Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effectiveness of Training Project Report
Effectiveness of Training Project Report
IN
OF
By
JOSEPHINE PRIYA N
RAMAPRIYADHARSHINI T
CHENNAI-6
(2010 – 2012)
BONA FIDE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Project Report titled “Training and Development” in
ICF is a bona fide work carried out by Josephine Priya N and
Ramapriyadharshini T of I year MA Human Resource Management students
from the department of Management Studies, Women’s Christian College,
Chennai-6.
HOD Guide
Date:
Place:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Our grateful thanks to Mrs. Biji Rajan, Welfare Inspector, ICF who in spite
of being extraordinarily busy with her duties, took time out to hear, guide and
keep us on the correct path. A humble ‘Thank you’ Madam.
Prof. Mrs. Ms. G. Nancy Elizabeth, M.B.A., M.Phil., was always so involved
in the entire process, shared her knowledge, and encouraged me to think. Thank
you, Dear Madam.
Last but not the least there were so many who shared valuable information that
helped in the successful completion of this project.
Josephine Priya N
Ramapriyadharshini T
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
1 Title Page
2 Bonafide Certificate
4 Declaration
5 Acknowledgement
6 Company Profile
7 Need for the Study
10 Research Methodology
11 List of tables
12 List of Charts
13 Findings
14 Suggestions
15 Questionnaire
16 Conclusion
17 Bibliography
COMPANY PROFILE
The principal objective of training and development division is to make sure the
availability of a skilled and willing workforce to an organization. In addition to
that, there are four other objectives: Individual, Organizational, Functional, and
Societal.
Research has shown specific benefits that a small business receives from
training and developing its workers, including:
Increased productivity.
Reduced employee turnover.
Data were collected through different sources and by different methods. There
are two different methods through which data can be collected. They are as
follows:
PRIMARY DATA:
Under primary data collection method, data are collected
through questionnaires. Here a set of questions are given and employees
are asked to respond to it.
SECONDARY DATA:
In secondary data information are collected from the available
sources of the organization. They are collected through the use of
Internet, Magazines, Journals and Reports.
SAMPLE SIZE:
Yes 36 90
No 4 10
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 92% of the employees have attended some kind of
training program so far and 8% of the employees have not attended any kind of
training program so far.
CHART 1
40
35
30
25
20 NO
YES
15
10
0
Yes
NO
2. Table showing the number of training programs attended by the Employees.
0-2 12 30
3-5 12 30
6-7 6 15
8-above 10 25
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 30% of the employees have attended 0-2 training
programs, another 30% of the employees have attended 3-5 training programs,
15% of the employees have attended 6-7 training programs and the rest 10% of
the employees have attended 8-above training programs.
CHART 2
12
10
0 to 2
6 3 to 5
6 to 7
8 & above
8 & above
6 to 7
0 3 to 5
0 to 2 0 to 2
3 to 5
6 to 7
8&
above
3. Table showing the method of training given to the Employees.
On-the-Job 24 60
Off-the-Job 16 40
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 60% of the employees were given On-the-Job training
and the rest 60% of the employees were provided with Off-the-job training.
CHART 3
40%
On-the-Job
Off-the-Job
60%
4. Table showing the duration of training period.
One Week 12 30
One Month 10 25
3 Months 6 15
More 12 30
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 30% of the respondents had one week of training,
another 30% of the employees had one month period of training, 15% of
the employees have had 3 months of training and the rest 12% of
employees have had more than 3 months of training program.
CHART 4
12
10
8
No Of Respondents
One Week
6 One Month
3 Months
More
More
3 Months
0 One Month
Criteria
5. Table showing the sufficiency of the employees in the training given.
Yes 36 90
No 4 10
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 90% of the employees are sufficient and 10% of
employees are not sufficient with the level of training program given to the
employees.
CHART 5
Yes(90%)
No(10%)
10%
90%
6. Table showing the employees improvement in various skills through
training programs.
Technical Skills 20 50
Interpersonal Skills 18 45
Both 2 5
None 0 0
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 50% of the employees agree that the given training
helps to improve their technical skills, where as 45% of the employees have
said it helps to improve their interpersonal skills and the rest 5% of the
employees have said it helps improve both.
CHART 6
20
18
16
14
No Of Respondents
12
10
8 Technical Skills
Interpersonal Skills
6 Both
None
4
2
None
Both
0 Interpersonal Skills
Technical Skills
Criteria
7. Table showing the extent of knowledge and skills applied to the job obtained
through training programs.
Not Suitable 0 0
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 82.5% of the employees think that the knowledge and
skills obtained from the training programs directly apply to their job to full
extent and the rest 17.5% employees thinks it applies to their job only to some
extent.
CHART 7
35
30
25
No Of Respondents
20
To Full Extent
15 To Some
Extent
10
Not Suitable
To Some Extent
0
To Full Extent
To Full To
Extent Not
Some
Suitable
Extent
Criteria
8. Table showing the extent of training programs’ contribution in achieving the
concern’s and individual’s goals.
Not Suitable 0 0
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 87.5% of the employees feel that their training programs
contribute to the achievement of concern’s goals and employees’ individual
goals to the full extent and 12.5% of employees feel that it contributes only to
some extent.
