STRUCTURES
HANDBOOK .,
SERIES *
Docks, Piers and Wharves:
A Design Guide
William S. Burgess, Jr.
and Fred H. Kulhawy
NAVAThis manual is part of the Coastal Structures Handbook Series. The series
is being prepared for the New York Sea Grant Institute by the Geotechnice]
Engineering group at Cornell University. coordinated by Fred ¥. Rulhawy.
COVER DESIGN: DICK GORDON
New York Sea Grant Institute
State University of New York
and Cornell University
37 Elk Street
Albany, New York 12246
rr A TE
FIRST IMPRESSIONS ARE SELECTED UNPUBLISHED SEA GRANT RESEARCH PAPERS AVAILABLE
FOR THE PRICE OF PHOTOCOPYING.NySe@x -H -33- 002.6.
!LOAN coPY ONLY
DOCKS, PIERS AND WHARI
A DESIGN GUIDE
by
William S. Burgess, Jr., and Fred H. Kulhewy
Report
te
New York Sea Grant Institute
Albany, New York
by
School of Civil and Environmentai Engineering
Cornell, University
Ithaca, New York
January, 1983 NATIONAL SEA GRANT DEPOSITORY
PELL LIBRARY BUILDING
~ URL, NARRAGANSETT BAY CAMPUS
NARRAGANSETT, RI 02882
‘This vepert vill coastitute a chapter in manual entitled, "Analysis
Design and Construction of Coastal Scructu: menual is being
Prevared for the Yew York Seo Cranc Institute ty the Geotechnicai
Engineering Croup at Cornell University, and is being edited by Free
E. Kulhewy and Philip L.-F, Lin,PREFACE
The analysis, design and construction of coastal structures is of
gfeat concern to a broad cross-section of the population living near
major fresh and salt water bodies. Realizing this concern, the New York
Sea Grant Institute instituted a project to develop a manual to assist
a variety of user groups in addressing the problens associated vith the
development of coastal structures and coastal facilities. Although the
engineering community will find the manual to be of use, the focus of
this manual has been to develop a simplified user's guide which focuses
on the analysis, design and construction of coastal structures. The
emphasis hag been on understanding the structures and their behavior,
minimizing higher level mathematics, and presenting design charts and
design examples for smaller scale structures, typical of those of impor-
tance to a small community and the individual homeowner. Large scale
developments should be handled by design professionals with expertise
in the field.
This project was initiated in late 1977 by the New York Sea Grant
Institute and has been davaloped by the School of Civil and Environmental
Engineering at Coruell University. The project was initiated by Drs.
Fred H. Kulhawy and Dwight A. Sangrey. Dr. Sangrey left Cornell before
uch progress was made, and subsequent work has been supervised by Drs.
Fred H. Kulhawy and Philip L.-F. Liu.
Under the auspices of this project, the following reports have been
prepared and submitted to New York Sea Grant:
Ll “Regulatory Processes in Coastal Structures Construction”,
August 1979, by Susan A. Ronan, with the assistance of
Dwight A. Sangrey
ii2, “Coastal Construction Materials", November 1979, by
Waiter D. Hubbell and Fred H. Kulhawy
3. "Environmental Loads in Coastal Construction", November
1979, by Walter D. Hubbell and Fred H, Kulhawy
4, “analysis, Design and Construction of Pile Foundations
ia the Coastal Hovironment", April 1981, by Francis
K.-P. Cheung and Fred H. Xulhawy
5. “Breakwaters, Jetties and Groing: A Design Guide",
March 1982, by Laurie A. Ehrlich end Fred B. Kulhawy
6.. “Analysis, Design and Construction of Bulkheads in the
> May 1982, by Thowas M. Saczynsii
This report is the seventh submitted to date.ABSTRACT
Docks, piers and wharves are inner harbor structures that provide
a Link between Lend and water modes of transportation. This study
presents guidelines for the planning, layout and design of these struc-
tures while focusing on small craft recreational applications.
The planning and Layout ccusiderations for docks, piers and
wharves are discussed while recognizing that these topics are correctly
a subset of overall harbor planning. Design loads and material properties
are addressed to provide a basia for structural analysis and design.
