The document discusses ferromagnetism in Hubbard models. It finds that the system is ferromagnetic if the on-site repulsion U is large enough. At exactly quarter filling, the fully polarized system is insulating due to a large single-particle gap, and remains ferromagnetic away from quarter filling. The plaquette mechanism explains ferromagnetism in both insulating and metallic cases, but requires a large U that suppresses kinetic exchange. Numerical work has indicated three-site exchange stabilizes strong ferromagnetism, and studies have found an extensive ferromagnetic phase continuously connected to the ring-exchange regime.
The document discusses ferromagnetism in Hubbard models. It finds that the system is ferromagnetic if the on-site repulsion U is large enough. At exactly quarter filling, the fully polarized system is insulating due to a large single-particle gap, and remains ferromagnetic away from quarter filling. The plaquette mechanism explains ferromagnetism in both insulating and metallic cases, but requires a large U that suppresses kinetic exchange. Numerical work has indicated three-site exchange stabilizes strong ferromagnetism, and studies have found an extensive ferromagnetic phase continuously connected to the ring-exchange regime.
The document discusses ferromagnetism in Hubbard models. It finds that the system is ferromagnetic if the on-site repulsion U is large enough. At exactly quarter filling, the fully polarized system is insulating due to a large single-particle gap, and remains ferromagnetic away from quarter filling. The plaquette mechanism explains ferromagnetism in both insulating and metallic cases, but requires a large U that suppresses kinetic exchange. Numerical work has indicated three-site exchange stabilizes strong ferromagnetism, and studies have found an extensive ferromagnetic phase continuously connected to the ring-exchange regime.
that U 00 on the black (even) sublattice, but not on the odd sublat-
tice. Assuming again a sufficiently large €0 on the even sublattice, and
exact quarter-filling so that the odd sublattice can be filled with one electron per site, a systematic perturbation expansion [323] confirms that the effective spin-spin coupling is the same as in the toy model result (8.7)
The system is ferromagnetic if U is large enough.
tk does not play a role at, or below, quarter-filling. Strictly a t quarter-filling, the fully polarized system is an insulator because of a large single-particle gap, but it can be shown [323] that the system remains ferromagnetic even if we move away from quarter-filling. The plaquette mechanism gives a very transparent reason for find- ing ferromagnetism in insulating and metallic cases alike, but at a price: U has to be so large that the leading (second-order) kinetic exchange is suppressed and the usually negligible higher-order processes become dominating. Besides, the presence of frustration has to be assumed n in the sense that the plaquette product t i j must have a definite sign. Finally, the possibility of the perturbation expansion relies on the seem- ingly ad hoc assumption of a large €0. But at least, it is a hopeful feature that the ferromagnetic order is understood to be stable in a finite domain of the parameter space, not only in singular limiting cases. Our basic hope is that ferromagnetism extends beyond the range of validity of the perturbational argument, and then perhaps the entire phase can be understood by continuation from the strong-coupling, large-€0 regime. There are reasons to think that indeed such is the case. Early numer- ical work [386] on small clusters used E = 0; nevertheless, it indicated that three-site exchange in triangular loops is instrumental in stabiliz- ing strong ferromagnetism. Tasaki’s [392] finding of a fully saturated ferromagnetic ground state requires a large U but it does not require a large t o . Penc et al. [323] studied an extended version of Tasaki’s model by a variety of techniques and found that the extensive ferro- magnetic phase is continuously connected to the ring-exchange regime. It is also interesting to note that this is our first argument which ascribes