Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis Report CE-Congestion
Analysis Report CE-Congestion
Table of Contents
1 CE Status Review ............................................................................................................. 1
1 CE Status Review
1.1 Statistics
Let’s review the statistics of last week, which is from 12th Aug to 18th Aug.
Top 20 of RNC2
VS.RAB.FailEst VS.RAB.Fai
abPS.ULCE.Co lEstabCS.U VS.RRC.Rej.ULCE
CI Cell Name ng LCE.Cong .Cong
13032 Ntinda_Valley_2 173085 1810 69626
13035 Ntinda_Valley_5 164729 2697 57587
13037 Ntinda_Valley_7 129996 2767 44139
13036 Ntinda_Valley_6 99508 1322 56656
13033 Ntinda_Valley_3 85517 1581 28710
13031 Ntinda_Valley_1 80464 994 28168
12252 Kyebando_Nsoba_2 18449 188 6259
Top 20 of RNC1
VS.RAB.FailE
stabPS.ULCE VS.RAB.FailEsta VS.RRC.Rej.ULC
CI Cell Name .Cong bCS.ULCE.Cong E.Cong
13622 Nakabago_2 13034 294 2270
10126 Kireka_Caravan_6 5477 207 1519
10122 Kireka_Caravan_2 5407 168 1515
5435 First_Street_5 3095 159 1221
12965 IvoryPlaza_5 1105 154 364
12966 IvoryPlaza_6 1222 150 356
10085 HBTowers_5 1792 146 535
5336 MTN_Towers-6 891 140 286
12186 Marie_Hotel_6 2669 134 932
12962 IvoryPlaza_2 1162 134 292
13623 Nakabago_3 7743 130 899
52 BugolobiRadioStation_2 1604 128 346
12182 Marie_Hotel_2 2608 120 833
56 BugolobiRadioStation_6 1813 118 402
12961 IvoryPlaza_1 1058 116 285
9176 Zzimwe_Rd_Muyenga_6 5212 116 2302
4385 Mbuya_Hill_5 2901 112 1016
2572 Nkoma_2 6226 110 461
4615 UBC_5 1459 107 436
9122 Katwe_2 3797 103 589
CE
Congestion.xlsx
For details of the whole network, please refer to attached.
1.2 Analysis
For all the CE congestion shown above, they can be divided by three categories:
1. Real CE Congestion
Ntinda_Valley
There are still another kind of sites, whose CE utilization isn’t high at all, but still
has UL CE congestion, such as site Entebbe_Airport_Inbuilding:
CE Utilization is very low:
This statistics problems cannot be solved now, but you can refer to these two
counters to verify if congestion really exists:
1. RLM.FailRLSetupIub.Cong, always 0, which means no any congestion.
Sector 1- RLM.FailRLSetupIub.Cong
Sector 2- VS.IUB.FailRLRecfg.Cong
Sector 2- RLM.FailRLSetupIub.Cong
Sector 3- VS.IUB.FailRLRecfg.Cong
Sector 3- RLM.FailRLSetupIub.Cong
2 Solution of CE Congestion
As 5.76mbps need higher GBR, more CEs need to be reserved and then congestion
happened easily.
1. NodeB gave real consumed CEs within 2ms, while RNC get the statistics
from admission GBR for HSUPA in 5ms, even though the consumed CE
was far less than physical CE capacity, CE congestion could happen from
RNC statistics(RAB failures due to CE congestion).
2. When Dynamic CE function is on, HSUPA DCCC will be invalid, and
RNC will use GBR for admission.
3. When dynamic CE function was switched off, HSUPA DCCC will take
effect, through which RNC can give admission for user with initial speed,
not GRB, and thus blocked calls will reduce a lot.