5.73 4.97 5.41 2.73 1.60 4.42 287 ^ 2 Ma (Yañez et al., 1991). The pluton grades upward
K2 O 2.25 1.32 0.74 1.06 2.30 0.94 (to the north) from a basal gabbro/diorite through trondhje-
P2O5 0.06 0.11 0.04 0.09 0.05 0.08
mite/tonalite to a mafic marginal phase at the top. Foliation
LOI 0.48 2.19 0.20 1.34 1.41 5.28
and compositional banding generally dip steeply north. The
Total 100.51 99.93 100.71 99.96 99.82 99.80 pluton is nonconformably overlain by deformed, but
unmetamorphosed, clastic rocks of the Early Permian
Cr (ppm) 20 55 140 33
(Leonardian, 280 ^ 4– 269 ^ 7 Ma; Okulitch, 1999) Mat-
Ni 4 13 35 10
Co 9 9 32 43 32 zitzi Formation (Silva-Romo and Mendoza-Rosales, 2000).
V 26 58 20 180 212 129 This formation also dips steeply north and is unconformably
Cu 72 99 56 overlain by gently dipping Jurassic clastic rocks that contain
Pb 12 12 8 11 10 9 leaves of Bennettita leau.
Zn 26 69 34 92 55 136
Samples collected from the Totoltepec pluton as part of
Rb 77 52 51 29 37 3.9
Cs 3.14 3.49 2.04 1.37 1.11 this study exhibit typical calc-alkaline geochemical signa-
Ba 1907 1461 550 1669 1274 703 tures (Fig. 4a) accompanied by relatively flat rare earth
Sr 316 554 752 248 281 530 element (REE) patterns with only minor enrichments of
Ga 17 19 17 18 15 13 light REE and (La/Yb)n , 2– 3 (Fig. 4b). Representative
Nb 2.41 1.22 2.46 1.98 2.27 0.38
samples of both mafic and felsic rocks were analyzed by X-
Hf 1.52 0.91 1.69 0.84 1.16 0.74
Zr 61 32 6.9 29 44 22.5 ray fluorescence for major and some trace elements (Rb, Sr,
Y 22.79 14.99 22.25 6.80 7.87 1.20 Ba, Zr, Nb, Y, Cr, Ni) and by inductively coupled plasma-
Th 2.31 0.70 2.59 1.00 0.45 0.02 mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for the REE, Nb and Th, at the
U 0.68 0.22 0.81 0.22 0.22 0.10 Ontario Geological Survey in Sudbury (Table 1). The ICP-
La 6.09 3.11 6.90 2.52 4.57 1.32
MS method, described by Ayer and Davis (1997), indicates
Ce 14.11 7.50 16.43 5.89 9.95 2.47
Pr 2.04 1.10 2.36 0.80 1.38 0.27 a precision and accuracy of 2– 10% for trace elements. All
Nd 9.55 5.34 9.68 3.32 6.12 1.09 rocks were affected by secondary processes including
Sm 2.71 1.69 2.62 0.86 1.44 0.20 amphibolite grade metamorphism and hydrothermal
Eu 0.72 0.55 0.73 0.18 0.43 0.18 activity, which may have modified their composition.
Gd 3.06 2.07 3.03 0.90 1.32 0.19
Hence, the samples were petrographically and chemically
Tb 0.55 0.36 0.53 0.15 0.22 0.03
Dy 3.68 2.46 3.50 1.05 1.39 0.16 screened. Strongly altered samples, including those with
Ho 0.84 0.55 0.86 0.24 0.31 0.04 high LOI values, were discarded. The remaining samples
Er 2.44 1.60 2.28 0.64 0.84 0.11 are compositionally similar to modern rock suites, and thus,
Tm 0.38 0.24 0.35 0.10 0.13 0.02 the concentrations of most major elements, as well as the
Yb 2.38 1.60 2.40 0.69 0.90 0.12
high field strength elements (HFSE), REE, and transition
Lu 0.38 0.24 0.38 0.12 0.13 0.02
elements are believed to reflect the primary magmatic
F ¼ felsic samples; M ¼ mafic samples. distribution. These samples are employed for petrogenetic
considerations and to discriminate the tectonic setting.
(Yañez et al., 1991), the latter of which is interpreted as the Mantle-normalized trace element patterns (Fig. 4c)
date of its crystallization (Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999). display small negative Nb anomalies and distinct enrich-
Originally thought to represent a postorogenic, molasse- ment of Ba. Felsic rocks have SiO2 in the range of 66–
like unit deposited in the wake of thrust nappe emplacement 75 wt% and low K2O but high Na2O. Their REE patterns are
(Ortega-Gutiérrez, 1993), the Tecomate Formation has rather flat with low (La/Yb)n , 1– 2 and (La)n , 10– 22.
recently been interpreted as a turbiditic volcanic arc Mantle-normalized trace element patterns are also relatively
sequence deposited in advance of an arc-continent collision flat with Nb depletion and distinct enrichment of Ba and Rb.
