Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eunice Samonte
Section: I-E
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Havel’s activism
helped to bring down the communist regime in Czechoslovakia in the Velvet Revolution of
1989. The hope and expectations for his presidency were enormous. Inspired with high moral
purpose, Havel found the art of politics difficult. His proposals were often defeated in the new
Parliament. Three years later, he was not re-elected and the political party he had founded was
voted out. Czechoslovakia then became two separate countries, the Czech Republic and
Slovakia, something Havel was vehemently against. Though he was elected twice more as
president of the Czech Republic, he was no longer the favored leader he once was, losing
popularity and being accused by critics as being naive, especially around his notions of morality
in politics.
However, Havel remained a firm human rights activist all his life, working globally in
support of voices like Burma’s Aung San Suu Kyi and most recently China’s Liu Xiaobo.
Havel’s speech interweaves ethos, his ideals on returning to moral behavior, with logos, the
facts of Czechoslovakia’s then recent events and economic situation with grandiose pathos,
admiration for the accomplishments already achieved and encouragement in future endeavors
in a poetic style that was well written to lead his listeners logically from each point through to
his conclusion.
As the strongest and most consistent of Havel’s appeals, we shall look at the ethos, the
moral decline of the whole country.
Contents of the Speech
Vaclav Havel emphasized that we fell morally ill because we became used to saying
something different from what we thought and we learned not to believe in anything. People
nowadays tend to ignore each other and take care only about themselves. Such important
concepts like love, friendship, compassion, humility or forgiveness lost their depth and
dimensions. Havel also emphasized that the previous regime (the Communist Party of
Czechoslovakia), armed with arrogant and intolerant ideology, reduced man to a force of
production and nature to a tool of production. As a result, it attacked both their very substance
and their mutual relationship. Moreover, it reduced gifted and autonomous, skillfully working
in their own country, to “nuts and bolts” of some monstrously huge, noisy and stinking
machine which has no clear meaning at all.