Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Which Came First, the Chicken or the Cage? Inhumane Egg Production Methods
Sydney G Williams
Abstract
This paper will be covering the overlooked abuse within the egg production industry, specifically
focusing on cage-free production cruelty in comparisons with other production methods. The
author will be discussing within this paper how the consumer is mislead with lack of regulations
within egg production industries and false advertising in relativity to the abuse occurring in large
scale production farms. The author will also be discussing cost comparisons in this industry,
different health issues arising from different production methods, and possible solutions and
Which Came First, the Chicken, or the Cage? : Inhumane Egg Production Methods
On average, around 300 million hens are used for egg production ("The Egg Industry,"
n.d.). Whether produced more “humanely” cage-free, or with battery cages, both types of
production facilities go through a mutilation of burning their beaks partially off and sometimes
using starvation as a method to force molt, which is the shedding of feathers. These similar hen
farms also send all female chickens to slaughterhouses after their body can no longer keep up
with the businesses’ fast rate need for eggs, which usually is no more than two years, or less than
half of chicken’s normal life span. Male chickens, however, are not that lucky; more than 200
million male chicks in the U.S. alone are slaughtered immediately because they do not serve a
Battery cages are cages in which hens are granted 67 square inches, or less than a single
sheet of lined paper. The United Egg Producers require at least 8 inches by 8 inches with 6 birds
per cage; however, they also estimate that around 15% of egg facilities are not up to those
standards ("Cage-Free vs. Battery-Cage Eggs," n.d.). Free-range production is where hens are not
exposed to artificial light, do not have their beaks trimmed, and have access to green feed and
open spaces (Parker & De Costa, 2016). However, activists in this field of work call it “phantom
access” where doors are too small, limited, and not always open. Cage- free hens are to have
enough room to walk, spread their wings, and lay in nests. This production style puts the hens
together in a flock of usually thousands in one area. 97% of all eggs produced are from battery
cage farms, 2% are from cage-free farms, and 1% are free-range ("Cage-Free vs. Battery-Cage
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 4
Eggs," n.d.; "How Hens Are Confined," 2010). There are also “enriched” or “colony” cages
which are cages with flaps for nesting boxes, perches, and scratch pads for natural behaviors.
The European Union, New Zealand, California, and Michigan by law are restricted to the use of
these cages for egg production (Parker & De Costa, 2016). Egg laying hens who are raised in
cage-free egg production facilities suffer constant abuse from wide scale production methods in
factory farms.
Social
Animal cruelty is an up and coming issue that our generation is just beginning to become
aware of. Often consumers want to take a step in the right direction for animals, but do not want
to commit fully to a plant based lifestyle without eggs or fur or meat in their lives. Because of
this, people have been choosing the lesser of the two when it comes to animal products such as
going with products labeled as cage-free or free-range. However, what consumers are not aware
of, is that these labels are often just a marketing scam that big production factory farms are doing
in order to increase sales without changing much in their factories. Factory farms often find a
loophole in the definition of cage-free in order to consider their products cage-free without any
type of cruelty decrease. Unfortunately, this process is much easier than one would believe and
almost every large scale factory farm on the grocery store shelves labeling their eggs as
Regulation in Farms
As previously stated, factory farms are often finding loopholes in regulations to qualify
eggs as cage-free during the advertising process. By law, cage-free eggs must apply to hens that
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 5
have a minimum of 11 by 11 square inches per bird. However, as broad as this definition is on
its own, governments have also been reducing the amount of enforcement in this industry. In
Australia alone, the scope on egg production industry has minimized significantly just in the past
20 years (Parker & De Costa, 2016). The egg production industry inspections are often planned
with the factory owner as they have a set date and time. Along with allowing the factories to
prepare ahead of time for inspections, the regulations are often not searched thoroughly, and
inspectors often miss large problems. For example, videos have surfaced that show levels of
abuse that could not be cleaned up enough to fully pass inspection no matter how much time they
had. Direct Action Everywhere is an all-volunteer animal advocacy group who stealthily visited
a “cage-free” barn in California, also known as Kirkland. They documented their experience by
film and the results were shocking. The video shows dead birds on the floor, injured hens
pecking at other hens, flesh hanging off many chickens beaks, hens that couldn’t stand, missing
feathers on many of the birds, and feces covering not only the floor, but most of the chickens
backs’ as well. As if this were not enough, Wayne Hsiving, co creator of the video, stated “There
were birds rotting on the floor, and there was on dead bird that seemed to have lost her head.”
