Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison Group:
(s) Kent
(d) Essex
(u) West Sussex
(x) Hampshire
(a) Gloucestershire
(z) Northamptonshire
(g) Worcestershire
(n) Warwickshire
(w) Suffolk
(f) Lancashire
(m) East Sussex
(t) Staffordshire
(e) Nottinghamshire
(k) Hertfordshire
(h) Derbyshire
(r) Norfolk
The analysis is simple and non-judgemental. You will not find any
quartiles, traffic lights or subjective commentary. Instead the report seeks
to visualise the data and to enable readers to draw their own conclusions.
The "Executive Report" acts as a high level summary, but is also designed
as an introduction to the whole report. Most readers will find reading
through these pages helpful as an introduction to the style and logic of the
more detailed pages.
The reports will aid everyone interested in public library services to ask
informed questions and come up with informed proposals for how the
services should be delivered in the future.
We hope you find this report interesting and helpful. If you have any
comments, suggestions or queries then CIPFA would be delighted to hear
from you (please see appendix 5 for contact details).
Kind regards,
Ian Watson
Lancashire County Council
Chair of the CIPFA Public Library Statistics Working Party
This profile compares your authority's library service figures from the 2016 CIPFAstats collection
with the group of authorities specified on the title page.
This is the fifth year of the profile, CIPFA would greatly appreciate your feedback and
suggestions on how we can make the profiles more interesting and useful.
INDEX
Executive Summary Page 4
Appendices Page 45
• 93% of UK Library Authorities provided data for the 2016 CIPFAstats Public Library Statistics. Authorities who did not
provide data are excluded from these comparisions completely.
• In a small number of cases authorities have provided totals (e.g. for costs), but not a complete breakdown. In such
cases the breakdown has been estimated by techniques such as apportionment or comparison to previous years' figures.
• In a small number of cases authorities have not provided other pieces of information. Where CIPFA felt this value was
important an estimation has been made. In no cases does this estimated data constitute more than 15% of the data
used in a comparision.
• Should any authority not be fully happy with estimates provided for their authority we will be very happy to produce a
new report for them using new data supplied by that authority.
• If you have any queries about our approach please do not hesitate to contact us: libraries@cipfa.org
This summary provides an overview of the key indicators from the main report along with a few points of current interest,
showing how your authority's library service compares against other authorities.
Unless specified otherwise all data relates to 2015-16 Actuals.
120 Number of Libraries (31/03/16) • The chart on the left compares the number of
libraries your authority has with the other
100 authorities in the comparison. Kent has 110
libraries (the bar highlighted in black) compared
80 to an average of 52 libraries (as shown by the
horizontal line). Each pale bar represents one of
60 the authorities in the comparator group.
40
• Kent has one of the highest numbers of libraries
20 within the group giving an indication of the scale
of the library service.
0
s d f e x r t w k h z u a m g n
For more information about this type of chart
please see appendix 1.
1,600
• Population is an important figure in this report as
1,400
we use it as a denominator to adjust for the size
1,200 of the authority (see next chart).
1,000
800 • Kent is the largest of the 16 authorities compared
600 here (in terms of population).
400
200
0
s d x f k r t u e h w z a g n m
£10,000
• Kent comes out as being at the higher end of the
£8,000 comparison, which suggests that it should
£6,000 compare its costs to other authorities to see if
there are any ways it could learn from their
£4,000
approaches.
£2,000
£0
g k s d m e f t x r w n h u a z
£16,000
£14,000
£12,000
£10,000
£8,000
£6,000
£4,000
£2,000
£0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
(Estimates)
Kent Average
• The line chart plots the total revenue expenditure per 1,000 population over the last four years and shows the
estimated figure for 2016-17. The population figure used for all years is the mid-year 2016 figure, so the changes in
value relate to changes in expenditure only.
15.0%
• Kent had 6.1% of 'worked hours' provided by
volunteers in 2015-16 compared to an average of
10.0%
7.2%.
5.0%
0.0%
w z d g u a s f r m t x k n e h
6,000 Physical Visits for Library Purposes per 1,000 • The number of visits per 1,000 population is a
population strong indicator of workload faced by the
5,000 authority.
