You are on page 1of 1

Research Paper A - Excellent B - Good C - Acceptable F - Failing

Grading Rubric This paper is exceptionally well This paper is well written and This paper fulfills the This paper fails to fulfill one or
written and organized organized requirements and has a few more the basic requirements
weaknesses
Format -title page -title page -title page -lack of title page
-correct margin size -correct margin size -correct margin size -incorrect margin size
-meets page requirement -meets page requirement -meets page requirement -page requirements not met
-meets image requirement, and -meets image requirement and -meets image requirement and -few/no images are included and
each is numbered, and has title, each has title, artist, date each has title, artist, date may not contain title, artist, date
artist, date
Content -ample evidence of art historical -good evidence of art historical -contributions to the -contributions to the
terms or knowledge and terms or knowledge and art/architectural world are art/architectural world are not
contributions to the contributions to the addressed with examples addressed and little/no reference is
art/architectural world are art/architectural world are (images) made to images.
thoroughly and expertly discussed thoroughly discussed with -research info and amount is -research info is too simplistic and
with examples (images) examples (images) adequate for a college paper lacks adequate amount of research
-research info and amount is -research info and amount is -student demonstrates some for a college paper
excellent for a college paper good for a college paper original discussion, ideas and/or -relies much too heavily on
-student demonstrates original -student demonstrates more opinions. research with little/no discussion
discussion, ideas and/or opinions original discussion, ideas by the student.
than a ‘B’ paper and/or opinions than a ‘C’
paper

Clarity and -very few if any grammar issues -few grammar issues -some grammar issues -unprofessional appearance:
Style -logical flow of information -logical flow of information -logical flow of information wrinkled, ink issues, etc.
- no evidence of monotonous, - very little of the language is - some of the language may be -significant grammar issues
superfluous, mechanical, or monotonous, mechanical, or monotonous, superfluous, -lacking a logical flow of
repetitive language. repetitive. mechanical, or repetitive. information
-very little/none of the language is -very little of the language is -little of the language is - language is often monotonous,
informal informal informal mechanical, superfluous, or
-each well-developed paragraph -each well-developed -each paragraph has a central repetitive.
has a central topic that relates to paragraph has a central topic topic that relates to the thesis -language is too informal
the thesis that relates to the thesis -paragraphs lack a central idea or
topic
Organization -excellent organization -good organization -evidence of organization -no evidence of organization

Proofreading -very few to no type-os and errors -few type-os and errors -some type-os and errors -significant type-os and errors
Footnotes and -sources are cited -sources are cited -most sources are cited -omission of footnotes and/or
Bibliography -footnotes/bib are in the Chicago -footnotes/bib are in the -most footnotes/bib are in the bibliography
Manual of Style with very few/no Chicago Manual of Style with Chicago Manual of Style -footnotes/bib are not in Chicago
errors few errors Manual of Style
Sources -excellent use of primary -good use of primary -uses primary sources -lack of primary sources
sources sources -uses adequate number of -lack of adequate number of
-more than adequate number -uses adequate number of resources for a research resources for a research paper
of resources for a research resources for a research paper
paper paper

You might also like