Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perla Soto
English 102
07 November 2018
We come into this world assuming that we are who everyone says we are. The moment
we pop out of the cave we receive the almighty, “it’s boy” or “it’s a girl”. We spend our entire
lives being indirectly told that we have to act a certain way because of who we were told we
were from birth. David Henry Hwang and Ursula K. Le Guin demonstrate to us through their
literature that gender and sexuality are the driving forces within our societies. The manner in
which we function is based on this apparent idea that a woman is dainty and submissive while
the male is masculine and physically superior. Why should people have to live up to the
In M. Butterfly we see the story of a romantic tragedy unfold during the time of the
Vietnam war. The main protagonist, is a white western man, named Rene Gallimard, who works
for the French Embassy the man is fixated with the fantasy of attaining the woman who will
come through with his most wished for desires. He has the ability to create the “perfect woman”
and an established concept of a genuine “Oriental” woman. To this misogynistic male the perfect
woman is submissive, she is self-disciplined, and has the will to do anything for her male
dominant. The time and place where the story of these lovers begins is at the opera. Here is
where Gallimard is immediately intrigued by a performer who was playing the role of Madame
Butterfly, a Japanese woman, who falls in love with a western man in the navy. The man leaves
Soto 2
the woman and she commits suicide. Fascinated by the performance Gallimard goes to look for
the actress who goes by the name of Song Liling. At first impressions Song is not too fond of
Gallimard. To him Madame Butterfly is a beautiful story because the woman committed an
honorable sacrifice for a man who was “unworthy” of her unlimited supply of love. However,
Song sees it otherwise. Imagine if the story was the other way around with a skinny, mini,
boobie, blondie who falls in love with a short statured Japanese businessman. Now, picture him
treating the woman poorly and leaving her for some time while she sits and prays for his return.
Then when she finds out that the man who she’d fallen for has married another woman, she kills
herself. This version of the story would not be glorified by Gallimard because it is not an
Oriental woman who ends her life for a western man (Hwang 18). Scenes later when Gallimard
is invited to Song’s flat where his presence feels invasive his attraction for towards her is
enhanced.
The truth about the perfect Oriental woman, is revealed to the audience when we’re told
that Song Liling is really a male spy taking information from Gallimard for the communist
government. It’s interesting because although it was all an act, Song never broke character. In the
scenes where she appears without the accompaniment of Gallimard she stays being a female.
There is a segment where her fellow Comrade even protests about the dress she wears; perhaps
deep down Song is a cross dresser. She keeps up the act for over twenty years without ever being
questioned by Gallimard. Song pleases Gallimard without ever showing him what lies beneath
her clothes. Many times he would ask her to show herself to him, but the idea was brushed off by
Song reminding him of her conservative ways. Even though he never got Song to take off her
clothes he would still get what he wanted; she seduced him and acted like his slave.
Soto 3
For humans it is the normal thing to refer to someone as he or she which is what Genly
Ai does in The Left Hand Of Darkness to cope with the concept of people not having a specific
gender. In this novel a human is plonked on a planet where the people are androgynous beings.
Gethenians, which are the residents of the planet, choose to have either male or female sexual
organs for certain days of the month; that is called kemmer. Most of the time they are genderless.
Ai makes the effort to understand and come to terms the whole idea of gender amongst people
not existing. The one person who he struggles to accept is Estraven, who is the protagonist of the
novel. He feels hostility and lacks trust in Estraven. From his sexist male point of view the
feelings he gets of suspicion and things that cause him concern he classifies as feminine. The
qualities that astonish him or the things he finds to be satisfactory he classifies as masculine
(Cornell). Since the androgynous beings are not the norm to his customs it is difficult for him to
picture a world where gender is obsolete. Ai attempts to grasp and clarify the world that is
around him. He does so by showcasing his own culture and using his prefered way of
communicating; it’s all to make this new world more relatable and simpler to live in. As his
journey takes place he learns that he shouldn’t judge on solely what he sees. When he was in the
country to Orgoreyn he saw that it was clean place that had everything in order.
The main conflict we see in the novel is the overall struggle Ai faces with accepting and
understanding who Estraven is. It is known that Ai is not fond of Estraven, but eventually a
connection made between the two. It is possible that in the beginning Ai found interest in
Estraven due his soft female-like features and his masculine character when taking part as prime
minister. However, was afraid to see the reality of Estraven’s true self. Ai had pretended to not
see Estraven for who he was; both a woman and a man. The problem originally arose from Ai’s
Ultimately, from both works of literature a lesson was learned. Both M. Butterfly and The
Left Hand of Darkness demonstrate that it is okay to for a male to be emotional and be in touch
with an inner feminine side. There is no shame in loving whoever it is you love. Also, that the
bond between two people shouldn’t be undermined because it makes a third party
“uncomfortable”. We are all made as individuals, we all have our own thoughts, and we all have
our own feelings. No one should be told how they should or shouldn’t feel. Life would be much
simpler if people didn’t have labels of confinement which are genders. Imagine the simplicity of
being neutral and not having to think about these black and white concepts. There would be no
need to for anyone to assume superiority towards anyone else. If we were to strip ourselves of
skins, besides the reproductive, genital organs, we would look and be the same. Under the skin
we are all made of the same materials. If we could simply ignore genders and sexuality we would
have more room for the things that matter the most. Issues like sexism and discrimination would
The need to have fixed gender roles and sexuality comes from the notion that people have
to be put into categories. We live in a world that is the complete opposite to that of The Left
Hand of Darkness. In the world we live in people get classified as males or females, gay or
straight, transgender or pansexual, etc. Along with those classifications come the assumptions of
how a person has to act. Gender roles within our societies reckon how a person should act,
articulate, groom oneself, and dress accordingly to their given sex. Women, for instance, have to
dress in a way that meets the feminine standards, they have to be mannerly, and be the nurturing
figure. Men on the other hand, are strong, show no emotions, and they’re the ones who contain
the power. If a person wants to dress a certain way, wants to love a certain person, and do
anything in particular they should be allowed without a problem. The ability that a person has
Soto 5
should not be determined by gender they were given when they came into the world. If a male
wants to wear a dress or skirt he should be allowed. If the male feels sensitive for whatever
reason, he should be allowed to express his sensitivity. The life that a person wants to live should
not be compromised because their reproductive organs. The same way in that just because a
Works Cited
Cornell, Christine. “The Interpretative Journey in Ursula K. Le Guin's the Left Hand of
library.lavc.edu:2063/eds/detail/detail?vid=7&sid=b137f521-a25c-4fad-b17c-
Soto 6
28fb3276381c%40sdc-v-
sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3D#AN=edsgcl.82469994&db=edsglr.
library.lavc.edu:2063/eds/detail/detail?vid=7&sid=b137f521-a25c-4fad-b17c-
28fb3276381c%40sdc-v-
sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=edsgcl.82469994&db=edsglr.
Haedicke, Janet V.. "David Henry Hwang's M. Butterfly: The Eye on the Wing." Journal of
Dramatic Theory and Criticism . Vol. 23..(1992): Web.<From Literature Resource Center>.
Le Guin, Ursula K.. The Left Hand Of Darkness. Ace Books, 1969. Print.
Shimakawa, Karen. "JHU Press." "Who's to say?" or, making space for gender and ethnicity in
'M. Butterfly.'. Johns Hopkins University Press, Oct 1993. Web. <http://www.press.jhu.edu>.