Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ferent angles. The influence of different factors on the According to the researches in [9], the relationship
pressure of the formation near the injection well is ana- between the shearing rate and the seeping rate is as fol-
lyzed too. But the variation of rheological behavior was lows:
seldom taken into consideration and the consistency co- 3n 1 v
efficient and the power-law index were always treated as γ (4)
2n 1 2C ' K
constants. Besides, the researches on the well test of
viscoelastic polymer solution were seldom. where v is the flow velocity through porous medium, m/s;
Therefore, in this paper, the relationship between elas- K is the permeability of the formation, μm2; c’ is the
tic viscosity and shear viscosity has been insisted in this factor related to the tortuosity of capillary, 2.08~2.50;
paper. In addition, the variation of the rheological pa- Φ is the porosity of the formation, dimensionless.
rameters in the flow event has been taken into considera- The flow velocity through porous medium can be ap-
tion. What’s more, the expression of the apparent viscos- proximately expressed by using the following linear re-
ity of polymer solution which considered the viscoelas- lation:
ticity and the changing parameters of polymer solution
has been developed. Then the non-dimensional radial q
v (5)
instable flow mathematical model has been established 2rh
and solved using finite-difference methods. The pressure
where q is the injection rate of the polymer solution,
of different formation points near the bottom of the well
m3/d; h is the reservoir thickness, m.
at different time has been calculated. Then the well test
Then the expression of shearing rate considering the
analysis curves have been plotted. In the end, the influ-
variation of rheological parameters can be derived.
ence of different factors on the curves has been ana-
lyzed. 3n r 1 1 q 1
r (6)
2n r 1 2C ' K 2πh
2. APPARENT VISCOCITY OF POLYMER
SOLUTION The power-law index changes with the radius. How-
ever, the resulting changes of the shear rate make little
2.1. The Shear Viscosity sense to the viscosity of the fluid at the same point. As a
result, the variation of the power-law index can be ig-
The viscosity of the power-law fluid can be described nored when calculating the shearing rate. Then the
as: shearing rate can turn to the expression as follows:
v H r r n r 1 (1) 3n rw 1 1 q 1
r (7)
where r is the radius away from the wellbore, m; γ is the 2n rw 1 2C ' K 2πh
shear rate, s-1; H (r) is the consistency coefficient,
where n(rw) is the power-law index of polymer solution
mPa·sn; n (r) is the power-law index of polymer solution,
in the bottom hole, dimensionless.
dimensionless.
Letting
Reference [8] has studied the variation of rheological
behavior through experiments and developed the basic 3n rw 1 1 q
Fs (8)
models about the variation of rheological parameters 2n rw 1 2C ' K 2πh
along the seepage flow direction. In this paper it means
that the consistency coefficient and the power-law index The shearing rate can be eventually simplified as:
are changing along the radial direction. Fs r 1 (9)
For the well where the polymer solution is injected
into, the variation of rheological parameters can be ex- And the final expression of the shear viscosity of the
pressed as: polymer solution considering the variation of theological
r rw
parameters can be reached.
H r H rw e (2)
2.2. The Elastic Viscosity
n r n rw r rw (3)
The relationship between elastic viscosity and shear
where rw is the radius of the wellbore, m; α is the varia- viscosity has been obtained in [10].
tion factor of the consistency coefficient, dimensionless; e 2 f v (10)
β is the variation factor of the power-law index, dimen-
sionless. where, θf is the relaxation time, s.
