Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alarm Changes
Issue 01
Date 2016/10/08
All other trademarks and trade names mentioned in this document are the property of their respective holders.
Notice
The purchased products, services and features are stipulated by the contract made between Huawei and the customer. All or part of the
products, services and features described in this document may not be within the purchase scope or the usage scope. Unless otherwise
specified in the contract, all statements, information, and recommendations in this document are provided "AS IS" without warranties,
guarantees or representations of any kind, either express or implied.
The information in this document is subject to change without notice. Every effort has been made in the preparation of this document to
ensure accuracy of the contents, but all statements, information, and recommendations in this document do not constitute a warranty of
any kind, express or implied.
Intended Audience
This document is intended for:
Field engineers
System engineers
Network operators
Network planners
Structure
Change Type Alarm change type, for example, added, modified, or deleted.
Describes the changes in alarms of a new version from the following aspects:
● Alarm severity: Describes the changes in the alarm severity.
● Location information: Describes the changes in location information of alarms, including the addition,
modification, and deletion of location parameters. The changes in value ranges must be mainly described for
Change Description
modified location parameters, including addition, modification, and deletion of values.
● Alarm generation and clearance mechanism: Describes the changes in the alarm generation and clearance
mechanism. With these changes, alarms may be different before and after an update.
●Others: Describes other changes, such as changes in the alarm name and NMS type.
Describes whether the changes involve the northbound interface (NBI). The value of this field can be Yes or No.
● Yes: The changes involve the NBI. For example, the NBI reporting data changes if alarms are added or
Involve the NBI
deleted or if alarm parameters are modified.
● No: The changes do not involve the NBI. For example, the NBI reporting data does not change if the alarm
detection mechanism or alarm trigger threshold is changed.
Describes whether the changes are compatible with the NBI. This field applies only to the changes that involve
the NBI. The value of this field can be Yes, No, or N/A.
● Yes: The changes are compatible with the NBI. For example, new alarms or new alarm parameters are
Compatible with the compatible with the NBI.
NBI ● No: The changes are incompatible with the NBI. For example, deleted alarms, modified alarm names,
modified alarm parameter names, changed value type of alarm parameters, or deleted alarm parameters are
incompatible with the NBI.
● N/A: not involved.
Change Reason Describes change reasons and benefits brought by these changes to users.
Describes scenarios in which alarms are inconsistent before and after an upgrade, including the following
scenarios:
● An alarm does not exist before an upgrade but occurs after the upgrade.
● Alarm A is changed to alarm B after an upgrade.
Upgrade Impact ● An alarm exists before an upgrade but is cleared after the upgrade.
Impacts of an upgrade can be described from the following aspects:
● Upgrade impact: Describes the scenarios in which the inconsistency occurs.
● Preventive measures: Describes measures of avoiding the inconsistency.
● Suggestions: Describes suggestions on how to handle the inconsistency after an upgrade.
Applicable Mode Indicates the applicable mode of a alarm.
The Alarm Change Statement in this document provides alarm changes between different eNodeB
versions.
udience
This document is intended for:
Field engineers
System engineers
Network operators
Network planners
Describes the changes in alarms of a new version from the following aspects:
● Alarm severity: Describes the changes in the alarm severity.
● Location information: Describes the changes in location information of alarms, including the addition,
modification, and deletion of location parameters. The changes in value ranges must be mainly described for
modified location parameters, including addition, modification, and deletion of values.
● Alarm generation and clearance mechanism: Describes the changes in the alarm generation and clearance
mechanism. With these changes, alarms may be different before and after an update.
●Others: Describes other changes, such as changes in the alarm name and NMS type.
Describes whether the changes involve the northbound interface (NBI). The value of this field can be Yes or No.
● Yes: The changes involve the NBI. For example, the NBI reporting data changes if alarms are added or
deleted or if alarm parameters are modified.
● No: The changes do not involve the NBI. For example, the NBI reporting data does not change if the alarm
detection mechanism or alarm trigger threshold is changed.
Describes whether the changes are compatible with the NBI. This field applies only to the changes that involve
the NBI. The value of this field can be Yes, No, or N/A.
● Yes: The changes are compatible with the NBI. For example, new alarms or new alarm parameters are
compatible with the NBI.
● No: The changes are incompatible with the NBI. For example, deleted alarms, modified alarm names,
modified alarm parameter names, changed value type of alarm parameters, or deleted alarm parameters are
incompatible with the NBI.
● N/A: not involved.
Describes scenarios in which alarms are inconsistent before and after an upgrade, including the following
scenarios:
● An alarm does not exist before an upgrade but occurs after the upgrade.
● Alarm A is changed to alarm B after an upgrade.
● An alarm exists before an upgrade but is cleared after the upgrade.
Impacts of an upgrade can be described from the following aspects:
● Upgrade impact: Describes the scenarios in which the inconsistency occurs.
● Preventive measures: Describes measures of avoiding the inconsistency.
● Suggestions: Describes suggestions on how to handle the inconsistency after an upgrade.
Indicates the applicable mode of a alarm.
Alarm Changes
BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC230 Compared with BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC210
Change Description
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm Location Alarm Generation and
Others
Severity Information Clearance Mechanism
None None
Alarm Changes
BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC180 Compared with BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC160
Change Description
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm Location Alarm Generation and
Others
Severity Information Clearance Mechanism
None None None None None None None
C160
Upgrade Description
Compatible with Change
Involve the NBI
the NBI Reason Upgrade Impact Preventive Measure
None None
Alarm Changes
BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC160 Compared with BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC150
Change Description
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm Location Alarm Generation and
Others
Severity Information Clearance Mechanism
None None None None None None None
C150
Upgrade Description
Compatible with Change
Involve the NBI
the NBI Reason Upgrade Impact Preventive Measure
None None
Alarm Changes
BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC150 Compared with BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC112
Change Description
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm The Location Alarm Generation and
alarm Others
Severity parameters
Information Clearance Mechanism
are modified
as follows:
The value
Cell
Modified 29240 - "other causes" - -
Unavailable
has been
added to the
Specific
Problem
parameter.
C112
Upgrade Description
Compatible with Change
Involve the NBI
the NBI Reason Upgrade Impact Preventive Measure
Values are
added for
Alarm
Parameters
of this alarm
Yes Yes - -
to accurately
locate faults
and improve
O&M
efficiency.
cription
Applicable Mode
Suggestion
Cell RX
Channel
Interference
Added 29250 - - - -
Noise Power
Unbalanced
C060
Upgrade Description
Compatible with Change
Involve the NBI Before the upgrade,
the NBI Reason Upgrade Impact Preventive Measure
ALM-26522 RF Unit
The
RX Channel
detection
RTWP/RSSI
mechanism
Unbalanced is
of ALM-
reported if the
26522 RF
trigger conditions
Unit RX
are met. After the
Channel
Yes Yes upgrade, ALM- -
RTWP/RSSI
29250 Cell RX
Unbalanced
Channel
in the LTE
Interference Noise
mode differs
Power Unbalanced
from that in
is reported instead
other modes.
if the trigger
conditions are met
in the LTE mode.
cription
Applicable Mode
Suggestion
- L
Alarm Changes
BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC060 Compared with BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC050
Change Description
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm Location Alarm Generation and
Others
Severity Information Clearance Mechanism
None None None None None None None
C050
Upgrade Description
Compatible with Change
Involve the NBI
the NBI Reason Upgrade Impact Preventive Measure
None None
Alarm Changes
BTS3202E V100R011C10SPC050 Compared with BTS3202E V100R011C10
Change Description
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm Location Alarm Generation and
Others
Severity The Downlink Clearance Mechanism
Information
Frequency
Cell PCI Modified
Extension the
Modified 29247 - following - -
Conflict Flag
parameters:
parameter is
Add the value
added.
IKE
of parameter
Modified 25891 Negotiation - - -
specific
Failure
problem
IPSec SA
Negotiation
Failure.
Before the upgrade, Upgrade Description
Compatible with Band66
Changeis Downlink Frequency
Involve the NBI
the NBI supported.
Reason Extension
UpgradeFlag is
Impact Preventive Measure
Thealarm
An not in the alarm
EARFCNs
parameter in location information.
Yes Yes ALM-29247
value is After the upgrade, -
Cell PCIand
added, Downlink
Conflict are
therefore the Frequency
modified
fault can be Extension Flag is
Yes Yes accordingly. -in the alarm location -
more
accurately information.
located and
the O&M
efficiency is
improved.
cription
Applicable Mode
Suggestion
- L
- L
- L
- L
- L
Handle this alarm
based on the
impact on the
L
system as
described in the
alarm reference.
- L
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
- L
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
Handle this alarm
system impact.
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
L
Handle this alarm
1. The value
of the specific
problem is
changed from
Incorrect
Alarm Changes bandwidth When the Distance based
configuratio
BTS3202E V100R011C10 Compared with BTS3202E inter-RAT handover to
V100R009C00SPC280
n to GERAN(FDD) and
Change Description
Distance based inter-RAT
Incorrect
Change Type Alarm ID Alarm Name Alarm Location handover to UTRAN(FDD)
Alarm Generation and
cell license itemsMechanism
are Others
System Severity Information Clearance
bandwidth unavailable and the
Dynamic configuratio distance-based handover
Modified 26812 Traffic - -n. After the faultstarget in the object -
measurement
Exceeding SCTP
2. The value type is set to EUTRAN, link of an S1
Licensed Limit interface are rectified,
of the the mechanisms for
S1 Interface ALM-29201
reporting andS1clearing
Interface
Modified 29201 - -specific After the faults in the -
Fault Fault
ALM-26812with the Specific
problem is SCTP
Problem ofSystem
linkalarm anparameter
S1
changed Dynamic
interface Traffic
are Exceeding
rectified,
set to Lower-layer
Licensed Limit link fault
X2 Interface The value ALM-29204 X2areInterface
Modified 29204 - -from
1. is cleared.
optimized. -
Fault Incorrect RS In
Physical Fault
thewith
combinedthe Specific
RRU
resource fault Problem
scenario, alarm
if one parameter
RRU is
power
of the Specific set to Lower-layer
unavailable, linkRF
only the fault
Modified 29243
Cell Capability
-
configuratio
-Problem alarm In is cleared.
Unit Service Unavailable -
Degraded the CA group scenario,
n to alarm is reported. andThe Cell
System parameter is the generation
Incorrect Capability
clearance Degraded
mechanism alarm
of
Dynamic divided into
power
RF module is noSystem
the
When longer
all the reported.
Dynamic
LTE FDD or
Modified 26812 Traffic - -configuratio -
abnormal and Trafficcells
TDD Exceeding
are deleted,
Exceeding n.
