Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Richard A Muller Scholasticism Protestant and Catholic Francis Turretin On The Object and Principles Oftheology PDF
Richard A Muller Scholasticism Protestant and Catholic Francis Turretin On The Object and Principles Oftheology PDF
Scholasticism Protestant and Catholic: Francis Turretin on the Object and Principles of
Theology
Author(s): Richard A. Muller
Source: Church History, Vol. 55, No. 2 (Jun., 1986), pp. 193-205
Published by: Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Society of Church
History
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3167420
Accessed: 27-07-2017 11:35 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press, American Society of Church History are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Church History
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Scholasticism Protestant and Catholic:
Francis Turretin on the Object and
Principles of Theology
RICHARD A. MULLER
During the past two decades scholars have become more apprec
aware of the medieval scholastic roots of Protestantism and have b
gain some appreciation, albeit halting, of the scholastic form of Protes
which dominated the Protestant universities in the seventeenth centur
awareness implies, in the first place, a development beyond the
advanced by Lortz and Bouyer that Protestantism was the effect
decadent nominalist theology of the later Middle Ages.1 Schol
Oberman, Hagglund, and Steinmetz have acknowledged much
continuity but have emphasized the positive character of late me
thought.2 Roman Catholic scholarship has produced positive read
Scotist and nominalist theology,3 and in the case of Donnelly's analysis
sixteenth-century Protestant reformers, has noted-contra Lo
Bouyer-the impact of Thomism on Protestant thought.4 In the second
more attention has been paid to the development of "scholastic" pat
post-Reformation theology, and scholarship has moved considerably
the nineteenth and early twentieth-century thesis that Lutheranis
oped into a "system of justifiction" while Calvinism moved toward
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
194 CHURCH HISTORY
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCHOLASTICISM PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC 195
1.
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
196 CHURCH HISTORY
12. Francis Burgersdijck, Institutionum logicarum libri duo (Cambridge, 1637), 2.20.99.
13. Institutio 1.6.1; "Systematice et Objective per modum disciplinae" or "habitualiter et
subjective, per modum habitus in intellectu residentis."
14. Compare Turretin, Institutio 1.6.3 with Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, 1-2ae, q.50,
a.4; and P. Pathenuis Minges, Ioannis Duns Scoti Doctrina Philosophica et Theologica,
2 vols. (Quaracchi, 1930), 1: 465-467.
15. Compare Muller, "Vera Philosophia,"pp. 356-365. On faculty psychology, see Frederick C.
Copleston, Thomas Aquinas (Baltimore, 1955), pp. 163-164, 179-180, 194.
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCHOLASTICISM PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC 197
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
198 CHURCH HISTORY
22. Minges, Ioannes Duns Scoti Doctrina, 1: 510-517, on the difficulty of iden
scientia insofar as we do not have immediate evidence of the object of the
ibid. 1: 508, on the distinction between theologia in se and theologia nostr
23. Institutio 1.6.5.
24. Ibid. 1.6.7. Turretin's citations of classical authors, like his use of the scholastics, do
represent "research" into earlier sources of philosophy or theology but rather the use
received tradition of references. The use of ancient anthologies like Stobaeus or Suidas
typical.
25. Institutio 1.7.1.
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCHOLASTICISM PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC 199
26. Ibid. Again the paradigm belongs to a received tradition: see Gerh
1.11-12; Gomarus, Disputationes, 1.45-49.
27. Institutio 1.7.3.
28. Compare Turretin, Institutio 1.7.2, with Philipp Limborch, Theologia christiana adpra
pietatis ac promotionem pacis Christianae unice directa (Amsterdam, 1734; 1st ed., 168
1.1.5, for the Remonstrant view, and Benedict de Spinoza, A Theologico-Political Treatise
in Works of Spinoza, trans. R.H.M. Elwes, 2 vols. (New York, 1951), 1: 9-10, 182-199
29. Institutio 1.7.2.
30. See ibid. 1.7.6,10,14.
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
200 CHURCH HISTORY
2.
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCHOLASTICISM PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC 201
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
202 CHURCH HISTORY
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCHOLASTICISM PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC 203
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
204 CHURCH HISTORY
3.
46. Franciscus Junius, De theologia vera (Leiden, 1594) and Theses theologicae (ca. 1592), in
Opera theologica (Geneva, 1608), vol. 1, cols. 1592-1785; compare Althaus, Die Prinzi-
pien, pp. 230-231, who identifies the development as Thomist, not recognizing the parallels
with Scotus.
47. Institutio 1.2.6.
48. Ibid. 1.1.7.
49. Ibid. 1.2.6-7.
50. Ibid. 1.2.9. These paradigms again are drawn from medieval scholastic models.
example, Johannes Altenstaig, Vocabularius theologiae (Hagenau, 1517), s.v. "Lu
"Lux," and "Speculum," citing Peirre d'Ailly, Jacobus de Valencia, Alexander of
Thomas Aquinas, Bonaventure, and Jean Gerson.
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
SCHOLASTICISM PROTESTANT AND CATHOLIC 205
51. See the comments of Hermann Bauke, Die Probleme der Theologie Calvins (Leipzig, 1922),
pp. 22, 30-31, concerning the origin of the idea of central dogmas in the "deductive" and
"systematic monism" of Enlightenment philosophy, rather than in the theology of the
sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Note that Turretin does not attack Cartesianism
directly but instead notes that "theological certainty" is not a "mathematical cer
compare Institutio 2.4.22 with the argument noted above that theology cannot be a
since it does not rest on rational evidence (1.6.5).
This content downloaded from 158.162.134.74 on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:35:29 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms