TYPICAL DESIGN OF 10.

5 M SPAN RC SLAB BRIDGE

RC slab is designed as simply supported slab.Transverse analysis for different loading on the bridge is made
for determining the respective span and support moment and shear forces.RC slab is designed as per IRC 6 2017

1).Loads

i).Dead Load

Self weight of Deck slab

Self weight of Wearing coarse
Self weight of Crash barrier

ii).Live Load

70R Wheel
Class A
Live load on Footpath

2).Load Combination

i)Self weight of Deck slab + Wearing coarse + Crash barrier+ Dead load on foot path +
+Live load on Footpath + 1L - 70R Wheel load for every two lanes

ii)Self weight of Deck slab + Wearing coarse + Crash barrier + Dead load on foot path +
+ Live load on Footpath + 2 Lane Class A'

10500
500 7500

CRASH BARRIER

10500

DESIGN DATA
Chainage
Center to center span
Center to center span (skew)
Average depth of Slab
Deck Width
Deck Width (skew)
Clear Carriage way width
Width of Crash barrier
Width of Handrail
Height of crash barrier
Height of HAND
Wearing coat thickness
Density of Concrete
Density of Wearing coat
Grade of Concrete
Grade of Steel
Footpath width
Footpath thickness
Carriage way slope
Carriageway Width More than 7.5m

p = p' - 40L-300 40 X
= 500 -
9

Live Load of Footpath 444.44 =

DISPERSION AREA

65

Dispersion width / Length

Class A
(IRC :6-2017,Page 11)
500 b =
w =

380 250

630

Disperssion length = 250 + 2 x

b1 = 380 mm

Disperssion width = 500 + 2 x

l1 = 630 mm

70R WHEEL
(IRC :6 - 2017, Page 9)
860
b =
w =
361 231

990

Disperssion length = 231 + 2 x

b1 = 361 mm

Disperssion width = 860 + 2 x

l1 = 990 mm

IMPACT FACTOR

Class A
(IRC: 6 - 2017, CL:208, Page 24 )
Span length = 11175 mm

Impact Factor = 1 + 4.5

6 +

= 1 + 4.5
6 +
= 1.26

70R Wheel
(IRC: 6 - 2017, Cl 208.4, Page 25 )

Impact Factor = 1.25

LOAD COMBINATIONS
COMB - 1
2 LANES OF CLASS -A

500 400 1800 1700 1800

57 57 57

10500

COMB - 2
1 LANE OF CLASS - 70R

500 1630 1930

85 85

10500

BENDING MOMENTS AND SHEAR FORCES FROM STAAD MODEL :

S.NO MOMENTS DUE TO UNIT BENDING MOMENT

A DEAD LOAD CONDITION
1 SELF WEIGHT KN - M 314.32
2 CRASH BARRIER KN - M 27.29
3 HAND RAILS KN - M 35.93
4 WEARING COARSE KN - M 17.02
5 FOOTPATH DEAD LOAD KN - M 0.00

B LIVE LOAD CONDITION WITH IF

1 FOOT PATH (LL) KN - M 23.39 -
2 COMB - 1 (2L CLASS -A) KN - M 185.24 233.7690266
3 COMB - 2 (1L CLASS -70R) KN - M 183.61 229.5127119
TOTAL DEAD LOAD MOMENT KN - M 539.462
TOTAL LIVE LOAD MOMENT KN - M 377.552
DESIGN BENDING MOMENT KN - M 917.014

S.NO SHEAR FORCE DUE TO UNIT SHEAR FORCE

A DEAD LOAD CONDITION
 1 SELF WEIGHT KN 98.44
2 CRASH BARRIER KN 14.07
3 HAND RAILS KN 19.07
4 WEARING COARSE KN 7.29
5 FOOTPATH DEAD LOAD KN - M 0.00

B LIVE LOAD CONDITION WITH IF

1 FOOT PATH (LL) KN 12.03 -
2 COMB - 1 (2L CLASS -A) KN 87.97 111.0140314
3 COMB - 2 (1L CLASS -70R) KN 85.76 107.2033898
TOTAL SF FOR DEAD LOAD KN 190.382
TOTAL SF FOR LIVE LOAD KN 180.360
DESIGN SHEAR FORCE KN 370.742

