OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE
Jan 9/18
Nicole Brunne
Student:
Durham College OTA/PTA Program
5 – Very Good Delivery …………..…
4 – Good Delivery ……………………
3- Satisfactory Delivery ……. ……..
2 – Needs Improvement…………….
1 – Unsatisfactory/ Unsafe …......….
Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.
Date: ___________________________
e/p
Scenario# Rater: E.Lasso
Course Code: OTA______________________
II 3304
Performs to standard consistently. Consistently demonstrates a high standard of performance that is consistently safe
and effective. Could be used as a positive example for others. Highly recommended for progression.
Most often performs to standard. Performance has very minor error(s) or omission(s) that did not detract from the
safety and effectiveness of the activity/exercise. Ready for progression.
Performance meets minimum standards. Errors or omissions do not compromise safety or effectiveness. Meets
minimum standards for progression. A few areas could be improved.
Performance does not meet minimum standards. Errors or omissions compromised the effectiveness of
activity/exercise. Inconsistently performed, performance does not meet standards. Significant improvement is needed
before consideration for supervised patient care practice or progression.
Performance indicated cause for concern. Performance is unsafe, ineffective and/or inappropriate. Errors or omissions
compromise safety and/or significantly reduces treatment effectiveness. A potential for compromised patient
outcome or patient harm. Considerable improvement and remediation is needed. Is not ready for supervised patient care
practice or progression.
 OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE

ACCOUNTABILITY & Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
PROFESSIONALISM Improvement Unsafe

Individual’s overall ability to behave in a professional manner. Personal presentation: student wears appropriate attire with name identifier and is well groomed. Greets
client and confirms their identity. Obtains informed consent by introducing self (name and discipline), explaining what treatment will be provided and why, and receives
permission. Client is treated with respect and dignity (e.g. draping). Performs assigned duties as instructed within capabilities.

Wearing scrubs yes

Hair tied back yes
Name tag Introduces self (including name and discipline)- wrist band and
birthday, Explains treatment yes, but brief, risk briefReceives consent - yes

PREPARATION Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
Client and Environment Improvement Unsafe

Performs environmental scan of treatment area and ensures personal and client safety. Uses standard precautions and general sanitization techniques. All treatment
materials are well planned, prepared and organized. Uses effective time management in preparing client, self and environment. Client is well positioned for treatment.
Uses good body mechanics. Good flow throughout the session.

- environmental scan - noticed table too high and brakes on wheelchair not applied
- uses sanitation techniques - yes
- treatment materials gathered - yes
- effective time management - yes
- Client is well positioned for treatment/body mechanics - yes client safe in w/c

TREATMENT Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
IMPLEMENTATION Improvement Unsafe

Explanation and rationale is provided for treatment activities. Selection of treatment tasks are linked to client’s condition and goals. Treatment components are carried
out using safe, effective and efficient techniques. Client is the focus throughout treatment, not just the task itself. Monitors client performance and response to
treatment. Provides reinforcement, support and constructive feedback.

- rationale provided for the treatment activity - yes for school, use of planner...prioritizing
- part time schooling - 1 online class and in class - planning day/schedule/ getting help from other to help with cat
- provided agenda as a tool - used agenda as a way to grade session for the following week.
- discussed importance of why propelling efficiently is important - received consent again.
- used correct propelling techniques - long strides, and grabbing from under
- use demonstration.
- Requested patient try to use method taught in session
- effective reinforcement and cuing provided - use of verbal and physical cues - hand over hand approach
- provides feedback to client for improvement
- client focused

Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.
 OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE

CRITICAL THINKING Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
PROBLEM SOLVING & JUDGEMENT Improvement Unsafe
Demonstrates awareness of the need to grade or modified activities to provide “just the right challenge”. Identifies problems as they arise. Determines options
recognizing risks and benefits, and implements strategies to correct problems. Re-evaluates and revises strategies as required.

- grading activity - 2 for next week so its not :"jam packed" or information overload
- problem identified and evaluated - moved patient to lower table, requested patient apply brakes
- grading - next week can do 30 sec propulsion outdoors.

COMMUNICATION Needs Unsatisfactory or

Very Good Good Satisfactory
Verbal and Non-Verbal Improvement Unsafe

Clearly and accurately exchanges information. Engages in conversation to build rapport. Uses communication techniques and language suited the client. Checks on
the client’s understanding of information and adjusts strategies to meet client’s needs. Responds to client’s questions and concerns using effective listening skills,
empathy. Verbal and non-verbal are congruent. Brings session to a close (asks for questions and describes next steps).

- Communication clear and accurate

- language at the level of the client - engagine
- Checks for understanding of instructions - yes, agenda and long strokes
- Adjusts communication on level of the client
- engages in conversation (specific to interest and goals, social history) - yes
- brings session to close - yes, next steps indicated for next week and reporting back to OT, provided agenda and handouts
-

5 – Very Good Delivery …………..…
4 – Good Delivery ……………………
3- Satisfactory Delivery ……. ……..
2 – Needs Improvement…………….
1 – Unsatisfactory/ Unsafe …......….
Performs to standard consistently. Demonstrates a high standard of performance that is consistently safe and effective.
Could be used as a positive example for others. Highly recommended for progression.
Most often performs to standard. Performance has very minor error(s) or omission(s) that did not detract from the
safety and effectiveness of the activity/exercise. Ready for progression.
Performance meets minimum standards. Errors or omissions do not compromise safety or effectiveness. Meets
minimum standards for progression. A few areas could be improved.
Performance does not meet minimum standards. Errors or omissions compromised the effectiveness of
activity/exercise. Inconsistently performed, performance does not meet standards. Significant improvement is needed
before consideration for supervised patient care practice or progression.
Performance indicates cause for concern. Performance is unsafe, ineffective and/or inappropriate. Errors or omissions
compromise safety and/or significantly reduces treatment effectiveness. A potential for compromised patient
outcome or patient harm. Considerable improvement and remediation is needed. Is not ready for supervised patient care
practice or progression.

Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.
 OTA & PTA PERFORMANCE-BASED LAB EVALUATION: GLOBAL RATING SCALE
On the chart below: Enter the corresponding numerical value earned for each category.

ACCOUNTABILITY & PREPARATION TREATMENT CRITICAL THINKING COMMUNICATION

PROFESSIONALISM IMPLEMENTATION
Client and Judgement & Problem Verbal and Non-Verbal TOTAL
Environment Solving

4 5 5 5 5 24

Other Comments:
Well done Nicole! All the best next semester!

E.Lasso
Instructor Name ____________________________________

Instructor Signature__________________________________

Lee, P., Koseck, K., Mirco, C., Dickinson, D. & Tavares, W. (2014). OTA & PTA Performance-Based Global Rating Scale. unpublished.