Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I, 2014
4.3.1. Definition
A noun phrase is a phrase in which the word which acts as its head is typically a noun or a
pronoun. A noun phrase may minimally consist of a noun (cats), as in [NP Cats] make wonderful
pets preceded or not by a determiner, or of a pronoun (they), as in [NP They] make wonderful pets.
There are cases where the head of a noun phrase is an adjective, especially when the structure
definite article + adjective occurs, as in the soap opera title [NP The young] and [NP the restless].
Other examples include: the poor, the blind, the sick, and so on.
1
Examples and comments adapted from Biber, Conrad and Leech, Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English,
p. 264, 2002.
2
The process is called nominalization or substantivization. As Hasselgård, Lysvåg & Johanssonan show, an
“originally verbal process can be expressed by means of a noun phrase (e.g. Columbus discovered America -->
the discovery of America by Columbus was a landmark also in European history), or a quality can be expressed
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
some adjectives, particularly superlatives, that function as heads of noun phrases that are
abstract. These noun phrases are singular:
The best is yet to come.
The latest is that our team is winning.
some set expressions: from the sublime to the ridiculous, out of the ordinary, etc.
Examples:
We have much in common.
I’m leaving for good.
I’ll tell you in private.
The situation went from bad to worse.
Adjectives normally preceded by the definite article the or by a determiner like many or
more that in this structure designate a group having a characteristic in common:
There are more unemployed than ever before.
These expressions are normally plural (the dead means „all dead people‟ or „the dead
people‟, but not „the dead person‟) and cannot be used with a possessive ‘s. We say the
problems of the poor or the poor people’s problems, not the poor’s problems.
Adjectives without the are sometimes used in paired structures with both …and…:
opportunities for both rich and poor.
A few adjectives of nationality ending in –sh or –ch are used after the without nouns. They
include Irish, Welsh, English, British, Spanish, Dutch, French: The Irish are very proud of
their sense of humour. These expressions are plural; singular equivalents are an Irish woman,
a Welshman (not a Welsh). Where nouns exist, they are preferred to expressions with the
…ish: the Danes or the Turks (not the Danish or the Turkish).
In a few formal fixed expressions, the + adjective can have a singular meaning. They
include the accused, the undersigned, the deceased, the former and the latter:
The accused was released on bail,
… Mr. Gray and Mrs. Cook: the latter is a well-known designer.
Adjectives are sometimes used after the to refer to general abstract ideas, especially in
philosophical writing: the beautiful, the supernatural, the unreal. These expressions are
singular:
She’s interested in the supernatural.
A noun that has already been mentioned or that does not need to be mentioned can be
omitted, when thinking about a choice between two or more different kinds of thing:
Have you got any bread? ~ Do you want white or brown?
Colour adjectives can sometimes have a plural –s in this situation:
Wash the reds and the blues separately.
as if it were a thing (e.g. the people were loyal to their leader --> the people's loyalty to their leader was
remarkable.)” (1999/2012).
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
Much in the same line, Hasselgård, Lysvåg & Johanssonan note that
nominalized adjectives may refer to people, in which case they function as plural-only
nouns, usually with generic reference: The poor need help from the government. The
French are considered gourmets. If reference to one person is required, you need to add
a noun such as person, man, woman after the adjective. Colour adjectives can easily be
nominalized, as in She was dressed in red. Furthermore, adjectives referring to
abstractions may be nominalized (overcome evil with good; the unexpected often
happens; the unknown is usually feared), as well as adjectives in the superlative, also
with reference to abstractions (We'll hope for the best and expect the worst). Both
colour adjectives and nominalized adjectives referring to abstractions function as
singular (uncountable) nouns (1999/2012).
Similarly, certain classes of Romanian adjectives do not modify nouns and instead function as
heads for noun phrases themselves:
Adjectives preceded by the definite article or by a determiner like cel/cea/cei/cele that in this
structure designate a group having a characteristic in common: Albastrul e preferatul ei, Cei
înalți rămân în spate.
Adjectives which, after the omission of the nouns they modify, start to behave like nouns: A
fost prins în flagrant (delict), Colectăm (material) plastic, Avem (formulare) tipizate.
All the other parts of speech which can undergo substantivization/ nominalizaton in Romanian
also change their morphological behaviour together with their original class. The following parts
of speech can become heads for noun phrases:3 verbs in the long infinitive (Cele rele să le scrii
pe apa ce curge, iar facerea de bine în piatră să o sapi), verbs in the supine (De vorbit nu-i
greu.), adjectives (Cele bune să s-adune, cele rele să se spele.), verbs in the participle (Tot
pățitu-i priceput.), adverbs (Puţin şi des face mult.), pronouns (”Sunt un gunoi, sunt un nimic”,
by Radu Cîrstea Ratzone), numerals (Miile şi sutele mărită slutele.), interjections (Nu zi hop,
pân-a nu intra în joc), conjunctions (Și-ul acela al lui nu mi-a plăcut, mi s-a părut sarcastic.),
prepositions (Adaugă un pe în fața lui ”care”.).