(Mixtecan Orogeny) in the Late Devonian that was On the Nb – Y discrimination diagram (Fig. 4d), the felsic
responsible for its deformation (Sánchez Zavala et al., rocks plot in the arc field. Thus, the pluton appears to be one
2000). Early Mississippian sedimentary rocks (e.g. San of a series of Permo-Triassic granitoid bodies that extend
Salvador Patlanoaya Formation) that are reported to overlie the length of Mexico and have been interpreted as a
J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524 517
Fig. 9. Comparative equal-area stereographic projections of (a) LC2 and FC3 and (b) LT1 and FT2 in each of the three structural subareas.
520 J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524
kinematics of its Early Permian deformation are consistent Canada, Open File 3040 National Earth Science Series, Geological
with the northward movement of Mexican crustal blocks Atlas—Revision.
Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., 1975. The pre-Mesozoic geology of the Acatlán area,
required in current continental reconstructions of the final south Mexico. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds,
amalgamation of Pangea. UK, 166 pp.
Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., 1978. Estratigrafia del Complejo Acatlan en la
Mixteca Baja. Estados de Puebla y Oaxaca. Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geologı́a, Revista 2, 112–131.
Acknowledgements Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., 1993. Tectonostratigraphic analysis and significance
of the Paleozoic Acatlán Complex of southern Mexico. In: Ortega-
Gutiérrez, F., Centeno-Garcı́a, E., Morán-Zereno, D., Gómez-Cabal-
For his support and encouragement at all stages of this
lero, A. (Eds.), Terrane Geology of Southern Mexico, Universidad
study, we are deeply indebted to Dr Fernando Ortega- Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geologı́a, First Circum-
Gutiérrez. Funding for this project was provided by grants Atlantic Terrane Conference, Guanajuato, Mexico, Guidebook of Field
from the FIPSE North American Mobility in Higher Trip B, pp. 54–60.
Education Program (P116N9600018-99) and the Ohio Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., Ruiz, J., Centeno-Garcı́a, E., 1995. Oaxaquia, a
Proterozoic microcontinent accreted to North America during the Late
University Baker Awards Committee (39-10-9668) to
Paleozoic. Geology 23, 1127–1130.
RDN, and from CONACyT (25795-T) and PAPIIT Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., Elı́as-Herrera, M., Reyes-Salas, M., Macı́as-Romo,
(IN136999) grants to JDK. Logistical support provided by C., López, R., 1999. Late Ordovician–Early Silurian continental
the Instituto de Geologı́a at the Universidad Nacional collisional orogeny in southern Mexico and its bearing on Gondwana–
Autónoma de México in Mexico City is gratefully acknowl- Laurentia connections. Geology 27, 719 –722.
Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.B., Tindle, A.G., 1984. Trace element discrimination
edged. David Fraser kindly provided unpublished structural diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of
data on the Totoltepec pluton. Constructive reviews by Petrology 25, 956–983.
G. Draper and W. Frisch greatly improved the final Pindell, J.L., 1985. Alleghenian reconstruction and subsequent evolution of
manuscript. the Gulf of Mexico, Bahamas, and Proto-Caribbean. Tectonics 4, 1– 39.
Pindell, J.L., Barrett, S.F., 1990. Geological evolution of the Caribbean
region. In: Dengo, G., Case, J.E. (Eds.), The Caribbean Region:
Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, Geology of North
References America H, pp. 405 –432.
Powell, J.T., Nance, R.D., Keppie, J.D., Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., 1999.
Tectonic significance of the Magdalena Migmatite, Acatlán Complex,
Ayer, J.A., Davis, D.W., 1997. Neoarchean evolution of differing Mexico. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs 31
convergent margin assemblages in the Wabigoon Subprovince: (7), 294.
geochemical and geochronological evidence from the Lake of the Robison, R., Pantoja-Alor, J., 1968. Tremadocian trilobites from Nochix-
Wood greenstone belt, Superior Province, Northwestern Ontario. tlan region, Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 42, 767–800.
Precambrian Research 81, 155 –178. Ross, M.I., Scotese, C.R., 1988. A hierarchical tectonic model of the Gulf
Dickinson, W.R., Lawton, T.F., 2001. Carboniferous to Cretaceous of Mexico and Caribbean region. Tectonophysics 155, 139 –168.
assembly and fragmentation of Mexico. Geological Society of America Ruiz-Castellanos, M., 1979. Rubidium–strontium geochronology of the
Bulletin 113, 1142–1160. Oaxaca and Acatlán metamorphic areas of southern Mexico. Unpub-
Elı́as-Herrera, M., Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., 2000. Roots of the Caltepec Fault lished PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Dallas, TX, USA, 178 pp.
