Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Genre Analysis
Alexa Ramirez
Abstract
Two separate genres are being analyzed regarding the topic of Binational Health Issues. One
genre being a digital media video in contrast to academic journal genre. The analysis is focused
on my personal opinion of each genre as well as my focus to see on what type of audience each
genre approaches, the usage of rhetorical appeals and the structure and delivery of the video and
journal. Both genres do a great job presenting information and convincing a powerful argument
on the topic of Border Health Issues. The academic journal is more informative and provides
higher levels of logos, pathos and ethos. In conclusion both genres provided persuasive
information. After comparing and contrasting both genres were very compelling with the
Genre Analysis
Before analyzing two separate types of genre, I first need to define the term genre. Genre
is multiple types of texts forms, constructed to develop a response in language for any situation.
Genre use to be a literary term, now there are numerous types of genres. Whether it is film,
music, writing and speech. A writing genre keeps evolving and are always subject to be
changing. A genre has structure, whether it is for an introduction or an academic essay. The
genres I will be evaluating and analyzing on the topic of Binational Health Issues are a digital
media genre titled, “U.S-Mexico Border Health Issues,” and an academic journal titled
“Globalization and Health at the United States-Mexico Border.” Each genre had a different
perspective and representation addressing the prevention, awareness, solution and background on
binational health issues. In my perspective I found the academic journal to be more persuasive
and powerful, with stronger forms of rhetorical appeals such as higher credibility, reasoning and
easier to comprehend.
GENRE ANALYSIS 4
Rhetorical appeals
Logos; The appeal to logic and the way of persuading an audience due to reasoning. In
this case both genres had compelling and potent reasoning. In the digital video genre spoken by
Dr. Rosales, she provided the audience with facts, statistics and background information, health
plans, and health conditions that are affecting the border regions. For example, on minute 3:33
she provides the audience all the conditions people in the border region deal with and how they
detect these issues early on with a system, “early warning infectious diseases surveillance
system.” I found this logos to be convincing, however, in the second genre the academic journal,
Dr. Ugalde uses logos through statistics, data, and numerous amount of case studies, tables,
charts, methods and observations to advocate his findings. For instance, he observed participants
and conducted in depth interviews with policy makers and specialists to give reasoning to his
argument. (p2, 2018). In further notice another example of logos in the academic journal is the
visual chart on page 2 that provided characteristics and percentages on the border health
conditions. Over all I found the academic journal exceedingly more reliable and influential.
Pathos; Known as the pathetic appeal or an appeal to make the audience feel emotions or
identity. While I evaluated each genre I found both genres to be complete opposite when it came
to pathos. First, the digital media genre was able to provide an emotional appeal towards the
audience only because of self-interest since I do live in a border region. For example when she
spoke on families who commute and work on both sides of the border I empathized with her
stories since I as well have family on both sides of the border. In contrast to the journal it was
completely clinical. I did not find any emotional appeal, only case studies, data numbers and just
did not really influence me emotionally. For example all the case studies presented on (p3, 2017)
GENRE ANALYSIS 5
is clearly all clinical since the genre only provides examples and results of political barriers, or
cultural barriers. Thus, I believe the video genre was more influential and powerful in regards to
pathos.
Ethos; The third rhetorical appeal which is perceived by the audience as the credibility of
the argument. In comparison and contrast both genres had incredible credibility. The video genre
the speaker is director of the University of Phoenix Public Health Program and a member of the
US-Mexico Health commission. (00:19-00:30). The second genre the academic journal by Dr.
Homedes and Dr. Ugalde they provided their years of education. For instance, Dr. Homedes is a
member of the University of House Public Health Program as well as having research on cultural
barriers even in European studies. The second genres credibility was very persuasive and
compelling. (p1, 2018). Nevertheless, I would strongly say that both genres in this case were just
Given the main topic of Border Health issues, each genre the way each information was
organized and presented was particularly different. In the first genre, the video, the presenter
began with introducing her credibility, then she presented her thesis. After presenting her thesis
she gave a brief background on Border Health Issues. The genre also had a red background
intending for the color red to grab the audience attention. Versus the academic journal genre, had
a completely different lay out. Starting with the objectives on the top right in bold blue letters.
With titles on top of every objective like methods, results, background, credibility. After
comparing the lay out I would agree to say that the structure of the academic journal was easier
The audience is very important especially while evaluating both genres. The first genre,
Dr. Cecilia Rosales in the "U.S-Mexico Border Health issues" she addressed a particular region.
Dr. Rosales focused on the Southwestern Region like New Mexico, Arizona, Texas and Baja
California. The purpose of her reaching out to these Border States was to bring awareness and
centralize her main points to a smaller population (1:15-1:25). The journal genre, Dr. Ugalde and
Dr. Homedes addressed nation as whole and policy makers. In the academic journal
"Globalization and Health at the United States border" was addressed to everyone who feels
impacted affected in any border region. The audience in the second genre was for a larger crowd
and their purpose was to convey a message more to the policy makers, politicians, specialists,
doctors etc. (p1-5). In similarities both genres wanted to inform their audiences about how
sharing a border can be complex when it comes to health. Therefore, I think the journal was more
compelling and resourceful since the author was speaking to anyone who feels affected.
In conclusion, both genres were effective and extremely resourceful for my topic
Binational Health Issues. The journal genre was more comprehensive and scientifically as for the
first genre was harder to understand but it did present powerful information that I did not know.
Each genre transmitted its thesis effectively and left the audience with no questions. Each genre
represented a different approach to the same issue and widened the audience perspective and
awareness on Binational Health Issues. Border health issues is a real problem occurring today,
both sources provided content to strengthen, improve and respond to health security and apply
the knowledge received into our community. In conclusion I would say anaylzing this genres was
a great way to improve my writing skills and evaluating skills, I did think the academic journal
genre was more effective therefore I would say future refrernce I would look for sources that can
provide great logic, pathos, and crediblity like the academic journal.
GENRE ANALYSIS 7
References
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDqn7MWrtjI
Globalization and Health in U.S Mexico Border. (2003). American Journal of Public Health.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f36/b6f06e3761882f1792e16400be41c27b3494.pdf
GENRE ANALYSIS 8