Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Content:
Excellent discussion- convincing and precise
Shows excellent ability to analyse, make inferences and support views
EXCELLENT Analysis reflects excellent understanding of literary theories
Well elaborated justifications and very convincing (CS2)
27-30 Language:
Sophisticated structure and vocabulary
Varied and appropriate linking
Accurate spelling and punctuation with hardly any errors
Referencing:
Referencing adheres fully to the correct academic conventions
Soft skill:
Excellent level of maturity in presentation of ideas.(CTPS4)
Content:
Very good discussion – clear and precise
GOOD Shows good ability to analyse, make inferences and support views
Analysis reflects good understanding of literary theories
23-26
Elaborated justifications with clear textual evidence (CS2)
Language:
Some sophisticated structure and vocabulary
Good linking
Generally accurate spelling and punctuation with some errors
Referencing:
Referencing adheres closely to the correct academic conventions
Soft skill:
Good level of maturity in presentation of ideas. (CTPS4)
Content:
Satisfactory discussion
SATISFACTORY Shows a fair ability to analyse, make inferences and support views
Analysis reflects a fair understanding of literary theories
18-22 Well organized justifications with some textual evidence (CS2)
Language:
A few sophisticated structures and vocabulary
Adequate linking
Generally accurate spelling and punctuation with a number of errors which do not impede clarity
of interpretation
Referencing:
Referencing adheres loosely to the correct academic conventions
Soft skill:
Satisfactory level of maturity in presentation of ideas. (CTPS4)
Content:
Weak discussion
PASS Shows a weak ability to analyse, make inferences and support views
15-17
Analysis reflects weak understanding of literary theories
Reasonably organized justifications but with inadequate textual evidence (CS2)
Language:
Fairly accurate structures and vocabulary although much of it is basic
Some basic grammatical errors which impede understanding
Referencing:
Referencing does not adhere to the correct academic conventions
Soft skill:
Weak level of maturity in presentation of ideas. (CTPS4)
Shallow analysis of the text
Shows poor ability to analyse, make inferences and support views
WEAK Analysis reflects poor or no understanding of literary theories
0 - 14 Justifications are often repeated or irrelevant (CS2)
Language:
Structures and vocabulary are very basic with numerous errors
Referencing:
No or irrelevant referencing
Soft skill:
Poor display of maturity in presentation of ideas. (CTPS4)