You are on page 1of 104

Design and Simulation of 5G 28-GHz Jack Sifri

Phased Array Transceiver Webcast MMIC/Module Design


Flow Specialist
System / Circuit / EM Co-simulation with beam steering

© Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2013


Introduction
• Why mm Wave Bands for 5G?

• Propagation issues at mm-wave for mobile communication

• Phased arrays and beam steering antennas

• 28GHz is one of the several candidate bands for the new 5G


radio interface. Verizon has chosen 28 GHz for their pre-5G trial.

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 2
Agenda

• EM/Circuit Co-simulation / demo


• Transmit Chain components
• Design and Simulation
• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation

• Analysis
• Transceiver Design Example
• Future work
• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in ADS 2017

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 3
EM / Circuit Cosimulation

Antenna and other


physical structures

Momentum Planar EM
Full 3D FEM Simulation

© Keysight
Technologies
Page 4 2017 Page 4
EM / Circuit Cosimulation
HB, S-Par, Envelope, Tran, DC, AC

Antenna and other Transceiver Components


physical structures

Momentum Planar EM
+ Circuit level designs; X-parameter
Full 3D FEM Simulation models, EM models, etc.

© Keysight
Technologies
Page 5 2017 Page 5
EM / Circuit Cosimulation
HB, S-Par, Envelope, Tran, DC, AC

Complete EM / Circuit
Antenna and other Transceiver Components Simulation and Analysis
physical structures

Momentum Planar EM
+ =
Circuit level designs; X-parameter Captures the excitation from
Full 3D FEM Simulation models, EM models, etc. the T/R module and apply it
to the Antenna(s)
The output from the circuit
simulation drives/excites the
Antenna ports

© Keysight
Technologies
Page 6 2017 Page 6
28 GHz Transmit Chain with Patch Antenna
System / Circuit / EM Co-simulation and beam steering
Demo

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 7
Transmit Chain with Patch Antenna
System / Circuit / EM Co-simulation and beam steering

Plextek RFI Buffer Amp Phase Shifter 4X4 Array .5 Lambda


Power Divider 28 GHz BPF Plextek RFI PA Patch Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 8
28 GHz Power Divider

Power Divider

Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process

© Keysight Page
Technologies 2017 Page 9
Mm-Wave Small Signal Amps

mm-Wave small signal Amp

Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 10
28 GHz Filter Response

28 GHz BPF

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 11
Mm-Wave Power Amplifier

Plextek RFI PA
X-Parameter model

Designed with:
GCS InP_DHBT Process
Global Communications Semiconductors

© Keysight Page
Technologies 2017 Page 12
12
X-Parameters
• Accurately captures all non-linearties
• Protects your IP
• Much faster simulation speed and trade-off analysis in hierarchical
system design and verification.
• Accurate load pull modeling capability
X-parameter Model

Circuit Topology

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 13
X-Parameters
Overlaid Results
Model (Red) Vs. Circuit (Blue)

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 14
Mm-Wave Power Amplifier

Pin / Pout and Phase Response of PA

Plextek RFI PA
X-Parameter model

Circuit Sim – Red


X-Par model – Blue

Designed with:
GCS InP_DHBT Process

© Keysight Page
Technologies 2017 Page 15
15
Creating 16 X-Par models of Varied Pout and Phase

0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 16
Using a Four Bit Phase Shifter (with 22.5 degree phase increments)

45 deg 180 deg

22.5 deg 90 deg

Designed with:
TriQuint PHEMT process

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 17
Calculating Phase Shifter Phase Error

22.5 deg 22.5 deg

-5 +5

+5 -5

When circuit 1 is “ON”, circuit 2 is “OFF”


When circuit 1 is “OFF”, circuit 2 is “ON”

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 18
HB Analysis SS_Gain = 32.75 dB
LS_Gain = 31.65 dB @ Pin = -3 dBm (Pout = 28.65 dBm)
LS_Gain = 29.44 dB @ Pin = 1 dBm (Pout = 30.44 dBm)

Circuit level designs

P -1dB = 28.65 dBm


@ Pin -3 dBm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 19
HB Analysis SS_Gain = 40 dB
LS_Gain = 38.8 dB @ Pin = -10 dBm (Pout = 28.8 dBm)
LS_Gain = 37.2 dB @ Pin = -7 dBm (Pout = 30.2 dBm)

Behavioral level designs

P -1dB = 28.8 dBm


@ Pin -10 dBm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 20
Patch Antenna Design