Baseband Licensed
ALM-26819 LimitDataalarm is
Licensed Limit
Data When the forCDMA
3.
equipmentThe value improved
Configuration CA-related
Exceeding
Configuration optimization
license. Limit switch on the
Modified 26819 - -of the
abnormal.2. Licensed that is -
Exceeding eNodeB is turned on,
specific
The value reported because the data
Licensed Limit reported ALM-26819
Data Incorrect
problem is configuration exceedsData the
Configuration
limit of the Exceeding
corresponding
Configuration settings of
Modified 26819 - -changed Licensed
license item Limit is cleared
is cleared. -
Exceeding cell-level
from after the license file
Licensed Limit parameters
Incorrect of containing the license item
the Specific for E-UTRAN-to-
Modified 29240
Cell
-
EARFCN
Problem alarm -CDMA2000 hanover is -
Unavailable configuratio
parameter is loaded.
n to ALM-
changed
Added to
eNodeB Out Incorrect
Invalid
29249
Added 29249 - frequency
parameter - -
of Service eNodeB Out
configuratio
setting.3.
of Service.The
values The alarm detection
Base Station n.
License mechanism is optimized
Modified 25950 Being - -4. The value -
limitation for the flood attack of LTE
Attacked of the and The control-plane
alarm detection protocols.
multi-mode
specific
license mechanism has been
RF Out of
Modified 29248 - -problem is
limitation of optimized: The alarm is -
Service changed
the Specific reported when an RRU
from object isthe
Problem alarm Added removed.
correlation
Modified 29248
RF Out of
-
Abnormal
parameter
- for between this alarm and
-
Service alarm are ALM-26200 Board
RF module
this
to RF
combined Hardware Fault.
The alarm into Added the correlation
Cell Insufficient
module
parameters between this alarm and
Modified 29240 - -license.
abnormal. -
Unavailable are modified ALM-26200 Board
5. The
as value Hardware Fault.
follows:
of
The the
value of
Cell
Modified 29240 - Specific
specific - -
Unavailable
Problem
problem isis
optimized in
changed
RF Out of certain
from Fault
Modified 29248 - scenarios. - -
Service on the BBP
to Baseband
equipment
abnormal.
6. The value
of the
The
severity of
this alarm
is
X2 Interface
Modified 29204 changed - - -
Fault
from
eNodeB S1 "Major" to
Control Plane "Warning.
Added 29213 - - - -
Transmission " The mechanism for
Interruption reporting and clearing this
alarm is optimized to
S1 Interface
Modified 29201 - - become compatible with -
Fault
ALM-29213 eNodeB S1
The Local Control Plane
Description Transmission Interruption.
S1 Interface
Modified 29201 - alarm - -
Fault
parameter is
added.
M1 Interface The mechanism for
Added 29223 eMBMS - - -
reporting
The this alarm
mechanism for is -
Session Loss optimizedthis
reporting to indicate
alarm isa
failure to set
optimized up an S1a link
to indicate
S1 Interface because
fault of anthere
SCTP is link
a license
that
Modified 29201 - - -
Fault limit on an
carries S1-flex, RAN
eX2 interface
Sharing
when thewith Common
Carriers, RAN Sharing
BASED_ON_EX2_NON_I
The blacklisted
SCTP Link with Dedicated Carriers,
Modified 25888
Fault
- - DEAL_MODE
neighboring type is or
celloption -
Hybrid
under the
added. RAN Sharing.
This alarm is
eX2DynBlackListSwitch
reported when the PCI
Cell PCI Alarm
Modified the parameter
conflicts is selected and
between
Modified 29247 - - the BackhaulType -
Conflict parameters
following blacklisted neighboring
X2Interface
parameters: parameter
cells is set to
or between a
ID,Add
1. CN the NON_IDEAL(Non-Ideal
blacklisted
The neighboringand
alarm generation
X2 Interface Backhaul).
cell and a common
Modified 29204 _ Operator
value of ID, clearance mechanism is _
Fault neighboring cell.
and
parameter improved.
An alarm detection
Description
Possible scenario is added:the
Board are no longer
Cause heartbeats of the slave
Modified 26203 Software - -used. -
Secondary core on an LMPT are lost
Program Error
Board for 5 minutes,then this
Board alarm is reported.
Component
Software 1.An alarm detection
Modified 26254 - Software - -
Synchronizatio Added the scenario is added:
Activation
n Failure following the configuration of the
Failure.
Automatic parameters:
Modified
2. Add thethe base station clock
Modified 26255 Version -The 1. Detail
following
value of the -
synchronization mode or -
Rollback value of Modified
Information.
parameters:
parameter frame synchronization
the Alarm following
2. Rollback
Add the value
Possible switch is incorrect.
External Clock Level is parameters:
Version.
of parameter
Cause 2.For scenarios in which
Modified 26262 Reference changed 1. The value -
specific
Automatic SYNCETH clock quality
Problem from of the
Base Station Minor to problem
recovery of levels are unavailable, the
Frame Certificate
Abnormal alarm detection
Major/Min hot
Type patches
is
Added 26265 Number -or. Peer
-failed.System mechanism
- is optimized. -
Synchronizatio changed
Clock. from 3.An alarm detection
n Error Added
CRL tothe scenario is added: clock
following
CERTWHITEL desynchronization
License on
Modified 26817 -The parameters:
STFILE. -interference.
1. The time validity check -
Trial value of Grace
2. Add thePeriod is added to the certificate
the Alarm ExpireofDate.
value validity check for files of
Level is
Certificate parameter trust certificates.
