Nonparametric Correlations

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Correlations

Physical Health Psychological

Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .303**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) . .000

N 225 225
**
Correlation Coefficient .303 1.000

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient .307** .528**

sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 225 225
Spearman's rho
**
Correlation Coefficient .337 .253**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient -.015 -.123*

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .413 .033

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient -.103 -.070

Jenis Kelamin Sig. (1-tailed) .061 .148

N 225 225

Correlations

sosial Environment
relationship

Spearman's rho Physical Health Correlation Coefficient .307 .337**

Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 225 225
 Correlation Coefficient .528** .253

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 225 225
**
Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .290**

sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) . .000

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient .290** 1.000**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient -.188 -.076*

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .129

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient -.068 .000

Jenis Kelamin Sig. (1-tailed) .154 .498

N 225 225

Correlations

Geriatric Jenis Kelamin

Depression
Scale

Spearman's rho Correlation Coefficient -.015 -.103**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .413 .061

N 225 225
**
Correlation Coefficient -.123 -.070

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .033 .148

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient -.188** -.068**

sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .154

N 225 225
**
Correlation Coefficient -.076 .000**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .129 .498

N 225 225

Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .012*

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) . .430

N 225 225

Jenis Kelamin Correlation Coefficient .012 1.000

 Sig. (1-tailed) .430 .

N 225 225

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

Correlations LAKI-LAKI

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Correlations

Physical Health Psychological sosial

relationship
**
Pearson Correlation 1 .259 .377**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .003 .000

N 108 108 108

**
Pearson Correlation .259 1 .442**
Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .003 .000
N 108 108 108
** **
Pearson Correlation .377 .442 1
sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 108 108 108
** *
Pearson Correlation .343 .218 .247**
Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .012 .005
N 108 108 108
Pearson Correlation -.026 -.045 -.069

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .396 .321 .238

N 108 108 108

Correlations

Environment Geriatric Depression

Scale

Physical Health Pearson Correlation .343 -.026**

Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .396

 N 108 108
**
Pearson Correlation .218 -.045
Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .012 .321
N 108 108
**
Pearson Correlation .247 -.069**
sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .005 .238
N 108 108
**
Pearson Correlation 1 .005*
Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .479
N 108 108
Pearson Correlation .005 1

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .479

N 108 108

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

Notes

Output Created 30-AUG-2016 14:01:50

Comments
D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA
Data
LANSIA 2016.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter JK=1 (FILTER)
Input
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data
108
File
User-defined missing values
Definition of Missing
are treated as missing.
Statistics for each pair of
Missing Value Handling
variables are based on all the
Cases Used
cases with valid data for that
pair.
 NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=PH1 PS1 SR1
EV1 Depresi
Syntax
/PRINT=SPEARMAN
ONETAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Processor Time 00:00:00.03

Resources Elapsed Time 00:00:00.03

a
Number of Cases Allowed 104857 cases

a. Based on availability of workspace memory

Nonparametric Correlations

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Correlations

Physical Health Psychological

Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .339**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) . .000

N 108 108

Correlation Coefficient .339** 1.000

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .

N 108 108
**
Correlation Coefficient .341 .440**

Spearman's rho sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 108 108

Correlation Coefficient .374** .276**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .002

N 108 108

Correlation Coefficient -.015 -.062

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .438 .263

N 108 108
 Correlations

sosial Environment
relationship

Correlation Coefficient .341 .374**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 108 108

Correlation Coefficient .440** .276

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .002

N 108 108
**
Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .242**

Spearman's rho sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) . .006

N 108 108

Correlation Coefficient .242** 1.000**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .006 .