Three broad categories of structural type are presented including
solid fill, fixed and floating atructures, Hach structural type is
described by component part with design considerations and recommendations
based on practical, sound enginsering procedures, Design considerations
for utilities, special services, and dredging operations are also presented.
ivPREFACE
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
LIST OF SYMBOLS
LIST OF CONVERSIONS
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
2 PLANNING AND LAYOUT OF DOCKS, PIERS AND WEARVES
2.1 Harbor Type and Location
2.2 Choice of Structural Type
2.3 Eavironmental Impact
2.4 Legal Conceras
2.5 Layout and Geometry of Docks, Piers and Wharves
2.6 Summary
3 SUMMARY OF DESIGN LOADS
3.1 Design Wave and Wave Forces
3.2 Wind Loads
3.3 Current Loads
3.4 Boat Impact
3.5 Ice Loads
3.6 Dead and Live Loads
4.7 Catastrophic Loads
3.8 Combination of Loads
3.9 Summary
2
2
Bb
13
22
28
32
42
47
53
54
3s7
58
59CHAPTER 4
4h
4.2
43
a
45
4.6
CEAPTER 5
Sel
5.2
5.3
564
CHAPTER 6
61
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
TL
7.2
7.3
Th
ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
Concrete
Steel
Wood
Aluminum
Weought Iron
Summary
SOLID FILL TYPE DOCKS, PIERS AND WHARVES
Wall Types
Selection of Wall Type
Geotechnical Design Considerations
Summary
PIXED DOCKS, PIERS AND WHARVES
Structural Geometry
Pile Foundations
Selection of Pile Type
Design and Installation of Pile Foundations
Decking and Framing Design Considerations
Fixed Dock Moorage
Fixed Dock Fenders
‘Summary
FLOATING DOCKS, PIERS AND WHARVES
Structural Geometry
Design Considerations for Flotation Elements
Selection of Float Element Type
Design Considerstions for Float Components
vi
60
61
73
73
95
97
99
101
101
14
eB
129
131
135
137
152
154
154
176
182
1877.5 Floating Dock Moorage 229
7.6 Floating Dock Fenders 229
7.7 Anchorage Systems 231
7.8 Summary 250
CHAPTER 8 UTILITIES AND SPECIAL SERVICES 253
8.1 Electrical Service 254
8.2 Sewage Pumpout and Disposal Service 258
8.3 Fresh Water Service 264
8.4 Fire Fighting Services 268
8.5 Fueling Services 273
8.6 Summary 278
CHAPTER 9 DREDGING FOR SMALL CRAFT HARBORS 279
9.1 Methods and Equipment 279
9.2 Primary and Maintenance Dredging 283
9.3 Dredged Materials and their Disposal 284
9.4 Enviroumental Impacts of Dredging 289
9.5 Dredging Problems - 294
9.6 Summary 295
CHAPTER 10 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 297
REFERENCES 302
APPENDIX A SMALL CRAFT BERTHING FACILITIES, LAYOUT 32Table
Number
21
3.1
4d
Ad
43
Ad
45
46
47
1
LIST OF TABLES
Recommended Slip Widths for Various Slip Lengths
Typical Values for Gradient Height, Surface Drag
Coefficient and Roughness Length
Concrete Design Recommendations for Marine Structures
Steel Alloys and Uses
Availability of Shapes, Plates and Bars According
to ASTM Structural Steel Specifications
Average Specific Gravity and Average Weight for
Commercially Important Timber Species
Average Change in Clear Wood Strength Properties
for a 1~percent Change in Moisture Content Below
Fiber Saturation Point
Shrinkage Values of Wood
Properties of Commercial Aluminum
Mechanical and Hydraulic Dredges
wilt
72
74
13
83
389
98
280-281,Figure
Number
LL
1.2
22
2.2
2.3
24
2.5
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.5
3.6
37
3.8
3.9
3.10
3.11
3.12
3.13
3.14
4
42
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Dock, Pier and Wharf Geometry
Organizational Chart of Design Considerations
Inland River Marina Locations
Mechanical Current Generator ~
Spatial Arrangement of Berthing System Components
Gaussian Distribution of Slip Length
Recoumended Berth Width for Single and Double Slips
Horizontal Wave Force on a Floating Object
Small Craft Weight and Displacement Volume --..