Modified 26841 changed -
Invalid Certificate 2. The date validity check
from
Type CRL. is added for the device
Local Access Major to 3. Add the certificate referenced by
Maintenance Major,Su value of the
Added 26844 -ggestion. - - IKEPEER MO. -
Device parameter
Abnormal specific
problem Not
Exist.
4. Add the
value of
following
parameters:
The
Parameter
meaning of
Configuration the
Modified Receive the
Added 26247 - -following
Bc. Packets - -
Failure
Per Sec. is
parameters:
Ethernet Port The method of measuring
changed
1. The value from
Broadcast Modified the the average number of
Average
of the Service
Modified 25879 Packets - following receive broadcast packets -
number
Type is of
Exceeding parameters: onThe
1. an Ethernet port is
switch controlling
broadcast
changed from
Alarm
MAC Added
1. The the corrected.
mechanism is optimized
Excessive
packets
RSL
following tovalueper
GSM for
Modified 25881 - of
second the Service
Modified
Signaling the - reporting this alarm. -
Frame Error parameters:
Type
Modified
within is30s the 2.
1. The reporting
Rate following
Link.
Trunk No..
changed
following
after
parameters:this from mechanism of this alarm is
2. The value
RSL to
parameters:
alarm
Delete isGSM
the optimized for the scenario
Modified 25886 IP Path Fault - of the Service ALM-25886 SCTP IP Path -
Signaling
The
reported where ALM-25888
value
Type isof to FaultFault
and ALM-29204 X2
Link.
Parameter
Average from
parameter Link is
changed Interface Fault are
2.
meaning
number
ServiceThe to value
of
of
Type simultaneously reported
NULL eX2- reported simultaneously.
SCTP Link of
the the
broadcast
M1. PeerService
IP with ALM-29201 S1
Modified 25888 - AP. 3. The restriction -
Fault Type
Address is Interface Fault or onALM-the
3. Add theis
Packets
numberX2 that this alarm is
changed 29204 Interface.
received
value of from
in a The alarm is correlation
NULL
Peer
second IPto eX2- reported
2. The alarm reportingwith
lifted.
SCTP Link parameter the following alarm is
Modified 25889 - AP.
address
among to 30 mechanism is optimized in -
Congestion Servicethe Type added:
3.
Peer
secondsAdd IP the scenarios where theSCTP
ALM-25888 eX2
So-AP. Link Fault.Backhaul Type
value Interface
IKE 4. Addof
address
before
Modified
(If
the
thethe
parameter
IKE
alarm of
Modified is the parameter is set to IDEAL.
Modified 25891 Negotiation - value
following - -
Service
redundancy
generated.
following
parameter Type
Failure parameters:
So-AP.
backup
parameters:
Service Type 1. The reporting
1.
4.
becomesAdd
Add the
thethe The reporting mechanism
IP PM 1. Delete the mechanism
Modified
uX2-AP.
value
value
invalid ofduring
of of this alarmof is this alarm is
optimized
Modified 25900 Activation - -following
value
5. Add the of optimized in scenarios -
parameter
parameter
IPSec in scenarios where the
Failure parameter where
parameters:
value
specific
Service
redirection,
of
Type DSCP a user-plane
value path is
is modified.
Base Station Service
1. The
parameter
problem Type
value
DOS faulty.
uX2-AP.
the
M1.
of IP
the
Service Service
Type 2. The switch controlling
Modified 25950 Being - Attack. -The reporting -
Attacked
5.
Type
NULL.
2.
Addisthe
address
2. Add
Add
thein
the is mechanism is mechanism
optimized
value
the
value of
alarm
of of this alarm
for reporting thisis modified:
alarm.
changed
value of from Before the upgrade, this
parameter
peer
parameter
RSL IP
to GSM 3. The reporting
User Plane parameter alarm is reported
Modified 25952 - Service
addresses
Service
Signaling
specific
Type
Type mechanism of thiswhen
alarmthe
is -
Path Fault NULL.
configured total number of ALM-
uX2.
Link.
problem optimized for the scenario
by
3. the value
Add master
the 25886 IP Path faultUser
where ALM-25952 and
2.
SourceThe MAC ALM-25952 User Plane
User Plane IKEPEER.).
value
of of
the Service Plane Path Fault and
Added 25954 - Address
-parameter Path Fault exceeds 16; -
Fault Type
Attack. is ALM-29204 X2 Interface
Service Type After the upgrade,
Fault are reported this
changed from alarm is reported when the
SCTP Link IP eX2. to eX2-
NULL simultaneously.
4. total number of ALM-
Modified 25955 Address - AP.Add the 4. The restriction
-25886 IP Path
on the
fault andis -
Unreachable value
3. Addof the number that this alarm
parameter ALM-25952 User
reported is lifted. Plane
value of Path Fault exceeds 16 for
DNS Service Type
parameter
Added 25958 Resolution - -Service
X2&eX2.Type the
- same service type. -
Failure So-AP.
4. Add the
Board Memory value of
Deleted 26201 - - - -
Soft Failure parameter
Board Flash Service Type
Available uX2-AP.
Deleted 26209 - -5. Add the - -
Space
Insufficient value of
Board parameter
Configuration Service Type
Deleted 26243 - - - -
Data NULL.
Ineffective
ESN Read
Deleted 26102 - - - -
Failed
1. The alarm detection
mechanism is optimized
for the chip soft failure.