N 108 108

Correlation Coefficient -.106 .008

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .138 .469

N 108 108

Correlations

Geriatric Depression
Scale

Spearman's rho Correlation Coefficient -.015

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .438

N 108

Correlation Coefficient -.062**

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .263

N 108

Correlation Coefficient -.106**

sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .138

N 108

Correlation Coefficient .008**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .469

N 108

Geriatric Depression Scale Correlation Coefficient 1.000

Sig. (1-tailed) .
 N 108

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

Correlations

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Correlations

Physical Health Psychological sosial

relationship

Pearson Correlation 1 .238** .251**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .005 .003

N 117 117 117

Pearson Correlation .238** 1 .572**
Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .005 .000
N 117 117 117
Pearson Correlation .251** .572** 1
sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .003 .000
N 117 117 117
Pearson Correlation .320** .247** .310**
Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .004 .000
N 117 117 117
Pearson Correlation .010 -.181* -.250**

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .457 .026 .003

N 117 117 117

Correlations

Environment Geriatric Depression

Scale

Pearson Correlation .320 .010**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .457

N 117 117
 Pearson Correlation .247** -.181
Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .004 .026
N 117 117
**
Pearson Correlation .310 -.250**
sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .003
N 117 117
**
Pearson Correlation 1 -.122**
Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .095
N 117 117
Pearson Correlation -.122 1*

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .095

N 117 117

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

Nonparametric Correlations

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Correlations

Physical Health Psychological

Spearman's rho Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .260**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) . .002

N 117 117

Correlation Coefficient .260** 1.000

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .

N 117 117

Correlation Coefficient .263** .598**

sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .000

N 117 117

Environment Correlation Coefficient .295** .244**

 Sig. (1-tailed) .001 .004

N 117 117

Correlation Coefficient -.013 -.175*

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .445 .029

N 117 117

Correlations

sosial Environment
relationship

Correlation Coefficient .263 .295**

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .001

N 117 117
**
Correlation Coefficient .598 .244

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .004

N 117 117

Correlation Coefficient 1.000** .340**

Spearman's rho sosial relationship Sig. (1-tailed) . .000

N 117 117
**
Correlation Coefficient .340 1.000**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .

N 117 117

Correlation Coefficient -.259 -.157*

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .002 .045

N 117 117

Correlations

Geriatric Depression
Scale

Spearman's rho Correlation Coefficient -.013

Physical Health Sig. (1-tailed) .445

N 117

Correlation Coefficient -.175**

Psychological Sig. (1-tailed) .029

N 117

sosial relationship Correlation Coefficient -.259**

Sig. (1-tailed) .002

 N 117

Correlation Coefficient -.157**

Environment Sig. (1-tailed) .045

N 117

Correlation Coefficient 1.000

Geriatric Depression Scale Sig. (1-tailed) .

N 117

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1-tailed).

Crosstabs

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

DGS * psychological 225 100.0% 0 0.0% 225 100.0%

DGS * physical health 225 100.0% 0 0.0% 225 100.0%
DGS * sosial 225 100.0% 0 0.0% 225 100.0%
DGS * EVIROTMENT 225 100.0% 0 0.0% 225 100.0%

DGS * psychological

Crosstab

psychological Total
 buruk baik

Count 99 95 194
RINGAN
% within DGS 51.0% 49.0% 100.0%
DGS
Count 16 15 31
BERAT
% within DGS 51.6% 48.4% 100.0%
Count 115 110 225
Total
% within DGS 51.1% 48.9% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.004 .067 -.060 .952c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.004 .067 -.060 .952c
N of Valid Cases 225

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * physical health

Crosstab

physical health Total

buruk baik

Count 78 116 194

RINGAN
% within DGS 40.2% 59.8% 100.0%
DGS
Count 19 12 31
BERAT
% within DGS 61.3% 38.7% 100.0%
Count 97 128 225
Total
% within DGS 43.1% 56.9% 100.0%
 Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.147 .066 -2.215 .028c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.147 .066 -2.215 .028c
N of Valid Cases 225

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * sosial

Crosstab

sosial Total

buruk baik

Count 61 133 194

RINGAN
% within DGS 31.4% 68.6% 100.0%
DGS
Count 16 15 31
BERAT
% within DGS 51.6% 48.4% 100.0%
Count 77 148 225
Total
% within DGS 34.2% 65.8% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.147 .070 -2.212 .028c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.147 .070 -2.212 .028c
N of Valid Cases 225

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * EVIROTMENT

Crosstab

EVIROTMENT Total

buruk baik

Count 98 96 194
RINGAN
% within DGS 50.5% 49.5% 100.0%
DGS
Count 21 10 31
BERAT
% within DGS 67.7% 32.3% 100.0%
Count 119 106 225
Total
% within DGS 52.9% 47.1% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.119 .064 -1.789 .075c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.119 .064 -1.789 .075c
N of Valid Cases 225

