Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. Case Abstract
With our skilled and dedicated workforce (9), our mission at Elsewedy Electric (Cable
Division) is to be a producer of electrical solutions (wire and cables, electrical
products, turnkey projects, and wind energy) (2) targeted to customers (1) in the
Middle East, North Africa, and Europe (3, 5) who value reliable products and services
(2), at reasonable prices (8) without compromising our long-standing reputation for
high quality (4, 7, 8), as we make the most of our knowledge and experience (4) to
D. External Audit
The Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) identifies a firm’s major competitor(s) and its
particular strengths and weaknesses in relation to its strategic position. Elsewedy
Electric’s relative strengths and weaknesses based on the case details are portrayed
in the weighted scores. There are five main local and six key global competitors
identified in the case, but only three local and two international competitors are
described. These five competitors may be considered as representative of the overall
competition faced by Elsewedy. Their weighted scores are estimates based on their
strengths and weaknesses in terms of the critical success factors explicitly or
implicitly reflected in the case.
Overall, it is seen that NKT Cables is a close competitor to Elsewedy Electric, with
Energia trailing far behind, Prysmian and El Giza consolidating their strengths in
product quality, and Electro capturing significant market share commensurate with
its size and capabilities. To combat the strengths of its competitors, Elsewedy Electric
would do well to increase its customer base with a clear-cut market expansion and
penetration plan, and a more focused product line. Further, with its low-cost
advantage through commendable vertical integration, Elsewedy Electric could
embark aggressively on a coherent expansion drive backed by efficient advertising
and image-building.
Rating
Rating
Rating
Rating
Rating
Rating
ScoreWeighted
ScoreWeighted
ScoreWeighted
ScoreWeighted
ScoreWeighted
ScoreWeighted
Weight
Critical Success Factors
Price Competition 0.08 3 0.24 2 0.16 3 0.24 3 0.24 3 0.24 3 0.24
Global Expansion 0.11 4 0.44 3 0.33 1 0.11 4 0.44 4 0.44 4 0.44
Management 0.07 3 0.21 3 0.21 2 0.14 2 0.14 3 0.21 2 0.14
Technology 0.09 3 0.27 2 0.18 3 0.27 3 0.27 3 0.27 4 0.36
Product Lines 0.10 4 0.40 3 0.30 2 0.20 3 0.30 3 0.30 4 0.40
Customer Loyalty 0.10 3 0.30 4 0.40 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30
Market Share 0.09 4 0.36 3 0.27 4 0.27 2 0.18 3 0.27 3 0.27
Advertising 0.07 2 0.21 4 0.28 3 0.21 2 0.14 4 0.14 3 0.21
Product Quality 0.10 3 0.30 4 0.40 2 0.20 4 0.40 4 0.40 4 0.40
Product Image 0.10 3 0.30 4 0.40 2 0.20 3 0.30 3 0.30 4 0.40
Financial Position 0.09 3 0.27 3 0.27 2 0.18 3 0.27 3 0.27 3 0.27
TOTAL 1.00 3.30 3.20 2.32 2.98 3.14 3.43
Opportunities
Threats
1. Expansion into the European market connotes the risk of tackling new
cultures
2. The company faces competition from five local and six international firms
3. Co-operation with competitors as Elsewedy’s favored customers may backfire
if the latter switch loyalties
4. Italy and Spain could be risky markets in terms of relationships with Egypt
Opportunities
1. The European market is promising, with the
advantage of tariff-free transportation across 0.12 4 0.48
EU nations
2. Middle Eastern and North African nations such
as Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Algeria are turning 0.08 3 0.24
out to be profitable markets
3. Excess capacity from Egypt can be channeled
to the newly emerging European market 0.08 3 0.24
Threats
1. Expansion into the European market connotes
the risk of tackling new cultures 0.07 2 0.14
After markets have been segmented so that a firm can target particular customer
groups, the next step is to find out what customers want and expect. Many firms
have become successful by filling the gap between what producers see, and
customers perceive, as good service. Product positioning entails developing
schematic representations that reflect how a firm’s products or services compare
with their competitors’ regarding dimensions most important to success in the
industry. Two such matrices are presented below for Elsewedy and its competitors as
indicated above.
Product Image
(High)
Elsewedy
Prysmian Energia
Electro
Price (low) Price (High)
Product Image
(Low)
As depicted in the Product Positioning Matrix above for Price vs. Product Image,
Elsewedy has a good product image consistent with a reasonable price – though the
image is not as high as that of the local El Giza and the international NKT Cables of
Denmark. Despite its strong presence with high market share in the Middle East and
North Africa (MENA), Elsewedy needs to build up its image further in Europe and
other parts of the world. As the company has begun to give more attention to
providing “electrical solutions” rather than being just a “manufacturer” – through
after-sales service and consulting – its image in the market should become
wholesome and prominent. The spread of Elsewedy’s manufacturing and distribution
centres outside of Egypt into other parts of the Middle East – and into North Africa
and Europe – is salutary. This would again be consistent with keeping the prices at
reasonable levels through more economical and streamlined logistics following the
expansion drive.
Quality (High)
Elsewedy
NKT Cables
Energia El Giza
Prysmian
Electro
Quality (Low)
It can be seen from the above Product Positioning Matrix for Market Share vs.
Quality that Elsewedy is clearly ahead of the pack. NKT Cables, Energia, and El Giza
are also reputed for quality, but lag behind Elsewedy in market share. Electro, being
a government-owned company, is sluggish in reacting to market needs, quality
requirements, and marketing policies because of its slack financial control. Prysmian,
on the other hand, has a moderate position in both market share and product
quality, as it is still developing its services. Elsewedy needs to capitalize on its image
as a high-quality producer, and extend the same image to its services and consulting
aspects to retain and build on its commendable market share.
E. Internal Audit
Strengths
1. Elsewedy is a highly reputed firm in the MENA with four diversified segments
2. The company has an extensive and wide variety of electrical products and
services
3. Elsewedy has the largest production in Egypt with over 50 percent of the
market share
4. The Elsewedy family owns 75 percent of the company, allowing speedy
decision-making
5. The company has successfully entered the U.K. and France in the EU
Weaknesses
It is evident from the Income Statement results of Elsewedy and its four segments
that gross profit is nearly 24 percent due to robust performance by all four
segments. The three-and-a-half-fold increase in sales growth by the Wind Energy
segment is remarkable, and is indicative of the future potential of this products-and-
services segment – fuelled by the Elsewedy Wind Energy Group (SWEG) set up in
October 2008. The production of proprietary wind turbine parts in Egypt with Spanish
collaboration and other joint ventures is indicative of astute strategic initiatives. Of
the three remaining segments, the wire & cables segment has returned the highest
profit margin of 26 percent. This is not surprising, considering the upgradation of the
manufacturing facilities in Egypt, Sudan, and Syria – with new factories set up in
2010 in Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Libya. With 32 percent of this capacity in
low-competition countries, the future looks bright for the wires & cables segment.
The recession affected profitability for the electrical products segment, but Elsewedy
has survived that. All the segments are being transformed into “electrical solutions”
rather than “electrical products.” This again, augurs well for the future profitability of
Elsewedy. The plan to initiate a production centre in Italy for the European market
will help to streamline logistics strategies in the process of a profit and service-
oriented expansion.
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
Strengths
1. Elsewedy is a highly reputed firm in the MENA
with four diversified segments 0.10 4 0.40
2. The company has an extensive and wide
variety of electrical products and services 0.09 4 0.36
Weaknesses
1. “Elsewedy targets almost everyone” – this
suggests a lack of focus 0.09 3 0.27
Regardless of how many factors are included in an IFE Matrix, the total weighted
score can range from a low of 1.0 to a high of 4.0, with the average score being 2.5.
Total weighted scores well below 2.5 characterize organizations that are weak
F. SWOT Strategies
Strengths Weaknesses
1. Elsewedy is a highly 1. “Elsewedy targets
reputed firm in the almost everyone” – this
MENA with four suggests a lack of focus
diversified segments 2. The wire and cables
2. The company has an sales in Egypt are
extensive and wide predicted to decline
variety of electrical when New Cairo is
products and services completed
3. Elsewedy has the 3. Turnkey projects with
largest production in potential contribution
Egypt with over 50 from the other
perrcent of the market segments are executed
share mostly in Egypt and
4. The Elsewedy family Africa only
owns 75 percent of the
company, allowing
speedy decision-
making
5. The company has
successfully entered
the U.K. and France in
the EU
6. It is a price leader
producing quality
electrical goods and
services competitively
7. In 2007 Elsewedy
acquired Iskraemeco,
The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE) Matrix below indicates whether
aggressive, conservative, defensive, or competitive strategies are most appropriate
for a given organization. The axes of the SPACE Matrix represent two internal
dimensions (Financial Strength [FS] and Competitive Advantage [CA]) and two
external dimensions (Environmental Stability [ES] and Industry Strength [IS]).
These four factors are perhaps the most important determinants of an organization’s
overall strategic position.