4.8 mm

3.28 mm
0.84 mm
mm
0.58

1.14 mm

H=.794 mm Er=2.2 TanD=.0009

0.84 mm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 21
Antenna Array configurations

Uniform Linear Uniform Rect. Triangular Circular 3D/Conformal

0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 22
Patch Antenna Design (4X4 array – ½ Lambda)

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 23
Applying Phase Shift to Antenna Ports

http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html

The main beam always points in the


direction of the increasing phase
shift.
Well, if the signal to be radiated is
delivered through an electronic
phase shifter giving a continuous
phase shift now, the beam direction
will be electronically adjustable.
However, this cannot be extended
unlimitedly. The highest value,
which can be achieved for the
Field of View (FOV) of a phased
array antenna, is 120° (60° left and
60° right). With the sine theorem the
necessary phase moving can be
calculated.

© Keysight Page
Technologies 2017 Page 24
24
Applying Phase Shift to Antenna Ports
http://www.radartutorial.eu/06.antennas/Phased%20Array%20Antenna.en.html

The phase shift Δφ between two


successive elements is constant
and is called phase-increment.

© Keysight Page
Technologies 2017 Page 25
25
Applying Phase Shift to Antenna Ports

Phase Shift Antenna look-up angle


61.5 degrees 20 degrees
31.2 10
22.5 7.2

© Keysight Page
Technologies 2017 Page 26
26
Sweeping the Phase Shifter for Different Look-up Angles
Phase Shift Antenna look-up angle
61.5 degrees 20 degrees
31.2 10
22.5 7.2

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 27
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

0 degrees
Antenna incremental
look-up angle = 7.2
degrees

0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 28
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

Antenna incremental
look-up angle = 7.2
degrees

7.2 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 29
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

Antenna incremental
look-up angle = 7.2
degrees

14.4 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 30
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

21.6 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 31
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

28.8 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 32
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

36.0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 33
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

43.2 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 34
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

50.4 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 35
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

The highest value, which


can be achieved for the
Field of View (FOV) of a
phased array antenna, is
120° (60° left and 60° right).
57.6 degrees
-57.6 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 36
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 50.4 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 37
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 43.2 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 38
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 36.0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 39
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 28.8 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 40
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 21.6 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 41
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 14.4 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 42
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

- 7.2 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 43
Momentum Visualization – Far Field Cut

0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 44
Harmonic Balance - Sweep Pin for each state

Swept power for each phase state

0 degrees

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 45
Multi Band Systems

For Multi Band


Systems, select
the channel
frequency and
sweep the phase

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 46
EM Circuit Excitation for Multi Band Systems

0 degrees

© Keysight
Page 47
Technologies 2017 Page
EM Circuit Excitation for Multi Band Systems

0 degrees

© Keysight
Page 48
Technologies 2017 Page
Switched Beam Systems and Isolation

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 49
Four Channel Switched Beam System
Antenna 1

28 GHz

Antenna 2
28 GHz
Switch

Antenna 3

28 GHz

Antenna 4
28 GHz

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 50
SP4T Pin Diode Switch
On
Off
Off
Off
32 - 38 dB
isolation

< - 20 dB Return Loss

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 51
Effect of Isolation with SP4T Pin Diode Switch
Good isolation; low leakage
Antenna 1 (ON) Antenna 2 (OFF)

30.73 dBm - .43 dBm


30.14 dBm - 1.02 dBm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 52
Modeling the Switch in ADS

>30 dB isolation

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 53
Using a Switch with 35 dB Isolation
Good isolation; low leakage
Antenna 1 Antenna 2

Good isolation
29.91 dBm - 2.46 dBm
29.32 dBm - 3.06 dBm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 54
Using a Switch with 20 dB Isolation
Bad isolation; high leakage
Antenna 1 Antenna 2

Bad isolation
29.91 dBm 12.54 dBm
29.32 dBm 11.95 dBm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 55
Using a Switch with 10 dB Isolation
Very bad isolation; very high leakage
Antenna 1 Antenna 2

Very bad isolation


29.89 dBm 22.54 dBm
29.31 dBm 21.95 dBm

Good isolation is important to have in components


© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 56
5G Verification Test benches (VTB) in ADS

VTB is a regular component in the ADS simulation environment,


which is linked to the Verification Test Bench (VTB) in SystemVue.

VTBs enable circuit designers to make use of sources and


measurement setups from SystemVue and verify the performance of
a circuit using real world complex modulated signals conforming to
advanced wireless standards such as 2G/3G/4G/5G.

