F G H J K L M

8400 8400 8400 8400 7400 3500

BA BB BC BD BE BEa BF BG BH BJ BK BL BM BN
100 5100 4100 4200 5300 1400 5900 5900 6700 3800 6600 6400 6000 5400
APPROX SITE
BOUNDARY Key Plan
LINE
73 80 95 1 10 1 25 1 40 1 55 NOTES

TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67
1. DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING
1 7
180 TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
2. THESE DRAWINGS ARE TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH
TA B1 ARCHITECTS AND OTHER CONSULTANTS INFORMATION

3. LEVELS BASED ON OAK SURVEYS DRAWING OS.P.0318TOPO.

DATUM OF +10.00 CROWN OF ROAD
74 81 96 11 26 41 56

4200
B B B 1 1 1 1
T T T TB TB TB TB 4. FOR SETTING OUT OF MASONRY CLADDING AND PORTIONS
2 8 14 20 26 32 38 44 50 56 62 REFER TO ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS
TB TB TB TB TB TB
TB TB TB TB TB 68
TB
5. FOR SETTING OUT OF THRESHILD UPSTANDSSTEP REFER TO
ARCHITECTS DRAWINGS
B2
6. FOR SETTING OUT OF HOLES LESS THAN 200mm DIAMETER
78 75 82 97 1 12 1 27 1 42 1 57 REFER TO M&E DRAWINGS
1 B B B
TA TB TB TB TB

3800
T T T
3 9 15 21 27 33
TB TB TB TB TB TB
B39 B45 B51 B57 B63
T T T T T
B69
T
B3 ASSUMED LOCATION OF
13 28 43 58 EXISTING PILES SHOWN THUS
B76 B83 B98 1 1 1 1
T T T TB TB TB TB SITE SURVEY REQUIRED TO
10 16 22 28 34 40 46 52 58 64 DETERMINE POSITION, DIAMETER AND
TB
4
TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
B70 DEPTH. IF POSSIBLE PILES TO BE
T REMOVED IF CLASHING WITH

6600
179 PROPOSED PILES
TA
14 29 44 59
77 84 99 1 1 1 1
TB TB TB TB TB TB TB

5 11 17 23 29 35 41 47 53 59 65 71
TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB B B
T T B4

78 85 1 00 1 15 1 30 1 45 1 60 PILING NOTES
TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
77 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60
1. ALL PILES ARE TO BE DESIGNED BY
1 6 66 72

6400
TA TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB TB
TB TB
THE PILING CONTRACTOR FOR THE
MOST ONEROUS COMBINATION OF
VERTICAL & LATERAL LOADS
INDICATED ON THIS DRAWING. IT HAS
79 86 1 01 1 16 1 31 1 46 1 61 BEEN ASSUMED THAT A CONTINUOUS
TB TB TB TB TB TB TB FLIGHT AUGERED SYSTEM WILL BE
USED.
1 B5
4 5 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 2. HORIZONTAL LOADS ON EACH PILE
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2
P2

P4

P2 P2 MAY BE APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION.

HORIZONTAL LOADS ARE ASSUMED
TO ACT 75mm ABOVE PILE CUT OFF
87 1 02 1 17 1 32 1 47 1 62 LEVEL.
8 0 TB TB TB TB TB TB
P2 P3

6400
3. ALL PILES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF
6 No MILD STEEL REINFORCING BARS
FOR THE UPPER 10m OF PILE.

4. THE PILE DESIGN SHOULD ALLOW FOR

THE FOLLOWING POINTS REGARDING
6 7 4 5 2 3 0 1 6 7 8 9 5 03 18 33 48 63 B6 LEVELS:
P4 P4 P4 P4 P4 P4 P4 P4 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 B88 1 1 1 1 1
T TB TB TB TB TB - THE LEVELS OF PILING PLATFORM;
WHETHER A REDUCED OR ELEVATED
2 0 1 8 9 6 7 4 5 0 1 2 3 9
LEVEL.
P7 P7 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P6 P5 - THE AMOUNT OF "CUT OFF" TO FORM
PILE CAPS AND GROUND BEAMS.