DESIGN OF DECK SLAB

DESIGN BENDING MOMENT M

DEPTH AT SECTION D
CLEAR COVER FOR REINFORCEMENT
DIAMETER OF THE MAIN BAR
DIAMETER OF THE TRANSVERSE BAR

Effective depth of the section d

Effective depth of the section d
Partial safety factor for CONCRETE
( IRC:112 - 2011 , CL : A2.10, Pg.no : 242)
Partial safety factor for STEEL

Design Value of Concrete compression strength fcd =(0.67*fck)

(Page 87,Cl 10.3.1,IRC 112-2011) γm
Design Value of the strength of Steel in Flexure fyd =(fSy)
(Page 87,Cl 10.3.1,IRC 112-2011) γm
Mean value of axial tensile strength of concrete fct,eff
(As per IRC : 112-2011 , Pg.no : 38 , Table : 6.5)

Effective strength
For fck < 60 Mpa ( IRC:112 - 2011 , Eq.A2-35 , Pg.no : 242)

Effective height of the compression zone

For fck < 60 Mpa ( IRC:112 - 2011 , Eq.A2-33 , Pg.no : 242)

εcu2
b 0.0035

X = 79.51

d d=

As

εs 0.0022
Limiting depth of neutral axis, for grade of concrete M 35 As per (IRC :112-2011, Table 6.5

Modulus of elasticity of steel

Strain in steel

Depth of neutral axis

Depth of neutral axis

Limiting lever arm

Limiting lever arm

Limiting lever arm

Actual N.A depth X

d

X = 1 -
d
Actual Lever arm distance

UNDER REINFORCED

Area of the stress diagram

Limiting Lever arm distance

Actual lever arm
Breadth of the section considered
Resisting moment
MR = 0.35733 x
MR = 0.35733 x
MR = 0.22042401

MR = 0.1660 x

Ultimate / Design moment

Check

CHECK FOR DEPTH :

We know that,

Effective Depth required

Effective Depth required
Effective Depth provided

MAIN REINFORCEMENT :

We know that , Ultimate /Design Bending moment

Therefore , Area of steel required

Area of steel required

Area of steel required

MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT :

A. Minimum area of steel reinforcement

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 16.5.1.1 , Eq : 16.1 ,Pg.no :175)
B. Minimum area of steel reinforcement
(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 16.5.1.1 , Eq : 16.1 ,Pg.no :175)

C. Minimum area of steel reinforcement for crack control

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 12.3.3 , Eq : 12.1 ,Pg.no :122)

Absolute value of max. stress permitted in the reinf.

Immediately after formation of the crack = fyk

Area of concrete within tensile zone

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 12.3.3 ,Pg.no :123)

Coeff. for reduction of restraint forces

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 12.3.3 ,Pg.no :124)

Coeff. of stress distribution

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 12.3.3 ,Eq:12.3,Pg.no :124)
But ,

There fore ,

Minimum area of steel reinforcement for crack control

Area of steel required

Spacing required
Spacing Provided

Spacing should be lesser of 2D or 250 mm 2D = 1660 mm

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 16.6.1.1(4) , Pg.no :181)

Provide 25 mm dia of bars @ 150

Area of steel provided

Minimum reinforcement 1132.040

Provide 16 mm dia of bars @ 150
Area of steel provided

TRANSVERSE / DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT :

Minimum reinforcement in transverse direction in one way slab should be atleast 20% of the main reinforcemen
(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 16.6.1.1(3) , Pg.no :181)
Area of distribution reinforcement required

Spacing required
Spacing Provided

Spacing should be lesser of 3D or 400 mm 3D = 2490 mm

(As per IRC:112-2011 , CL : 16.6.1.1(4) , Pg.no :182)

Provide 12 mm dia of bars @ 150

Area of steel provided Ast (dist.provd)

Ast (dist.reqd)

Percentage of distribution reinforcement provided

CHECK FOR SHEAR :

