Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Ocean Environment
2. Submarine Soils
Soils encountered in the marine environment can be classified into two categories
namely marine soils and submarine soils. Deposits, which have been removed from marine
environment by uplift or by other means are considered as marine while those continue to be
submerged, are considered as submarine. Submarine soils can be divided into two categories,
one bear similarity to on-land soils whereas others are distinctly a product of ocean environment.
The former is known as terrigenic soils - these are formed on-land and then transported to
sea, the latter are called pelagic soils and these are formed of material, which settle down through
water column in the sea. A more detailed classification is depicted in Fig. 1. and Fig. 2 show
the relative abundance of terrigenic and various types of pelagic soils on the ocean floor. Of the
pelagic soils, calcareous ooze is the most abundant and is found extensively in the Atlantic and
19
the Indian oceans. Brown clay and siliceous ooze are more abundant in the Pacific Ocean on
account of its greater water depths. The characteristics of terrigenic deposits are primarily
controlled by the nature of soil in the coastal area adjacent to the deposit.
Since submarine soils have different origins, there is a wide range in their rate of
accumulation on the sea floor. This is highlighted in Table 1 which shows the soils of
terrigenic origin are deposited rapidly, whereas pelagic soils are deposited at a much slower
rate. A particle or brown clay may as such stay within the top 1 cm of the ocean floor as long as
20,000 years.
Submarine soils
Foraminifera Diatom
Globigerina Radiolarin
20
Submarine soils
[100](71)
Diatom[9](6.5)
Radiolarin[2](1.5)
21
Table 1: Rate of accumulation of sediments on the ocean floor
The double layer theory can be used for explaining some of the observed
interaction in clay water system that control flocculation. It is well known that if the net effect of
inter particle electrical forces between two clay particle is attractive, they tend to move
towards each other and hence flocculate. If the net influence of electrical force is repulsive,
particle tends to disperse.
22
3.1. Cementation Bonding
From the study of the engineering behaviour of deep sea sediments presented above
one may conclude the following.
23
iii) Because of the low rate of deposition and due to presence of cementing material some
bonding appears to exist in these carbonate deposits which manifests itself by impart apparent
overconsolidation behaviour
An analysis of the reported engineering behaviour of continental margin sediments reveals that:
1. The natural water content is often found to be higher than liquid limit in these deposits.
2. Unlike deep-sea deposits these deposits are under consolidated, normally
consolidated, or over-consolidated states. The over-consolidation may result from
(a) Stress history, which has been attributed to erosion or glaciation or fluctuation in water
level.
(b) Manner of computation of effective stress
(c) Secondary or delayed consolidation
(d) Slow rate of deposition and
(e) Cementation caused by various materials such as carbonates, organic matters etc.
5. Carbonate Sediments
Carbonate soils or carbonate sediments are those containing calcium carbonate or its
derivatives. Carbonate materials are deposited in the marine environment in variety of forms,
ranging from microscopic oozes to large intricate coral formations. Carbonate soils are
encountered on over 35 percent of the ocean floor on the continental margin they exist in
abundance in the low latitude areas lying between Lat 30 N and Lat 30 S (warm water zones)
which includes the east and west coast of India. In deep sea, they occur extensively in the
Indian and Atlantic oceans and to a lesser extent in the Pacific Ocean. The form in which the
carbonate soils exist is very much influenced by the ocean environment.
24
5.1. Origin
Calcareous soils are mostly formed from the accumulation of skeletal remains of
organisms secreting calcium carbonate, like forminifera, echinoderms etc and plants like
banthenic calcareous algae, planktonic calcareous algae etc. In addition to these skeleton
deposits, non-skeletal deposits formed by precipitation also exist. It has been observed by
numerous investigators that the presence of carbonate material in submarine soils affects their
engineering behaviour significantly. The variation in the engineering properties of such
soils have usually been correlated with quantity of carbonate material present in the soil, without
focusing attention on the nature of carbonate material present in these soils. In the recent past
attention has been focused to study the nature of carbonate material in carbonate soil.
In Sands carbonate materials exists in various shapes and forms, as thin walled shell
fragments e.g. Toft (1967), as skeletal grains with large intra particle voids e.g. Valent (1974),
Datta et al (1979) and as round solid non skeletal grains with smooth surfaces or cemented lumps
of non-skeletal grains e.g. Taft (1967).
25
5.4. Carbonate as cementing material
Carbonate soils have been often been reported to exist in a cemented state e.g. from Australia
by Angemeer et al (1973 and 1975), from Abu Dhabi by Wees and Chamberlins (1971) and
from India by Katti et al 1978. However these investigations have not identified the form of
existence of cementing carbonate material. Bathrust (1971) had discussed the process of
concentration from a geological point of view from which one can conclude that cementation
occurs by physio-chemical or biochemical precipitation of carbonate material in the form of (a)
micritic void filler, (b) a coating which envelopes the particles or (c) as over glow on the surface
of particles. Recently Datta et al (1981) from an investigation conducted to study the nature and
distribution of carbonate material in two carbonate soils obtained from the west coast of India
have shown that the part of carbonate material is present in this soil as a cementing material
either in the form of coating or in the form of needle like overgrowths.
From the above discussion it is evident that carbonate material can exist either as inert particles
of various shapes and sizes, with or without intra particle voids or as a cementing material in the
form of filler or as a coating, or as overgrowths.
