You are on page 1of 14

Page 66 of 14

CONSUMER SATISFACTION IN PROCESSED SPICES PRODUCTS

Dr.S.Ganesan1 and R.Rajanbabu2


1
Assistant Professor and 2 Research Scholar, Department of Economics, Bharathidasan
University, Tiruchirappalli-620 023, Tamil Nadu.

Introduction desire to satisfy them. To satisfy the


"Satisfaction is a kind of stepping away expectations they purchase certain goods
from an experience and evaluating it". under the impression that the goods
Consumer satisfaction with a would satisfy his expectations. If they
purchase depends upon the product are satisfied with the product they shall
performance relative to his expectations. become the customer of the firm and
A consumer might experience various also tell about the product to their
degrees of satisfaction. If the product friends and others. The advertising
performances fall short of expectations, improves the effectiveness of the
the customer is dissatisfied. If the manufacturers and other sales effort.
performance matches the expectations, Such factors finally lead to better
the customer is satisfied. If the volume of sales.
performance exceeds expectations, the
customer is highly satisfied or delighted. Satisfaction is important to the
Consumer satisfaction with a consumer because it reflects a positive
product/service refers to the outcome from the outlay of scarce
favourability of the individual's resources and the fulfillment of unmet
subjective evaluation of the various needs. Today‟s market is consumer
outcome and experiences associated with oriented. Consumer satisfaction is a
using or consuming the product service. major element to survive in the
The extent to which expectations are marketing field. The goods produced by
realized is assumed to be directly related the manufactures and services provided
to the level of satisfaction experienced. by the traders must satisfy the customer.
If the actual product outcome meets with The service provided by the
or exceed these expected level of manufactures should not only satisfy the
satisfaction results. If the product existing customers but also attract the
outcomes are judged below the potential customers. Thus minimizing
expectation dissatisfaction occurs. dissatisfaction and maximizing
satisfaction are seen as important goals
Importance of Consume r’s for both the firm and the consumer.
Satisfaction
Every consumer has certain Indian Spices
expectations and needs and a strong
Page 67 of 14

India is known as “The home of lot of time in doing a work, since it is


spices”. No Indian meal is considered less time consuming, saving energy, etc.
complete without the tangy and Since the potential for market expansion
delectable flavour of Indian spices, of the processed spices products are vast,
locally known as „Masala‟. Indian spices mushrooming of processed spices units
are famous all over the world for their in and around Madurai and the
gastronic value and they are known to competition among them is very acute.
possess high medicinal values. There is One such concern is Eagle Food
no other country in the world that Products Company, which produces
produces as many kinds of spices as processed spices products, pickles, etc
India. Some of the most widely on large-scale under the brand name of
consumed spices in the country inter alia Eagle. Across four p‟s viz: Product,
include: chilli, cinnamon, cumin, curry Place, Price and Promotion available to
leaf, fennel, asafetida, basil, bay leaves, tackle the competition, Madurai
cardamom-small, cardamom- processed spices units preferred product
large, ginger, mustard, bishops weed, and strategized to fight it out through
cassia, celery, clove, coriander, consumers satisfaction.
fenugreek, garlic, kokam, mint, onion,
parsley, pomegranate, turmeric, Questions Rose
tamarind, pepper, poppy, rosemary and 1. What are the products that are
vanilla. The climate of the country is preferred in Eagle Food Products
found suitable for growing almost all by the consumers?
spices. India produces 25 lakhs tonne to 2. How frequently do they purchase
30 lakhs tonne of spices annually. India the products?
produces spices of different categories 3. What is the degree of satisfaction
worth around Rs.14,000 crore. In terms derived by the consumers?
of volume India accounted for 46
percent and 23 percent in value of Hypotheses Formulated
global spice trade. India accounts for 25- The null hypothesis has been
30 percent of world‟s pepper production, framed to test the relationship
35 percent of ginger and about 90 between the level of satisfaction
percent of turmeric production. and factors influencing consumer
satisfaction.
Proble m Formulation
In this moving world, people Objectives of the Study
have very less time to do a lot of work in 1. To analyze the factors which are
their day-to-day life. In order to influencing the consumer
complete their works quickly, make use satisfaction.
of ready- made processed spices
products, pickles, etc., that save them a
Page 68 of 14