2.3. The Apparent Viscosity Where μ* is the characteristic viscosity, that is the ap-
parent viscosity of the polymer solution at the bottom of
There are both the shearing deformation and the elas-
the wellbore.
tic deformation when the polymer solution seeping in the
1 n rw n rw
porous medium because of the continuous contraction * a r rw
Arw Crw (20)
and spreading of the runner. As a result, the apparent
where
viscosity is composed of the shear viscosity (μv) and the n rw 1
elastic viscosity (μe). A H rw Fs (21)
a e v 1 2 f v (11) C 2 f H rw Fs
n rw
(22)
According to the expressions of the shear rate and the According to the dimensionless variable above, the
shear viscosity, the final expression of the apparent vis- seeping model of the polymer solution considering the
cosity can be obtained. variation of the rheological parameters was established:
a 1 2f Fs r 1 H rw e r rw 1 * pD pD
(12) rD
rD rD a rD tD
n rw r rw 1 1 n rw r rw
Fs r
p 0
D tD 0
3. MATHETICAL MODEL AND ITS *
pD (23)
SOLUTION rD r 1 1
a rD D
The mathematical model for transient flow of viscoe- p
lastic polymer solution is derived with the following D 0
equations. rD rD rDe
The partial differential equation for transient flow of The difference equation at the point (i, j) can be estab-
viscoelastic polymer solution: lished by using Implicit Difference Method.
1 r p C L p ai pij11 b i pij 1 ci pij11 di i 1, 2, , N 1
(13)
r r μa r K t
pi0 0, i 1, 2, , N 1
Initial condition:
p t 0 pi (14) pi pi 1 d 0 , i 0
K p q where
(15)
μa r 2πrw h Di r D i
r rw ai
rDi2 x 2 2rDi2 x
Outer boundary condition:
2 Di 1
p bi
0 (16) rDi x
2 2
t j
r r re
D r '
Define the dimensionless variable as follows: ci D
Dimensionless radius
rD2x2 2rD2x
r 1 j
rD (17) di pDi
rw t
1 n rw n rw
Dimensionless pressure
Ar 1 n ( rw ) e
x
1
Crw
n rw
1 e x
1 n rw n rw
w
2πKh d0
pD p pi (18) 1 n rw n rw
q * B Arw Crw
The equation has been solved. The pressure and its Figure 1. The type curve of viscoelastic polymer solution.
derivative value at the bottom of the wellbore at different
time have been calculated. 3
θ f=0.010s
θ f=0.005s
4. TYPE CURFE OF VISCOELASTIC
4 3
H (r w)=0.06Pa·sn α =-0.002
α =-0.006
H (r w)=0.02Pa·sn
2 1
1
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 lg(t D)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
lg(t D) Figure 5. The influence of the variation factor of consistency
coefficient.
Figure 3. The influence of consistency coefficient at the well-
bore.
4
β =0.0005
4 3 β =0.0010
n (r w)=0.1
1
2
0
1
-1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0 lg(t D)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
lg(t D)
Figure 6. The influence of variation factor of the power-law
Figure 4. The influence of power-law index at the wellbore. index.
The influence of variation factor of the consistency above make the pressure derivative curve falls earlier.
coefficient is analyzed on the basis of Figure 5. As the
variation factor of the consistency coefficient increases, 6. CONCLUSIONS
the radial flow regime disappear earlier, the pressure
According to the behavior that the polymer solution
derivative curve goes down earlier and deeper instead of
has viscoelasticity and its rheological parameters are not
going on turning up. It is mainly for the following rea-
sons: The smaller the variation factor of the consistency constants along the seepage flow direction, the transient
coefficient is, the faster the consistency coefficient flow mathematical model has been established. It has
changes and the faster the apparent viscosity of polymer been found that the type curve is different from the
solution decreases. In the same period of flowing time, curves without considering the viscoelasticity and the
the smaller the apparent viscosity of the polymer solu- rheological parameters’ variation.
tion is, the smaller the flow resistance is. As a result, the Compared with the curves simply considered the
pressure derivative curve goes down earlier, the recessed polymer solution as power-law fluid, the pressure curve
part is wider and the radial flow period stopped earlier. of viscoelastic polymer solution is higher and the pres-
The influence of variation factor of the power-law in- sure derivative curve upturns less in the radial flow re-
dex is analyzed on the basis of Figure 6. As the variation gime.
