You are on page 1of 9

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector


Activities guide and evaluation rubric

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e Ingeniería


Academic Unit
Academic Level Profesional

Academic Field Formación interdisciplinar básica común

Course Name Teoria Electromagnética y Ondas


Course Code 203058
Course Type Theoretical Can be ye ☒ N ☐
enable s o
d
Number of Credits 3

2. Description of the activity

Numbe
Type of the Individua
☐ Collaborative ☒ r of 2
activity: l
weeks
Unit
Moment of
Initial ☐ Intermediate ☐ Final ☒
evaluation:
:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and evaluation
activity: 125
environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
November 29th 2018 December 12th 2018
Competence to develop:
The student analyzes the wave and medium behavior from the source
of the wave to the reception point.
Topics to develop:
-
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop

Step 5 – make the final activity

The group will have to follow the next steps to accomplish the activity
goals.

Step 1: Make an academic research about the topics defined for this
unit.

Step 3: Each member of the group has to participate solving the given
problems; if all members don’t chose a role, the group has to ensure
that all problems are solved and delivered in the forum.

Step 4: Validated the problems answers and procedures by mean of


the suitable tool.

Step 5: Compile the group contributions from the collaborative forum


and ensure the accomplish of the rubric items.

Step 6: Deliver the work in the monitoring and evaluation


environment.

Activities to develop

In this activity, the group will have to solve some practical problems
using as a reference the following image.
Retrieved from: http://www.scientechworld.com/education-software-training-and-skill-
development/wireless-communication/understanding-wireless-sensor-network
Taking into account the image, solve the following problems:

1. If the signal frequency used to send the sensed parameters from


the water monitoring system to the reception point is 5,2MHz.
how deep could the wireless transmitter be placed? How does
the water behave at this frequency? Find Υ , α , β , λ
and v p . Explain how these values could be used in the
practice.

2. If the medium has the following electromagnetic characteristics:


−3 Sm
σ =10 , ϵ r =1 y μr =1 . Find the losses per length unit,
m
take into account the given frequency for the signal, how long
must travel the signal to have more than 3dB of attenuation?

3. In the buildings have an intrinsic impedance of η2=300 Ω and


the signal has a power of 100 mW /m2 . Fin the reflected and
transmitted power to the buildings.

4. A near monitoring station has put 75 Ω coaxial transmission


line with a length of 20m and is terminated with an antenna of
35+ j 78 Ω . If the relative permittivity of the line is 2.56 and the
frequency is 3GHz, find the input impedance to the line, the
reflection coefficient at the load, the reflection coefficient at the
input, and the SWR on the line.

5. In the monitoring station, there is a radio transmitter connected


to an antenna having an impedance 75+ j 35 Ω with a 6 0 Ω
coaxial cable. If the 50 Ω transmitter can deliver 30W when
connected to a 50 Ω load, how much power is delivered to the
antenna?

Use the software Smith Chart to validate the answer to the fourth and
fifth problems.

Environment Collaborative learning environment: In this


for the environment, there is a forum where the student is
developmen going to share information with his/her fellow
t classmates in order to understand the conceptual
bases in Electrodynamic and waves and to solve the
proposed problems.
Monitoring and evaluation environment: In this
environment, the student will have to deliver the
collaborative activity, according to the course agenda.

Practical learning environment: In this


environment, the student will find information to
develop the proposed practical activities.
Individual:
The student will have to answer the conceptual
questions using academic sources, to solve a chosen
problem and to make a review in the forum about the
delivered problems.

Collaborative:
The collaborative group will have to choose the best
Products to
analyses about the given concepts and to consolidate
deliver by
each part of the proposed activity, including the
student
practical exercises, where everyone has to participate.

The deliver document should contain the following:


- Cover page
- Introduction
- Developed activity
- Conclusions
- References

General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of Each contribution has to be posted in the forum


activities for associated to this step, one important responsibility is
the to analyze and to discuss about his/her fellow’s
development contributions.
of
collaborative Before the three last days of the activity, the final
work document has to be consolidated according to the
proposed activity and each student has to analyze it
according to the rubric, looking for deliver an excellent
activity.
Roles to
Choose the role to perform within the group. Taking
perform by
into account, that no matter the role that the student
the student
chooses, it’s very important to evidence significant
in the
contributions.
collaborative
group
In this activity, each student in the group will have to
choose a role, but it is important to recognize each of
the following, that will be assumed from the following
step on.

Roles Function
Compiler Consolidate the document, as the final
product from the discussion, taking
into account that it will include the
contributions from all participants and
that it will only include the members
whom participate in the progress of
the work. To inform the one who is in
charge of the alerts in order to inform
to the students whom did not make
Roles and the contributions that they are not
responsibilit going to be include in the product that
y for the will be delivered.
delivery of Reviewer Ensure that the document accomplish
the presentation required rules.
products by
students Evaluator Ensure that the document contains
the established criteria in the rubric.
To alert the one who are playing that
role, to inform the others members
when it is necessary to make some
change.
Deliverer Alert about the time on the delivered
products and to send the document in
the defined time, using the resources
for the delivery and to inform the
other students when the deliver will
be made.
Alert Inform the group members about the
work news and to inform to the
teacher using the forum course and
the internal delivered message service
about the final document deliver.
Use of Always cite the references using APA style.
references
Students must be aware of severe sanctions in the
case of plagiarism.

In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article


99, are considered as faults that violate the academic
order, among others, the following: literal e)
"Plagiarism, that means, to present as his own
authorship all or Part of a work, work, document or
invention made by another person. It also implies the
use of wrong citations or references, or propose
citations where there is no coincidence between it and
the reference "and liberal f)" Reproducing, or copying
for profit, educational materials or results of research
Plagiarism products, which have Intellectual rights reserved for
policy the University.

The academic sanctions that the student will face are


the following:

A) In cases of academic fraud demonstrated in


academic work or respective evaluation, the grade
that will be imposed will be zero point zero (0.0)
without prejudice to the corresponding disciplinary
sanction.

B) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in


academic work of any nature, the grade that will be
imposed will be zero point zero (0.0), without
prejudice to the corresponding disciplinary sanction
4. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric

Collabor
Activity type: Individual Activity ☐ ative ☒
Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Interme ☐ Final ☒
evaluation diate:
Performance levels of the individual
Assessed activity Score
Aspects
High score Media score Low score
Despite, the The
student solve student
The student any of the does not
Analyze the analyzes the given solve any
problems in problems problems, of the
the given referred to the the solution problems or 20
diagram given diagram. is not the solution
referred to is not
the diagram. correct.
(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student The student
solves at least does not
The student
one problem, solve the
solves the
explaining step problem or
Participate problem but
by step the there is
solving the there isn’t
procedure and only the 20
given analyze in
analyzing its answer,
problems each step.
practical without the
application. procedure.
(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student
The student
limits the
does not
analysis to
The student make any
accept the
analyzes the critical
procedure
Analyze the problems solved analysis
exposed by
problems in the group and about the
the group
presented by gives a problems 15
member, but
the group professional solved by
there isn’t a
members concept. each
critical
member of
concept
the group.
about this.
(up to 15 (up to 7 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student The student
solves at limits the
The student least one participatio
makes significant exercise but n to use a
Participate contributions to does not mathematic
analyzing the the results make any al formula 20

You might also like