Welcome to Scribd!
Academic Documents
Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hobbies & Crafts Documents
Personal Growth Documents
= find [PODAL, wich o inte 7 Mean and variance | = Wa ti acor—ourfat eat Te _ = [ure -dode 3 = 40> fuoae since is a number, independent of f and 7. put we haver aif) = fwceder'*Fa a so emae [Wendie = «i0) _sed> = , (0) is'a veal number, Aso ee = 2K () co the mean square of the output is finite, although that of the jnput would be infinite, This arises from the attemiation of the higher frequencies, visich 4s showm more clearly by considering che spectral. density ron the above, klif'= <1, 50 S(f)= oe keaete Keath e 4 For white noise input Sp(f) = a and S,(f) = ert Keanttd hese vill be recognised as the associated pair of R and S previously discussed (§ 6.6): For white noise input, = a! efits a which gives z&— as above. ack Integrals of this type are of frequent occurrence and are te- Gious to work out for more complex systems; a table of some stan- dard types is given in Crandall and Mark, page 72 (Ref, 1-1). Lf we suppose the input to be of the type eater tl 42eb R= ate, S()= wee ) applied to same systen, fo -alen we obtain R,(@) =74 and Sf) = these give <=> [note that the integrals for Ry since Rp is represented b itive and for negative valu 7.5. Random input to seco at all frequencies in of second order has will be reflectes ‘The situation Fig. 71s we General relationships 4a’b att + ante?) 2 2 ik+bo) * yy different algebraic es of the argument] . wnd order mechanical system In the previous example, s a natural frequency of its 4 in the output unless the damp: as it affects the spectral densit Fig. 7-1 passing-through the system; have to be done in sections forms for pos~ the input is attenuated but a system own, and this ving is too Large. y is shown in second order mechanical system 15 ‘Taking a conventional system consisting of a mass controlled by a spring and viscous damper, the equation of mo- tion will be mésck+kx = P(t). ‘this gives the impulsive receptance ectetlot ein 2atat wt y amt if the damping is small (& <1) s0 that the response to an in pulse is oscillatory. Here the natural frequency is fy = we Vi danping factor § = ZS Rig frequency of damped vibration fy = fy o For a white noise input wi white noise input with Rp(t) = ZaP6(E) , this gives deck Vi - ¢ R= with cos This gives = R,(0) = a°/4ck. The dan damped frequency fy of the system shows up in the output auto-correlation function. ‘The receptance for this system is:General relationships : so that if Sp(f) = a®, 2 SFr re 2 2felitdt = at/Ack as ab { We can verify that Fig. 7.2 hese results are shown a peak at frequencies plitude of the peak depending on the value of § «The of the value of S(fq) to $(0) 48 48" a* (see § 4.3). system with small danping the peak will be sharp, and # put will be a random motion with the frequencies in thi ourhood strongly predominating. in Fig, 7.2. The spectral density has | in the neighbourhood of f = fy » the am) For a the out- s neigh- Chapter 8 VIBRATION THEORY 1 : NORMAL MODES 8.1. Introduction In this chapter ve will be concerned with the modal analysis of the response of Lightly danped Linear’ systens ‘To begin with ve wish to consider systems of such complexity that they cannot be regarded as a collection of concentrated masses, beans, shells, ete, whose partial differential equations can be formulated on the basis of geometric dimensions and ma terial properties, Frequéntly it is found that the configuration of a machine = even as complicated as an aircraft - can be de- scribed adequately in terms of a certain set of n displacements or rotations qi(j=1,2,--.n) at judiciously chosen points P; - It is to be noted that in assuming that the q; describe the configuration independent of tine ve are to a certain extent ex- cluding systens with time varying parameters. For the sake of sinplicity it will be assuned that no forced displacements are imposed on the system. Thus, in the parlance of higher dynamics, ve will be considering scleronomic as opposed to rheonomic sys~ tens, After deciding on the n significant generalized coordt- ates qj» the next step would be to conduct vibration tests on ‘the given machine by applying sinusoidal forces at the points Pj. Afeer considerable effort one will be in a position toNormal modes 2B systen of second-order differential. equations governing : re been increased or (the necessary