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 57
5G FBMC Transmit Analysis VTB
Note: OFDM is the technology that has been selected by 3GPP rather than FBMC.
ADS 2017 plans to include this update. The VTB flow is the same.

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 58
5G FBMC Transmit Analysis VTB
Pin = -50 dBm
SS Gain = 49 dB

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 59
5G FBMC Transmit Analysis VTB
Pin = -25 dBm SS Gain = 49 dB
LS Gain = 47.8 dB; 1.2 dB compressed

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 60
Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 61
Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 62
Effect of Feeding Network and Line Lengths

Slide is taken from Dr. Gabriel Rebeiz’s


RFIC Symposium Plenary talk, June 2017
© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 63
System with identical PA’s and No Interconnect Lines
No added phase

To
Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 64
System with identical PA’s and No Interconnect Lines
No added phase
Phase Shift = 0 deg

Side lobe 14.33 dB down


Null 34.9 dB down
© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 65
Adding Short Interconnects from PA’s to Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 66
Adding Interconnects from PA’s to Antenna mm

Phase Shift = 0 deg


Phase Shift = 0 deg

5 deg
shift

Side lobe 8.93 dB down (14.33 with no lines)


Null 18.75 dB down (34.9 with no lines)

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 67
Adding Longer Interconnects from PA’s to Antenna
3, 5, 7, 9 mm
Phase Shift = 0 deg
Phase Shift = 0 deg

28 deg
offset

Side lobe 10.63 dB down (14.33 with no lines)


Null 24.73 dB down (34.9 with no lines)

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 68
Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 69
Case 1 – Using Identical PA’s
Phase=0 Phase= 62

Lobe is 14.56 dB down Lobe is 11.04 dB down


Null is 36.26 dB down Null is at 35.89 dB down

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 70
X-Parameters of Various PA’s with Varied Amplitude and Phase

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 71
Case 2 – Using Different PA’s
Phase=0 Phase= 62

Lobe is 12.813 dB down Lobe is 10.96 dB down


Null is at 24.76 dB down Null is at 24.28 dB down
Compared with the case of identical PA’s
Lobe is 14.56 dB down
Null is 36.26 dB down

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 72
Summary: Response Using Identical PA’s Vs Different PA’s
With Identical PA’s With Different PA’s

Lobe is 14.56 dB down Lobe is 12.81 dB down


Null is 36.26 dB down Null is 24.76 dB down

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 73
Important to Design Circuits with Small Variability

PA 1 Wide variation PA 2 Smaller variation

Phase
Phase

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 74
Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 75
Coupling / Crosstalk between:

• Adjacent Channels
• PA’s
• Antenna elements
• Feed Lines and Antenna elements

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 76
Response with No Coupling

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 77
Response with No Coupling @ 0deg

Lobe is 14.53 dB down


Null is 35.94 dB down

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 78
Response with Coupling

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 79
Response with Coupling 0deg

Lobe is 11.73 dB down


Null is 19.29 dB down

Compared with the case of no coupling


Lobe is 14.53 dB down
Null is 35.94 dB down
© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 80
Analysis

1. Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths

2. Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response

3. Effect of Coupling and Cross talk

4. Effect of PA Loading and Change in Impedance

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 81
Effect of scan angle

As scan angle increases :


– Effective cross-section area “A” of the array
decreases Q=0o
• Less power to main lobe (lower peak gain)
• Less directivity (wider beam)
Q=45o
– PA loading & impedance changes
• Affects the final beam shape
• In extreme cases can create blind
spots
– More energy goes to side lobes (“grating
lobes”)

Watch out for unexpected interference


(pilot tones, jamming) and false echoes
(clutter) coming from unwanted directions

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 82
Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

From:
An Introduction to Phased Array Design
A Technical Note by N. Tucker
15/04/2011

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 83
Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna
Phased Array system Architecture exploration
ArrayPhase1 {ArrayPhase}
CalcMode=Auto
Theta=11 ° [mytheta]
ArraySplit1 {ArraySplit} Phi=46 ° [myphi]
InsertionLoss=1 dB SParamSource=DataSet
Mode=SubArray DatasetName=HMC543ALC4B_sparm_25C_0.0.s2p
NumRows=8 RxInOrTxOutMap=2
NumCols=8 RxOutOrTxInMap=1