1,000
0
g r w x d f t u e z s a m k h n
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
r g x u f w k e m h d s n t z a
D: Stock
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
w r g x e d h f n t s m a u k z
E: Performance
0
e s f w r h t d a z m u x g k n
Section Contents
Page 8 A1: Service Points
Number of terminals
Number of hours available & recorded
Public wi-fi access
Authority Average
Population 1,524,700 913,113
100
80
60
40
20
0
s d f e x r t w k h z u a m g n
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
e s f w r h t d a z m u x g k n
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 1 to 45, ONS Population Estimates Mid 2016
Busiest Service Point (Issues): Tunbridge Wells Busiest Service Point (Visits): Margate
1,000,000 1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
800,000
600,000
600,000
400,000
400,000
200,000 200,000
0 0
r g d h u e x n k f m s w t a z r g h x d f s w u a t m e n k z
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 48 & 49 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 50 & 51
Library Opening/Closures
7.00
0.80
6.00
5.00 0.60
4.00
3.00 0.40
2.00
0.20
1.00
0.00 0.00
k m f z x w u t s r n h g e d a z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 46 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 47
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-4.00
-5.00
-6.00
-7.00
-8.00
z x w u t s r n h g e d a m f k
• The scatter plots below compare these two factors. For all UK library authorities it can be seen that as population density
increases (on the horizontal axis), the number of libraries per 100,000 population tends to be lower.
• As these charts are strongly effected by outliers, values for population density are capped at 120 and service points per
100,000 population capped at 18.0 and 3.0 for static service points and mobile libraries respectively.
Authority Median
Population Density 4.3 3.3
6.0
5.0
4.0
population
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Population Density
Mobile Libraries
1.2
Comparator Group Kent
1.0
Mobile Libraries per 100,000
0.8
0.6
population
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Population Density
Mobile Libraries
6.3%
Number / 100k pop Average
Mobile Libraries 11 0.7 0.4
1.0
93.8%
0.8
0.6
0.4
Service Points
Statutory Non-Statutory Total / 100,000 population % in Each Band
y
y
y
ge
ge
rit
ge
ge
ge
rit
rit
rit
rit
era
Hours Open
tho
era
tho
tho
tho
tho
era
era
era
Av
Au
Av
Au
Au
Au
Au
Av
Av
Av
All Libraries: < 10 1 1 0 0 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.9% 1.7%
Mobile: <10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.0 0.0% 0.0%
Mobile: >10 11 4 0 0 11 4 0.7 0.4 10.0% 7.6%
Static: 10-14 6 3 0 0 6 3 0.4 0.3 5.5% 4.6%
Static: 15-19 13 5 0 0 13 5 0.9 0.0 11.8% 7.6%
Static: 20-24 12 6 0 1 12 6 0.8 0.6 10.9% 10.7%
Static: 25-29 9 5 0 0 9 5 0.6 0.6 8.2% 9.8%
Static: 30-34 4 5 0 0 4 6 0.3 0.6 3.6% 10.6%
Static: 35-39 4 6 0 0 4 6 0.3 0.6 3.6% 12.4%
Static: 40-44 24 6 0 0 24 6 1.6 0.6 21.8% 10.4%
Static: 45-49 4 4 0 0 4 4 0.3 0.4 3.6% 7.7%
Static: 50-54 7 5 0 0 7 5 0.5 0.5 6.4% 10.3%
Static: 55-59 13 3 0 0 13 3 0.9 0.3 11.8% 4.8%
Static: >60 2 1 0 0 2 1 0.1 0.1 1.8% 1.9%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
All Mobile: Mobile 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 >60
Libraries <10 Libraries
< 10 >10 Weekly Opening Hours
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
z f g r w x s d u h e n a t m k z f g r x w d u t h s e n a m k
150 8
6
100
4
50
2
0 0
d e r g x u k h m f z w s a n t
n h s a w f r g z e d u x m k t
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 122 & 123
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
g r w x d f t u e z s a m k h n
Kent Average
Percentage of Service Points with 8,000 Visits to Website per 1,000 population
Electronic Counters
100% 7,000
6,000
80%
5,000
60%
4,000
40% 3,000
2,000
20%
1,000
0% 0
t k z u h w m g d x r f e a s n r n u d w k e f t z g m s a h x
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 127 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 128