size of n may have : sual. test procedures decreased during the tests). sten from the theory of modal, response bt {ficial Lines of argument Since the u: ased on the governing equations, ve will follow the usual art: by starting with these governing equations naeagegg - 9 i.e. (1) 7” ”. ” 27 pedi Dudu + CGM = See ‘the Lagrangian method of setting up equations A and a stiffness matrix § that are : | (4) yields amass matrix i ‘is clear that A) must.be positive | symmetric, In addition it definite in-all real cases, since the Kinetic energy of a nov- | ro of negative. ing physical system can never be 76 BF Here as in Chapter 4 we will use the complex no- ent sinusoidally varying quantities. ve write 0, = (f,+49))° the response will be xf the sation to repres forces in Q are all at frequeney & io in view of the linearity, sexp(iwt) . : (ujrivPexpGod 5 4 oo ge (yt tpesptiut. subset s ation of the fac- of these expressions into (1) and cancel | tion tor, exp(w!) yields (Griug-wpPyrigd = frig. i Q@) ial introduction a which is equivalent to the two real equations Guy - wBy + Be ol a Here it 4s to be noted in passing that, being the ratio of the complex response to the complex: excitation, the receptance of the present system is given by g(ww)=(G+iu8—utAYs which is similar in form to the corresponding expression 4.25) for the one freedom case, If all the forces are in phase we can set g =0 with ff desoribing the distribution of amplitudes of che" txoi- tation, the system is said to be vibrating in a nomal node when the frequency wand {are such that all the displace ments have a common phase differing from the excitation by 60°, (Alternatively, the forces and velocities are in phase), Equa- tions (3) then reduce to “By = f> (a) G-o'py = g- 6) In order that (5) have non-zero roots y, #0 it is necessary and sufficient that det(G-ufA)=0, which is the characteristic equation for the associated conservative systen Ag+ Gq = 0. The vector yy is called the k-th modal shape and is obviously Andependent of the structure of the damping matrix B . The factNormal modes orthogonality 81 80 gative and symnetric guarantees that The zero roots correspond chat A) and Q are non-ne ail the roots wf are non-negntive, igid-body modes and are usually treated separately, Since Fg avo sancti an one at Last is sestine defines 27 proved eee incarly Sndepentent wodsh shapes Bi ) even if there are Tess than nm distinct modal e than one mod- fo one modal frequency, The probability Being Linearly indepen- are defined by (5) frequencies Wy » i.e, it is possible to have mo" a1 shape corresponding t fairly low. of such degenerate cases is the modal shapes is that any dent, the important thing abou n-dimensional vector v can be f the n modal shapes i.e. represented as a Linear combi- nation of gon auger aeyet et Rake * © 8.2. Onthogonality ‘Two veotars ft > Geqyie21) and Be (xasyerte) | —rr———— “=E™™”— zee | + yset H1%2 vanishes. calar product can be written If the above vectors are treated a= colt wectors, the 8 aegine opine! here superscript T indicates transposition to 4 TOW veetor. A | weighted scalar product can be defined by axtetbyiyet CHEE | which in matrix notation is written a 0.0][xe [enyoz]]/0 b Ollye] = riDee. 0 0 elle. Having gone so far, the last step in generalizing the idea of orthogonality is to aduit a symmetric non-diagonal matrix D for caloulating thé scalar product , riDr, = rJDr, ridge = pidge = duce t delve + may te. - : Thus in two dimensions the "Length" of a vector 2, y) becomes dyx*+2diozy + dee. This is simply equiv. alent to using ellipses instead of circles to measure the di tance from a point, Because D de- - fines how we measure distances, it is called the metric, After these prelin- inary remarks, let us show that the normal modes are orthogonal in this generalized sense, i ized ,, the mass and stiffness matrices playing the roles of metrics, For two distinct modal. freque quencies wy and Wp 8.1(5) reads 2 gu-uidys = 0, Gye-widy = 0-7) Premulesplyin ying the first equation by yf» the second by ylNormal modes ff 83 and subtracting the results we obtain otylam-eigidze * 9° due to the symmetry of and since wt-w) 40, for the Hence, y relations nodal vectors we have the orthogonal st @) pidge = O- ss of A means that worebver, the positive definitene (9) ylAy = m2 0 and gaye = mz >O- Now from (7) we have the additional orthogonality relations vhen tb 0 1 zy? co) vidas = Ore ARE | even