2. To find out the factors characteristics of the respondents


considered by consumers while and product related factors.
purchasing Eagle Food Products. 3. Chi-square test has been applied
to establish the relationship
Methodology between the level of product
Data Collection satisfaction and factors
The study is mainly based on influencing consumer
primary data. Convenient sampling satisfaction.
method is adopted for selecting samples.
A sample of 200 women respondents has Measure ment of Satisfaction level in
been selected for the study. Care has Processed Spices Products
been taken to include both urban and To measure the consumer
rural consumers and hence respondents satisfaction in Eagle Food Products, nine
have been selected from different parts aspects of products, viz., Smell, Taste,
of Madurai. A structured questionnaire Quality, Cost, Availability, Packing,
has been used for collection of data. Hygienic preparation, Durability and
Necessary secondary data have also been Variety of products have been
collected from sources like books, considered. The consumer responses for
magazines and internet. these aspects have been measured by
adopting Likert 3 point scale viz., highly
Data Analysis
satisfied, satisfied and dissatisfied. These
For the purpose of detailed
responses were assigned scores
analysis, the following statistical tools
respectively 3, 2, and 1. The sum of the
have been used in this study:
scores obtained by each respondent for
1. The satisfaction index has been
all responses represented her satisfaction
used to estimate the consumers‟
score. From the sum of scores,
level of satisfaction in processed
satisfaction index for each respondent
spices products.
has been calculated as follows:
2. Percentage has been employed
for analyzing the socio-economic

Sum of scores obtained by each respondent


Satisfaction Index = * 100
Maximum Score

Based on Satisfaction Index, the respondents are classified as highly satisfied, satisfied
and dissatisfied as follows:

Mean Score + Standard deviation = Highly Satisfied


Between (Mean Score - Standard deviation) = Satisfied
and (Mean Score + Standard deviation)
Page 69 of 14

Mean Score - Standard deviation = Dissatisfied


Mean score is 61.35 and the Standard deviation is 5.78.

Results and Discussion:


Level of Satisfaction of Respondents
Satisfaction level of the respondents is envisaged in Table-1.

Table-1
Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents
Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage
Highly Satisfied 68 34
Satisfied 103 52
Dissatisfied 29 14
Total 200 100

The above table shows that 68 Family status (5) Monthly income (6)
respondents (34 percent) are obtained Residential status (7) Size of the family
high level of satisfaction from the usage (8) Food habits (9) Period of usage (10)
of eagle processed spices products and Frequency of purchase (11) Awareness
103 respondents (52 percent) are about ingredients (12) Awareness about
satisfied and the remaining 14 percent of expiry date.
the respondents are not received any
satisfaction, but merely they used this Age and Level of Satisfaction
brand. It is evident that majority of the The age of respondents range
respondents (86 percent) are expressed from 20 to 62 years. On the basis of age,
positive approach towards this brand. respondents are classified into three
categories; young those who are up to 30
years, those who are between 30 and 40
Satisfaction Factors years of age as middle aged and old
The satisfaction level of those who are above 40 years. The
individual is influenced by many classification of respondents based on
independent factors such as: (1) Age (2) age and their satisfaction index are
Formal education (3) Occupation (4) presented in the following table.
Page 70 of 14

Table-2
Age and Level of Satisfaction
Age Level of Satisfaction
Group Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Young 30 (32) 54 (57) 10 (11) 94 (100)
Middle aged 16 (24) 44 (66) 7 (10) 67 (100)
Old 11 (28) 23 (59) 5 (13) 39 (100)
Total 57 (28) 121 (61) 22 (11) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 4 Calculated value of χ² = 1.49
Table value at 5% level = 9.49

Out of the 200 respondents, 121 respondents, more respondents are


respondents (61 percent) are satisfied identified in young age group followed
and 57 respondents (28 percent) are by middle age group. Hence no
highly satisfied with the eagle food relationship is observed between age and
products. Only 11 percent (22) of the level of satisfaction. The result of Chi-
total respondents are dissatisfied with square test also proves that there is no
the food products. More number of significant relationship between the age
respondents are identified as satisfied group and level of satisfaction. The
respondents in all three age groups hypothesis is accepted because the
namely middle age (66 percent), old (59 calculated value of χ² is less than the
percent) and young (57 percent). In both table value.
highly satisfied and satisfied level of