(Storm, 2016)
Economic
Most successful farms in the United States are family owned which means that the
principal owners and their relatives by either blood or marriage own over 50% of all the
business’s assets. Studies show that in 2015, while around 90% of U.S. farms were small family
operated, their gross cash farm income was less than $350,000; however, large family farms
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 6
made over one million in gross cash farm income. (MacDonald & Hoppe, 2016) Along with
ultimately having higher production levels, larger farms are also more efficient making food
from them less expensive. According to Tim Griffin, director of the Agriculture, Food and
Environment program at Tufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, “As
the farms get larger, it’s easier to invest in labor-saving machinery, technology and specialized
Everyday consumers are willing to pay the extra couple dollars when they believe that it
may help lessen animal cruelty or their own health. On average, white eggs produced from
battery cages cost $.93, and brown eggs with the same production cost around $.97. Cage-free
eggs cost on average $2.37 for a white carton of eggs and $3.33 for a brown carton. While brown
organic free-range eggs cost on average $3.66 per carton ("How Hens Are Confined," 2010).
These prices are raised as the price of production increase; however, cage-free and battery cage
egg production costs are unnoticeably close as the differences between minimum allotted spaces
for each bird is only a mere 53 inches ("How Hens Are Confined," 2010).
Health
Animal Welfare researchers argue that large scale cage production may protect hens from
themselves and others in some scenarios. These scenarios include but are not exclusive to:
feather pecking, vent- pecking, and cannibalism (Parker & De Costa, 2016). Feather pecking,
also known as injurious pecking, is a term that occurs with egg laying hen flocks which is a
abusive harmful version of the natural habitat chickens have called gentle pecking. This can
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 7
result in balding hens which ultimately require 40% more feed to maintain their body
temperature than a healthy chicken. The stress caused by this pecking can make the hens more
susceptible to diseases and death ("What Is Feather Pecking?," n.d.). Vent-pecking is a more
severe form of injurious pecking where the chicken will not only peck at the feathers and the
skin, but continue to peck to the point of reaching their internal organs and sometimes pull out
the organs and intestines. Cannibalism is often the next tragic step after feather and vent pecking
and is yet another leading cause to hen death within factory farms.
Often egg laying hens who spend their lives in cages face new types of illnesses and
bring the risk of spreading new diseases that hens otherwise would not face. Constantly kept in
cages without exercise and being deprived of calcium and other crucial vitamins and minerals,
hens will develop a very serious condition known as caged layer fatigue. This sickness paralyzes
the birds as they die from thirst and starvations within reach of their food and water. This is an
effect of not only lack of room to move within confinement, but also a genetic manipulation
founded in the 20th century to produce a hen capable of laying an unusual amount of eggs.
During this paralyzing process, pieces of eggs clog the bird’s oviducts, which are tubes in which
an egg passes through an ovary ("Oviduct," n.d.), as eggs are overly large for the bird to lay. In
addition, a new disease has been founded known as the fatty liver hemorrhagic syndrome. This is
associated with an abnormally fragile, enlarged liver coated with blood clots (Davis, n.d.). These
types of diseases are not only extremely painful to the birds, but they can be unhealthy for
humans when consumed. Contaminated eggs can be easily seen and prevented however along
with the abuse in the industry, the sicknesses are overlooked for the economic value.