bd wt i cto explain the weility of the tv0 oF a thogonality relations (8), (10) con on an elastic \ | sider two unequal masses cable, With’ a suitable choice of units 4 0 at wene hb, g42 3]. . b I & i 4 she modal veotors By 2 Be can b° found from the orthogonality relations (8) and (10) above: yi = 4% -3) orthogonality yy = (1,-vs-3 ae cree ) the orthogonality relations yield the modal shapes without re- quiring the calculation of the corresponding modal freq. al. frequencies. Zn the case of proportional damping 8 is a line ear combination of A and/or & , so in this case we Rave vim -{ 0 when jf # etapa spk. OD Let us now see how cae o see how tho response qin system (1) e expressed in terms of the moral modes. For the sake of deriving a model expression for the receptance ve et the +420) ication te Q=pexpliut). subseisucion of g= (ys +. explwt) yields aj =v i 2% AG vA +inBhy, =p - (a2) In ‘view of the relations (8), (9), (10) and (11) premltiplica— tion of both sides of (8.12) by yf yields a> yt 4 mAak- 8 + 2:8 0,0} ro (13) 4 . —BeBgpo_up HOON.84 Normal modes From this expression it is clear that any node yj can be SuP- pressed by making the force vector p orthogonal to ity dae. K C., Alternatively the amplitude of node wip = quency differences (w} wut). ‘the can be ine wR creased by reducing the fre receptance Gp, af station r due to & simisoidal excitation .d by inserting a foree vector p with at station s is obtaines vent and zeros elsewhere. If Vy; de~ a 4 in the s—th compon notes the *—th component of vector yj s it follows from (13) hat (4) ee = Mes GE oe + aie wyu} ia np{of 09 + 28,0.) A similac expression for the receptance of a continuous system ‘can be derived, For instance, in the case of a uniform bean of visco-elastic material we have $ Ww, . PA i) Mj {o* = w®) + 2iejoa) fiore the wodsl finetions W;(s) satisfy the equations \ EIW.%) - mut We) = 0 team, The mass per unit Length of and the end conditions on the the beam is denoted by m . The gencralized mass is defined as w}(s) dx. The modal damping factor is defined as gj Voy 2e where V ‘and E are the viscous and clastic mod~ Normal. coordinates 85, duli in the stress-strain relation 6 = EE + Vé ‘All modes above a certain : tain frequency will be over-critical danped, since the dé factor _ ees factor increases with W; 5 this is character istic of all systems in which the damping matrix is 8.3. Normal coordinates The n norm vaca 1 normal. coordinates of system (1) are re~ ated to the initial more or less arbitrarily chosen coordinat coordinates qty the matrix transformation go ME = St. + 8p, (15) where Yj is composed of the n colum vectors wv, 1. Bir be. Mi M2 Ms Y= Uwoperoga) = | + (6) », rat Substitution of (15) into (1) yields AVE+gye+cye - g, which after preluntiplying by V' and taking account of the or ing by V ing a thogonality relations (8), (9), (10), (11) becomes y (8), (9), (40), (41)B+ bet an : where the normal forces aseion (11) 0 equations (17) would ever, since the curr , are base’ masses ™; cous damping is more of @ jon of the usual. mechanics script: Little point in con cept as a last resol te is seen’ from the set rns coordinates $j G+ 20,048, + Habs mn the damping matrix were 1 28d + wits = 2Botwebe + ibe 7 components of YQ + Tf cone ot fulfilled the normal are the ‘be coupted through the velocity cerns, Hove ene methods of determining the generalized 41 on an wndanped model and the use of vis convenient artifice than a true de- al situation, there seems to be sidering other than proportional. damping - cond way of writing (as) are a measure of what proportion that the no! of each normal mods .e response q+ fe appears in the response 9 Chapter 9. RANDOM VIBRATION RESPONSE I: SIMPLE EXAMPLES 9.1. System with two degrees of freedom To illustrate the situation where a system is to be regarded as one with a few degrees of freedom, with lumped parameters, we consider the conventional system of Fig. 9.1 We suppose that the input consists of random movenent of the base, re~ presented by the coordinate x, and that we are interested in the result ing movements of the two masses re- presented by the coordinates x and y , We require the re~ ceptances i, and ty, » giving the outputs at x and y respective ly for a unit sinusoidal input at % . The receptances here are ra Fig. 9.1 tos of displacements instead of ratios of displacements to force, bat it is convenient to use the term in a wider sense