Education Level and Level of education, the respondents have been


Satisfaction classified as illiterate, school, under
The education level of the graduate and post graduate educated.
respondents is another factor, which The details of the classification of
influences the satisfaction. The respondents and satisfaction level are
respondents range from illiterate to presented in the following table.
degree holders. On the basis of formal
Page 71 of 14

Table-3
Education Level and Level of Satisfaction
Education Level of Satisfaction
level Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Illiterate 10 (25) 22 (55) 8 (20) 40 (100)
School 21 (26) 52 (63) 9 (11) 82 (100)
UG 19 (32) 36 (60) 5 (8) 60 (100)
PG 6 (33) 10 (56) 2 (11) 18 (100)
Total 56 (28) 120 (60) 24 (12) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 6 Calculated value of χ² = 4.04
Table value at 5% level = 12.59

Among the 200 respondents, 120 significant relationship between


respondents (60 percent) are satisfied education level and level of satisfaction
and 56 respondents (28 percent) are expressed by the respondents. The result
highly satisfied. Maximum numbers of of the Chi-square test also in support of
respondents are found as satisfied in all the findings as the hypothesis is accepted
four education levels i.e. school (63 because the calculated value is less than
percent), UG (60 percent), PG (56 the table value.
percent) and illiterate (55 percent).
Hence it is concluded that there is no

Occupation and Level of Satisfaction agriculturists, housewives, professional,


The factor of job content may at business and employed. The distribution
times have an impact on the level of of the respondents based on occupation
satisfaction. Occupation has been and satisfaction level is presented in the
classified into five groups namely below table.
Table-4
Occupation and Level of Satisfaction
Occupational Level of Satisfaction
Category Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Agriculturists 6 (21) 18 (62) 5 (17) 29 (100)
Housewives 21 (26) 47 (57) 14 (17) 82 (100)
Professional 4 (18) 17 (77) 1 (5) 22 (100)
Business 6 (30) 13 (65) 1 (5) 20 (100)
Employed 18 (38) 25 (53) 4 (9) 47 (100)
Page 72 of 14

Total 55 (27) 120 (60) 25 (13) 200


Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 8 Calculated value of χ² = 9.49
Table value at 5% level = 15.51
In all four occupational calculated value of the chi-square test is
categories more people are satisfied, less than the table value, the hypothesis
some people are highly satisfied and is accepted. Hence it is inferred that
only few respondents are dissatisfied there is no significant relationship
with the processed spices product. From between occupation and level of
the analysis, Housewives are more satisfaction.
satisfied than other categories. Since the

Type of Family and Level of socializing force and agencies from joint
Satisfaction to nuclear families. The respondents are
The development of individuals classified into two groups namely;
proceeds under the influences of many nuclear and joint family.

Table-5
Type of Family and Level of Satisfaction
Type of Level of Satisfaction
Family Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Nuclear 43 (28) 105 (69) 5 (3) 153 (100)
Joint 10 (27) 19 (51) 18 (22) 47 (100)
Total 53 (26) 124 (62) 23 (12) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 2 Calculated value of χ² = 4.88
Table value at 5% level = 5.99

As per the above table, a But more respondents in joint family


majority of the satisfied (62 percent) and dissatisfied with processed spices
highly satisfied (26 percent) respondents product than the nuclear family. The
belong to both nuclear family and joint hypothesis is accepted, since the
family type. When compare the calculated value is less than table value.
satisfaction level of nuclear family with Hence it is confirmed that there is no
joint family, nuclear families were significant relationship between type of
dominating during the period of analysis. family and level of satisfaction.

Income and Level of Satisfaction respondents have been classified into


Expectations and desires are three categories, like low- income group
based on income. Based on income, the (below Rs.10,000), moderate-income
Page 73 of 14

group (Rs.10,000 - Rs.20,000) and high income group (above Rs.20,000).