Determiners/ determinatives are function words that come before the head and before all the other
dependents in a noun phrase and determine or specify “how the reference of a noun phrase is to be
understood. For example, this determines the reference of table in this table: it tells us which or what
table is intended.” (Leech, 2006, p. 33) the author also mentions that “in an older tradition of
grammar, determiners were treated as adjectives, and terms like „demonstrative adjective‟ and
„possessive adjective‟ are still used in some grammars.” (2006, pp. , 33)
The presence of determiners is obligatory before singular count nouns. Notice that, for example,
cat without a determiner cannot be a noun phrase: Cat makes a wonderful pet, unless cat is a
name or a nickname, but in that case it no longer is a count noun.
Determiners can be divided into three classes:
1. predeterminers, e.g. all, both, half, as in [det all] cats, [det both] breeds.
2. central determiners, e.g. a(n), the, those, as in [det a] breed, [det those] cats.
3
In the enumeration, they are ordered according to the frequency of substantivization. Most of the examples
provided above are Romanian proverbs retrieved from (Proverbe românești) and (Proverbe românești 1 n.d.)
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
3. postdeterminers, e.g. other, two, first, as in [det two] cats, [det other] breeds.
Premodifiers are modifiers placed before the head. They are normally realised by adjectives
(indoor cats), participial premodifiers (broken heart, breaking news) but can sometimes be
realized by nouns (church roof) or other types of phrases. An example proposed by Biber et al.
shows a prepositional phrase that premodifies a noun.
It probably fell out of the sky after an [PpP in-flight] explosion. (Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad,
& Finegan, 1999)
The head governs concord, that is, the agreement in grammatical form between elements in a
clause or a phrase. It may be preceded by determiners and premodifiers and followed by
postmodifiers.
The postmodifiers incorporate all the elements placed after the head and typically consist of
prepositional phrases (cats [PpP of different breeds]), relative clauses (cats [that-Cl that stay
indoors]) and non-finite clauses (cats [ing-Cl staying on the sofa]). Appositive clauses can also be
embedded in noun phrases quite often, as in [NP the fact [app-Cl that she was his worst nightmare]].
Biber, Conrad and Leech (2002, pp. , 266) distinguish between clausal postmodifiers and
phrasal postmodifiers.
Clausal postmodifiers can be finite (relative clauses) or non-finite (to-clauses, ing-clauses, and
ed-clauses).
Phrasal postmodifiers consist of two main types: prepositional phrases and appositive noun
phrases, but adjective phrases can also occur, less commonly, as in President Bush will reiterate
he wants a smooth transition and will cooperate in [any way possible]4.
Occasionally adverbs can also be premodifiers or postmodifiers in noun phrases:
a. adverb as premodifier: the nearby guards
b. adverb as postmodifier: a block behind
Relative clauses are a common type of postmodifier. In the clause He has two cats that stay indoors,
the relative clause is embedded in the noun phrase. In order to highlight the process of embedding,
we should try to recreate previous stages, starting from two independent clauses and moving towards
the embedded relative clause provided above:
He has two cats. The cats stay indoors.
The next step connects the two clauses into a sentence, by replacing cat (which is object in the
former and subject in the latter) with the relative pronoun that:
He has two cats that stay indoors.
In the sentence we obtained, the first clause is the main clause, and the second the relative clause.
That preserves its syntactic function of subject in the dependent clause and the whole relative is
embedded in the noun phrase [NP cats [that-Cl that stay indoors]].
The same procedure can be used for embedded non-finite clauses:
4
Examples and comments adapted from Biber, Conrad and Leech, Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English,
p. 266, 2002.
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
All the NPs in the table above can have the same function in a clause; they can all realise, for
example, subjects, as in Cats/those cats/ white cats/ some white cats/ cats on the sofa/ some cats on
the sofa/ white cats on the sofa/ some white cats on the sofa are asleep, or objects, as in He liked
cats/those cats/ white cats/ some white cats/ cats on the sofa/ some cats on the sofa/ white cats on the
sofa/ some white cats on the sofa.
There can be more than one premodifier or postmodifier in a noun phrase: nice white cats, cats
on the sofa which require my attention
Both the two premodifiers in the first example and the two in the second separately modify the
head word, cats. Consequently, the two examples can be re-written as follows:
nice white cats
nice cats white cats
Another characteristic of the modifier is that it may itself be modified by the addition of adverb
phrases, as in a very nice cat.