to cover inputs and outputs of various natures. ‘The differential equations for this edse are tot ede t(kyt kx -cay-key = ck thyzSimple examples Normal: modes 7 88 = ma + ce +key ~ ce Kae = 0 iat wet the desired E yor z= Zeit, x— seh y= yore? , we get the tions of i ratios xo/% and yo/20 a8 funct! re = wXlingky + x62) — bw macy * D D and the denominator D is 'm, im, A 4 make + O62) + gots iwXmyce + myc, + Myce) ~ UPL + make + Make + O462 gat a iulkyee + kee) + Kike » ¢ there is no damping, the denominator reduces to a quadratic the d re a qf tl 5 natural frequen~ the roots of which give the two natural freq ‘ 2 ners the guantities| cies of the system, For 2 Jecgal” and [ety,[° wild bot modérate anounts of damping, hh have peaks in the neighbourhood of | ‘these frequencies, the shape of the peaks depending on the parane f ss e peaks depending on the P ies, sat is white noise at z ; eters of the system, If the random input is whi roporticnal to these sities at x and y will be Pp | the spectral densit tence sueputs can be quantities. The mean square of the output <> ; = 2 f Jeli de, as in 7.4 3 A detasled study sing the table of integrals referred to there. of this system, with reference to the effect of differént values of the paraneters, is given in Crandall and Mark (Ref. 1.1). 9.2, Use of normal modes of vibration The most general method of analysis for a system with many degrees of freedom is that based on the concept of nor- mal modes, as described in the last lecture, This method is best illustrated in tems of a system with distributed parameters, which we think of as having an infinite number of degrees of freedom. We shall again use the transverse vibration of a beam aS a convenient illustration, since for this case the idea of the nodes of vibration is a familiar one, aid the modes themselves can be easily visualized, We suppose then that we have a random force P applied to the beans at a point determined by a coordinate x, , measured along the length, and that we wish to find the movement at a point with coordinate x, It has been established that the movenent ww(tp,t) at this point for a sinusoidal input Pye ig given by F__ willed sat (x98 0) A= 28,050" = eafndPoe™t, where ciay(iu) 4s the receptance Linking output displacenent at 2 with input force at x4, In this formila, w,(x) is the mode associated
is a number, independent of f and 7. put we haver aif) = fwceder'*Fa a so emae [Wendie = «i0) _sed> =
, (0) is'a veal number, Aso ee = 2K () co the mean square of the output is finite, although that of the jnput would be infinite, This arises from the attemiation of the higher frequencies, visich 4s showm more clearly by considering che spectral. density ron the above, klif'= <1, 50 S(f)= oe keaete Keath e 4 For white noise input Sp(f) = a and S,(f) = ert Keanttd hese vill be recognised as the associated pair of R and S previously discussed (§ 6.6): For white noise input, = a! efits a which gives z&— as above. ack Integrals of this type are of frequent occurrence and are te- Gious to work out for more complex systems; a table of some stan- dard types is given in Crandall and Mark, page 72 (Ref, 1-1). Lf we suppose the input to be of the type eater tl 42eb R= ate, S()= wee ) applied to same systen, fo -alen we obtain R,(@) =74 and Sf) = these give <=> [note that the integrals for Ry since Rp is represented b itive and for negative valu 7.5. Random input to seco at all frequencies in of second order has will be reflectes ‘The situation Fig. 71s we General relationships 4a’b att + ante?) 2 2 ik+bo) * yy different algebraic es of the argument] . wnd order mechanical system In the previous example, s a natural frequency of its 4 in the output unless the damp: as it affects the spectral densit Fig. 7-1 passing-through the system; have to be done in sections forms for pos~ the input is attenuated but a system own, and this ving is too Large. y is shown in second order mechanical system 15 ‘Taking a conventional system consisting of a mass controlled by a spring and viscous damper, the equation of mo- tion will be mésck+kx = P(t). ‘this gives the impulsive receptance ectetlot ein 2atat wt y amt if the damping is small (& <1) s0 that the response to an in pulse is oscillatory. Here the natural frequency is fy = we Vi danping factor § = ZS Rig frequency of damped vibration fy = fy o For a white noise input wi white noise input with Rp(t) = ZaP6(E) , this gives deck Vi - ¢ R= with cos This gives = R,(0) = a°/4ck. The dan damped frequency fy of the system shows up in the output auto-correlation function. ‘The receptance for this system is:General relationships : so that if Sp(f) = a®, 2 SFr re 2 2felitdt = at/Ack as ab { We can verify that Fig. 7.2 hese results are shown a peak at frequencies plitude of the peak depending on the value of § «The of the value of S(fq) to $(0) 48 48" a* (see § 4.3). system with small danping the peak will be sharp, and # put will be a random motion with the frequencies in thi ourhood strongly predominating. in Fig, 7.2. The spectral density has | in the neighbourhood of f = fy » the am) For a the out- s neigh- Chapter 8 VIBRATION THEORY 1 : NORMAL MODES 8.1. Introduction In this chapter ve will be concerned with the modal analysis of the response of Lightly danped Linear’ systens ‘To begin with ve wish to consider systems of such complexity that they cannot be regarded as a collection of concentrated masses, beans, shells, ete, whose partial differential equations can be formulated on the basis of geometric dimensions and ma terial properties, Frequéntly it is found that the configuration of a machine = even as complicated as an aircraft - can be de- scribed adequately in terms of a certain set of n displacements or rotations qi(j=1,2,--.n) at judiciously chosen points P; - It is to be noted that in assuming that the q; describe the configuration independent of tine ve are to a certain extent ex- cluding systens with time varying parameters. For the sake of sinplicity it will be assuned that no forced displacements are imposed on the system. Thus, in the parlance of higher dynamics, ve will be considering scleronomic as opposed to rheonomic sys~ tens, After deciding on the n significant generalized coordt- ates qj» the next step would be to conduct vibration tests on ‘the given machine by applying sinusoidal forces at the points Pj. Afeer considerable effort one will be in a position toNormal modes 2B systen of second-order differential. equations governing : re been increased or (the necessary size of n may have : sual. test procedures decreased during the tests). sten from the theory of modal, response bt {ficial Lines of argument Since the u: ased on the governing equations, ve will follow the usual art: by starting with these governing equations naeagegg - 9 i.e. (1) 7” ”. ” 27 pedi Dudu + CGM = See ‘the Lagrangian method of setting up equations A and a stiffness matrix § that are : | (4) yields amass matrix i ‘is clear that A) must.be positive | symmetric, In addition it definite in-all real cases, since the Kinetic energy of a nov- | ro of negative. ing physical system can never be 76 BF Here as in Chapter 4 we will use the complex no- ent sinusoidally varying quantities. ve write 0, = (f,+49))° the response will be xf the sation to repres forces in Q are all at frequeney & io in view of the linearity, sexp(iwt) . : (ujrivPexpGod 5 4 oo ge (yt tpesptiut. subset s ation of the fac- of these expressions into (1) and cancel | tion tor, exp(w!) yields (Griug-wpPyrigd = frig. i Q@) ial introduction a which is equivalent to the two real equations Guy - wBy + Be ol a Here it 4s to be noted in passing that, being the ratio of the complex response to the complex: excitation, the receptance of the present system is given by g(ww)=(G+iu8—utAYs which is similar in form to the corresponding expression 4.25) for the one freedom case, If all the forces are in phase we can set g =0 with ff desoribing the distribution of amplitudes of che" txoi- tation, the system is said to be vibrating in a nomal node when the frequency wand {are such that all the displace ments have a common phase differing from the excitation by 60°, (Alternatively, the forces and velocities are in phase), Equa- tions (3) then reduce to “By = f> (a) G-o'py = g- 6) In order that (5) have non-zero roots y, #0 it is necessary and sufficient that det(G-ufA)=0, which is the characteristic equation for the associated conservative systen Ag+ Gq = 0. The vector yy is called the k-th modal shape and is obviously Andependent of the structure of the damping matrix B . The factNormal modes orthogonality 81 80 gative and symnetric guarantees that The zero roots correspond chat A) and Q are non-ne ail the roots wf are non-negntive, igid-body modes and are usually treated separately, Since Fg avo sancti an one at Last is sestine defines 27 proved eee incarly