Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contoh Design Note Surge Shaft
Contoh Design Note Surge Shaft
P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
1. SURGE SHAFT
1.1 Location
Surge shaft has been located on the ridge with flat topography with general
ground elevation of El. 536.58 m. The location shall be accessible from
existing road by taking off an additional branch road.
The size of the orifice has been calculated to satisfy the condition given by
Calame and Gaden (Appendix 2.2). An orifice size of 7.8 sq. m. is provided.
On the perusal of results after running this model following inference has been
notified. The maximum upsurge level in the surge tank has been worked out
corresponding to the full load rejection at the highest reservoir level. Maximum
upsurge level works out to be El. 532.5 m. Considering a freeboard, the top
of the surge tank has been kept at El. 536.5 m (Appendix 2.3).
The minimum down surge has been calculated considering 100% load
rejection followed by full load acceptance at the instant of maximum negative
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
velocity in the head race tunnel at minimum reservoir level .This gives the
maximum down surge level of El. 503.3 m (Appendix 2.4). The invert of the
HRT (El.482.75 m) has been kept sufficiently below this level so as to ensure
sufficient water cover over the tunnel overt to avoid vortex formation.
The height of the surge tank from the crown of HRT (El.489.75 m) to the top of
the surge shaft (El. 536.58 m) works out to be 46.83 m.
1.4 Others
The surge shaft shall be provided with a vertical slide type gate at the
downstream end to close the penstock / pressure shaft for inspection and
maintenance.
The surge shaft details have been provided in drawing nos. ________
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
(2) APPENDIX
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 2.1
A surge tank has been envisaged at the downstream end of the HRT to
provide the open reflection column of water to limit the transmission of water
surges due to water hammer phenomenon to HRT. The surge tank would
also assist in improving the regulation and to provide water supply to turbines
in case of sudden start up of a machine.
To ensure the hydraulic stability of surge tank, its area has been calculated
according to Thomas criteria. According to Thomas, the limit cross sectional
area of surge tank is
L × At
Asth =
2g × β × H
Where,
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
116
Flow velocity in HRT, V = = 2.8546 m / sec
40 .6357
The value of resistance factor is function of total head loss in water conductor
system excluding the Head Loss in pressure shaft and tail race tunnel.
V 2n2 L
β v2 = + other losses in tunnel system
R4/3
V 2 n 2 L
∴βv 2 = 1.1 4 / 3
R
L × Af v2
Asf = ×
β ×v2 × H 2g
β = 0.6179 sec2/m
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
2 2
2.8 5 ×4 0.06 1 × 8 4 0 0 22 .178
β v = 1.1
2
= 1.1
( 1.7 ) 48/ 3
2.1531
1.1 [10.3] = 11.330
β = 1.390 sec2/m
As per Thoma criteria for calculation of diameter of surge shaft tank minimum
value of β is to be taken.
The cross sectional area of Surge Tank required, for n=0.012 ,β=0.6179
4
Required diameter of surge tank, D = Asth *
π
D =26.76 m
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
\APPENDIX 2.2
Surge column shall depend upon the restriction provided by the orifice in the
bottom of surge shaft. According to IS: 7396 (Part 1)-1985 clause-5.5.3 &
5.5.3.1 the area of orifice is so chosen as to satisfy the condition given by
Calame and Gaden for maximum flow which is as fallow:
Z* 1 Z* 3
+ h f ≤ ho r ≤ + h f
2 4 2 4
Where
LAt
Z* = v
gAsth
8400 × 40 .6357
Z * = 2.8546 × = 37 .56 m
9.81 × 200 .96
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
Z * hf
+ = 27.82 And,
2 4
Z* 3
+ h f = 30.33
2 4
Q2
hor = 2 2
C d * Ao * 2 g
Where,
116 2
hor = = 29 .41m
0.62 2 * 7.79 2 * 2 * 9.81
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 2.3
According to IS: 7396 (Part 1) – 1985, the surge tank shall be designed to
accommodate the maximum and minimum water levels anticipated under worst
condition.
The maximum upsurge level in the surge tank shall be worked out
corresponding to:
The surge levels were also calculated for other cases like 100% load
acceptance followed by full load rejection at highest reservoir level, 66% load
acceptance followed by full load rejection at highest reservoir level and 33%
load acceptance followed by full load rejection at highest reservoir level .
It was observed from the result (shown in Table 2.3.1 and Fig.2.3.1 , Fig.2.3.2,
Fig.2.3.3 & Fig.2.3.4) for restricted orifice type surge tank that the level of
worst case of upsurge in surge tank, El.532.461 m occurs when full load
rejection at highest reservoir level using WHAMO.
TABLE-2.3.1
ft m ft m
1712.5776 522 100-0 1746.90 532.461
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
Fig.2.3.1
Fig. 2.3.2
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
Fig. 2.3.3
Fig. 2.3.4
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 2.4
According to IS: 7396 (Part 1) – 1985, the surge tank shall be designed to
accommodate the maximum and minimum water levels anticipated under worst
condition.
To obtain minimum down surge level the worst of the following two conditions
shall be considered:
The surge levels were also calculated for other cases like 100% load rejection
followed by full load acceptance at the instant of maximum negative velocity in
the head race tunnel, 100% load rejection followed by 66% load acceptance at
the instant of maximum negative velocity in the head race tunnel and 100%
load rejection is followed by 33% load acceptance at the instant of maximum
negative velocity in the head race tunnel.
It was observed from the result (shown in Table 2.4.1 and Fig.2.4.1,Fig.2.4.2 ,
Fig.2.4.3 & Fig.2.4.4) for restricted orifice type surge tank that the level of
worst case of downsurge in surge tank, El.503.291 m occurs when 100% load
rejection is followed by 100% load acceptance at the instant of maximum
negative velocity in the head race tunnel using WHAMO.
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
TABLE – 2.4.1
ft M ft m
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
Fig.2.4.1
Fig.2.4.2
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
Fig.2.4.3
Fig.2.4.4
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 2.5
According to IS: 7357 – 1974, the thickness of lining for surge shaft shall be
designed on the basis of Lame’s thick cylinder theory. For designing purpose,
the worst condition occurs from outside the lining. The lining shall be
adequate to withstand this anticipated external pressure. Indian standards
suggest providing a minimum thickness of 0.3m or thickness required to resist
maximum external pressure, whichever is higher.
b2 − a2
Pc = c 2
σ
2
b + a
Where,
σc = 113.70 kg/cm2.
a = 800 cm
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
4.66 b 2 − a 2 b 2 − 82
∴ = 2 =
113 .70 b + a 2 b 2 + 82
64 x 118.36 = 109.04x b2
7575.04 = 109.04x b2
∴b2 = 69.4702
b = 8.33
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT
YAMNE STAGE –II H.E.P (84 MW)_________________________________________________________________________
(3) DRAWINGS
__________________________________________________________________________________
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ON SURGE SHAFT