Kent Average
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 128 and equivalent for previous years
Number per 100,000 pop Average Number per 1,000 pop Average
1,500
40
1,000
20
500
0 0
g f r e m t h d w k z s a u n x g f r t w z e h s m k a d n u x
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 52 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 53
Number of Hours Recorded per 1,000 Percentage of Service Points with Public
1,000 population Wi-Fi Access
100%
800 80%
600 60%
400 40%
200 20%
0 0%
g f r m w t s e a h u d n k x z k a z u h x f e m w g s d t r n
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 54 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 55
£14,000
£12,000
£10,000
£8,000
£6,000
£4,000
£2,000
£0
g k s d m e f t x r w n h u a z
Section Contents
Page 16 B1: Financial Information (Actuals)
£15,000
£10,000
£15,000 £0
g k s d m e f t x r w n h u a z
£10,000
Total Revenue Income
£0
£5,000
-£1,000
£0
g k s d f m e t x r n h w a u z -£2,000
-£3,000
-£4,000
a f t h s n u z k x d e r m w g
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 157, 167 & 168
£18,000
£16,000
£14,000
£12,000
£10,000
£8,000
£6,000
£4,000
£2,000
£0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
(Estimates)
Kent Average
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 157 and equivalent for previous years
£7,000 £12,000
£6,000
£10,000
£5,000
£8,000
£4,000
£6,000
£3,000
£2,000 £4,000
£1,000 £2,000
£0 £0
k u e m w s r x f d g n h t a z g s d e k r t m x f w h a z n u
£2,500
£1,500
£2,000
£1,000 £1,500
£1,000
£500
£500
£0 £0
k r m h g x f d u z s w n t e a d t s k r m a e g n f w u x z h
£2,000 £400
£1,500 £300
£1,000 £200
£500 £100
£0 £0
m t x e h r s w g f k z n u d a t n d s r g e x u k m h z w a f
£300 £3,000
£250 £2,500
£200 £2,000
£150 £1,500
£100 £1,000
£50 £500
£0 £0
e z a s f d x w u t r n m k h g s f n a k d x e h w t m r z u g
£250
£300
£200
£150 £200
£100
£100
£50
£0 £0
k u w r x a z d e s n t f m h g r x m k u z h w s a f e g t d n
£2,000 £400
£1,500 £300
£1,000 £200
£500 £100
£0 £0
g w e t d k m z s x f a h u r n r h g a z u f n d w s e t k m x
£800 £500
£400
£600
£300
£400
£200
£200
£100
£0 £0
w e g m n s r z u t x k f h d a m d n x k t f r z e w s u h g a
£500
£400
£300
£200
£100
£0
m d n x k t f r z e w s u h g a
£60 £120
£50 £100
£40 £80
£30 £60
£20 £40
£10 £20
£0 £0
x r u m f h n k t z w e d g s a k m n d f z h u t x w s r g e a
£300
£100
£200
£50
£100
£0 £0
t x e w r s z g m a u f h k d n d m n s a u z x w t r k h g f e
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 159, 160, 162 & 164
£p Average £p Average
Average Cost per Book £6.72 £6.39 Cost per Visitor £4.07 £3.09
• Average cost per book acquisition. • Revenue expenditure divided by visitor number.
£8 £4
£6 £3
£4 £2
£2 £1
£0 £0
g u z n m s x t h f e r k d w a g k s m n d e h f t x a r w u z
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 -
Sum of Cells 133 to 137 divided by Cell 71 Cell 157 divided by Cell 124
% Average % Average
80% 20%
60% 15%
40% 10%
20% 5%
0% 0%
g u z w h n r e x m k a f t s d g z h u r x n m w f k t d s a e
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 -
Cell 131 as a percentage of Cell 157 Cell 151 as a percentage of Cell 157
35% Support Service Costs as a % of Revenue £20 Cost per Available Hour
Expenditure
30%
25% £15
20%
£10
15%
10%
£5
5%
0% £0
g a n s f k d x h e w t m z r u g x d k s m n e u a h t w r f z
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 -
Cell 156 as a percentage of Cell 157 Cell 157 divided by Cell 53
£10,000
£16,000 Net Expenditure
£14,000 £5,000
£12,000
£10,000 £0
g k s d m e x r t n w f h u a z
£8,000
80% 20%
60% 15%
40% 10%
20% 5%
0% 0%
g u z h w e n r f m a k x s t d g z x r h u w f t m k n e d s a
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 -
Cell 170 as a percentage of Cell 174 Cell 172 as a percentage of Cell 174
40 1
0
30 x r u t f h s z e n m k g w a d
20
20
15
10
5
0
x f k w u e s n z m r d t h a g
This tree diagram analyses professional and other staff as a percentage of total staff.