DESIGN SHEAR FORCE

Depth at maximum shear

The design shear resistance of the member

(IRC:112-2011, cl. 10.3.3,Pg. 88)
Where , Coefficient ; Factor

Reinforcement ratio

Compressive stress in the concrete from axial load

Axial load
Therefore,
The design shear resistance of the member

The slab can withstand a shear of 355.4596 KN/m without providing any shear reinforcement
Minimum shear resistance

Check
IRC:112-2011, cl. 10.3.3,Pg. 88
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQ

SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQ

(HENCE THE DIFFERENCE IN DESIGN SHEAR FORCE AND SHEAR RESISTING CAPACITY OF THE SECTION IS MINIM
IS PROVIDED FOR THE CONCEALED EDGE BEAM.)

SERVICIBILITY CHECK
1. CRACK WIDTH OF SLAB

Wk = Sr,max x (εsm - εcm) (IRC :112 -2011, Cl 12.3.4, Page 1

Sr,max = 3.4c + 0.425 k1 k2 Φ (IRC :112 -2011, Cl 12.3.4, Page 1

ρ p.eff

Φeq = n1 Φ12 + n2 Φ22

n1 Φ1 + n2 Φ2
(IRC :112 -2011, Cl 12.3.6, Page 129)
c = Clear cover to the longitudinal reinforcement
k1 = Co-efficient which takes account of the bond properties of the bonded reinforcement
k2 = Co-efficient which takes account of the distribution of strain
ρ p.eff = As / Ac.eff
As / Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinforcement, of depth hc,eff ,
where hc,eff is the lesser of 2.5 (h-d); (h - x/3); or h/2
W(max) = Maximum crack width as per Table : 12.1 of IRC:112-2011 of Pg.no: 122
σsc = Maximum allowable value from table: 12.2 of IRC:112 - 2011 of Pg.no : 162
x(actual) = 79.51 mm (IRC :112-2011, Page 71 )
h = 830
d = 780
hc,eff , = minimum of
= 2.5 x (h-d) or (h-x) /3
= 125 or 250.1635777
hc,eff , = 125 mm (In Tension Zone)

705
125
1000

ρ p.eff = As / Ac.eff

(εsm - εcm) = σsc - kt (fct,eff / ρp.eff) (1+ αe ρp.eff) ≥ 0.6 (σsc / Es)
Es
 c mm 40
k1 0.8
k2 0.5
fck N/mm2 35
As mm2 3272.5
Ac.ef mm2 125000
ρ p.ef = As / Ac.ef 2.6180
Φ1 mm 25
Φ2 mm 12
n1 No 7
n2 No 7
Φeq mm 21
Sr,max mm 53.3
σsc N/mm2 222
kt 0.5
fct,eff N/mm2 2.8
Es N/mm2 2.0E+05
Ecm N/mm2 32000
αe 6.3
(εsm - εcm) 0.0011
0.6 (σsc / Es) 0.0007
SAFE
Wk mm 0.06
Limiting crack width
mm 0.30
W(max)
SAFE

2.STRESS CONTROL CHECK

Overall depth D or h = 830 mm

Effective depth deff = 778 mm
Depth of neutral axis h/2 = 415 mm
Breadth b = 1000 mm
Moment of inertia I = bh3/12 = 4.765E+10 mm4

BM - Rare comb M (RARE COMB) = 649.27 kN-m

BM - Quassi Permanent
comb M(QUASI COMB) = 397.96 kN-m
Grade of concrete fck = 35 N/mm2
Grade of Steel Fe 500 N/mm2
If the section is un-cracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom
of the section respectively would be
Stress in Rare comb σ top =σ bot = 5.65 Mpa
 Stress in Quassi comb σ top =σ bot = 3.47 Mpa
fctm = 2.80 Mpa
From table 6.5 for M 35
σ top =σ bot > fctm Hence Section is Cracked
Hence Section is Cracked
If Section is cracked, Stresses need to be calculated ignoring concrete in tension.
The relevent modular ratio, αeff, depends on the proportion of long and short-term loading

A) CHECK FOR STRESSES ASSUMING SHORT TERM CREEP AND ELASTIC MODULUS.

