You are on page 1of 6

Vol.2, No.

12, 1327-1332 (2010) Natural Science


doi:10.4236/ns.2010.212161

Well test analysis on pressure of viscoelastic polymer


solution with variable rheological parameters*
Hongjun Yin#, Weili Yang, Siyuan Meng, Ming Cai
Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery Ministry of Education; Northeast Petroleum University; Daqing, China;
#
Corresponding Author: yinhj7176@126.com

Received 27 September 2010; revised 28 October 2010; accepted 2 November 2010.

ABSTRACT Many domestic and foreign scholars have studied its


rheological property and established several rheological
According to the behavior that the polymer so-
model. The initial researches on the flow behavior of the
lution has both the characteristics of viscosity
non-Newtonian fluid are mainly focus on the power-law
and elastic properties, the transient flow mathe-
fluid. In most well test analysis on pressure of polymer
matical model considered the viscoelasticity of
solution, it is also assumed that the polymer solution is
the polymer solution has been established. The
pure viscous fluid, only the shear viscosity is considered
model, in which the variation of the rheological
and the rheological parameters are always treated as
parameters during the seepage flow has been
constants.
also taken into consideration, has been solved
But a large number of experiments have demonstrated
using finite-difference method. The type curves
that polymer solution has viscoelastic behavior and the
have been plotted. The influence of some prop-
rheological parameters changes in the seepage flow
erties of polymer solution including the viscoc-
process. The viscosity of the polymer solution will de-
ity, the elastic properties and the rheological
cline as the raising of the shear rate at a relatively lower
parameters has been analyzed. Compared with
Darcy velocity. In the flow event, the viscosity is the
the curves of the power-law fluid, it is shown
dominant influential factor and the elastic property can
that the pressure derivative curve considering
be neglected. In addition, the rheological property of
the elasticity of the polymer solution upwarps
polymer solution can be expressed by using pseudo-plastic
less at the radial flow regime. Besides, it will
power-law model. However, once the Darcy velocity
come down as the variation of the rheological
exceeds the critical value,the viscosity will raise with
parameters, which is quite different from the
the increasing of the shear rate, the elastic effect will
case regarding them as constants. Therefore, in
enhance gradually and its influence will be too signifi-
well test analysis on pressure of polymer solu-
cant to be ignored.
tion, it’s necessary to consider the elasticity and
Reference [1] has declared that the effective viscosity
the variation of the rheological parameters.
of polymer solution is composed of the individual con-
tributions of shear and strain viscosity. The elasticity
Keywords: Polymer Solution; Viscoelastic;
behavior and rheological property of polymer solution in
Relaxation Time; Rheological Parameters
porous media under the conditions of reservoir flow rate
has been studied in [2]. A power-law fluid viscoelastic
1. INTRODUCTION semi-empirical model which could describe the viscoe-
lastic effect of polymer solution in porous media has
The polymer solution used in the oil field is a typical
been developed in [3]. The researches on the viscoelas-
kind of non-Newtonian fluid and its rheological property
ticity have promoted the development of percolation
in the porous media is very complicated because of the
theory. Reference [4] has conducted numerical simula-
effect of shear degradation, deconcentration, adsorption
tion study for improvement of polymer flooding by vis-
and entrapment.
coelastic effect. Reference [5] has studied the flow be-
*
Project supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant havior of viscoelastic fluid, power law fluid and Newto-
No: 50874023) and by the Heilongjiang Provincial Science and Tech-
nology Plan Project (Grant No: GZ09A407) and by the Research Pro- nian fluid in pore throat by numerical method. Differ-
gram of Innovation Team of Science and Technology in Enhanced Oil ence mathematical models of viscous-elastic polymer
and Gas Recovery (Grant No: 2009td08). solution have been established in [6] and [7] from dif-

Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/


1328 H. J. Yin et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 1327-1332

ferent angles. The influence of different factors on the According to the researches in [9], the relationship
pressure of the formation near the injection well is ana- between the shearing rate and the seeping rate is as fol-
lyzed too. But the variation of rheological behavior was lows:
seldom taken into consideration and the consistency co- 3n  1 v
efficient and the power-law index were always treated as γ (4)
2n  1 2C ' K
constants. Besides, the researches on the well test of
viscoelastic polymer solution were seldom. where v is the flow velocity through porous medium, m/s;
Therefore, in this paper, the relationship between elas- K is the permeability of the formation, μm2; c’ is the
tic viscosity and shear viscosity has been insisted in this factor related to the tortuosity of capillary, 2.08~2.50;
paper. In addition, the variation of the rheological pa- Φ is the porosity of the formation, dimensionless.
rameters in the flow event has been taken into considera- The flow velocity through porous medium can be ap-
tion. What’s more, the expression of the apparent viscos- proximately expressed by using the following linear re-
ity of polymer solution which considered the viscoelas- lation:
ticity and the changing parameters of polymer solution
has been developed. Then the non-dimensional radial q
v (5)
instable flow mathematical model has been established 2rh
and solved using finite-difference methods. The pressure
where q is the injection rate of the polymer solution,
of different formation points near the bottom of the well
m3/d; h is the reservoir thickness, m.
at different time has been calculated. Then the well test
Then the expression of shearing rate considering the
analysis curves have been plotted. In the end, the influ-
variation of rheological parameters can be derived.
ence of different factors on the curves has been ana-
lyzed. 3n  r   1 1 q 1
   r (6)
2n  r   1 2C ' K 2πh
2. APPARENT VISCOCITY OF POLYMER
SOLUTION The power-law index changes with the radius. How-
ever, the resulting changes of the shear rate make little
2.1. The Shear Viscosity sense to the viscosity of the fluid at the same point. As a
result, the variation of the power-law index can be ig-
The viscosity of the power-law fluid can be described nored when calculating the shearing rate. Then the
as: shearing rate can turn to the expression as follows:
 v  H  r  r n r  1 (1) 3n  rw   1 1 q 1
    r (7)
where r is the radius away from the wellbore, m; γ is the 2n  rw   1 2C ' K 2πh
shear rate, s-1; H (r) is the consistency coefficient,
where n(rw) is the power-law index of polymer solution
mPa·sn; n (r) is the power-law index of polymer solution,
in the bottom hole, dimensionless.
dimensionless.
Letting
Reference [8] has studied the variation of rheological
behavior through experiments and developed the basic 3n  rw   1 1 q
Fs  (8)
models about the variation of rheological parameters 2n  rw   1 2C ' K 2πh
along the seepage flow direction. In this paper it means
that the consistency coefficient and the power-law index The shearing rate can be eventually simplified as:
are changing along the radial direction.   Fs r 1 (9)
For the well where the polymer solution is injected
into, the variation of rheological parameters can be ex- And the final expression of the shear viscosity of the
pressed as: polymer solution considering the variation of theological
  r  rw 
parameters can be reached.
H  r   H  rw  e (2)
2.2. The Elastic Viscosity
n  r   n  rw     r  rw  (3)
The relationship between elastic viscosity and shear
where rw is the radius of the wellbore, m; α is the varia- viscosity has been obtained in [10].
tion factor of the consistency coefficient, dimensionless; e  2 f  v (10)
β is the variation factor of the power-law index, dimen-
sionless. where, θf is the relaxation time, s.

Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/


H. J. Yin et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 1327-1332 132
1329

2.3. The Apparent Viscosity Where μ* is the characteristic viscosity, that is the ap-
parent viscosity of the polymer solution at the bottom of
There are both the shearing deformation and the elas-
the wellbore.
tic deformation when the polymer solution seeping in the
1 n  rw   n  rw 
porous medium because of the continuous contraction  *  a r  rw
 Arw  Crw (20)
and spreading of the runner. As a result, the apparent
where
viscosity is composed of the shear viscosity (μv) and the n  rw  1
elastic viscosity (μe). A  H  rw  Fs (21)
a  e   v  1  2 f   v (11) C  2 f H  rw  Fs
n  rw 
(22)
According to the expressions of the shear rate and the According to the dimensionless variable above, the
shear viscosity, the final expression of the apparent vis- seeping model of the polymer solution considering the
cosity can be obtained. variation of the rheological parameters was established:
a  1  2f Fs r 1  H  rw  e  r  rw   1    * pD  pD
(12)   rD 
 rD rD  a rD  tD
n  rw     r  rw  1 1 n  rw     r  rw 
Fs r
p 0
 D tD  0
3. MATHETICAL MODEL AND ITS  *
 pD (23)
SOLUTION  rD r 1  1
 a rD D
The mathematical model for transient flow of viscoe-  p
lastic polymer solution is derived with the following  D 0
equations.  rD rD  rDe
The partial differential equation for transient flow of The difference equation at the point (i, j) can be estab-
viscoelastic polymer solution: lished by using Implicit Difference Method.
1   r p   C L p ai pij11  b i pij 1  ci pij11  di  i  1, 2, , N  1
  (13)
r r  μa r  K t
pi0  0,  i  1, 2, , N  1
Initial condition:
p t  0  pi (14) pi  pi 1  d 0 ,  i  0 

Inner boundary condition: pij 1  pij11  0,  i  N 

K p q where
  (15)
μa r 2πrw h Di r D i
r  rw ai  
rDi2 x 2 2rDi2 x
Outer boundary condition:
2 Di 1
p bi  
0 (16) rDi x
2 2
t j
r r  re
D r '
Define the dimensionless variable as follows: ci   D
Dimensionless radius
rD2x2 2rD2x

r 1 j
rD  (17) di   pDi
rw t
1 n  rw   n  rw 
Dimensionless pressure
Ar 1 n ( rw ) e 
x
1
 Crw
 n  rw   
1  e x
1  n  rw  n  rw 
w
2πKh d0 
pD    p  pi  (18) 1 n  rw   n  rw 
q * B Arw  Crw

Dimensionless time And Δx = ln(re/rw)/N, which is the grid spacing; re is


the radius of the external boundary, m; rw is the radius of
Kt the wellbore, m; i is the number of the node; N is the
tD  (19)
 Ct rw 2
*
grid number; pe is the supply boundary pressure, Pa.

Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/


1330 H. J. Yin et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 1327-1332

Then the tridiagonal coefficient matrix equation of the 3


lg(p D)
dimensionless mathematical model was built up as: lg(p D'· t D)

lg(p D), lg(p D'· t D)


2
 1 1   pD0   d 0 
a b c1   p  d 
 1 1   D1   1  1
 a2 b2 c2   pD2    d 2 
    
 . . . .   .  0
 1 1  pDN   pe  2 3 4 5 6
lg(t D)
7 8 9 10

The equation has been solved. The pressure and its Figure 1. The type curve of viscoelastic polymer solution.
derivative value at the bottom of the wellbore at different
time have been calculated. 3
θ f=0.010s
θ f=0.005s
4. TYPE CURFE OF VISCOELASTIC

lg(p D),lg(p D'· t D)