Your authority's value is followed by the average value in italics.
Professional Staff
15.3% 13.7%
Total Staff
£ Average
0.3
£15,000
£8,000 Employee Costs per 1,000 population
£10,000
£5,000
£6,000
£0
g d m e k w h s u r a t n f z x
£4,000
0.29
0.28
0.27
0.26
0.25
0.24
0.23
0.22
0.21
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Kent Average
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 97 and equivalent for previous years
60
0
d w s u k r z x f a t g m e h n
40
80,000 Number of Volunteer Hours
20
60,000
0
x f w g n z d t s u e m a h k r
40,000
20,000
• The section below uses 1,625 hours as the annual hours worked by a full-time member of staff.
• We use this to compare hours provided by paid staff and volunteers.
• The two charts below compare the volunteers to the total of paid staff and volunteers.
20.0% 80%
15.0% 60%
10.0% 40%
5.0% 20%
0.0% 0%
w z d g u a s f r m t x k n e h w z d u a r g m k s t n f h e x
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 98 & 99 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 98 & 99
400
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 -
200
Cell 98 and equivalent for previous years
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Kent Average
• This section examines issues and stock turn for books and other
items along with requests, enquiries and loans.
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
r g x u f w k e m h d s n t z a
Section Contents
Page 26 C1: Book Issues
1,200
800
5,000
600
4,000 400
200
3,000
0
g r u x f k d w h e n s m a t z
2,000
1,000
2,000 Children's Fiction Issues
0
r g x u f w k e m h d s n t z a 1,500
1,000
500
Adult Fiction
350 Children's Non-Fiction Issues
41.6% 43.4%
300
Adult Non-Fiction
250
Book 17.4% 19.2%
200
Issues
Children's Fiction 150
35.9% 32.5%
100
Children's Non-Fiction 50
5.1% 4.8%
0
r x e w u g h k a s d m z f n t
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 100 to 103
Number Average
4.0
• Number of books issued divided by the book stock
(i.e. the average number of times each book was issued
during the year). 2.0
0.0
u r g z f x m a k h t d s n w e
4.0
5.0 2.0
1.0
4.0
0.0
3.0 u r f x k s e g h t d z n m w a
2.0
8.0 Children's Fiction Stock Turn
1.0
6.0
0.0
u r k f x z m g h s a n t d e w
4.0
2.0
0.0
k u r z a m x n g h f s w d t e
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
r u k x m a f h g z n s d e t w
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 100 to 104 divided by Cells 58 to 62 respectively
Sound Recordings
Music 22,311 14.6 16.6
Adult Talking Books 123,373 80.9 82.0
Children's Talking Books 20,940 13.7 18.6
Video & DVDs 74,558 48.9 62.1
Multimedia & Open Learning Packs 3,253 2.1 4.6
Electronic Products
eBooks 108,038 70.9 92.7
eAudio 36,445 23.9 19.7
eAudiovisuals 0 0.0 0.0
500
400
300
200
100
0
r x u h w k f e d s m a t n g z
This tree diagram analyses Audio, Visual, Electronic & Other Issues.
Your authority's value is followed by the average value in italics.