Zone, southern Mexico: Early Permian epidote-bearing anatexic Salvador, A., 1991. Triassic– Jurassic. In: Salvador, A., (Ed.), The Gulf of
granitoids. GEOS, Union Geophysica Mexicanan, 2nd Reunion Mexico Basin: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America,
Nacional de Ciencias de la Tierra, Resumenes y Programa 20 (3), 323. Geology of North America J, pp. 131–180.
Esquivel-Macı́as, C., Ausich, W.I., Buitrón-Sanchez, B.E., Flores de Dios, Sánchez Zavala, J.L., Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., Elı́as Herrera, M., 2000. La
A., 2000. Pennsylvanian and Mississippian pluricolumnal assemblages orogenia Mixteca del Devonico del Complejo Acatlán, sur de Mexico.
(Class Crinoidea) from southern Mexico and a new occurrence of a GEOS, Union Geophysica Mexicanan, 2nd Reunion Nacional de
column with tetralobate lumen. Journal of Paleontology 74, Ciencias de la Tierra, Resumenes y Programa 20 (3), 321–322.
1187–1190. Sedlock, R.L., Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., Speed, R.C., 1993. Tectonostrati-
Jensen, L.S., 1976. A new cation plot for classifying subalkalic volcanic graphic terranes and tectonic evolution of Mexico. Geological Society
rocks. Ontario Division of Mines, Miscellaneous Paper 66. of America, Special Paper 278, 143.
Keppie, J.D., Ramos, V.A., 1999. Odyssey of terranes in the Iapetus and Silva-Romo, G., Mendoza-Rosales, C., 2000. La unidad piedra hueca
Rheic Oceans during the Paleozoic. In: Keppie, J.D., Ramos, V.A. secuencia clastica Paleozoica (sur de puebla). GEOS, Union Geophy-
(Eds.), Laurentia–Gondwana Connections Before Pangea, Geological sica Mexicanan, A.C., 2nd Reunion Nacional de Ciencias de la Tierra,
Society of America, Special Paper 336, pp. 267–276. Resumenes y Programa 20 (3), 325.
López, R., Cameron, K.L., Norris, W.J., 2001. Evidence for Paleoproter- Sun, S.S., 1982. Chemical composition and origin of the Earth’s primitive
ozoic, Grenvillian, and Pan-African age Gondwanan crust beneath mantle. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 46, 179–192.
northwestern Mexico. Precambrian Research 107, 195–214. Sun, S.S., McDonough, W.F., 1989. Chemical and isotopic systematics
Malone, J.A., 2000. Kinematic and structural analysis of the Cosoltepec and of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and
Tecomate Formations, Acatlán Complex, southern Mexico. Unpub- processes. In: Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J. (Eds.), Magmatism in
lished MS Thesis, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA, 103 pp. the Ocean Basins, Geological Society London, Special Publication
Ochoa-Camarillo, H., 1996. Geologı́a del anticlinoria de Huayacocotla en 42, pp. 313 – 345.
la región de Molango, Estado de Hidalgo. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Torres, R., Ruı́z, J., Patchett, P.J., Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., 1999. Permo-
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico, 91 Triassic continental arc in eastern Mexico; tectonic implications for
pp. reconstructions of southern North America. In: Bartolini, C., Wilson,
Okulitch, A.V., 1999. Geological time scale 1999. Geological Survey of J.L., Lawton, T.F. (Eds.), Mesozoic Sedimentary and Tectonic History
524 J.R. Malone et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 15 (2002) 511–524
of North-central Mexico, Geological Society of America, Special Paper and kinematic history of the Acatlán Complex in the Nuevos
340, pp. 191–196. Horizontes-San Bernardo region, Puebla. Geofı́sica International 36,
Vechard, D., Flores de Dios, A., Buitrón, B.E., Grajales, M., 2000. 63 –76.
Biostratigraphie par fusulines des calcaires Carbonifères et Yañez, P., Ruiz, J., Patchett, P.J., Ortega-Gutiérrez, F., Gehrels, G.E., 1991.
Permiens de San Salvador Patlanoaya (Peubla, Mexique). Geobios Isotopic studies of the Acatlán Complex, southern Mexico: implications
33, 5 – 33. for Paleozoic North American tectonics. Geological Society of America
Weber, B., Meschede, M., Ratschbacher, L., Frisch, W., 1997. Structure Bulletin 103, 817– 828.