Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Correlations: Female Only

    Uploaded by

    crisanto valdez
    14 views3 pages
    This document presents correlation data between measures of eccentric hamstring strength, approach velocity, and lower body joint angles at initial contact during running. For the overall sample, eccentric hamstring strength was significantly correlated with approach velocity and mean hip angle. When separated by sex, for females eccentric hamstring strength was significantly correlated with mean hip angle, while for males mean hip angle was significantly correlated with mean torso angle.

    Original Description:

    SPSS sample

    Original Title

    SPSS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document presents correlation data between measures of eccentric hamstring strength, approach velocity, and lower body joint angles at initial contact during running. For the overall sample, eccentric hamstring strength was significantly correlated with approach velocity and mean hip angle. When separated by sex, for females eccentric hamstring strength was significantly correlated with mean hip angle, while for males mean hip angle was significantly correlated with mean torso angle.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views3 pages

    Correlations: Female Only

    Uploaded by

    crisanto valdez
    This document presents correlation data between measures of eccentric hamstring strength, approach velocity, and lower body joint angles at initial contact during running. For the overall sample, eccentric hamstring strength was significantly correlated with approach velocity and mean hip angle. When separated by sex, for females eccentric hamstring strength was significantly correlated with mean hip angle, while for males mean hip angle was significantly correlated with mean torso angle.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 3

    Correlations

    Mean eccentric Mean knee angle Mean hip angle Mean torso angle
    hamstring Approach @ initial contact @ initial contact @ initial contact
    strength (N) Velocity (m/s) (deg) (deg) (deg)
    Mean eccentric hamstring Pearson Correlation 1 .365** -.026 -.331** .193
    strength (N) Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .840 .007 .123
    N 65 65 65 65 65
    Approach Velocity (m/s) Pearson Correlation .365** 1 .075 -.137 -.112
    Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .552 .277 .372
    N 65 65 65 65 65
    Mean knee angle @ initial Pearson Correlation -.026 .075 1 .103 .056
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .840 .552 .415 .660
    N 65 65 65 65 65
    **
    Mean hip angle @ initial Pearson Correlation -.331 -.137 .103 1 -.461**
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .007 .277 .415 .000
    N 65 65 65 65 65
    Mean torso angle @ initial Pearson Correlation .193 -.112 .056 -.461** 1
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .123 .372 .660 .000
    N 65 65 65 65 65
    **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

    FEMALE ONLY

    Correlations
    Mean eccentric Mean knee
    hamstring angle @ initial
    strength (N) contact (deg)
    Mean eccentric hamstring Pearson Correlation 1 .052
    strength (N) Sig. (2-tailed) .772
    N 33 33
    Mean knee angle @ initial Pearson Correlation .052 1
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .772
    N 33 33

    Correlations
    Mean eccentric Mean knee angle Mean hip angle Mean torso angle
    hamstring Approach @ initial contact @ initial contact @ initial contact
    strength (N) Velocity (m/s) (deg) (deg) (deg)
    *
    Mean eccentric hamstring Pearson Correlation 1 .037 .052 .344 -.057
    strength (N) Sig. (2-tailed) .837 .772 .050 .754
    N 33 33 33 33 33
    Approach Velocity (m/s) Pearson Correlation .037 1 .183 -.081 -.281
    Sig. (2-tailed) .837 .308 .654 .113
    N 33 33 33 33 33
    Mean knee angle @ initial Pearson Correlation .052 .183 1 -.017 .240
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .772 .308 .927 .178
    N 33 33 33 33 33
    Mean hip angle @ initial Pearson Correlation .344* -.081 -.017 1 -.116
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .050 .654 .927 .520
    N 33 33 33 33 33
    Mean torso angle @ initial Pearson Correlation -.057 -.281 .240 -.116 1
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .754 .113 .178 .520
    N 33 33 33 33 33
    *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

    MALE ONLY

    Correlations
    Mean eccentric Mean knee angle Mean hip angle Mean torso angle
    hamstring Approach @ initial contact @ initial contact @ initial contact
    strength (N) Velocity (m/s) (deg) (deg) (deg)
    Mean eccentric hamstring Pearson Correlation 1 .179 -.004 -.225 -.006
    strength (N) Sig. (2-tailed) .327 .982 .216 .972
    N 32 32 32 32 32
    Approach Velocity (m/s) Pearson Correlation .179 1 -.016 .133 -.285
    Sig. (2-tailed) .327 .929 .469 .113
    N 32 32 32 32 32
    Mean knee angle @ initial Pearson Correlation -.004 -.016 1 .201 -.257
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .982 .929 .270 .156
    N 32 32 32 32 32
    Mean hip angle @ initial Pearson Correlation -.225 .133 .201 1 -.632**
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .216 .469 .270 .000
    N 32 32 32 32 32
    Mean torso angle @ initial Pearson Correlation -.006 -.285 -.257 -.632** 1
    contact (deg) Sig. (2-tailed) .972 .113 .156 .000
    N 32 32 32 32 32
    **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

    You might also like