Music
5.7% 5.6%
Adult Talking Books
31.7% 27.7%
Children's Talking Books
5.4% 6.3%
Videos & DVDs
30 120
25 100
20 80
15 60
10 40
5 20
0 0
f r n x u d k w s h t m g a e z x u r h m e k w s f t d n g z a
60
50 150
40
100
30
20 50
10
0 0
r u k x t m h a e s g f w d z n r x w h f d m a u s k g z e n t
20
150
15
100
10
50
5
0 0
t u k w h r a s e z x f g d n m r x u e h k w a t d s f n g m z
30
20
10
0 0.0
x a w k r s f u h m z d n e g t z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a
700 Number of Requests for Specific Items 500 Number of Online Requests
600
400
500
400 300
300 200
200
100
100
0 0
w d s r u a x f h k m e g n t z w d k s x u r n g m f h t a e z
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 114 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 115
C5: Enquiries
2015-16 Actuals
Number per 1,000 pop Average Number per 1,000 pop Average
700
20
600
500 15
400
300 10
200
5
100
0 0
m e d k r x n h g w f s a t u z w d e g s k a f t u x h m n r z
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 119 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 120
8.0 8.00
6.0 6.00
4.0 4.00
2.0 2.00
0.0 0.00
n x f r k w h u t s m d a e z g f n x r m d h k w s a t u e z g
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 129 Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cell 130
• This section examines issues and stock turn for books and other
items along with requests, enquiries and loans.
300
200
100
Avg Kent
Children's Fiction
(See page 32 for details)
Section Contents
Page 32 D1: Book Stock
Trendline
Summary
Adult Fiction
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
Children's Non-Fiction 0 Adult Non-Fiction
This tree diagram analyses each type of stock as a percentage of total book stock.
Your authority's value is followed by the average value in italics.
Reference Books
7.9% 6.5% Adult Fiction
34.6% 33.5%
Adult Non-Fiction
25.6% 30.8%
Book Stock Lending Stock
86.2% 85.0% Children's Fiction
30.9% 27.3%
Children's Non-Fiction
9.0% 8.4%
Reserve Stock
6.0% 8.5%
120
at 31 March 2016
100
No. /1,000 pop Avg
80
Reference Books 119,795 79 70
60
Lending Stock
40
Adult Fiction 451,900 296 309
20
Adult Non-Fiction 334,810 220 284
0
Children's Fiction 403,437 265 252 r f g u n x z s m d k t h w e a
300
graphs shown per 1,000 population
200
100
0
w e r f n g x m t h d s u k z a
1,600 Total Book Stock
1,200
300
1,000
800 200
600
400 100
200
0
0 e x w d t s r f m g u n h a k z
w r g x e d h f n t s m a u k z
500
400
300
200
100
0
g w x a r d k h n m e u f s z t
Reference
30
Reserve 25 Music
20
15
eAudiovisuals 10 Adult/Talking Books
5
0
This tree diagram analyses each type of stock as a percentage of total audio visual stock.
Your authority's value is followed by the average value in italics.
at 31 March 2016
Number per 1,000 pop Avg
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
m n x r h u w f d s e z t k a g
1.0 100
0.5 50
0.0 0
h k s r d a w u t m z x n g f e n u f x w m t d s r k g a h e z
30
10
20
5
10
0 0
x m n u d h r s z f e t g k w a t h r u e x m k s g a f d z w n
40
6
30
4
20
10 2
0 0
d e w x h m z r f s g u n a k t r x u k w d f e z t s a g n m h
200
6
150
4
100
2
50
0 0
m h n w a x r f u k e s z g d t t a k x n w e h z r u f s m d g
0.8
10
0.6
0.4
5
0.2
0.0 0
z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a s t u x r a z m g n w k h f e d
50
40
200 Total Book Acquisitions
30
20
150
10
0
100 k r h u x g f s n e w t d a z m
50
0 40
r k f x h w s g m n d u t e z a
30
20
10
0
r x w f k h e m d s t n g u a z
3 10
2
1 5
0
g n u k h s m w x e r t z d a f 0
w r h e k x d f n g s z u a t m
This tree diagram analyses each type of stock as a percentage of total book acquisitions.
Your authority's value is followed by the average value in italics.
100 3
80
2
60
40 1
20
0
0 z x u t k h m e d r n s f w a g
m z r h w x u k s d a e t g n f
1.5
200 eBook Acquisitions
1.0
150
0.5
100
0.0
50 r t u h k m e f z s w g d x n a
4.0 4
3.0 2
2.0 0
h r z m x w g s d a k u e f n t
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
u k r t w f d x s n e z m h g a
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - Cells 84 to 94
This tree diagram analyses each type of stock as a percentage of total audio visual acquisitions. Your authority's
value is followed by the average value in italics.