Wave Force Adjustment for Relative Body Length
Isotach of Maximum Wind Velocity (mph), 30 ft (9.1 =)
Above Ground, 50 Year Recurrence Period
Mean Wind Velocity versus Altitude
Mean Wind Velocity versus Profile Height
Horizontal Wind Pressure on a Vertical Face
Above Water Profile Height versus Length of Craft
Superposition of Waves and Harmonic Motion
Current Pressure versus Current Velocity
Underwater Profile Height versus Boat Length
Docking Impact Energy for Smail Craft
Assumed Geonezry for Boat Impact Analysis
Impact Energy Reduction Factor versus Berthing Point
Relation Between Durability and Water-Cement Ratio for
Air-Entrained and Non~Air-Entrained Concrete
Relationship Between Coefficient of Permeability and
Water-Cement Ratio, for Mortar and Concrete of Three
Aggregate Sizes
ix
Be
Ww
ig
28
29
30
34
36
39
40
43
45
48
SL
63
84Figure
43
4.4
45
4.6
47
4.8
4.9
4.10
441i
4.12
4.13
ale
415
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
Conventional Gradation Chart for Concrete Aggregate
Gradation Chart for Concrete Aggregate Using
Sieve Sizes to the 0.45 Power
Strength in Relation to Water-Cement Ratio for Air
Entrained and Non~Air-Entrained Concrate
Réfect of Moist Curing on the Strength of Concrete
‘Temperature Dependency of Concrete Strength
Transverse and Tangential Sections of a Softwood
The Orthotropic Axes of Wood
Permanent Effect of Dry Heat on the Modulus of
Rupture of Dry Wood
Load Direction in Relation to Annual Growth Ring
Direction
Characteristic Shrinkage and Distortion of Wood
Shapes Because of Annual Ring Direction
Adjustment of Wood Working Stresses for Load Duration
Experimentally Derived Creep Curve for Wood
‘Typical Fatigue Curves of Aluminum Alloys
Anchored Bulkhead Walt
Cantilevered Sheet Pile Wall
Typical Pile Supported "L" Wall for Weak Soils
Use of Gabions in Marina Construction
Typical Timber-Crif Wharf
Cellular Sheet Pile Wharf
Sheet Pile Arrangement for Cellular Walls
Concrete Caieson Wharf
Relteving Platform Type Wharf
Effect of Wave Characteristics on Air Pressure Buildup
x
66
69
69
70
78
84
86
a1
93
96
102
104
105
106
108
110
110
uu
13
usFigure
3.11
5.12
$5.13
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
6.14
6.15
6.16
6.17
6.18
6.19
6.20
Reduction of Air Pressure in Relation to
Percentage of Air-Hole Arca
Deep-Seated Failure of a Retaining Platform Because
of Insufficient Bearing Capacity of Underlying
Weak Soil
Granular Bedding Layer Used to Increase the
Bearing Capacity of an Underlying Weak Soil
Dry-Stack Storage
Compressed Air-Ice Suppression System
Air Bubbler Layout
Fixed Pier Construction
High-Level Fixed Wharf Consteuction
‘Typical Pile Types Used in Waterfront Construction
Bearing and Batter Piles
Concrete and Tar Pile Cap
Molded Synthetic Pile Cap
Wood Batten Pile Protection
Timber Pile Splice Detail
Examples of Cast~in-Place Concrate Piles
Examples of Precast Concrete Piles
Types of Fixed Pier Bracing
Pile Cap Types
Typical Pile to Superstructure Connections
Prestressed, Precast Concrete Deck System
Proper Grain Orientation for Wood Plank Decking
Diagonal Dack Planking
Fixed Pier Gangway
Page
116
11
122
133
134
136
136
138
140
143
143
164
145
a9
150
158
160
162
164
165
166
169Figure
6.21
6.22
6.23
6.24
6.25
6.26
6.27
6.28
6.29
6.30
6.31
TL
7.2
7.3
7.4
2.5
7.6
wT
7.8
9
7.10
7.4L
742
7.13
Finger Pier or Walkway Misalignment
Timber Joint Fasteners
Joist and Beam Hangare and Framing Anchors
Sall Craft Berthing Arrangements
Hardwood Mooring Cleat
Line Mooring end Cleat Location for Single and
Double Berths
Cooperative Svitch-Tie System for a Double Berth
Traveling Tron
Vertical Tube Fender
Vertical Fender Pile
Typical Wood Pile Dolphins
Floating Covered Berths
Floating Dock Indicating Suggested Frecboard
Floating Dock Structural Types
Floating Dock Design for Pontoon Location
‘Timber Frame and Bearing Boards above Premolded
Styrofoam Floats
Insert and Through-Rod Concrete Pontoon Assemblies
Stringer Detail on a Lightweight Shell
Floating Dock Braces
Grossties and Struts Used to Strengthen Floating
Pier Decks
Deck Framing Stiffened with a Torque Pipe
Floating Dock Gangway
Wheel Guided Gangway with Apron Plate
Gangway Counterbalance Systen
mii
UL
172
174
177
179
180
181
183
185
186
188
192
194
196
209
211
213
215
27
220
221
223
224
225Figure
Number
7.14
7S
7,16
Wy
7.18
7.19
7,20
7.21
7.22
7.23
7.28
7.25
7.26
7,27
7.28
7.29
8.1
8.2
8.3
1
9.2
‘Truss Supported Gangvaya
Crossiccked Connection of Finger and Headwalk
Stringers
Hinge Connectors
Floating Dock Fender
4@mchor Pile Location
Pile Yokes
Pile Rollers
‘Traveling Iron Guide
‘T-Bar Guide
Pipe Strut or Stiff Arm Anchorage
Deepwater Cable Anchorage of Floating Pier
Drawdown Adjustable Anchorage
Soft Ground Anchor Types
Cable Anchorage of a Floating Dock
Penetration and Keying of a Propellant-Enbedded
Anchor
Submerged Crossties
Location of Electrical Utilities
