Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Basics of Verification: Richard Nott Lloyd's Register EMEA
The Basics of Verification: Richard Nott Lloyd's Register EMEA
Richard Nott
Lloyd’s Register EMEA
Richard Nott
Manager, Compliance and Engineering Services
Lloyd’s Register EMEA
• Introduced in UK in 1992
• Followed Cullen enquiry into Piper Alpha disaster
• Replaced previous prescriptive legislation with “goal setting”
regime
• Introduced concept of the safety case, requirements for
identification of major accident hazards and safety critical
elements and establishment of written schemes of examination
• Supported by other legislation - DCR, PFEER, PSR, MAR
• Revised in 2005
• Methodology increasingly adopted outside UK legislative
environment
• Hydrocarbon containment
• Overpressure protection
• ESD
• Flare and blowdown
• Emergency power
• Escape routes
• Jacket primary structure
• Natural ventilation
• High speed rotating equipment
Plainly, the role of the duty holder as defined by OSCR cannot be fulfilled by one
person within an organisation. A wide range of competencies and experience is
required. While not defined in OSCR, it has become common practice for duty
holders to appoint a number of technical authorities, with responsibility for
particular SCEs, or groups of SCEs , probably along discipline lines.
Independence
• from duty holder’s internal issues and politics
• from design/EPIC contractor’s drivers
• from the delivery process
Competence
• in specific issues related to performance of SCEs and implementation of
codes and standards
• in verification and the safety case philosophy in general
Experience
• across a range of duty holders, types of project and types of asset
• with a range of design contractors, vendors and fabricators