Rx Po rt_1 Po rt_2

Tx Circuit_Link

ArrayPort1 {ArrayPort} Subnetwork1 {Circuit_Link}


RxTx=Tx DesignName=XParamAmp
Freq=2 GHz [Freq] ArrayAttn1 {ArrayAttn} ArrayAnt2 {ArrayAnt}
Window=Taylor Configuration=Uniform Rectangular Array
Phase=0 °
SideLobeLevel=-20 dB10 NumElementsX=8
MainCarrierIndex=1
NumBars=2 NumElementsY=8
SParamSource=DataSet DistanceUnit=Wavelengths
DatasetName=HMC1019ALP4E_sparameters_deembedded_0.0p0dB.s… DistanceX_in_Wavelengths=0.25
RxInOrTxOutMap=2 DistanceY_in_Wavelengths=0.25
RxOutOrTxInMap=1 ElementPatternType=Pattern File
ElementPatternFileName=D:\EMPROHOME\single_element_patter…
ActiveLoading=Active Reflection Coefficients
RxTx=Tx

1 8X8 8x8 8x8 8x8 8x8


Digital
Digital Antenna
Source Splitter Phase Amplifier
Attenuator Array
Shifter
Multiple Multiple X-parameters Element patterns
S-parameters
S-parameters S-parameters Polarization
© Keysight
Coupling
Technologies 2017

Active impedance

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 84
Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna
Mild blind angles are observed here due to the active reflection coefficients and
accurate models for amplifiers, Phase shifters and attenuators

The simulation can further be enhanced if employed load pulled X-parameters.

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 85
5G 28-GHz Phased Array
Transceiver
0.18um SiGe BiCMOS technology

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 86
Full Phased Array Transceiver
Transmit Receive

LOS Link
10 Km

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 87
SiGe BiCMOS Doherty Power Amplifier
PA Output Power and Phase

Doherty PA

Small Signal S-Parameters

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 88
Transceiver Transmit Chain
PA’s Filters
Transmit Patch LOS Link
Antenna 10 Km
Phase
Amps Shifters

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 89
Transceiver Receive Chain
LOS Link 2 Receive Antennas
10 Km Dipole & Patch LNA’s
Phase
Shifters Amps

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 90
Transceiver

-10.3 dBm -4.65 dBm 20.4 dBm 16.8 dBm -76.8 dBm -34.7 dBm 11.3 dBm

Pin PA_in PA_out P_Antenna LNA_in LNA_out P_received

P_Antenna 16.8 dBm


Antenna gain 14 dB 108 dB Loss in the LOS Link
LNA_in -77 dBm

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 91
Receiver Noise Figure

Gain = 60 dB
S11 = -35 dB
S22 = -27 dB
NF = 3.5 dB

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 92
Transmit Chain Verification Test Bench (VTB) for EVM

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 93
Transmit Chain EVM

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 94
Receive Chain Verification Test Bench (VTB) for BER

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 95
Receive Chain Verification Test Bench (VTB) for BER

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 96
Transceiver – Transmit Antenna

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 97
Transceiver – Receive Antenna 1

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 98
Transceiver – Receive Antenna 2

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 99
Future Work EM Excitation in ADS 2017
Includes Circuit Envelope
EM Excitation in ADS 2016

Allows bringing in modulated 5G sources


from system view to perform full 5G analysis

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 100
Acknowledgement
I extend my sincere gratitude to the following people who have
helped me put this project material together:

• Anil Panday
• Plextek RFI
• Rupam Anand

Special Thanks to the following people who have provided me with


feedback and support

• Carmina Stremlau
• How-Siang Yap
• Murthy Upmaka
• Bhumit Rojivadia (Intern)
• Sangkyo Shin

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 101
Conclusion
This webcast has demonstrated the importance of:
• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in 5G design and simulation
• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation
• Analysis
➢ Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths
➢ Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response
➢ Effect of Coupling and Crosstalk
➢ Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

• Transceiver Design Example


➢ Using Tower Jazz .18um SiGe BiCMOS technology

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 102
Conclusion
This webcast has demonstrated the importance of:
• EM/Circuit Co-simulation in 5G design and simulation
• Verification Test Bench (VTB) Simulation
• Analysis
➢ Effect of the Feed Network and Line Lengths
➢ Effect of Varying PA’s AM / PM Response
➢ Effect of Coupling and Crosstalk
➢ Effect of PA Dynamic Impedance with Antenna

• Transceiver Design Example


➢ Using Tower Jazz .18um SiGe BiCMOS technology

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 103
www.keysight.com/find/eesof-how-to-videos

– “How To” Video Series


– Application Focused
(10 min each)
– Free workspace

http://www.keysight.com/find/mytrial.rfmw.wc

© Keysight
Technologies 2017 Page 104

You might also like