Location of Fresh Water Service
Fuel Dock Locations
Beach Nourishment and Sediment Bypassing
Behavior of Dredged Material Released From a Scow
wit
Page
226
228
230
232
235
237
239
261
261
242
244
265
266
268
249
251
259
269
277
287
292‘LIST OF SYMBOLS
English Letters
for
Above-water profile Area
Below-water profile Area
Relative Deasity
Energy
Current Force
Tensile Stress
Wave Force
Wind Force
Minima Yield Stress
Constant of Gravitational Acceleration
Above-water profile height
Undervater profile height
Stiffness
Impact Energy Reduction Factor
Einetie Energy
Coefficient of Permeability
Length
Wave Length
Body Length Adjustment Factor
Current Pressure
Wind Pressure
Velocity of Boat Normal to Dock
Current Velocity
Displacement VolumeMean Wind Velocity
Measured Wind Velocity
Wacer-Cement Ratio
Minimum Weight of Boat
Altitude
Standard altitude for Wind Veloctty Measurements
(usually 30 ft or 9.1m)
Roughness Length
Wind Velocity Gradient Hetght
Greek Letters
A
Deformation or Deflection
In-site Soil Density
Minimum Density of Soil in Laboratory
Maximum Density of Soil in Laboratory
Density of WaterZo Convert From
"
foot
inch
pound
ib/et
a/c”
wee?
t/ta?
LIST OF CONVERSIONS
To
°c
meter
millimeter
Newton
N/a
N/m’
eit/ a
e/a’
xvi
Multiply By
°C = (5/9) (°F -32)
0.3048
25.4
4.448
0.0146
0.0479
0.1571,
6.895CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Docks, piers, and wharves are types of coastal structures intended
to provide a link between land and water modes of transportation. With
Fespect to the recreational marinas which are the focus of this study,
water transportation refers to small craft such as sailboats, open-hulled
Power boats, and Light cruisers. These vessels are often large enough to
Preclude launching by trailer, hoist, or forklift with each outing.
In addition to convenient access, dock, pier, or wharf structures
must also provide mooring or tie-up facilities that afford adequate
protection from environmental loads.
The term "dock" is defined with some difficulty since tt may refer
either co the area of water between two lauding piers, or to the landing
pier proper (Webster's, 1976). According to Quinn (1972), a "dock" is a
general term used to describe a marine structure used for the mooring of
vessels, or for the transfer of passengers and cargo. Accordingly, a
dock may consist of various arrangements of wharves or piers which are
defined as follows: @ "wharf" is a dock which parallels and is generally
contiguous with the shore, while a "pier" projects out into the harbor
basin, The primary functional difference is that a pier may ba ap-
proached from both sides, while a wharf only has one side open
to the water. Simple examples of these structures are illustrated in
Figure 1.1, Several other tems are coumonly used in literature concerning
small craft harbor facilities. A “uarginal wharf" is one that lies along
the border of a harbor, and along it runs the “marginal walkway". The
1Aqyawoz9 JABYM pue Aeza ‘y20q TT eaNza
au Avery Teurszen
peautTng
wILPAIwD,,
(
SePTND OTTa UITS
BeTa r0yoUy
wI¥OTs 208073, verrd
azoddns
ysaaq
aT qnop
you Surze0ts 390d POXTE3
dock surface of a pier that extends out from the shore is called the “main
walk" or “headwalk". As indicated in Figure 1.1, berthed craft are
separated by “finger piers" which are known as “catwalks” in the case
of fixed dock structures, and "finger floats" for the corresponding
floating docks.
There are three broad categories of structural type used in the con~
struction of docks, including solid Fill, fixed or pile supported, and
floating or pontoon supported. It would be unusual however, for the
typical small craft marina to consist of only one structural type. The
most common form of marginal wharf is the anchored bulkhead which also
serves to retain the surrounding soil. Floating berthing arrangements
are often accessed by a fixed pier approach.
In the past, the analysis and design of these structures has been
besed om the local experience of the ower and/or contractor. While such
procedures may have resulted in some savings in terms of first cost, the
quality of the finished product was often compromised. According to
Chamberlain (1977), a large portion of.the marinas built in the sixties
are literally falling apart. Although some of this deterioration may be
because of 2 lack of proper maintenance, most is a result of trying to
cut corners in the construction stage. In light of the rising cost of
construction materials and labor, there is increasingly a need for
Yational analysis and design procedures that incorporate the probable
environmental loads and material strength properties. The object is
to develop an efficient, functional design at reasonable initial cost
that will provide an acceptable service life and a minimum of required
maintenance. An attractive appearance is generally considered to be of