FS
Conservative +7
Aggressive
ELSEWEDY
+6
+5
+4
+3
+2
+1
CA IS
-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
Defensive
Competitive
ES
Financial Strength (FS) Average 4.2 Environmental Stability (ES) Average -2.2
The directional vector of the SPACE Matrix above indicates that Elsewedy is on an
aggressive growth trajectory in a stable industry. According to the results of the
SPACE Matrix, it is recommended that Elsewedy embark on an Aggressive
Strategy that balances all extant external and internal realities impinging on the
company. The company is already backward integrated (acquiring raw material for
production of textiles); forward integrated (taking ownership of distribution channels
and nodes such as warehouses and retail store chains); and, with scope for further
horizontal integration (acquiring similar firms towards oligopoly or monopoly) with
the acquisition of the Slovakian energy solutions company Iskraemeco in 2007. It
appears from the overall strategic thrust of the various analyses including the CPM,
EFE, IFE, SWOT, Financial Information, and Product Positioning Matrix, that Elsewedy
is unlikely to adopt an unrelated diversification strategy as the electrical giant’s
mainstay is electrical products, services, and solutions. Elsewedy will also need to
embark on a market penetration and market development strategy, together with
product development to meet quality, price, and demand for various market
segments that could be targeted in MENA and Europe.
All organizations can be positioned in one of the Grand Strategy Matrix’s four
strategy quadrants. The Grand Strategy Matrix is based on two evaluative
dimensions: competitive position and market (industry) growth. Any industry whose
annual growth in sales exceeds 5 percent could be considered to have rapid growth
(Elsewedy’s annual sales growth is a whopping 41 percent!). Appropriate strategies
for an organization to consider are listed in sequential order of attractiveness in each
quadrant of the matrix. Firms located in Quadrant I of the Grand Strategy Matrix are
in a strong strategic position with rapid market growth. For these firms,
Rapid Market
Growth Quadrant I
Quadrant II
ELSEWEDY
Strong
Weak
Competitive Competitive
Position
Position
Quadrant III
Quadrant IV
Slow Market Growth
1. Market development
2. Market penetration
3. Product development
4. Backward integration
5. Forward integration
6. Horizontal integration
7. Related diversification
The only analytical technique in the literature designed to determine the relative
attractiveness of feasible alternative actions is the Quantitative Strategic Planning
Matrix (QSPM), which comprises Stage 3 of the strategy-formulation analytical
framework. This technique objectively indicates which alternative strategies are best.
The QSPM uses input from Stage 1 analyses and matching results from Stage 2
analyses to decide objectively among alternative strategies. That is, the EFE Matrix,
IFE Matrix, and Competitive Profile Matrix that make up Stage 1, coupled with the
SWOT Matrix, SPACE Matrix, and Grand Strategy Matrix that make up Stage 2,
provide the needed information for setting up the QSPM (Stage 3). The QSPM is a
strategic decision-making tool that allows strategists to evaluate alternative
strategies objectively, based on previously identified external and internal critical
success factors. Like other strategy-formulation analytical tools, the QSPM requires
good intuitive judgment.
The left column of a QSPM consists of key external and internal factors (from Stage
1), and the top row consists of feasible alternative strategies (from Stage 2).
Specifically, the left column of a QSPM consists of information obtained directly from
the EFE Matrix and IFE Matrix. In a column adjacent to the Critical Success Factors,
the respective weights received by each factor in the EFE Matrix and the IFE Matrix
are recorded. The top row of a QSPM consists of alternative strategies derived from
the SWOT Matrix, SPACE Matrix, and Grand Strategy Matrix. These matching tools
usually generate similar feasible alternatives. However, not every strategy suggested
by the matching techniques has to be evaluated in a QSPM. Strategists should use
good intuitive judgment in selecting strategies to include in a QSPM.
Opportunities
1. The European market is
promising, with the 0.12 4 0.48 4 0.48 1 0.12
advantage of tariff-free
transportation across EU
nations
2. Middle Eastern nations
such as Syria, Saudi 0.08 -- -- -- -- -- --
Arabia, and Algeria are
turning out to be
profitable markets
3. Excess capacity from
Egypt can be channeled 0.08 3 0.24 2 0.16 2 0.16
into the newly emerging
European market
4. The financial crisis has
proved to be an 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 4 0.40
opportunity for expansion
into Europe
5. Egypt’s varied natural
resources and industrial 0.07 -- -- -- -- -- --
products could be
attractive for backward
integration
6. The acquisition of
Iskraemeco has 0.10 2 0.20 4 0.40 3 0.30
expanded opportunities
for electrical services
7. Wind Energy is a
promising division which 0.08 2 0.16 3 0.24 3 0.24
promotes generation of
alternative power
Threats
J. Recommendations
Strategy #1: Elsewedy should expand into Europe with a combination of aggression
and caution in order to avoid a lack of focus – contrary to the observation, “Elsewedy
targets almost everyone.”
K. Epilogue
(2) The company should deploy its wide variety of electrical products and services
aggressively as “electrical solutions” to tackle competitors for market expansion.
(3) Existing profitable markets in the MENA should be consolidated to fuel the
expansion into Europe.
As the Sum Total Attractiveness scores for the three possible and related strategies
are only 0.26 apart, all three strategies could be used, in the order of priority of their
scores.