Board
2. The alarm detection
Modified 26200 Hardware - - -
mechanism is added for
Fault
the problem that the BRU
is reset repeatedly in a
short period of time.
when the Distance
based inter-RAT
handover to
GERAN(FDD) and
Distance based
inter-RAT handover
to UTRAN(FDD)
license items are
unavailable and the Upgrade Description
Compatible with TheChange
alarm
Involve the NBI distance-based
Before the upgrade,
the NBI detection
Reason Upgrade Impact Preventive Measure
handover
after the faults in the
mechanism
measurement
SCTP link of an target
S1
has been
The alarm to object type
interface areis set to
No N/A optimized Before the upgrade, -
detection EUTRAN,
rectified, ALM-
ALM-
increase the after the faults in the
mechanism 26812 System
29201 S1 Interface
alarm SCTP link
has been
reporting
Dynamic
Fault the X2
withTrafficof an
No N/A The alarm to
optimized interface
Exceeding
Specific are Licensed
Problem -
accuracy.
detection rectified,
In theisparameterALM- set
combined
increase the Limit
alarm mistakenly
mechanism
alarm 29204
RRU
reported.
to X2After
scenario,
Lower-layer Interface if
the
link
has been Before
Fault
one RRUwiththeis upgrade,
the
reporting
The alarm to upgrade,
fault ALM-
may persist.
No N/A optimized if ALM-29240
Specific
unavailable Problem Cell
before -
accuracy.
detection 26812
After
Before the System
the upgrade,
upgrade,
increase the Unavailable
alarm
the parameter
upgrade, with
the the
set
RF
mechanism Dynamic
this
when alarm
the Traffic
is cleared
CDMA
alarm Specific
to
UnitLower-layer
Before Service Problem
the upgrade, link
has been Exceeding
in the preceding
optimization Licensed
switch
reporting
The alarm to alarm
fault may
Unavailable
when parameter
all persist.
the and
LTE set
No N/A optimized Limit
scenario.
switch willon not
the be -
accuracy.
detection to
Cell
FDD Physical
After the
Capability
or TDD resource
upgrade, cells
increase the mistakenly
eNodeB isis reported
turned
mechanism fault
this
Degraded
are is reported,
alarm
deleted, cleared
alarms
ALM- the
alarm in
on the
and preceding
the license
has been Specific
in
are the
26819 reported. Problem
preceding
Data After
reporting
The alarm to scenario.
on
No N/A optimized
accuracy. - the
alarm
scenario.
the eNodeB
parameter
upgrade,
Configuration onlywill -
detection
increase the expires
be set toor
the Cell CapabilityRFthe module
Exceeding Licensed
mechanism
alarm license
abnormal
Degraded fileor on theis
alarm
Limit may persist,
has been eNodeB
reporting
The alarm to and the does not
Baseband
reported.
No N/A optimized
accuracy. contain
equipment the license -
detection corresponding
increase the item
abnormalfor E-UTRAN-
after the
mechanism license item cannot
alarm to-CDMA2000
upgrade.The value
has been be queried by
reporting hanover,
Incorrect reported
settings
No N/A optimized to running the CHK of -
accuracy. ALM-26819
This alarm
increase the DATA2LIC Data
cell-level
Before the upgrade,
has been Configuration
parameters
this alarm isAfter
command. of
not the the
alarm
optimized Exceeding Licensed
reporting to Specific
upgrade,Problem
reported when
this all
alarm
Yes Yes improve Limit isparameter
not incleared
accuracy.the alarm
cells are
is cleared abnormalthe in -
alarm after
ALM-29240
and a
the license
base
preceding scenario. Cell file
station
This alarm
locating containing
Unavailable this item
works in single
has
The been is loaded. After
capability. reported
mode. Afterbefore the the the
Yes Yes added to
correlation Before
upgrade,
upgrade the upgrade,
isreported
changed -
if the
improve O&M
detection this alarm
ALM-26819
to Invalid is Data
not
The alarm switch for parameter
reporting
efficiency.
mechanism generated
Configuration
setting after whenthe
detection ALM-29249
Assume that eNodeB
both
between LTE
Before control-plane
Exceeding
upgrade.The
Out of the
Service upgrade,
Licensed
value
isOut on,
No N/A mechanism ALM-29248 RF -
alarms has protocols
this
Limit
License
this alarm
is cleared
alarm are
is
limitation
is notunder
in or
has
beenbeen of Service
flood attack. and ALM-
The an
generated
the preceding
multi-mode
reported inwhenlicense
the
optimized
optimized toto 26200
Assume
alarm isBoard
that
generated both
The RRU
scenario.
limitation
preceding object is
ofFault
the
scenario.
make
improve theO&M Hardware
ALM-29240
after the Problem
upgrade.Cell
No N/A correlation removed.
Specific The alarm -
alarm
efficiency. exist on the and
Unavailable
detection is generated
alarm parameter afterin
locating more eNodeB,
ALM-26200 andBoard ALM-
mechanism the upgrade
ALM-29240 when
Cell
accuracy, 29248
The
between an RRU object of
Hardware
Unavailable
RF Out
Fault is
No N/A improving the
correlation Service
exist on is the triggered -
alarms has removed.
reported before the
O&M
detection by a baseband
eNodeB, and ALM-
been
The alarm
efficiency. upgrade is changed
mechanism resource
29240 Cell problem.
optimized to
parameter to Insufficient
between Before
Unavailable the upgrade,is
No N/A improvehave
values O&M license -
alarms has the two after
triggered by atheare
alarms
efficiency.
been upgrade.
been
The alarm not correlated.
baseband
Before andresource
after Afterthe
optimized
optimized to the upgrade,
parameter to problem.
upgrade, the the the
Before
make
improve theO&M two alarms
upgrade, the are two
Yes Yes values have Specific Problem -
alarm
efficiency. correlated.
alarms are changes not
been parameter
locating more Before
correlated. and after the
After the
optimized in certain scenarios.
accuracy, to upgrade,
upgrade, the two the
make the the
improving
Yes Yes Specific
alarms are Problem -
alarm
O&M parameter
correlated. changes
locating
efficiency.more
in certain scenarios.
accuracy,
improving the
O&M
efficiency.