Table-6
Income and Level of Satisfaction
Income Level of Satisfaction
Level Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Low 24 (21) 70 (60) 23 (19) 117 (100)
Moderate 25 (37) 36 (53) 7 (10) 68 (100)
High 3 (20) 11 (73) 1 (7) 15 (100)
Total 52 (26) 117 (59) 31 (15) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 4 Calculated value of χ²= 54.81
Table value at 5% level = 9.49

Table-6 indicates that the high- influenced by the income level. Since
income category has more satisfied the calculated value is higher than the
respondents (93 percent) and only one table value, the hypothesis is rejected.
respondent has the dissatisfaction with Hence it is evident that there is a
the product. Both high and moderate significant relationship between the
income groups are achieved more level income and satisfaction levels of the
of satisfaction than the low income respondents.
group. Hence the level of satisfaction is

Residential Status and Level of satisfaction. The respondents belong to


Satisfaction both urban and rural areas. The
Generally the expectations of the classification of respondents based on
people residing in rural and urban differ residential status and satisfaction level is
with effect of product features, which presented in the table below.
inturn would affect the level of

Table-7
Residential Status and Level of Satisfaction
Place of Level of Satisfaction
Residence Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Rural 17 (24) 43 (62) 10 (14) 70 (100)
Urban 39 (30) 76 (58) 15 (12) 130 (100)
Total 56 (28) 119 (59) 25 (13) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 2 Calculated value of χ²= 0.87
Table value at 5% level = 5.99
Page 74 of 14

According to Table-7, it is very the chi-square test proves that there is no


interesting that majority of the rural relationship between the residential
based respondents are using and status and the level of satisfaction.
receiving more satisfaction than the
urban residing respondents. The result of

Size of the Family and Level of


Satisfaction
Depending upon the size of the and large families (6 and above). The
family, the respondents have been distribution of respondents based on size
classified into three groups, small (upto of the family and satisfaction index is
3 members), medium (4 and 5 members) shown by the following table.

Table-8
Size of the Family and Level of Satisfaction
Size of the Level of Satisfaction
Family Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Small 17 (31) 28 (52) 9 (17) 54 (100)
Medium 28 (25) 67 (59) 18 (16) 113 (100)
Large 8 (25) 60 (48) 9 (27) 33 (100)
Total 53 (27) 111 (55) 36 (18) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 4 Calculated value of χ² = 3.31
Table value at 5% level = 9.49

It is witnessed from the Table-8 and small size families are interesting to
that both small and medium size families enjoy with different variants of food
have more satisfaction than the large size products. Since the calculated value of
family. More respondents as per the the chi-square test is less than the table
percentage are dissatisfied with the value, the hypothesis is accepted. Hence
processed spices product in the large size it is confirmed that there is no significant
family. It is a strong support for relationship between the size of family
diversification patterns because medium and satisfaction level of the respondents.

Food Habits and Level of Satisfaction


The food habit of the respondents satisfaction. All the respondents have
is yet another important factor for been divided into vegetarian and non-
influencing the level of consumer vegetarian based on their food habits.
Page 75 of 14

Table-9
Food Habits and Level of Satisfaction
Food Level of Satisfaction
Habits Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Vegetarian 11 (24) 27 (60) 7 (16) 45 (100)
Non-Vegetarian 44 (28) 90 (58) 21 (14) 155 (100)
Total 58 (28) 117 (58) 28 (14) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 2 Calculated value of χ² = 0.32
Table value at 5% level = 5.99

It is evident from Table-9 that the products. It is concluded that there is no


number of respondents of the non- significant relationship between the food
vegetarian category is higher than the habits and level of satisfaction obtained
vegetarian category regarding the level by the respondents. The hypothesis is
of satisfaction. In general, most of the accepted because the calculated value is
respondents of both groups are satisfied less than the table value.
with the eagle branded processed spices