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 8
In 1909 production was one quarter of what it is today with starting in 1900 at 76 million
and growing to over 303 million by 2008. At the earlier times, all egg production was free range,
but lots of disadvantages came with that. The hens had no protection from heat, cold, and other
weather circumstances. The hens were kept in dirty conditions with no protection from predators,
disease, and parasites while having a poorly regulated diet. From the years of 1947 to 1951 there
were 395 cases of trichinosis with 57 deaths. However, as regulations became stricter and
medical technologies increased, there were no deaths and only 12 cases of trichinosis from the
Pros
Although large scale factory farming has many questionable aspects, there are also many
pros to this style of production. Through using vitamins, minerals, and other substances, animals
grow at an unusually rapid rate. Also the processes used are modern and efficient, resulting in
decreasing overhead prices. Both of these contribute to lowering business costs and making food
more accessible to lower income citizens. Along with that, factory farms may improve local and
national governments. This is because while not only creating jobs and generating revenue, they
are also attracting workers from nearby towns and cities therefore increasing the need for the
Cons
Along with pros in this industry, there are also many cons. The population of farm
animals have increased by 23% from 1980 until 2010 and according to Worldwatch Institute, has
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 9
increased to 4.3 billion. However, The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization
estimates that around 80% of this growth is from strictly large scale factory farming animals This
level of increase has many cons as the rate of production has never been this rapid. CAFOs, or
concentrated animal feeding organizations, account for vast amounts of waste, water, and land.
Along with these factors, they also contribute to biodiversity loss and pose as a serious threat to
human and animal diseases. Biodiversity is the variety of life within an environment and as
farms expand and take land to breed more farm animals, they are taking away land and
ultimately killing off the natural animals who resided on the land before (K. Wyckoff, Personal
communication, December 18, 2017). Diets with high levels of meat and animal fat
cardiovascular diseases, and certain types of cancer. The high levels of waste and gases given off
from production methods also drastically contributes to climate change. Around 18% of all
greenhouse gases originate from factory farms, to be more exact, around 9% of all carbon
dioxide, 40% of all methane (which is 25 times as potent as carbon dioxide), and 65% of nitrous
oxide (which is 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide).While the greenhouse effect requires
a healthy amount of these gases to keep the atmosphere warm enough for substantial life, too
much of these gases, which is what we are experiencing now on Earth, can let too much heat into
An interview was conducted with Bill and Amy Prince, owners of the Leaping Lizard, a
restaurant in Virginia Beach. This interview occurred because along with owning the restaurant,
they also created the idea to farm their own produce for the restaurant. After speaking with Mr.
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 10
and Mrs. Prince, a lot of light was shed on the business perspective within this industry. Their
moving impetus to begin raising their own poultry was that they wanted fresh eggs for personal
use, as well as to supplement when needed in their restaurant. They added that it makes for a
good source of entertainment and fun at the Leaping Lizard. Unfortunately, however, as with
most cage free small farms, they have lost eight chickens to foxes in the past two years. This is a
commonly seen problem for farmers such as Mr. Bill Prince, who takes care of the chickens
mostly on his own, as they are focused more on the happiness and freedom for the birds that in
some cases will be taken advantage of by predators. Although stating that raising his own hens is
a great source of entertainment and that every last dollar helps when owning a restaurant, Mr.
Prince states that the eggs laid in their own farm could not possibly cover the obscene amount of
eggs needed in a fully functioning kitchen and is simply used in specialty dishes as an added
attraction (B. Prince & A. Prince, Personal communication, October 25, 2017).
Case Law
National
As of July 2010, the FDA began requiring egg factory farms producing 50,000 or more
eggs to be subject to the Egg Safety Rule. This rule states that the factory owners and producers
must take all possible steps to prevent possible salmonella spreading with the hens and with
transportation and consumption. The Egg Safety Rule also requires records and documents on
the producer’s submission with the FDA (Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 2012).