Sndepentent wodsh shapes Bi ) even if there are Tess than nm distinct modal e than one mod- fo one modal frequency, The probability Being Linearly indepen- are defined by (5) frequencies Wy » i.e, it is possible to have mo" a1 shape corresponding t fairly low. of such degenerate cases is the modal shapes is that any dent, the important thing abou n-dimensional vector v can be f the n modal shapes i.e. represented as a Linear combi- nation of gon auger aeyet et Rake * © 8.2. Onthogonality ‘Two veotars ft > Geqyie21) and Be (xasyerte) | —rr———— “=E™™”— zee | + yset H1%2 vanishes. calar product can be written If the above vectors are treated a= colt wectors, the 8 aegine opine! here superscript T indicates transposition to 4 TOW veetor. A | weighted scalar product can be defined by axtetbyiyet CHEE | which in matrix notation is written a 0.0][xe [enyoz]]/0 b Ollye] = riDee. 0 0 elle. Having gone so far, the last step in generalizing the idea of orthogonality is to aduit a symmetric non-diagonal matrix D for caloulating thé scalar product , riDr, = rJDr, ridge = pidge = duce t delve + may te. - : Thus in two dimensions the "Length" of a vector 2, y) becomes dyx*+2diozy + dee. This is simply equiv. alent to using ellipses instead of circles to measure the di tance from a point, Because D de- - fines how we measure distances, it is called the metric, After these prelin- inary remarks, let us show that the normal modes are orthogonal in this generalized sense, i ized ,, the mass and stiffness matrices playing the roles of metrics, For two distinct modal. freque quencies wy and Wp 8.1(5) reads 2 gu-uidys = 0, Gye-widy = 0-7) Premulesplyin ying the first equation by yf» the second by ylNormal modes ff 83 and subtracting the results we obtain otylam-eigidze * 9° due to the symmetry of and since wt-w) 40, for the Hence, y relations nodal vectors we have the orthogonal st @) pidge = O- ss of A means that worebver, the positive definitene (9) ylAy = m2 0 and gaye = mz >O- Now from (7) we have the additional orthogonality relations vhen tb 0 1 zy? co) vidas = Ore ARE | even bd wt i cto explain the weility of the tv0 oF a thogonality relations (8), (10) con on an elastic \ | sider two unequal masses cable, With’ a suitable choice of units 4 0 at wene hb, g42 3]. . b I & i 4 she modal veotors By 2 Be can b° found from the orthogonality relations (8) and (10) above: yi = 4% -3) orthogonality yy = (1,-vs-3 ae cree ) the orthogonality relations yield the modal shapes without re- quiring the calculation of the corresponding modal freq. al. frequencies. Zn the case of proportional damping 8 is a line ear combination of A and/or & , so in this case we Rave vim -{ 0 when jf # etapa spk. OD Let us now see how cae o see how tho response qin system (1) e expressed in terms of the moral modes. For the sake of deriving a model expression for the receptance ve et the +420) ication te Q=pexpliut). subseisucion of g= (ys +. explwt) yields aj =v i 2% AG vA +inBhy, =p - (a2) In ‘view of the relations (8), (9), (10) and (11) premltiplica— tion of both sides of (8.12) by yf yields a> yt 4 mAak- 8 + 2:8 0,0} ro (13) 4 . —BeBgpo_up HOON.84 Normal modes From this expression it is clear that any node yj can be SuP- pressed by making the force vector p orthogonal to ity dae. K C., Alternatively the amplitude of node wip = quency differences (w} wut). ‘the can be ine wR creased by reducing the fre receptance Gp, af station r due to & simisoidal excitation .d by inserting a foree vector p with at station s is obtaines vent and zeros elsewhere. If Vy; de~ a 4 in the s—th compon notes the *—th component of vector yj s it follows from (13) hat (4) ee = Mes GE oe + aie wyu} ia np{of 09 + 28,0.) A similac expression for the receptance of a continuous system ‘can be derived, For instance, in the case of a uniform bean of visco-elastic material we have $ Ww, . PA i) Mj {o* = w®) + 2iejoa) fiore the wodsl finetions W;(s) satisfy the equations \ EIW.