Period of Usage and Level of basis of period of usage, respondents


Satisfaction have been classified into three categories
The period of usage of a product viz., upto 5 years has been classified as
may at times have an impact on the level short-period, 5-10 years as medium and
of satisfaction. The period of usage more than 10 years as long-period.
range from 1 year to 25 years. On the
Table-10
Period of Usage and Level of Satisfaction
Period of Level of Satisfaction
Usage Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Short Period 16 (28) 34 (60) 7 (12) 57 (100)
Medium Period 17 (28) 35 (56) 10 (16) 62 (100)
Long Period 22 (27) 46 (57) 13 (16) 81 (100)
Total 55 (28) 115 (57) 30 (15) 200 (100)
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 4 Calculated value of χ² = 0.47
Table value at 5% level = 9.49
It is evident from Table-10 that are highly satisfied with the eagle food
115 respondents (57 percent) are products in the total respondents. In all
satisfied and 55 respondents (28 percent) different period of usage respondents are
Page 76 of 14

received nearly same percentage level of


satisfaction. It is evident that the Frequency of Purchase and Level of
diversification pattern in processed Satisfaction
spices products of eagle brand attracts The frequency of purchase is also
more and more new consumers. The an important factor to determine the
hypothesis is accepted, since the level of satisfaction. Frequency of
calculated value of chi-square is less purchase is classified as weekly,
than the table value. Hence it is monthly and as and when required. The
confirmed that there is no significant distribution of respondents based on the
relationship between the period of usage frequency of purchase and satisfaction
and satisfaction level of the respondents. index is shown in the table below.

Table-11
Frequency of Purchase and Level of Satisfaction
Frequency of Level of Satisfaction
Purchase Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Monthly 14 (30) 23 (50) 9 (20) 46 (100)
Weekly 18 (26) 43 (61) 9 (13) 70 (100)
As and
24 (29) 49 (58) 11 (13) 84 (100)
when required
Total 56 (28) 115 (58) 29 (14) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 4 Calculated value of χ² = 1.94
Table value at 5% level = 9.49

The Table-11 envisages that in


the different frequency of purchase, Awareness about Ingre dients and
nearly same amount of respondents are Level of Satisfaction
satisfied with the processed spices The awareness about ingredients
products. Hence satisfaction level is not of these products is another main factor,
influenced by frequency of purchase. It which influences the level of
is also proved by the result of chi-square satisfaction. The respondents have been
analysis. The calculated value is less classified into two groups according to
than the table value and hence the null their awareness on ingredients or
hypothesis is accepted. A conclusion is contents of these products, such as those
so derived that there is no significant who are aware and those who are not
relationship between frequency of aware.
purchase and the level of satisfaction of
the respondents.
Page 77 of 14

Table-12
Awareness about Ingredients and Level of Satisfaction
Awareness Level of Satisfaction
about Total
Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied
Ingredients
Aware 40 (32) 70 (56) 16 (12) 126 (100)
Not Aware 16 (22) 46 (62) 12 (16) 74 (100)
Total 56 (28) 116 (58) 28 (14) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 2 Calculated value of χ² = 45.37
Table value at 5% level = 5.99

It is evident from Table-12, majority (86


percent) of highly satisfied and satisfied Awareness about Expiry Date and
respondents are aware of the contents or Level of Satisfaction
ingredients of processed spices products The awareness about expiry date
whereas respondents who are not aware is also one of the important factors,
of the ingredients of these products are which influences the level of
less satisfied and more dissatisfied (16 satisfaction. The respondents have been
percent) than the awareness group. Since classified into two groups according to
the calculated value of chi-square is the awareness about expiry date of
higher than the table value the null processed spices products, such as those
hypothesis is rejected and it is concluded who are aware and not aware. The
that there is a significant relationship distribution of respondents based on
between awareness about ingredients their awareness about expiry date and
and level of satisfaction. satisfaction index is shown in the below
table.
Table-13
Expiry Date and Level of Satisfaction
Awareness Level of Satisfaction
about
Highly Satisfied Satisfied Dissatisfied Total
Expiry Date
Aware 37 (33) 58 (52) 17 (15) 112 (100)
Not Aware 19 (22) 45 (51) 24 (27) 88 (100)
Total 56 (28) 103 (51) 41 (21) 200
Note: Numbers in Parentheses are Percentage
Degrees of Freedom = 2 Calculated value of χ² = 6.01
Table value at 5% level = 5.99
Page 78 of 14