After the upgrade,
this
Before alarm theisupgrade,
The severity reported when
ALM-29213 eNodeB the
Before
status
S1 Control ofthe allupgrade,
the
Plane
of this alarm
the severity
SCTP
Transmission links (no of this
has been
alarm
fewer than
Interruption is "Major." two)
doesthat
Yes Yes modified to -
After
carry
not exist. the upgrade,
S1 interfaces
After the
improve
This the severity of is this
alarmalarm in an
upgrade, eNodeB
Before theALM- upgrade,
has been alarm
abnormal.
29201
thisdynamic
no isS1 "Warning."
alarm is eX2 This
Interface
not
accuracy.
The alarm
Yes Yes added to alarm
Fault
reported
blacklist isiscleared
cleared
when an
function foris -
detection
improve O&M when the status of
all
Before
S1 S1
link interfaces
the
fails
available. After the upgrade,
to be
mechanism
efficiency. an SCTP link that
when
this
set up
upgrade, ALM-29213
alarm because is not
the
has been carries an S1
eNodeB
Before
Beforeisthe
reported
there
eNodeB the S1
when
achecks
licenseControl
upgrade,
version the
No N/A optimized
The alarm to interface becomes -
Plane
no
eNodeB
limit
whether
upgrade, onTransmission
Local detects
S1-flex,
anthis SCTP alarm that
improve
parameter normal and the
Interruption
Description
SYNC
RAN
link
is that
reported packets
Sharing carries isalarm
when with are
an
alarm
has been status remains
reported.
parameter
lost
eX2 for
Common
each ALM-
X2aninterface
interface is meets
evolved
Carriers, is
reporting
added to normal forAfter 90eX2
Yes Yes 29201
available.
multimedia
RAN S1
faulty. Alarm with
the Sharing
dynamic Interface the -
accuracy.
improve seconds (default
Fault
upgrade, willconditions
broadcast/multicast
Dedicated
blacklist
parameters be
the Local
Carriers,
alarmalarm
This value).
reported again for a
Description
service
or
withinHybrid
X2Interface the (eMBMS)
RAN alarm
ID, CN
location
has been faulty interface after
The alarm parameter
session
Sharing. After
measurement
Operator over is
ID, and the
the M1
Yes Yes accuracy.
added to ALM-29213 eNodeB -
detection available.
interface.
upgrade,
period of about
Description After
this the
alarm
can 2
improve O&M S1 Control Plane
mechanism upgrade,
is reported
minutes
identify specific X2ifthis
thewith alarm the
efficiency. Transmission
has been
This alarm is is reported
Specific
following
interfaces. when
Problem
conditions the
No N/A The alarm
optimized to Interruption
1.When
eNodeB
alarm the
detects
parameter is
NE that -
reported are
After met:
the version
detection cleared.
detects
the number that the
improve
when the
mechanism PCI being
The
upgrade, linkLicense thisof
fails to
alarmbe
alarm
conflicts 1.
SYNC If
current
limited heartbeats
setgenerated
After
is upthe version
packets
in
upon the
upgrade, thelost of
is
first
has been
reporting the
improper
for anslave
preceding eMBMS core
andscenario. on an
between ato setup
this
depending
1. attempt.
alarm
If a clock is onsource the
No N/A optimized
accuracy. LMPT
performs
session
After theare an
over
S1 lost the
link for M1
for5 -
blacklisted The
reported
specific
that does when
X2not interface the
improve minutes,
automatic
interface
which no
theexceeds alarm
version
alarm a
neighboring
alarm
BASED_ON_EX2_
PCI
fault
support conflicts
cause, frame suchisas
cell and a are not reported
rollback,
specified
reported
NON_IDEAL_MOD
between
lower-layer this
threshold.
is
blacklisted
link alarm
reporting synchronization
before
is not setup the
reported upgrade is
No N/A common
The alarm removed,
E option
neighboring
fault, or
under thetheor
cells
failure, -
accuracy. activated,
but this alarm no alarm
neighboring
detection before
license alimit
eX2DynBlackListS
between
and CPBEARER version
a beforeis is no
is reported
reported
rollback after
but is the
cell. This is
mechanism longer
witch
blacklisted
subscription imposed
parameter failure. tois
the
upgrade.