26
Table 2: Reported Investigation on Naturally Cemented Soil
Clayey sit to 70-118 IP=10-43 40-90 - 0.10-0.90 Depicts granular type behaviour
silt
28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2 North Pacific Hemipelagic - wL=68-149 0-48 Su √Po=0.03- - Observed little decrease of porosity
Guadalupe site wP=30-77 0.34 with depth. Depicts apparent over
consolidation behaviour
(a) Hamilton Calcareous 151- wL=68-149 - 3.39-0.76 -
(1964) ooze 148 IP= 10-82
(b) Moore Clayey silt to - - - - -
(1964) silty clay
(Guadalupe
site)
(c) KellerCalcareous 52-375 - - 0.04-0.18 - Exhibits higher strength coastal areas
(1969) sand and silt, or those calcareous ooze
red clay and
some siliceous
ooze
(d) Calcareous 84-116 wL=43-56 - 0.11-0.14 0.57-0.91 Depicts apparent over consolidation
Noorany(1971) sediments behaviour
(e)Richards et Siliceous 135- wL=104-275 - 0.01-0.22 - -
al(1976) pelagic ooze 476 wp=58-183
fine grained IP=46-92
IL=1.5-2.0
3. Gulf of Mexico
(a)Delflanche Silty clay Porosit - About 4 - Samples -
and y-472 from top
Bryant(1970) 5m show 2
values,0.87
-
4.13.Below
5m depth
29
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
(b)Bryant and Silt and clay 49-179 - - 0.02-0.12 0.49-1.17 -
Dlflache(1971)
4 Arabian Sea Clay to silt 25-100 wL=30-65 3-23 0.005-0.45 - Exhibit higher shear strength due to
Keller(1967)(G also range(less wp=20-55 carbonate cementation
ulf of Oman) than 30%
sand)
30
Table 3 physical an engineering properties of deep sea sediments
Sl.n Location and Soil type Natural Index Properties Carbon Undrained Compre Remarks
o Researcher water (%) ate shear strength, ssion
content content Su (kg/cm2) index Cc
(%) (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 Gulf of Mexico
(a) Mc Clelland Clay 28-81 wL = 32-98 - 0.06-2.18 0.2-1.09 Sediments exist in under
(1967) wP = 18-36 consolidated to over
IP = 9-72 consolidated state
IL = 0.30-1.11
(b) Kolb and Clay 40-55 wL = 65-85 - 0.05-1.22 - Some layers are under
Kaufman (1967) wP = 25-30 consolidated
IL = 0.3-0.4 (for
normally
consolidated
clay) IL = 0.704
(for under
consolidated
clay)
(c) Bryant et al Silty lutities 50-150 - About 0.01 -0.41 0.55-1.0 Depicts apparent over
(1965) 10 consolidation in slope
sediments
2 North Atlantic
(a) Richards and Fine Porosity - - 0.02-.09 0.36-1.4 Depicts apparent over
Hamilten (1967) grained soil 58-82 Su √Po=0.4-2.0 consolidation behaviour
(b) Robertson (1967) Clay to sand 40 - - - - Aragenite needles appeared
range to get crushed under
pressure above 100 kg/cm2
3 Mediterranean
31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Almagor (1967) Near shore 40-85 wL = 54-82 - 0.01-.0.1 0.15- Normally consolidated state
(palmekhim coast ) coarse wP = 17-35 Su √Po= 0.50 0.61
materials IP = 37-49
Shelf and 80-143 wL = 79-85 - 0.003-0.050 0.70- Under consolidated state
upper slope wP = 25 Su √Po= 0.03- 0.82 high rate of accumulation
silty clay IP = 55-60 0.15
Deeper silty 111-156 wL = 87-113 - 0.005-0.09 1.09- Normally consolidated state
wP = 27-29 IP = Su √Po= 0.35- 1.28
63-85 0.9
4 Red Sea and Gulf of Clayey silt 90-180 wL = 70-105 47-60 0.01-0.05 - Exhibit higher shear
Aden to silty clay wP = 35-60 strength due to high
IP = 35-60 carbonate content
5 Nile delta Silty (sand 60-140 wL = 60-110 10-55 0.01-0.05 - Exhibit higher shear
Einsele (1967) silt clay) wP = 25-45 IP = strength due to high
30-70 carbonate content
32
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
9 British, Gerorgia Silty clay 138-236 wL =130 Carbon 0.02-0.05 2.3 Exhibits apparent over
british Colombia Fin wP = 74 aceous consolidation behaviour
and Byrne(1971) IP = 56 matter
4
10 Southern California Clay 52-143 - - From direct 0.011- Shell sediment have higher
Continental shear test at 1.04 grained size, shear strength
Borderland Wilson et normal stress = and unit weight and lower
al(1970) 0.05 kg/cm2 water content , void ratio
0.05-0.08 and compressibility than
the slopes, basin and fan
sediments.
33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
13 New Jersey coast Plastic clay 50-70 wL =50-100 - 0.5-0.89 - Depicts apparent over
Koutsoftas and wP =25-50 consolidation behaviour
Fischer (1976) IP = 25-55
34
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
(c) Bhavani-Shankar Clay 93-120 wL =86-92 - 0.03-0.06 0.63-1.0 Depicts apparent over
Rao and Pranesh IP = 40-48 consolidation behaviour
(1978)
15 Off West Coast of Clayey silt - wL =94 51 Su √Po= 0.25 - Exist in normally
India Datta et al wP =50 consolidated state
(1981) IP = 44
35