%) - mut We) = 0 team, The mass per unit Length of and the end conditions on the the beam is denoted by m . The gencralized mass is defined as w}(s) dx. The modal damping factor is defined as gj Voy 2e where V ‘and E are the viscous and clastic mod~ Normal. coordinates 85, duli in the stress-strain relation 6 = EE + Vé ‘All modes above a certain : tain frequency will be over-critical danped, since the dé factor _ ees factor increases with W; 5 this is character istic of all systems in which the damping matrix is 8.3. Normal coordinates The n norm vaca 1 normal. coordinates of system (1) are re~ ated to the initial more or less arbitrarily chosen coordinat coordinates qty the matrix transformation go ME = St. + 8p, (15) where Yj is composed of the n colum vectors wv, 1. Bir be. Mi M2 Ms Y= Uwoperoga) = | + (6) », rat Substitution of (15) into (1) yields AVE+gye+cye - g, which after preluntiplying by V' and taking account of the or ing by V ing a thogonality relations (8), (9), (10), (11) becomes y (8), (9), (40), (41)B+ bet an : where the normal forces aseion (11) 0 equations (17) would ever, since the curr , are base’ masses ™; cous damping is more of @ jon of the usual. mechanics script: Little point in con cept as a last resol te is seen’ from the set rns coordinates $j G+ 20,048, + Habs mn the damping matrix were 1 28d + wits = 2Botwebe + ibe 7 components of YQ + Tf cone ot fulfilled the normal are the ‘be coupted through the velocity cerns, Hove ene methods of determining the generalized 41 on an wndanped model and the use of vis convenient artifice than a true de- al situation, there seems to be sidering other than proportional. damping - cond way of writing (as) are a measure of what proportion that the no! of each normal mods .e response q+ fe appears in the response 9 Chapter 9. RANDOM VIBRATION RESPONSE I: SIMPLE EXAMPLES 9.1. System with two degrees of freedom To illustrate the situation where a system is to be regarded as one with a few degrees of freedom, with lumped parameters, we consider the conventional system of Fig. 9.1 We suppose that the input consists of random movenent of the base, re~ presented by the coordinate x, and that we are interested in the result ing movements of the two masses re- presented by the coordinates x and y , We require the re~ ceptances i, and ty, » giving the outputs at x and y respective ly for a unit sinusoidal input at % . The receptances here are ra Fig. 9.1 tos of displacements instead of ratios of displacements to force, bat it is convenient to use the term in a wider sense to cover inputs and outputs of various natures. ‘The differential equations for this edse are tot ede t(kyt kx -cay-key = ck thyzSimple examples Normal: modes 7 88 = ma + ce +key ~ ce Kae = 0 iat wet the desired E yor z= Zeit, x— seh y= yore? , we get the tions of i ratios xo/% and yo/20 a8 funct! re = wXlingky + x62) — bw macy * D D and the denominator D is 'm, im, A 4 make + O62) + gots iwXmyce + myc, + Myce) ~ UPL + make + Make + O462 gat a iulkyee + kee) + Kike » ¢ there is no damping, the denominator reduces to a quadratic the d re a qf tl 5 natural frequen~ the roots of which give the two natural freq ‘ 2 ners the guantities| cies of the system, For 2 Jecgal” and [ety,[° wild bot modérate anounts of damping, hh have peaks in the neighbourhood of | ‘these frequencies, the shape of the peaks depending on the parane f ss e peaks depending on the P ies, sat is white noise at z ; eters of the system, If the random input is whi roporticnal to these sities at x and y will be Pp | the spectral densit tence sueputs can be quantities. The mean square of the output <> ; = 2 f Jeli de, as in 7.4 3 A detasled study sing the table of integrals referred to there. of this system, with reference to the effect of differént values of the paraneters, is given in Crandall and Mark (Ref. 1.1). 9.2, Use of normal modes of vibration The most general method of analysis for a system with many degrees of freedom is that based on the concept of nor- mal modes, as described in the last lecture, This method is best illustrated in tems of a system with distributed parameters, which we think of as having an infinite number of degrees of freedom. We shall again use the transverse vibration of a beam aS a convenient illustration, since for this case the idea of the nodes of vibration is a familiar one, aid the modes themselves can be easily visualized, We suppose then that we have a random force P applied to the beans at a point determined by a coordinate x, , measured along the length, and that we wish to find the movement at a point with coordinate x, It has been established that the movenent ww(tp,t) at this point for a sinusoidal input Pye ig given by F__ willed sat (x98 0) A= 28,050" = eafndPoe™t, where ciay(iu) 4s the receptance Linking output displacenent at 2 with input force at x4, In this formila, w,(x) is the mode associated