Along with the previous rule, Congress decided in 18 U.S.C. §48 for the criminalization of the
“commercial creation, sale, or possession of certain depictions of animal cruelty” (United States
v. Robert J. Stevens). The statute states that if animal abuse occurs knowingly for commercial
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 11
gain, one may face up to five years in prison. In United States v. Robert J. Stevens, Mr. Stevens
brings the question to the court if the prohibition in the statute is consistent with the First
Amendment’s freedom of speech. The court responds with the creation of the legal definition of
animal cruelty: “ in which a living animal is intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded,
or killed” however exempts any actions with serious religious, political, scientific, educational,
journalistic, historical, or artistic value. The court ruled against Stevens stating that although the
First Amendment does protect your freedom of speech, it does in no way protect any violence or
criminal conduct. Also, under no circumstances may the First Amendment grant permission to
Congress to step outside and to assume any underlying meaning of the amendment to allow
International
One of Brazil’s main economic sources is eggs, producing around 697 million eggs
annually around the country. Although their production numbers are so high, they still have yet
to create any legislation strictly for egg production methods nationwide, with their closest
relating legislation being Federal Act n. 9.605/98. This act states that criminal charges and
punishments will be put in place with any type of harm to the environment. Because this act does
not specifically address any livestock abuse or regulations, a Federal Animal Welfare Code has
been proposed. This bill is meant to explicitly protect pets and livestock as Brazil has no other
legislation similar to that. This bill, however, is under consideration by the government and has
been since 2012 (Sousa, Pereira, Watanabe, & Cataneo, n.d.). However, the Brazilian
Agricultural Research Agency of Embrapa located in the state of Santa Catarina has a set of
animal welfare guidelines relating to the commercial egg production methods known as
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 12
Technical Guidelines 49/2006. The purpose of this legislation is to ensure that, because eggs are
so widely popular, no nutritional values can decrease or pose as a risk to consumers’ health due
to improper production methods. Nonetheless, this is strictly a set of guidelines and is not
mandatory in any way for egg producers nor does it cover anything specific to animal welfare.
Possible Solutions
There are many possible solutions in relation to cage-free egg production cruelty within
the industry. Many suggest to cut eggs completely out of one’s diet and make an independent
effort to reduce the amount of egg production person by person. However, it is argued that this is
not possible for all as the most realistic egg substitutes are relatively more expensive than eggs
themselves. These prices could be significantly reduced with increasing awareness and demand
for a less cruel answer to still enjoy your favorite meals. This brings the next solution into
conversation with spreading more awareness with the younger generations. The egg industry is a
very vague subject which is very unknown to the public; however, many specialists suggest that
raising younger generations from the start with the knowledge of what occurs in large scale
production farms can also be a solution to this abuse. This is because it may force producers to
create a more humane environment for the animals in order to stay in business if interest were to
drop as awareness rises. Children in the U.S. are taught that the food pyramid should contain 2-3
servings of meat and dairy per day which is scientifically proven to not be necessary. In fact,
most educational food nutritional sources suggest all plant based calcium and protein to be
strictly “allergenic alternatives” ("Dairy Group Food Gallery," 2017). Raising children to know
that there are not only tasty alternatives, but healthier, cruelty free alternatives to all animal
products can heavily decrease the amount harm occurring in egg production factory farms.
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 13
Conclusion
Summary
government regulations and awareness within the public. The three types of egg production
methods are battery caged, cage-free, and free-range with cage-free and free-range being the two
most cruelty free methods believed by the general population. However, cage-free hens, contrary
to popular belief, face constant abuse and overcrowding of farms. Everyday consumers believe
that by buying cage-free, it automatically means the hens are raised less harmfully, and
unfortunately that is not the case. Factory farms often find loopholes in the regulations to label
eggs as cage-free without changing much from their battery cage production methods. Cage-free
egg regulations by law states that hens must have 11 by 11 square inches per bird and typically
inspectors will let the factory owners know ahead of time when inspections will take place
without any real threat of criminal penalties for breaking regulations. The cage-free production
style, however, is not the only overlooked production style, especially when speaking on health
issues. All production methods have a risk of types of liver and cannibalistic diseases with the
hens which can be linked to paralyzing symptoms and often death. Despite past stated
information, factory farms are an extremely efficient method of production and often allow
consuming prices to decrease. Although prices may decrease, many experts argue that the
contributions to climate change factory farms have are not worth it long term. Despite the fact
that so much abuse is occuring and it is risking the health of others as well, there still yet to be
any approved legislation nationally or internationally covering strictly animal welfare within
factory farms. There are many simple solutions to this issue such as raising awareness with the
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 14
public and younger generations of the abuse occurring in large scale production facilities and the
types of alternatives available. Egg laying hens who are raised in cage-free egg production
facilities suffer constant abuse from wide scale production methods in factory farms.