factor of the power-law index increases, pressure and The greater the relaxation time is, the greater the elas-
pressure derivative values are smaller in the same period tic viscosity of polymer solution is and then the greater
of flowing time, the pressure derivative curve upwarps the seepage resistance the fluid encountered is. It means
less obviously at the radial flow regime and the radial that the energy required in the seepage flow is higher. So
flow period become shorter. What’s more, the Concave the injection pressure required is higher and the pressure
appears earlier and deeper. It is mainly for the following at the other point of the formation is higher.
reasons. The greater the variation factor of the The smaller the power-law index of polymer solution in
power-law index is, the faster the power-law index the bottom hole is, the more seriously the non-Newtonian
changes, the sooner the apparent viscosity of polymer behavior is. Hence, at the same rate, the apparent viscos-
solution decreases, then the smaller the apparent viscos- ity of the polymer solution near the bottom hole is
ity is and the lower the flow resistance is. It is the reasons smaller. This will make the pressure changes more slow-
ly and make the pressure derivative curve upturns more The viscoelastic effects of polymer solutions in porous
at the radial flow regime. The consistency coefficient of media. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 18, 139-
143 (in Chinese).
polymer solution in the bottom hole has no significant
[4] Li, H., Cheng L.S. and Zhang S.Y. (2002) Numerical
influence on the upturned degree of the pressure deriva- simulation study for improvement of polymer flooding
tive curve. It mainly has impact on the value of the by viscoelastic effect. Petroleum Exploration and De-
pressure and the pressure derivative. The larger the con- velopment, 29, 91-93 (in Chinese).
sistency coefficient of polymer solution in the bottom [5] Zhang, L.J., Yue, X.A., Liu, Z.C. and Hou, J.R. (2005)
hole is, the larger the value of the pressure and the pres- Percolation mechanism of polymer solution through po-
sure derivative is. rous media. Journal of University Petroleum (Natural
Science Edition), 29, 51-55 (in Chinese).
Because of the variation of the rheological parameters, [6] Yin, H.J., Fu, C.Q. and Lv, Y.P. (2004) An unsteady
the apparent viscosity of polymer solution reduces con- seepage flow model of viscoelastic polymer solution.
tinuously in the flow process, which makes the pressure Journal of Hydrodynamics, 16, 209-215 (in English)
derivative curve declines after the upturned section in [7] Cao, R.Y., Cheng, L.S., Hao B.Y., Gao, H.H. and Yao,
the radial flow and make a concave section appears be- D.W. (2007) Mathematical model of viscous-elastic
fore the upturned section caused by the closed outer polymer solution seepage. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou Uni-
versity (Natural Science Edition), 22, 107-109 (in Chi-
boundary. The more seriously the rheological parameters nese).
changes, the more obviously the concave will be. [8] Xia, H.F., Yue, X.A., Cao, G.S. and Zhang, S.F. (2000)
Rheological behavior of polymer solution in the course
REFERENCES of seepage flow. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,
24, 26-29 (in Chinese).
[1] Ranjbar, M., Rupp, J., Pusch, G. and Meyn, R. (1992) [9] Wang, X.H. and Zhao, G.P. (1998) Shear rate of power-
Quantification and optimization of viscoelastic effects of law fluid through porous media. Xinjiang Petroleum Ge-
polymer solutions for enhanced oil recovery. Society of ology, 19, 312-314 (in Chinese).
Plastics Engineers, 24154, 521-531. [10] Xia, H.F. (2002) The theory and application of polymer
[2] Wang, W.Y. (1994) Viscoelasticity and rheological prop- solution with visco elastic behavior. Petroleum Industry
erty of polymer solution in porous media. Journal of Ji- Press, Beijing, 97-101 (in Chinese).
anghan Petroleum Institute, 16, 54-57 (in Chinese).
[3] Zhang, Y.L., Li, C.H., Wang, X.M. and Hu, J.B. (1994)