Yongs modulus of steel (ES) = 2E+05 Mpa

Yongs modulus of concrete (Ecm) = 33000 Mpa
Thus, Ec,eff = Ecm = 33000 Mpa
Area osf steel (AS) = 3272.49 mm2
Breadth b = 1000 mm
eff depth d (or) (d eff
) = 778 mm
BM in Rare comb MED (RARE) = 649 KN-m
BM in Quassi permanent comb MED (QUASSI) = 397.96 KN-m
CHECK FOR�_�=(−𝐴_𝑆
COMPRESSION STRESSES
𝐸_𝑆+√( 〖〖 (𝐴 〗 _𝑆: 𝐸_𝑆) 〗 ^2+2𝑏𝐴_𝑆 𝐸_𝑆 𝐸_� �_𝑒𝑓𝑓 ))/(𝑏𝐸_(�,𝑒𝑓𝑓) )
The depth of concrete in compression from the following equation is :

dc = -3272.49x 2E+05 + (3272.49x 2E+05 )^2 +

1000 x

dc = -7E+08 + 4.28E+17 + 3.3585589E+19

33000000

dc = 156.9 mm

The cracked second moment

�=𝐴_𝑠 ( 〖�−�of_�)
area in steel units
〗 ^2+1/3 from following
𝐸_(�,𝑒𝑓𝑓)/𝐸_𝑠 𝑏 〖� _�equation
〗 ^3 is:

I = 3272.49 x (777.50 - 156.9)^2 + 1 33000

3 2E+05
I = 1260388110 + 2E+08
I = 1472819636.2 mm 4

Modulus of elasticity of concrete ZC = I / dc

ZC = 1472819636
156.9
ZC = 9387086.195 mm3

The concrete stress at�_�=𝑀_𝐸�/𝑍_𝐶

the top of the section from following equation is :
𝐸_(�,𝑒𝑓𝑓)/𝐸_𝑠

RARE COMBINATION :
σc = 649 x 10^6 3.30E+04
x
9387086.19491402 2E+05

σc = 69.17 x 0.165
σc = 11.41 Mpa (or) N/mm2

From Clause 12.2.1, the compression limit in rare combination = 0.48f ck

Rare combination 0.48 x 35 = 16.8 Mpa
0.48fck > σ
16.8 > 11.41 SAFE

QUASSI PERMANENT COMBINATION :

 σc = 398 x 10^6 3.30E+04
x
9387086.19491402 2E+05

σc = 42.39 x 0.165
σc = 7.00 Mpa (or) N/mm2

From Clause 12.2.1, the compression limit in quassi permanent combination = 0.36f ck
Quasi permanent combination 0.36 x 35 = 12.6
0.36fck > σ
12.6 > 7.00

CHECK FOR TENSILE STRESSES :

The reinforcement stress from following equation is :
�_𝑠=𝑀_𝐸�/𝑍_𝑆

RARE COMBINATION :
Zs = I = 1472819636.20708 = 2373213.099
(d-dc) ( 777.5 - 156.9 )

σS = 649 x 10^6
2373213.09909637
σS = 273.584 Mpa
From Clause 12.2.2, the Tensile stress limit in Rare combination = 0.8f yk
Rare combination 0.8 x 500 = 400 Mpa
0.8fyk > σs
400 > 273.584
CHECK FOR FATIGUE ANALYSIS :
If the tensile stress in the reinforcement doesnot exceed 300Mpa under rare combination of servicibility limit st
σs < 300 Mpa
(IRC:SP:105-2015, Pg.no:145,
CL:10.2.2 ) 273.584 < 300 Mpa
�_�=(−𝐴_𝑆
�=𝐴_𝑠𝐸_𝑆+√(
�_𝑠=𝑀_𝐸�/𝑍_𝑆
( 〖�−� 〖〖 (𝐴
_�)
�_�=𝑀_𝐸�/𝑍_𝐶 〗〗^2+1/3
_𝑆 𝐸_𝑆) 〗𝐸_(�,𝑒𝑓𝑓)/𝐸_𝑠
^2+2𝑏𝐴_𝑆 𝐸_𝑆𝑏 𝐸_�
𝐸_(�,𝑒𝑓𝑓)/𝐸_𝑠 �_𝑒𝑓𝑓
〖� _� 〗 ^3))/(𝑏𝐸_(�,𝑒𝑓𝑓) )
 M SPAN RC SLAB BRIDGE