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Crosstabs LAKI-LAKI

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

DGS * psychological 108 100.0% 0 0.0% 108 100.0%

DGS * physical health 108 100.0% 0 0.0% 108 100.0%
DGS * sosial 108 100.0% 0 0.0% 108 100.0%
DGS * EVIROTMENT 108 100.0% 0 0.0% 108 100.0%

DGS * psychological

Crosstab

psychological Total

buruk baik

Count 44 50 94
RINGAN
% within DGS 46.8% 53.2% 100.0%
DGS
Count 6 8 14
BERAT
% within DGS 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%
Count 50 58 108
Total
% within DGS 46.3% 53.7% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .027 .096 .274 .785c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .027 .096 .274 .785c
N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * physical health

Crosstab

physical health Total

buruk baik

Count 36 58 94
RINGAN
% within DGS 38.3% 61.7% 100.0%
DGS
Count 7 7 14
BERAT
% within DGS 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Count 43 65 108
Total
% within DGS 39.8% 60.2% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.080 .098 -.829 .409c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.080 .098 -.829 .409c
N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * sosial
 Crosstab

sosial Total

buruk baik

Count 28 66 94
RINGAN
% within DGS 29.8% 70.2% 100.0%
DGS
Count 6 8 14
BERAT
% within DGS 42.9% 57.1% 100.0%
Count 34 74 108
Total
% within DGS 31.5% 68.5% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.095 .102 -.978 .331c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.095 .102 -.978 .331c
N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * EVIROTMENT

Crosstab

EVIROTMENT Total

buruk baik

Count 48 46 94
RINGAN
% within DGS 51.1% 48.9% 100.0%
DGS
Count 7 7 14
BERAT
% within DGS 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Count 55 53 108
Total
% within DGS 50.9% 49.1% 100.0%
 Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .007 .096 .074 .941c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .007 .096 .074 .941c
N of Valid Cases 108

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Crosstabs PEREMPUAN

[DataSet1] D:\DATA LANSIA 2016\DATA LANSIA 2016.sav

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

DGS * psychological 117 100.0% 0 0.0% 117 100.0%

DGS * physical health 117 100.0% 0 0.0% 117 100.0%
DGS * sosial 117 100.0% 0 0.0% 117 100.0%
DGS * EVIROTMENT 117 100.0% 0 0.0% 117 100.0%

DGS * psychological

Crosstab
 psychological Total

buruk baik

Count 55 45 100
RINGAN
% within DGS 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%
DGS
Count 10 7 17
BERAT
% within DGS 58.8% 41.2% 100.0%
Count 65 52 117
Total
% within DGS 55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.027 .092 -.291 .772c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.027 .092 -.291 .772c
N of Valid Cases 117

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * physical health

Crosstab

physical health Total

buruk baik

Count 42 58 100
RINGAN
% within DGS 42.0% 58.0% 100.0%
DGS
Count 12 5 17
BERAT
% within DGS 70.6% 29.4% 100.0%
Count 54 63 117
Total
% within DGS 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
 Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.202 .088 -2.213 .029c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.202 .088 -2.213 .029c
N of Valid Cases 117

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * sosial

Crosstab

sosial Total

buruk baik

Count 33 67 100
RINGAN
% within DGS 33.0% 67.0% 100.0%
DGS
Count 10 7 17
BERAT
% within DGS 58.8% 41.2% 100.0%
Count 43 74 117
Total
% within DGS 36.8% 63.2% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.189 .095 -2.061 .042c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.189 .095 -2.061 .042c
N of Valid Cases 117
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

DGS * EVIROTMENT

Crosstab

EVIROTMENT Total

buruk baik

Count 50 50 100
RINGAN
% within DGS 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
DGS
Count 14 3 17
BERAT
% within DGS 82.4% 17.6% 100.0%
Count 64 53 117
Total
% within DGS 54.7% 45.3% 100.0%

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

a
Error

Interval by Interval Pearson's R -.229 .077 -2.523 .013c

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation -.229 .077 -2.523 .013c
N of Valid Cases 117

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.