10.

6 Discussion and Outlook 565

Like in the Hartree-Fock theory, it is useful to construct the refer-

ence state [QSDW) in an explicitely normalized form, expressing U k and
V k with the variables18 0 5 & <_ 1

(10.59)

(10.60)

It can be shown [272, 2701 that the structure of the energy expression
is quite similar to (9.44) and (10.51)

(EHFis like (7.151)) but q has become complicated

+
4(n - 2 n d ) ~ n d ( n d 1 - n) + 2(2nd + 1 - n)Jm
9=
J(n2 - mz1)((2- n>2- mil>
(10.62)
Note that (10.62) reduces to (10.20) for m,l = 0.
It turns out that the k-dependence of the optimized & arises from

Act + + A2
ek = (10.63)
+
BE; A2
In the Hartree-Fock theory A = 0 and B = 1. Here, A and B still de-
pend on 77 in a complicated manner. However, the relationship between
the sublattice magnetization m,l, and the gap parameter A turns out
to be the same (7.63) as in our previous SDW theory:

(10.64)

The energy (10.61) remains to be minimized with respect to 7 (or nd)

and m,l (or A).
"The present parametrization is an alternative to that quoted in (10.56).