You are on page 1of 1

WILMON AUTO SUPPLY V.

CA
208 SCRA 108
FACTS:
Wilmon was the lessee of a commercial building and bodegas standing on a registered land owned in
common by the Lacsons, Solinap, and Jarantilla. The leases were embodied in deeds wherein one of the
clauses provided for a reservation of rights—the seller has the right to encumber or sell the property
provided that the transferee would respect the lease of Wilmon. On a relevant date, after the expiration of the
lease period, the premises were sold to Star Group Resources and Development. The latter instituted an
action for unlawful detainer against Wilmon. Wilmon impugned Star’s right to eject them. It alleges that its
right of preemption has been violated, as well as their leasehold rights, and that it was denied the option to
extend the lease. These same propositions were also raised in the case it filed with the RTC. In the unlawful
detainer cases, it was decided by the MTC that the case should proceed against some of the lessees but not
with the others. The lessees filed a motion for reconsideration but it was denied. They filed a petition for
certiorari and the RTC held in the end that the pendency of the case in the RTC didn't warrant suspension of
the unlawful detainer case with the MTC.

HELD:
An ejectment suit cannot be suspended by an action filed with the RTC based on a tenant’s claim of his right of
preemption was violated. The actions in the RTC didn't involve physical possession and on not a few
occasions, that the case in the RTC was merely a ploy to delay disposition of the ejectment proceeding

You might also like