Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Flowrate Lab Report
Flowrate Lab Report
During this lab I created and ran an investigation to determine the flowrate and turn over time
of tank #2. Going into this we had already found out the total number of gallons (853 gallons) of
water our whole system could hold, which we needed to know in order to find flowrate. The
ideal flowrate for our tank’s system was 2,559 gallons per hour. Our flowrate was 500 gallons
per hour. Our pump is an “Eco Pump 478470”, its maximum head is 13 feet and has a flowrate
of 900 gallons per hour. Will our tank reach the recommended three times per hour turn over
time? If our tank system, used our pump, meant to move 900 gallons per hour, then our tank
will not reach the recommended three times per hour turn over time. This will not happen
because our tank is so complex and dependable on all parts not just the pump.
Materials/Method:
The materials need for this lab are a tank, a gallon bucket or container, a stopwatch, and at
least 2 people.
Procedure:
5. Put directly under water entry point from the pump to the tank.
6. Have someone time from when you put the bucket under to when it is completely full.
9. Find the average time for the day. You will do this for 5 days total so you will have 25
times.
10. Use the average time to calculate the flow rate for each day.
1. Find the average for the day (add all 5 times together and divide by 5).
2. Calculate the flowrate by multiplying the number of gallons you used to measure (we
used a 1 gallon bucket) and the number of seconds in one hour (3600), then divide this
by the average time for the day times 1 hour. The final answer should be in gal/hr.
3. Calculate the turn over time by dividing the flowrate by the number of gallons in the
Results:
After completing this lab, we observed from our data that day 5 was the fastest day with an
average time of 5.65 seconds and that day 2 was the slowest day with an average time of 9.18
seconds. Our highest turn over time was day 5 with a 0.7 hour turn over time, the lowest day 2
Time (seconds)
6.97 7.5
7.25 7
7.18 6.5
1 2 3 4 5
Trial Number
Day 2
8.11
9.47 Trial Number and Time
9.45 for Day 2
9.38
15
Time (Seconds)
9.47
10
5
0
1 2 3 4 5
Trial Number
Day 3
7.05 Trial Number and Time
6.72 for Day 3
6.55
7.5
6.53
Time (Seconds)
7
7.07
6.5
6
1 2 3 4 5
Trial Number
Day 4
7 Trial Number and Time
6.99 for Day 4
7.26
7.5
6.38
Time (Seconds)
7
7.05 6.5
6
5.5
1 2 3 4 5
Trial Number
Tial Number and Time
Day 5 for Day 5
5.23 6.5
Time (Seconds)
5.62 6
5.5
6.04 5
5.67 4.5
5.71 1 2 3 4 5
Trial Number
Calculations:
Day 1:
Turn Over Time: (500 gal/hr)/(853 gal)= 0.6 hr turn over time
Day 2:
Turn Over Time: (400 gal/hr)/(853 gal)= 0.5 hr turn over time
Day 3:
Mean (average): (7.05+6.72+6.55+6.53+7.07)/(5)= 6.78 seconds
Turn Over Time: (500 gal/hr)/(853 gal)= 0.6 hr turn over time
Day 4:
Turn Over Time: (500 gal/hr)/(853 gal)= 0.6 hr turn over time
Day 5:
Turn Over Time: (600 gal/hr)/(853 gal)= 0.7 hr turn over time
Percent Error:
Discussion:
My hypothesis was supported because we did not reach the recommended turn over time per
hour which is three times. We didn’t reach whole numbers for our turn over time. I think this is
because we have so much water in many different places throughout our system, and because
of this complexity the water just simply can’t travel that fast. The pump can cycle up to 900
gallons per hour but I believe it is not sufficient enough to move as much water as we have in
all of our tanks combined. The fastest flowrate we got was 600 gallons per hour which was on
day 5, but on average we had 500 gallons per hour. There were sources of error. The biggest
was probably the fact that we had to move the standing pipes in the tank everyday which
wasn’t accurate because they would be moved differently each time. This would affect our data
because they controlled the water level and how we could get under the pump with the gallon
bucket to measure the times. Another source could be that maybe we didn’t start and stop at
exactly the time we needed to. That could affect because the times would be inaccurate. This
could be fixed by making it easier to move the water level down in the same spot every time we
measure.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, our tank system did not reach the recommended 3 times per hour turn over
time. This was because of the size of our RAS system. In the future we should investigate how
we can try and make this system meet the recommended times while still keeping the
complexity of it.