Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEFINITION OF LIMIT
SOLUTION 1 :
inequality is always true, no matter what value is chosen for . For example,
will work. Thus, if , then it follows that . This
completes the proof.
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff .
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff .
iff
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term |x+1| with an appropriate constant and keep the term
|x-1| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then implies that -
1 < x-1 < 1 and 0 < x < 2 so that 1 < |x+1| < 3 (Make sure that you understand this step
before proceeding.). It follows that (Always make this ``replacement" between your
last expression on the left and . This guarantees the logic of the proof.)
iff
iff .
iff
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term |x-1| with an appropriate constant and keep the term
|x+1| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.). Then implies that -1
< x+1 < 1 and -2 < x < 0 so that 1 < |x-1| < 3 (Make sure that you understand this step
before proceeding.). It follows that (Always make this ``replacement" between your
last expression on the left and . This guarantees the logic of the proof.)
iff
iff .
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term |3x+5| with an appropriate constant and keep the term
|x-2| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then implies that -
1 < x-2 < 1 and 1 < x < 3 so that 8 < |3x+5| < 14 (Make sure that you understand this
step before proceeding.). It follows that (Always make this ``replacement" between
your last expression on the left and . This guarantees the logic of the proof.)
iff
iff .
Now choose (This guarantees that both assumptions made about in
the course of this proof are taken into account simultaneously.). Thus, if
, it follows that . This completes the proof.
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term |x+3| with an appropriate constant and keep the term
|x-3| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then implies that -
1 < x-3 < 1 and 2 < x < 4 so that 5 < |x+3| < 7 and (Make sure that
you understand this step before proceeding.). It follows that (Always make this
``replacement" between your last expression on the left and . This guarantees the
logic of the proof.)
iff
iff
iff .
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term |2-x| with an appropriate constant and keep the term
|x+6| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then implies that -
1 < x+6 < 1 and -7 < x < -5 so that 7 < |2-x| < 9 and (Make sure that
you understand this step before proceeding.). It follows that (Always make this
``replacement" between your last expression on the left and . This guarantees the
logic of the proof.)
iff .
iff
iff .
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term | 4x-9 | with an appropriate constant and keep the
term |x-3| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then implies that -
1 < x-3 < 1 and 2 < x < 4 . HOWEVER, THIS RANGE OF X-VALUES IS NOT
iff
iff
iff .
iff
iff
(At this point, we need to figure out a way to make | x-9 | ``appear'' in our
computations. Appropriate use of the conjugate will suffice.)
iff
(Recall that .)
iff
iff .
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term with an appropriate constant and keep the
term |x-9| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will arbitrarily
assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general, once we find
a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then implies that -
iff
iff .
iff
(At this point, we need to figure out a way to make | x-4 | ``appear'' in our
computations. Appropriate use of the conjugate will suffice.)
iff
(Recall that .)
iff
iff
iff
iff .
We will now ``replace" the term with an appropriate constant and keep
the term |x-4| , since this is the term we wish to ``solve for". To do this, we will
arbitrarily assume that (This is a valid assumption to make since, in general,
once we find a that works, all smaller values of also work.) . Then
implies that -1 < x-4 < 1 and 3 < x < 5 so that and
iff .
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
(At this point, we need to figure out a way to make | x-1 | ``appear'' in our
computations. A simple use of constants will get us started.)
iff
iff
iff
(We need to be able to factor (x-1) from the numerator. Apply the conjugate to the
term .)
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff
iff .
iff
iff .
iff .
At this point, we need to figure out a way to introduce the term | x-a | into our
computations. The answer lies with the Mean Value Theorem. Consider the function
on the interval [A, B] . Since f is continuous on the closed interval [A, B]
and differentiable ( ) on the open interval (A, B) , according to the Mean
Value Theorem there is at least one number C , A < C < B , satisfying
i.e.,
.
Then
so that
This is true for any two real numbers, A and B . It follows that (Always make this
``replacement" between your last expression on the left and . This guarantees the
logic of the proof.)
iff .
At this point, we need to figure out a way to introduce the term | x-a | into our
computations. The answer lies with the Mean Value Theorem. Consider the function
on the interval [A, B] , where A and B are both positive. Since f is
i.e.,
.
Thus,
(*) .
This is true for any two positive real numbers A and B , where B > A . At this point,
we need to consider two cases.
If x > a , it follows from inequality (*) that (Always make this ``replacement"
between your last expression on the left and . This guarantees the logic of the proof.)
iff
iff .
If x < a , then it is reasonable to assume that since we are considering the limit
so that
iff
iff .
ASSUME THAT THE LIMIT DOES EXIST. That is, assume that ,
where L is some real number. It follows that for EACH real number , there
exists another real number so that
if , then .
Consider . Under our assumption that the limit does exist, it follows that there is
and .
In addition,
= | -1 |
=1.
=1.
an obvious contradiction. It must be that the original limit does not exist.
Duane Kouba
Tue May 6 10:38:27 PDT 1997