6600
5. SETTING-OUT DIMENSIONS SHOWN
GENERALLY ARE BASED ON A
89 1 04 1 19 1 34 1 49 1 64 MINIMUM PILE SPACING OF 3 x DIA. A
TB TB TB TB TB TB PILE DIAMETER OF 1200 or 600 HAS
BEEN ASSUMED. THE CONTRACTOR
MAY PROPOSE ALTERNATIVE PILE
B7 DIAMETERS BUT SHOULD TAKE THE
SETTING-OUT SHOWN INTO ACCOUNT.

90 1 05 1 20 1 35 1 50 1 65 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE A

B METHOD STATEMENT FOR THE
4 5 2 3 0 1 8 9 4 5 6 7 3 T TB TB TB TB TB
P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 P8 INSTALLATION OF PILES WHICH
INCLUDES THE PROPOSED SEQUENCE
OF CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILS OF
3 18 19 16 17 14 15 12 13 08 09 10 11 07 HOW MANY PILES ARE TO BE CUT

8000
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1
DOWN AND "HEADS" REMOVED FROM
SITE.
91 1 06 1 21 1 36 1 51 1 66
TB TB TB TB TB TB 7. A FACTOR OF SAFETY OF 3 MUST BE
ADOPTED IN THE DESIGN OF THE
BEARING PILES FOR COMPRESSIVE
AND TENSION LOADS.
THE CONTRACTOR MAY CHOOSE TO
B8 INSTALL A PRELIMINARY TEST PILE
07 22 37 52 67 FOR USE IN HIS DESIGN IF A MORE
B92 1 1 1 1 1 ECONOMIC F.O.S CAN BE ACHIEVED.
T TB TB TB TB TB
8. THE CONTRACTORS ATTENTION IS
142 143 140 141 138 139 136 137 132 133 134 135 131 DRAWN TO CLAUSE 760 OF THE
P P P P P P P P P P P P P ENGINEERS SPECIFICATION
REFERRING TO INTEGRITY TESTING
OF PILES.
4 66 67 64 65 62 63 60 61 56 57 58 59 55 08 23 38 53 68
93

9200
P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1 B 1 1 1 1 1
T TB TB TB TB TB 9. PILING CONTRACTOR TO ADVISE ON
PILING MAT THICKNESS REQUIRED IN
HIS TENDER TO REFLECT HIS PLANT
REQUIREMENTS CONSIDERING THE
GROUND CONDITIONS ON SITE.

94 1 09 1 24 1 39 1 54 1 69
TB TB TB TB TB TB
B9

3300
190 191 188 189 186 187 184 185 180 181 182 183 179
P P P P P P P P P P P P P

204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211

5 23 24 21 22 19 20 17 18 13 14 15 16 212 P P P P P P P P
P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P

236 237 238 239

P P P P

240 241 243 242 244 245 246

P P P P P P P

47 48 250 49 51 52 53
P2 P2 P P2 P2 P2 P2
262 263 260 261 258 259 256 257 254 255
P P P P P P P P P P

6 83 84 81 82 79 80 77 78 75 76
P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05
P2 P2 P2 P2 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3

4200
306
P
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TC TC TC TC TC TC TC TC C1
310
P

Client: Drawing title: Scale at A0: Drawn by: Date: Chk'd by:
T4 06.09.18 ISSUED FOR TENDER DJP BS
Victoria Holidays Company Limited 1 : 100 DJP MARCH 2018 BS
T3 05.09.18 ISSUED FOR TENDER DJP BS Zone B
T2 20.08.18 ISSUED FOR TENDER DJP BS Project:
Piling Layout
P3
P2
10.08.18
05.07.18
SCHEME DESIGN
SCHEME DESIGN
DJP
DJP
BS
BS
La Definition TENDER
P1 25.05.18 SCHEME DESIGN DJP BS
Akin Ogunlewe Road, Project Number: Drawing Type: Drawing No: Revision:
1:100 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Victoria Island, Lagos.
T1
Rev
04.05.18
Date
ISSUED FOR TENDER
Amendments
DJP
By
BS
Chk'd
1731 GA B03B T4