1.When upgrade but this
improves
optimized
An alarm to allow thethe
reported
selected.
neighboring
ALM-29204 after
S1X2 cella and
link
Yes Yes alarm
2. If an
software
version is reported
LBBPcof
rollback. a or -
1. An alarm
alarm
increase
detection the setup,
The
a common
Interface this
BackhaulType alarm
Fault with
after
LBBPd
secondary
2.When theboard upgrade.
the board
U2000
detection
reporting is
alarm
scenario with
parameterthe
neighboring
different Specific
is
specific set
cell. to
2. If the
performs
component
links down SYNCETH
aalarm
self-
orfailstheto
scenario
accuracy
reporting
added
Values forisand
are Problem
NON_IDEAL(Non-
causes can coexist.
clock
healing
be
system quality
activated, reset
resets level
after
this
after
No N/A added
O&M
accuracy.
improving
added for
for parameter
Ideal
When Backhaul).
one being
or -
configured
detecting
alarm
upgrading is not the the
loseon ofare
hot
supporting
efficiency.
fault reporting
Alarm License
If the
multiple conditions
X2limited is
NE is unavailable
heartbeats
reported
patch and beforeon
performs the a
frame
accuracy
Parameters and cleared.
met,
interfacesthe eNodeB
are faulty
and
slave ALM-25880
synchronizati
O&M
of this alarm
version
an
due
Ethernet tocore
automatic
removes theupgrade
the and
same
Link
hot but
link
Fault
Yes Yes on and heartbeats
is
patch
and reported
cause, doesversion
only nonot are
after
one still
report a -
efficiency.
to
Thisaccurately
alarm is reported,
improving lost
version
rollback,
this
1.After
ALM-29204within
alarm. the 1
upgrade.
this hour
alarm
upgrade,
X2
locate faults
parameter is alarm
after theis reported
self-healing
O&M 2.If
is
If
this not
the automatic
Interface reported
conditions
alarm is
Fault hotisare
and improve
added to before
reset, the
ALM-26200 upgrade
efficiency. patch
before
not
reportedmet,
generated. recovery
a hot
this
when The patch
alarm aof a
Yes Yes O&M
facilitate fault but
Board thisfails,alarm
Hardware isalarm -
2. The alarm board
rollback
is
trust
alarmreported but
certificate
is cleared nois
for the theor a
efficiency.
location and reported
Fault after
iscertificate
reported
detection is
link.reported
reported
device
only when after before
all a hot
the X2
improve O&M upgrade.If
before
the upgradethe recoverthe
upgrade
scenario
efficiency.is
patch
referenced
interfaces
SYNCETH
rollback. bybut
clock thethis
Yes Yes optimized for but
alarm
3.When
IKEPEER
from thisisalarmthe MO is
reported -
1.The alarm
improving
quality
1.If
reported
after a the
the
configuration level
cross-R- preceding
after
upgrade. the
of the
To support expires.
fault.
configured
version In upgrade
thison alarm,
the
reporting
fault reporting upgrade.
NE is modified and
GUL 2.This
X2Interface
NE
occurs, alarmalarm
is unavailable is and
ID
mechanism
accuracy and is leads
reported
CN tothis
Operator the
with base ID are
is
Yes Yes maintenance,
modified, and and
-station
not thesatisfying
reported SYNCETH before the -
O&Malarm
This Certificate
displayed Type
as F, and
this alarmthe
therefore is clock
a version
condition is of upgrade
efficiency.
parameter is being
Description is
added.
O&M reconfigured
but is reported
configuration afterafter
3. The to
added alarm CERTWHITELSTFI
displayed as NULL.
efficiency is being
a version
rollback removed,
and upgrade. no
Yes Yes detection
facilitate fault LE andisAlarm -
improved. alarm
2.When
performing reported
the an license
scenarioand
location is Severity being
2.To add the before
file expires,
automatic the upgrade
this
added
improve toO&M Suggestion when
whitelist but
alarm this is
configuration alarm
not is
facilitate fault
efficiency. the following
Yes Yes filtering reported
rollback, after
before
this the a -
identification conditions
upgrade.
version upgrade arealarm met: but
function
and improve is1)not reported
To support 3.
is The
If this
reported IKE
alarm after is a
when
the a digital
O&M before a switch is
GUL verification
reported
version before the
upgrade.
certificate
efficiency. is configuration
Yes Yes maintenance, enabled
-
upgrade by
and running -
used for IKE
this alarm is rollback
the SET but
CERTCFG isclock
negotiation, desynchronization
reported after a
added. command.
interference occurs
the alarm configuration
2) The
after the current
upgrade, base
parameter rollback.
station
the severity doesof not this
and alarm
have
alarman activated
is changed
severity are
certificate
from minorwhitelist to major
modified.
This alarm is occurs if the global
added to alert GTP-U static
operators to detection switch is
When
enabled. theAfter datathe
data
configuration
upgrade, this alarm
configuration
An alarm becomes
is reportedabnormal, when the
becomes
parameter is this alarm is notfault
corresponding
Yes Yes abnormal and -
added, and reported
occurs if before the linka
to improve
therefore the version
GTP-U static upgrade but
alarm
An alarm
fault can be is reportedswitch
detection after ais
reporting
parameter is
Yes Yes more version
-
enabled upgrade.
or if the -
accuracy
added and and
accurately
O&Minvalid setting of link GTP-
therefore
The
located andthe
efficiency.
fault can be U static detection
alarm
the O&M
Yes Yes Alarm
more switch
- follows that -
parameter
efficiency isis
parameter
accurately of the global GTP-U
removed
improved. and
values
located are
and static detection
the alarm
optimized
the O&M switch and the latter
reporting
Alarm
Yes Yes and the alarm
efficiency is is is enabled. -
mechanism
parameter
reporting
improved. 2. If the X2(X2)
modified,
values are and
mechanism check
1. If thebox is and
therefore theis
optimized local
optimized, selected
peer under
IP addresses the
Yes Yes O&Mthe alarm
and -Service -
and therefore When
of an IP the Interface
pathbase are the
efficiency
reporting is
the
The fault
alarm can Alarm
After
station
same Configure
the
as and upgrade,
thosethe of peeran
improved.
mechanism is
be more
reporting Switch
this alarm
equipment
automatically parameter not in
issupport
optimized,
accurately the
Yes Yes mechanism is reported
different
established when
IP PMuser-ALM- -
and therefore
located and ENODEBALMCFG
optimized, 25888path,
versions
plane SCTP andonly Link
the
the
the fault
O&M can MO, ALM-25886 IP
and therefore Fault
transport
ALM-25886 is reported.
network
IP Path
be more
efficiency is Path Fault with
the fault can
accurately between
Fault them
is reported
Yes No improved. -Service Type being -
be more
located and modifies
before the the DSCP
upgrade
The alarm
accurately X2 will be masked.