Kies proposes the following diagram of the functional components of a noun phrase:
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
He explains that, depending on the context of the situation, determiners and modifiers are chosen
according to our needs in identifying and specifying the referent of the NP. The diagram is one
way to represent the dual nature of a phrase, seen as a merger of both form and function.
4.3.3. Coordination
Noun phrases can be linked together with the conjunctions and or or, as in the white cats and
their owner. The same applies to premodifiers or postmodifiers, which can also be coordinated.
Especially for the non-native speakers of English, this possibility can pose certain problems of
understanding who/ what the modifiers refer to. For example, in a situation where two adjectives
coordinated by and premodify a noun in the singular, it is clear that the noun has both of the
attributes expressed by the two adjectives. In a polite and friendly person, it is easy to understand
that the person is both polite and friendly. The difficulty appears when two adjectives modify a
head noun in the plural, as in literate and religious inhabitants, because the phrase can be
interpreted in two ways: inhabitants that are both literate and religious, but also literate
inhabitants and religious inhabitants. The same is true, for instance, about young men and
women, because it is not clear whether both categories share the attribute „young‟.
Similar examples can be provided for postmodifiers: a dessert of chocolate and cream means „a
dessert that consists of both chocolate and cream‟, while desserts of chocolate and cream can
mean „desserts that consist of both chocolate and cream‟, as well as „desserts that consist of
chocolate and desserts that consist of cream.‟
Determiners can also apply to two or more nouns or modified nouns, as in her sister and two
brothers meaning 'her sister and her two brothers'. Consequently, there are ambiguous situations
involving determiners as well; their cats and other pets can be understood as either „their cats
and their other pets‟ or „other pets and their cats‟.
Even more elaborate examples and comments are provided by Downing and Locke (2006, pp. , 455).
The following structure is an example of a pronominal head (something) which has as postmodifier a
single finite relative clause, some of whose elements are realised more than once.5
The other night, on television, I saw something [which reminded me of the Spaniards [going into
South America + and advancing over the mountains + and terrifying the population with terrible
new weapons, + cannon + and the horse [which nobody [in their world] had ever seen]]].
The next sentence uses a different organisation of successive post-modification. Each of the two NPs,
every student and a grant, is post-modified by three coordinated units:
a. in the case of the first, AdjP + PpP + non-restrictive relative clause
b. in the case of the second, PpP + two relative clauses.
Virtually every student [AdjP normally resident in England or Wales], [AdjP with specified minimum
qualifications], [relative-Cl who is admitted to a full-time degree, [PpP at a university [PpP in the UK]]] is
entitled to a grant [PpP from his/ her Local Education Authority], [relative-Cl which is intended to cover
his/ her tuition fees and maintenance [PpP for the duration [PpP of the course] [relative-Cl and which also
includes an element [PpP towards his/her vacation maintenance.]]
Three of these six modifiers contain embedded units of their own.
Under certain circumstances, complex noun phrases may be split up, as in the following examples6:
A rumour spread through the camp that a relieving force from Dinapur had been cut to pieces on
the way to Krishnapur.
The time was coming for me to leave Frisco or I would go crazy.
In this chapter a description will be given of the food assistance programs that address the needs of
the family.
This arrangement is in agreement with general principles for the ordering of elements within the
clause. The principal syntactic means are:
word order
the passive
existential there
dislocation
clefting
Choices also vary according to register, reflecting differences in communicative needs and stylistic
norms. In registers where use of language is the focus, as in in fiction and journalism, choices may
sometimes simply be due to a desire to achieve stylistic variation.
As these examples show, noun phrases can display considerable structural complexity generated by
combinations of different kinds of modifiers and through embedding noun phrases, appositional
structures and clauses.
5
Embedding is indicated by a bracket, and coordination by „+‟:
6
Examples and comments adapted from Biber, Johansson, et al. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English,
1999, p. 99, 886)
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
7
The term is used here for elements which cannot be assigned to a more specific category.
I. O. Macari, Morpho-syntax, Lecture 2 sem. I, 2014
the noun phrase. They take either the form of a noun phrase or of an interrogative or
declarative clause. Noun phrase tags examples:
Oh [he] was a, [he] was a lovely man, wasn't [he], Doctor Jones?
[It] makes you wonder, you know, all this unemployment.
[It] was a good book this.
e. Vocatives take the form of noun phrases (very often proper names) and are used to single
out the addressee of a message:
Are you singing mate?
Mum, I'm making such a big sandwich.
EXERCISES