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Kent Average
Lending Stock Years Average • Time taken in years to replenish the lending stock on
Replenishment Rate 6.9 7.3 open access or available on loan at 2015-16 rate.
10
0
e g a w d n t z x s u h f r k m
Source: CIPFA Public Library Statistics 2016 - (Cell 62 + Cell 81) / (Cell 70 + Cell 93)
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a
Section Contents
Page 42 E1: Requests
Satisfaction Measures
Satisfaction Measures
Outcome Measures
This PLUS data is the feedback from the individuals who makes use of library services. It contains the views of children,
young people and adults from diverse neighbourhoods who have been surveyed on a variety of topics including books,
homework and computers. Examples of the way the PLUS data is used includes, for example, demographic profiling to
determine demand amongst key groups for services.
If you would like to learn more about PLUS please contact research@cipfa.org
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
z w g x n t e u m k r f d a s h
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
z w x g n e s t u m r a f k h d
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
z x w u t s r n m k h g f e d a
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
x w u s r n m k g f e a t h d z
This chart displays fictional user satisfaction data for 25 authorities. Each bar represents an individual authority and the
bar for the reader's authority highlights in black.
The values for the authorities are displayed in order starting at the highest value at the left of the chart and dropping to
the lowest at the right of the chart.
In this example, the black bar highlights on the left of the chart, showing that the authority is performing strongly (has a
high value) for this indicator when compared to the other 24 authorities.
The horizontal black line is the average value for the group. In this example it can literally 'be seen' that the authorities
user satisfaction is clearly above average as the black bar is taller than the height of the average line.
The y-axis shows the scale and enables readers to judge the values of individual authorities and the average. While
readers natually cannot read exact values off the chart, your authority's own value and the group average will be
displayed near the chart, often with the associated raw data.
• group average
• comparator authority
• your authority
Example 2: Comparative bar charts for reports with small numbers of authorities
Authorities can request copies of this report using any grouping of authorities that they wish (e.g. small regional
groupings, nearest neighbours or family groupings, core cities up to the whole of Britain).
For small groupings of authorities (19 or less) we display letters under the charts and provide a key in the report to
enable readers to identify each of their comparator authorities individually.
Zero values: In some cases the value for any authority might be zero, in this case the value 'displays' as a bar of zero
height (i.e. no bar) on the right of the distribution (which follows the pattern of lowest values to the right of the chart).
Unavailable data: In other cases there may not be data available, either because the data were not supplied, or because
the data supplied have been rejected. These are displayed by missing bars on the left of the chart.
Averages: Zero values are included in the average as they are genuine values for authorities. The average however
excludes unavailable data.
This chart shows fictional agency staff costs for 12 authorities. The four missing bars can potentially cause confusion,
however it will quickly become second nature to readers.
In this chart, authorities q, f and a have no spend on agency staff, i.e. they have not used agency staff and therefore
their values are genuinely zero. However the use by authority h is unknown and has been excluded from the analysis
(represented by the gap on the left of the chart). The chart average is based on only 11 authorities as authority h is
excluded.
When a large number of authorities are displayed the individual bars get so small that they start to merge. The value for
your authority should still be clearly visible as the black bar. While individual bars cannot be seen, this does not detract
from the readers ability to compare their value to the group, or learn about overall range of values.
This chart shows fictional overhead costs for 150 authorities. By looking at the shape of the graph and position of the
black bar and average line the following information can be observed.
• The black bar authority has a very low figure, being less than a third of the group average.
• Data were not available for around 10% of the authorities (gap on left of the chart).
• 5% of the authorities report either zero or miniscule costs (gap on right of the chart).
• There is great variation in these costs, as the distribution slopes smoothly from left to right showing that there is no
'typical' value for this cost.
The distributions of values shown on the charts can vary greatly. Here we show some examples to help readers
understand how the distributions can vary. In each case we will keep the black bar authority's value the same and the
group average the same, however the shape of the graph and distribution of the groups values are varied to give quite
different pictures of the example authority's costs.
• This chart shows a very common distribution (which a • This chart shows a straight sloping distribution.
statistician would appropriately call the 'normal' • There is no consistency between authorities and no such
distribution). thing as a typical value.
• While there is a wide range of values (20-100) the • In this particular case the highlighted authority is above
majority of authorities are in a much tighter range (about average, but not signficantly so.
half are between 50 and 70).