Alarm
the O&M of
but the
bothIP PM
ALM-25886
reporting
located and If
3. the
When number the numberof this
parameter
Alarm
efficiency is is session
IP Path packet,
Fault and
mechanism
the O&M IKEv2
of this redirections
alarm
No N/A values
parameter are
improved. to alarm is reported.
ALM-25952 User -
optimized
efficiency is exceeds
reported theupgrade,
on aIKEv2
board
added,
values and
are BeforePath
Plane the Fault
improve
improved. O&M redirection
reaches 32, DOS
this
therefore
added
A andthe
scenario in the
are reported "Alarm
afterin
efficiency. attack
alarm threshold
will
fault can
the alarm
which thisbe Cause"
the upgrade is not
"Peer be
when
Yes Yes 300 consecutive
reported
version before
is not the -
more
reporting
alarm is this
When IP the
path is alarm
total faulty.
seconds,
upgrade
supported" this
but will
orpath still
accurately
mechanism
reported is is 2. Before
number oftheIP
A scenario in is
be not
"DSCPand reported
reported modified."after the
located
optimized,
added and
so that upgrade,
faults this
user- alarm
which this before
upgrade.
After thetheupgrade,
upgrade
Yes Yes the O&M
and
this therefore
alarm is is reported
plane path faults when the -
alarm is can but
the is reported
reported after
"Alarm
efficiency
the fault
reported is corresponding
exceeds 16, bothfault
Alarm
reported is the
Cause"upgrade.
improved.
be
when more
user- occurs
ALM-25886 ifisthe"DSCPglobal
IP Path
parameter
added
accurately
plane so that
faults modified."
GTP-U
Fault and staticALM-
Yes Yes values
this are
alarm
located and is detection switch is -
occur, and 25952 User Plane
optimized,
reported
the O&M the
therefore enabled.
Path Fault After
are the
and
when
alarm therefore
the
efficiency
can isbe If the DNS
upgrade,
reported client
this
before alarmthe
the
DNS fault
improved.
more can
client initiates
is reported
upgrade domain
butwhen only the
Yes Yes - -
be more
initiates
accurately name resolution
corresponding
this alarm is fault to
accurately
domain
reportedname and the DNS
occurs if instead
reported server
the link and
located
O&M and
resolution to a domain
GTP-U
after thestatic name fails
upgrade.
Yes Yes the O&M
DNS
efficiency is to
detection switchthis
be resolved, is -
efficiency
server
The andisa
invalid
improved. alarm
enabled is not or if the
improved.
domain
alarm is name reported
setting ofbefore link GTP- the
fails to be
deleted to upgrade
U but
static detection is
Yes No resolved,the and -reported after the -
improve switch follows that
The
O&M invalid
therefore the upgrade.
alarm is of the global GTP-U
alarm can be
efficiency. static detection
deleted
more to
Yes No -
switch and the latter -
improve
accurately the
The
O&M invalid is enabled.
reported
alarm is and
efficiency.
O&M to
deleted
Yes No efficiency is - -
improve the
The invalid
improved.
O&M
alarm is
efficiency.
deleted to
Yes No - -
improve the
O&M
efficiency.
baseband chip
experiences a soft
failure. After the
upgrade, this alarm
The alarm
is reported when the
detection
baseband chip
mechanism is
experiences a soft
No N/A optimized for -
failure and its self-
improving the
healing fails.
O&M
2. When the BRU is
efficiency.
reset repeatedly in a
short period of time,
this alarm is not
reported before the
upgrade and is
reported after the
upgrade.
cription
Applicable Mode
Suggestion
- G,U,L
- L
- L
- G,U,L
- L
Handle this alarm
based on the
impact on the
L
system as
described
Handle thisinalarm
the
alarm
by reference.
referring to the
alarm reference for L
the eNodeB
Handle after
the alarm
the upgrade.
according to the
impact of the
GUL
alarm on the
Handle thethe
system in alarm
according to the
alarm reference.
impact of the
L
alarm on the
Handle thethe
system in alarm
according to the
alarm reference.
impact of the
L
alarm on the
Handle thethe
system in alarm
according to the
alarm reference.
impact of the
L
alarm on the
Handle thethe
system in alarm
according to the
alarm reference.
impact of the
L
alarm on the
Handle thethe
system in alarm
according to the
alarm reference.
impact of the
L
alarm on the
system in the
alarm reference.
- L
Handle this alarm
according to the
instructions in the L
alarm reference for
the eNodeB.
- L
- L
- L
- L
- L
Handle this alarm
based on the
impact on the
L
system as
described in the
alarm reference.
- L
- L
- L
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.
- L
- L
- L
- L
Handle this alarm
with recommended
L
actions based on
system impact.