From Table-13 it is observed that awareness respondents. The null


the percentage of awareness in both hypothesis is rejected, since the
satisfied (52 percent) and highly calculated value is higher than the table
satisfied (33 percent) level respondents value. Hence it is confirmed that there is
is higher than those who are not having certainly a significant relationship
any awareness about expiry date. It is between awareness about expiry date
evident that the unaware respondents are and satisfaction level of the respondents.
more dissatisfied (27 percent) than

Conclusion
From the analysis it is evident that out of 200 respondents, 34 percent are highly
satisfied, 52 percent are satisfied and only 14 percent are dissatisfied with t he Eagle
brand processed spices products. Further the research from analysis shows that there is a
significant relationship between level of satisfaction and following factors: (1) Income
(2) Awareness about ingredients and (3) Expiry date. However no significant relationship
is proved between level of satisfaction and following factors: (1) Age (2) Education (3)
Occupation (4) Family type (5) Residential status (6) Size of the family (7) Food habits
(8) Period of usage and (9) Frequency of purchase. However the overall analysis of the
study indicates that majority of the respondents has been satisfied with the Eagle brand
processed spices products. It is a strong evidence to improve the market in the processed
spices products.

Suggestions
The followings are the suggestions made on the findings of the analysis and
collected informations from respondents.
1) The Eagle Food Products Company may introduce some variants of
processed spices products in vegetarian category.
2) People like to buy small size pouch packs for every day purpose. This kind of
pouch packs will reach people easily.
3) The present advertisement covered by Eagle Food Products is inadequate.
Television advertisement is effective one. So that company may consider this
to promote the market size in rural areas.
4) Some of respondents feel to change the brand because of non-availability of
eagle products in all shops. So the managements will take steps to make the
availability of products in all shops. .
5) The company may consider avoiding the artificial colour in some products.
Page 79 of 14

References:
1) Carol M. Michael (1999), “Opportunities for the Advancement of Home
Economists in the Food Manufacturing Industry”, Family and Consumer Sciences
Research Journal, Vol.27, No.3, pp.293-319.
2) Cates, S.C. & Carter-Young, H., (2004) “Consumer Attitudes Towards and
Preferences for Food Standards of Identify”, Journal of Food Products
Marketing, Vol.No.10 (1), pp.67-84.
3) Ferdaus Hossain & Ruchi (2005), “Financial Structure, Production, and
Productivity: Evidence from the U.S. Food Manufacturing Industry”, Agricultural
Economics, Vol.33, pp.399-410.
4) Jairus Banaji (1997), “Globalization and Restructuring in the Indian Food
Industry”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol.24, No.1, pp.191-210.
5) Michalis M. Efstratiadis (2000), “Implementation of ISO 9000 to the Food
Industry: An Overview”, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition,
Vol.51, pp. 459-473.
6) Nandagopal R and Chinnaiyan P (2004), “Small Scale Food Processing
Industries: A Case Analysis”, Small Enterprises Development Management and
Extension (SEDME) Journal, Vol.31, No.2.
7) Omesh Saigal (2001), “Food Processing Industry: Current Scene and
Prospectus”, Yojana, Vol.45, No.1.
8) Phillp Kottler (1995), “Principles of Marketing”, Prentice-Hall of India Pvt.,
New Delhi, p.553.
9) Rajanbabu.R (2008), “A Study of Diversification Patterns and Consumer
Satisfaction in Masala Products with Special Reference to Eagle Food Products,
Madurai”, M.Phil. Dissertation, Bharathidasan University, Trichy.
10) Robert W. Ivester (2008), “Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food
Safety”, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,
Vol.7, pp.182-191.
11) Sarin K.P (1999), “Food Processing: An Introspection for the Next Millennium”,
Processed Food Industry, Vol.45, No.9.
12) Spyridon Mamalis (2009), “Critical Success Factors of the Food Service
Industry”, Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, Vol.21,
pp.191-206.
13) Sukhpal Singh (1997), “Aspect of Entrepreneurship in Primary Food-Processing
Industries in Punjab”, The Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol.6, No.2, pp.223-231.

You might also like