CHART 8
35
30
25
No Of Respondents
20
To Full Extent
15
To Some
Extent
10
Not Suitable
To Some Extent
0
To Full Extent
To Full
Extent To Some
Not
Extent
Suitable
Criteria
9. Table showing the employees rating of training infrastructure facilities
provided in the organisation.
Very Good 24 60
Good 13 33
Average 3 7
Poor 0 0
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 60% of the employees rated the training infrastructure
facility provided in the organisation as very good, 33% of employees rated it as
good and 7% of the employees rated it as average.
CHART 9
30
Poor
Average
Good
Very Good
25
20
15
10
0
Very Good Good Average Poor
10. Table showing the Employees preferred training method.
On-the-Job 22 55
Off-the-Job 18 45
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 55% of the employees prefer On-the-Job training
method and 45% of the employees prefer Off-the-Job training method.
CHART 10
25
20
15
On-the-Job
Off-the-Job
10
Off-the-Job
0
On-the-Job
On-the-Job
Off-the-Job
11. Table showing the percentage of employees who convey their training needs
to their Superiors.
Yes 40 100
No 0 0
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 100% of the employees in the concern have conveyed
their need for training to their supervisors.
CHART 11
45
No Yes
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Yes No
12. Table showing the ratings of trainers by their employees.
Very Good 25 63
Good 15 38
Average 0 0
Poor 0 0
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 63% of the employees rated their trainers conducting the
training programs in the organisation as very good and the remaining 38% of
employees rated them as good.
CHART 12
25
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
20
15
10
0
Very Good
Good
Average
Poor
13. Table showing the employees acceptance of job satisfaction due to training
activities.
Yes 37 93
No 3 8
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 93% of the employees have achieved job satisfaction due
to training activities and the remaining 8% of the employees have not achieved
job satisfaction from these training activities.
CHART 13
Yes No
8%
92%
14. Table showing about the information secured about the training program.
Well in advance 25 63
Previous day 10 25
Never 0 0
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 63% of the employees get the information about the
training program well in advance, 10% of the employees get information only
the day before and 5% of the employees never get the information at all.
CHART 14
25
20
15
10
0
Well in
advance Previous day
On the day of
program Never
15. Table showing the employees acceptance of changes in work after the
training programs.
Yes 36 90
No 4 10
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 90% of the employees accept that there is change in their
working method after the training programs. 10% of the employees do not
accept that there is a change in their working style after the training programs.
CHART 15
Yes No
10%
90%
16. Table showing about the stipends paid during the training program.
Yes 0 0
No 40 100
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table 100% of the employees say that there is no stipends paid
during the training programs.
CHART 16
Yes, 0
100
80
60
40
20
0
No
17. Table showing about the formal feedback session held after training
programs.
Yes 36 90
No 4 10
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 90% of the employees say that they have a formal
feedback session after every training program but 10% of the employees say
that they don’t have such a feedback session.
CHART 17
No, 4
Yes, 36
18. Table showing about the measurement of performance after training.
Yes 28 70
No 12 30
Total 40 100
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table, 70% of the employees say that their performance is
being measured after the training programs. But the remaining 30% of the
employees say that there is no such measurement of performance after
training.
CHART 18
35
Yes, 28
30
25
20
15
10
No, 12
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
The time allocated for doing the project was limited. So the information
Findings
ICF is providing training for all the employees relevant to their job during
different time periods according to their job, individual needs and
experience.
All the employees are conveying their need for training to their superiors.
This shows that the employees are very active and well interested in
increasing their knowledge and keeping them updated.
www.google.com
in.answers.yahoo.com
www.ehow.com
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Coach_Factory
www.icf.indianrailways.gov.in
CONCLUSION
Integral Coach Factory, ICF, just like every other successful company has learnt
the value of ‘Training and Development’ and is working hard to identify and
satisfy the training needs of its employees. We, through this one month project,
learnt about the Training and Development Process carried out in ICF by going
to each and every department in ICF allocated by our Guide in a daily basis. It
was a very good and useful learning. Overall doing a project in a giant railway
industry gave us a very pleasant and valuable experience.
QUESTIONNAIRE
Name:
Designation:
Experience:
7. Do you think the knowledge and skills obtained from the training programs directly
apply to your job?
a) To full extent b) To some extent c) Not suitable
8. To what extent training programs contribute to the concern’s goals and employees’
individual goals?
a) To full extent b) To some extent c) Not suitable
9. How would you rate the training infrastructure facility provide in the organization?
a) Very Good b) Good c) Average d) poor
10. Which method of training is preferred well?
a) On-the-Job b) off-the-Job
12. How do you rate the trainers conducting training program for your organization?
a) Very Good b) Good c) Average d) poor
13. Do you accept job satisfaction has increased due to training activities?
a) Yes b) No
15. Have you observed any changes in your work after the training program?
a) Yes b) No
16. Are you paid any stipends during the training program?
a) Yes b) No
18. Do you have any formal feedback session after training program?
a) Yes b) No
20. What changes would you like to suggest for improvement in the training program?
Thank You!