• In this particular case the highlighted authority has one
of the highest costs.
• This chart shows little variation between authorities. • This distribution is quite rare, the chart clearly displays
two distinct groupings of authorities.
• In this particular case the highlighted authority is clearly
the most expensive per 1,000 population. • In this case interpreting the highlighted authorities value
is difficult and it is important to investigate the reasons
behind this variation.
Quartiles
We finish this introduction with a quick note about quartiles.
Quartiles are a popular simple way to examine distributions of
cost or performance data.
Quartiles are produced by splitting the distribution into four
quarters, as presented on the right.
Mathmatically the word quartile refers to the boundaries
between the quarters (called the lower quartile, median and
upper quartile).
In business & management the word quartile is more often
used to refer to the quarters themselves. "Top quartile" is used
to desribe the best quarter (e.g. highest performance) while
"bottom quartile" refers to the worse (e.g. high cost or low
performance).
It is common approach to view "being in the top quartile" as a
benchmark to be achieved, and "being in the bottom quartile"
as a sign of problems.
We do not show quartiles in this report, as this approach can be
viewed as simplistic, and it does not fit in with the purpose of
the report, which is to inform rather than judge. The reader
should however compare the top and bottom charts and note
how easy it is to quarter the distribution with the mind's eye.
Educational Attainment
Average
Educational Attainment 57.3% 58.1%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
k n a g u x f d s e m t h r w z
Deprivation
Average
Index of Deprivation 17.7 16.5
25 Indices of Deprivation
20
15
10
0
f m e r h s z g t w d n a u k x
• The higher the index, the more deprived the authority is.
Average
Population 1,524,700 913,113
1,800,000 Population
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
s d x f k r t u e h w z a g n m
Area
Average
Area (hectares) 354,486 275,617
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
r w x s d f a t h z e u n g m k
Population Density
Median
Population Density 4.3 3.3
8 Population Density
0
k s u d f e x g t m h z n a w r
1
Includes Music, Adult Talking Books and Children's Talking Books (Cells 139 to 141)
2
Includes DVDs, Multimedia & Open Learning Packs and CD-ROMs & Software (Cells 142 & 143)
3
Includes eBooks, eAudio, eAudiovisual, Subscriptions and Online / Electronic Products (Cells 144 to Cell 148)
CIPFA are the leading independent source of data about local government services, undertaking more
than 30 surveys annually. We have been collecting data relating to public libraries for more than fifty
years. The data collected represents the most comprehensive source of information relating to
measuring the performance of public library authorities in the UK.
A working group of local authority practitioners and central government representatives meet bi-annually
to help shape the direction of the questionnaire and data that is collected to ensure that it is continually
adapted to remain relevant in an ever-changing environment.
Datasets provide financial and non-financial information for local government managers engaged in
comparative analysis and performance measurement. Subscribers to www.cipfastats.net have access to
our historical archive of downloadable data in addition to a range of interactive and visual tools to help
with further analysis.
www.cipfastats.net/leisure/publiclibrary
CIPFA have been developing and supporting a range of library survey tools, enabling authorities to
collect feedback from users of their services, since 1995. This began with the launch of PLUS in 1995,
which was followed by Children's PLUS in 1997, ePLUS in 2001 and the Home Delivery Survey in 2005.
Indicators from PLUS were adopted by the Audit Commission and the Department for Transport, Local
Government and the Regions (DTLR now DCLG) for the collection of a number of Best Value Performance
Indicators (BVPIs). It was also adopted by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) for
their Public Library Service Standards (PLSS) and Public Library Impact Measures (PLIMs).
New from July 2012: The 2012 Adult PLUS survey has now been updated and includes new questions on
transport, use of computers and living arrangements. The questionnaire and manual of guidance can be
accessed by subscribers from www.cipfasocialresearch.net/subscribersarea, which will also include
details on how CIPFA can help you to deliver your survey and make best use of the results.
www.cipfasocialresearch.net
This is the sixth year of the profile and we aim for this to be a user-led product that improves year-on-
year.
Please help us improve the next round by contacting us with your thoughts and suggestions!
libraries@cipfa.org
We will also be happy to answer any queries you have regarding the profiles.