References
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 15
10 advantages and disadvantages of factory farming. (2016, March 11). Retrieved from
https://futureofworking.com/10-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-factory-farming/
Bouchat, G. (2017, November 06). Alt-meat: Seeking solutions to unethical factory farming.
Retrieved from
https://psuvanguard.com/alt-meat-seeking-solutions-to-unethical-factory-farming-sustain
able-vegan/
Cage-free eggs Vs. regular eggs: Who wins? (2016, June 08). Retrieved from
https://fitnessreloaded.com/cage-free-eggs-vs-regular-eggs/
Cage-free vs. battery-cage eggs. (n.d.). Retrieved September 28, 2017, from
http://m.humanesociety.org/issues/confinement_farm/facts/cage-free_vs_battery-cage.ht
ml
Center for food safety and applied nutrition. (2012, July). Inspections - final report and quarterly
summaries on FDA inspections under the egg safety rule. Retrieved from
https://www.fda.gov/Food/ComplianceEnforcement/Inspections/ucm311029.htm
Colb, S. F. (2010, April 14). Federal appeals court rejects preemption claim against california.
Retrieved from
http://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/federal-appeals-court-rejects-preemption-c
laim-against-california-downed-animal-law-a-victory-for-animal-rights.html
Compassion over killing v. U.S. food and drug administration (U.S. Court of Appeals February
https://www.choosemyplate.gov/dairy-group-food-gallery
Davis, K. (n.d.). The battery hen: Her life is not for the birds. Retrieved from
https://www.upc-online.org/batthen.html
https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/factory-farming/chickens/egg-industr
y/
Haspel, T. (2014, September 02). Small vs. large: Which size farm is better for the planet?
Retrieved from
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/small-vs-large-which-size-farm-is-better-
for-the-planet/2014/08/29/ac2a3dc8-2e2d-11e4-994d-202962a9150c_story.html?utm_ter
m=.954c77f3730d
How hens Are confined [Digital image]. (2010, August 14). Retrieved September 28, 2017, from
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/08/15/weekinreview/15marsh-grfk.html?ref=w
eekinreview
MacDonald, J. M., & Hoppe, R. (2016, March 6). Large family farms continue to dominate U.S.
https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2017/march/large-family-farms-continue-to-domi
nate-us-agricultural-production/
Miller, D. A. (2010). Current controversies: Factory farming. Farmington hills, MI: Greenhaven
press.
INHUMANE EGG PRODUCTION 17
Parker, C., & De Costa, J. (2016). Misleading the ethical consumer: The regulation of free-range
egg labelling. Melbourne University Law Review, 39(3), 895-949. Retrieved October 2,
Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act. (2010, March 1). Retrieved September 28, 2017, from
https://www.countable.us/bills/hr4733-111-prevention-of-farm-animal-cruelty-act
Prince, B., & Prince, A. (2017, October 25). Egg production from a business's point of view
[Personal interview].
Rising number of farm animals poses environmental and public health risks. (n.d.). Retrieved
from
http://www.worldwatch.org/rising-number-farm-animals-poses-environmental-and-public
-health-risks-0%20
Serbe, L., main, E., H., H., R., T., & E. (2012, July 28). The truth about your eggs. Retrieved
from http://abcnews.go.com/Health/truth-eggs/story?id=16871055
Sousa, G., Pereira, D., Watanabe, K., & Cataneo, P. (n.d.). Comparison of national and
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2016000400581
Storm, S. (2016, October 21). Grim video shows how hens live 'cage free'. SIRS. Retrieved
https://sks.sirs.com/webapp/article?artno=0000388463&type=ART
United States v. Robert J. Stevens (April 20, 2010), google scholar 08-769.