ng on the bridge is made

b is designed as per IRC 6 2017

500 1500 500

HANDRAILS
CRASH BARRIER FOOT PATH

=
= 10500 mm 10.5
= 11175 mm
= 830 mm
= 10500 mm 10.5
= 11175 mm
= 7500 mm
= 500 mm
= 500 mm
 = 900 mm
= 1160 mm
= 65 mm
= 25 kN/m3
= 22 kN/m3
M = 35
Fe = 500
= 1500 mm
= 0 mm
= 2.5 %

20.00 - 300
9

4.4 KN/m
 250 mm
500 mm

65

65

231 mm
860 mm

65

65
 L

11.17496807
 1800 500 1500 500

57

3940 500 1500 500

FACTOR FOR ULS FACTOR FOR SLS

RARE COMBINATION QUASI P.C
424.335 314.32 314.32
36.839 27.29 27.29
48.508 35.93 35.93
29.780 20.42 20.42
0.000 0.00 0.00

26.898 17.542 0
350.654 233.769 0
344.269 229.513 0
539.462 397.96 397.96
377.552 251.311 0
917.014 649.274 397.96

FACTOR FOR ULS FACTOR FOR SLS

 132.895 98.441
18.992 14.068
25.742 19.068
12.754 8.746
0.000 0.000

13.839 9.025
166.521 111.014
160.805 107.203
190.382 140.322
180.360 120.039
370.742 260.361

= 917.014 KN - M
= 830 mm
= 40 mm
= 25 mm
= 12 mm

= 830 - 40 - 12.5
= 777.5 mm
 γm = 1.5

γm = 1.15

fcd = 15.63 N/mm

2

fyd = 434.78 N/mm

2

or fctm = 2.80 N/mm2

η = 1

λ = 0.8

ηfcd
15.63

Fc
λX = 63.61

778

Z= 745.70
d-x = 777

Fs

per (IRC :112-2011, Table 6.5 ,Page 38)

εcu2 = 0.0035
Es = 200000 N/mm2
εs = σs /Es
εs = 0.002
Xlim = εcu2 x d
εcu2 + εs

Xlim = 0.0035 x d
0.0035 + 0.00217
Xlim = 0.6169 d
Xlim = 479.6072797 mm
Zlim = d - Xlim

2
Zlim = 778 - 479.61

2
Zlim
= 538 mm

= 1 - 1 - 2MEd
bd2 ηfcd

1 - 2x 917.01 x 10^6
1000 x 604506 x 1x 15.63

X = 1 - 0.8059322
d
X = 0.102263
d
X = 0.1023 x d
X = 0.1023 x 777.5
X = 79.51 mm
 Z = d - X/2
Z = 778 - 79.51
2
Z = 738 mm

Xlim > X
479.607 > 79.5093
UNDER REINFORCED SECTION - STEEL WILL YIELD

Fc = ηfcd x λXlim
Fc = 1 x 0.67 fck x 0.8 Xlim
1.5
Fc = 0.3573 fck Xlim
Fc = 0.35733 x 35 x Xlim
Fc = 12.51 x 479.61
Fc = 5998.29 N/mm 3

Zlim = 537.70 mm
Z = 737.75 mm
b = 1000 mm
MR = Fc b ( d- (λ/2)*Xlim )
fck b Xlim ( d- (λ/2)*Xlim )
fck b * 0.6169 d ( d- ( 0.40 x 0.6169 d ))
fck b d 2
- 0.05439 fck b d2

MR = 0.16604 fck b d2

35 x 1000 x 777.5 x 777.5

MR = 3512940105.19859 N-mm
MR = 3512.94 kN-m
Mu = 917.0137095 kN-m
Mu < MR
917.0137095 < 3512.94
Mu < MR Design the Section as Singly Reinforced Section