2 θ f=0s
POLYMER SOLUTION
According to the solution of the mathematical model, 1

the type curve has been drawn, as may be seen in Figure


1. 0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
As shown in Figure 1, when considering the variation lg(t D)
of the rheological parameters and the elasticity of the
polymer solution, the characteristic of the type curve is Figure 2. The influence of the relaxation time.
as follows:
The pressure curve and the pressure derivative curve pressure derivative curve upwarps less at the radial flow
both change along the straight line with the slope of 1 at regime. What’s more, compared with the curves simply
the pure wellbore storage phase. considered the polymer solution as power-law fluid, it is
In transition section, the pressure curve flattens and shown that the pressure derivative curve upturns less at
the pressure derivative curve appears to be a transporta- the radial flow regime considering the elasticity of the
tion hump. polymer solution. The larger the relaxation time is, the
The pressure derivative curve goes up after the transi- elastic property of the polymer solution is stronger and
tion regime. This variation is a comprehensive action of the greater the energy is required, then the larger the
adsorption, shear, and elastic deformation. bottom hole pressure is and the faster it changes. There-
The pressure derivative curve goes down once the in- fore, it’s necessary to consider the elasticity in well test
fluence of the changing rheological parameters become analysis on pressure of viscoelastic polymer solution.
obviously. The influence of the consistency coefficient at the
When the effects of the closed outer boundary play a wellbore is analyzed on the basis of Figure 3. It is shown
role, the pressure curve and the pressure derivative curve that the consistency coefficient of the polymer solution
both go up. at the wellbore has no significant effect on the go-up of
the pressure derivative curve. However, as the consis-
5. ANALYSIS OF INFLUENTIAL tency coefficient at the wellbore increase, the apparent
viscosity of the polymer at the wellbore will increase,
FACTORS
the pressure and its derivative value of the radial flow
Some parameters which could influence the charac- regime will increase.
teristics of the type curve have been analyzed. These The influence of the power-law index at the wellbore
parameters include the relaxation time, the variation is analyzed on the basis of Figure 4. The power-law index
factor of the consistency coefficient and the variation at the wellbore mainly influences the radial flow regime.
factor of the power-law index, as well as the consistency As the power-law index at the wellbore decreases, the
coefficient and the power-law index of the viscoelastic upturned level of the pressure derivative curve increases.
polymer solutions. It means that the fluid is Newtonian fluid when the value
The influence of relaxation time is analyzed on the of the power-law index is 1. The more the power-law
basis of Figure 2. As the relaxation time increases, the index at the wellbore deviated from the value of 1, the
pressure and pressure derivative values increase after the more obviously of the non-Newtonian flow characteris-
pure wellbore storage phase, the “hump” of the pressure tic is, the greater the flow resistance is and the more ob-
derivative curve in transition section increases and the viously the pressure derivative curve goes up.

Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/


H. J. Yin et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 1327-1332 133
1331

4 3
H (r w)=0.06Pa·sn α =-0.002
α =-0.006

lg(p D),lg(p D'·t D)


H (r w)=0.04Pa·sn
3 2 α =-0.010
lg(p D),lg(p D'·t D)

H (r w)=0.02Pa·sn

2 1

1
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 lg(t D)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
lg(t D) Figure 5. The influence of the variation factor of consistency
coefficient.
Figure 3. The influence of consistency coefficient at the well-
bore.
4
β =0.0005
4 3 β =0.0010

lg(p D),lg(p D'·t D)


n (r w)=0.5 β =0.0015
2
3 n (r w)=0.3
lg(p D),lg(p D'·t D)

n (r w)=0.1
1
2
0
1
-1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0 lg(t D)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
lg(t D)
Figure 6. The influence of variation factor of the power-law
Figure 4. The influence of power-law index at the wellbore. index.

The influence of variation factor of the consistency above make the pressure derivative curve falls earlier.
coefficient is analyzed on the basis of Figure 5. As the
variation factor of the consistency coefficient increases, 6. CONCLUSIONS
the radial flow regime disappear earlier, the pressure
According to the behavior that the polymer solution
derivative curve goes down earlier and deeper instead of
has viscoelasticity and its rheological parameters are not
going on turning up. It is mainly for the following rea-
sons: The smaller the variation factor of the consistency constants along the seepage flow direction, the transient
coefficient is, the faster the consistency coefficient flow mathematical model has been established. It has
changes and the faster the apparent viscosity of polymer been found that the type curve is different from the
solution decreases. In the same period of flowing time, curves without considering the viscoelasticity and the
the smaller the apparent viscosity of the polymer solu- rheological parameters’ variation.
tion is, the smaller the flow resistance is. As a result, the Compared with the curves simply considered the
pressure derivative curve goes down earlier, the recessed polymer solution as power-law fluid, the pressure curve
part is wider and the radial flow period stopped earlier. of viscoelastic polymer solution is higher and the pres-
The influence of variation factor of the power-law in- sure derivative curve upturns less in the radial flow re-
dex is analyzed on the basis of Figure 6. As the variation gime.
factor of the power-law index increases, pressure and The greater the relaxation time is, the greater the elas-
pressure derivative values are smaller in the same period tic viscosity of polymer solution is and then the greater
of flowing time, the pressure derivative curve upwarps the seepage resistance the fluid encountered is. It means
less obviously at the radial flow regime and the radial that the energy required in the seepage flow is higher. So
flow period become shorter. What’s more, the Concave the injection pressure required is higher and the pressure
appears earlier and deeper. It is mainly for the following at the other point of the formation is higher.
reasons. The greater the variation factor of the The smaller the power-law index of polymer solution in
power-law index is, the faster the power-law index the bottom hole is, the more seriously the non-Newtonian
changes, the sooner the apparent viscosity of polymer behavior is. Hence, at the same rate, the apparent viscos-
solution decreases, then the smaller the apparent viscos- ity of the polymer solution near the bottom hole is
ity is and the lower the flow resistance is. It is the reasons smaller. This will make the pressure changes more slow-

Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/


1332 H. J. Yin et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 1327-1332

ly and make the pressure derivative curve upturns more The viscoelastic effects of polymer solutions in porous
at the radial flow regime. The consistency coefficient of media. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 18, 139-
143 (in Chinese).
polymer solution in the bottom hole has no significant
[4] Li, H., Cheng L.S. and Zhang S.Y. (2002) Numerical
influence on the upturned degree of the pressure deriva- simulation study for improvement of polymer flooding
tive curve. It mainly has impact on the value of the by viscoelastic effect. Petroleum Exploration and De-
pressure and the pressure derivative. The larger the con- velopment, 29, 91-93 (in Chinese).
sistency coefficient of polymer solution in the bottom [5] Zhang, L.J., Yue, X.A., Liu, Z.C. and Hou, J.R. (2005)
hole is, the larger the value of the pressure and the pres- Percolation mechanism of polymer solution through po-
sure derivative is. rous media. Journal of University Petroleum (Natural
Science Edition), 29, 51-55 (in Chinese).
Because of the variation of the rheological parameters, [6] Yin, H.J., Fu, C.Q. and Lv, Y.P. (2004) An unsteady
the apparent viscosity of polymer solution reduces con- seepage flow model of viscoelastic polymer solution.
tinuously in the flow process, which makes the pressure Journal of Hydrodynamics, 16, 209-215 (in English)
derivative curve declines after the upturned section in [7] Cao, R.Y., Cheng, L.S., Hao B.Y., Gao, H.H. and Yao,
the radial flow and make a concave section appears be- D.W. (2007) Mathematical model of viscous-elastic
fore the upturned section caused by the closed outer polymer solution seepage. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou Uni-
versity (Natural Science Edition), 22, 107-109 (in Chi-
boundary. The more seriously the rheological parameters nese).
changes, the more obviously the concave will be. [8] Xia, H.F., Yue, X.A., Cao, G.S. and Zhang, S.F. (2000)
Rheological behavior of polymer solution in the course
REFERENCES of seepage flow. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,
24, 26-29 (in Chinese).
[1] Ranjbar, M., Rupp, J., Pusch, G. and Meyn, R. (1992) [9] Wang, X.H. and Zhao, G.P. (1998) Shear rate of power-
Quantification and optimization of viscoelastic effects of law fluid through porous media. Xinjiang Petroleum Ge-
polymer solutions for enhanced oil recovery. Society of ology, 19, 312-314 (in Chinese).
Plastics Engineers, 24154, 521-531. [10] Xia, H.F. (2002) The theory and application of polymer
[2] Wang, W.Y. (1994) Viscoelasticity and rheological prop- solution with visco elastic behavior. Petroleum Industry
erty of polymer solution in porous media. Journal of Ji- Press, Beijing, 97-101 (in Chinese).
anghan Petroleum Institute, 16, 54-57 (in Chinese).
[3] Zhang, Y.L., Li, C.H., Wang, X.M. and Hu, J.B. (1994)

Copyright © 2010 SciRes. Openly accessible at http://www.scirp.org/journal/NS/

You might also like