MR = 0.1660 x fck b d2
MR = Mu
Mu = 0.1660 x fck b d2
Mu
d(reqd) =
0.1660 x fck b

d(reqd) 917.0 x 10^6

=
d(reqd) =
0.1660 x 35 x 1000
d(reqd) = 397.24 mm
d(provd) = 777.50 mm
d(reqd) < d(provd)
397.24 < 777.50 SAFE

Mu = Ast fyd z
Ast = Mu
fyd z
Ast = 917.0 x 10 ^6
434.78 x 737.75

Ast = 2858.888 mm2

Ast. Min = 0.260 fctm b d

fyk
Ast. Min = 0.26 x 2.80 x 1000 x 778
500

Ast. Min = 1132.040 mm2

 Ast. Min = 0.0013 bd

Ast. Min = 0.0013 x 1000 x 778

Ast. Min = 1010.750 mm2

Ast. Min = kc k fct,eff Act

σs
σs = 500 N/mm2

Act = 1000 x 698

Act = 697991 mm2

k = 0.65
≤1

kc = 0.4 1- σc
K1(h/h*)fct,eff
σc = Ned
bh
Ned = 0
kc = 0.4

Ast. Min = 1016.275 mm2

Ast (required) = 2858.888 mm2

= 171.70 mm
= 150 mm SAFE

Smax = 250 mm
SAFE

150 mm C/C

Ast (provided) = 3272.49 mm2

Ast (required) ≤ Ast (provided)

2858.888 ≤ 3272.49 SAFE

150 mm C/C
 Ast (provided) = 1340.41 mm2

Ast (required) ≤ Ast (provided)

1132.040 ≤ 1340.41 SAFE

20% of the main reinforcement

Ast (dist reqd) = 20 x 3272.49

100

Ast (dist reqd) = 654.50 mm2

= 172.80 mm
= 150 mm SAFE

Smax = 400 mm
SAFE

150 mm C/C

Ast (dist.provd) = 753.98 mm2

Ast (dist.reqd) ≤ Ast (provd)

654.498 ≤ 753.98 SAFE

= 23 % SAFE
 VEd = 370.74 kN
d = 777.5 SAFE

V Rd.c = [0.12K(80ρ1 fck)0.33+0.15σcp]bd

K = 1+(200/d)1/2 ≤ 2.0
K = 1.507 SAFE
ρ1 = Ast / b d ≤ 0.02
ρ1 = 0.00593 SAFE
σcp = Ned / Ac limited to 0.2 fcd
Ned = 0
σcp = 0.000 N/mm2
V Rd.c = 355459.6281 N
V Rd.c = 355.4596281 kN
ny shear reinforcement
V Rd.c.min = [0.031K3/2fck1/2+0.15σcp]bd

V Rd.c.min = 263842.7409 N
V Rd.c.min = 263.84 kN

V Rd.c ≥ VEd
355.46 ≥ 370.74
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED

V Rd.c.min≥ VEd
263.84 ≥ 370.74
SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED
ITY OF THE SECTION IS MINIMUM, NOMINAL SHEAR REINFORCEMENT

ECK

C :112 -2011, Cl 12.3.4, Page 125)

C :112 -2011, Cl 12.3.4, Page 127)

 = 40 mm
f the bonded reinforcement

orcement, of depth hc,eff ,

of Pg.no: 122
011 of Pg.no : 162

or (h/2)
or 415

830
grade of concrete

(From Table 6.5, pg.no :38 ,IRC:112-2011 )

2 x 1000 x 3272.49 x 2E+05 x 33000 x 778
33000

x 1000 x (156.9)^3
= 0.36f ck
Mpa

SAFE

mm3
 SAFE

bination of servicibility limit state check for fatigue is not reqd.

FATIGUE CHECK IS NOT REQUIRED

Node L/C Force-X kNForce-Y kNForce-Z kNMoment-XMoment-YMoment-Z kNm
8 147 0 114.715 0 0 0 0
5 147 0 104.355 0 0 0 0
2 147 0 88.522 0 0 0 0
7 147 0 66.921 0 0 0 0
28 147 0 52.94 0 0 0 0
31 147 0 43.969 0 0 0 0
32 147 0 41.599 0 0 0 0
29 147 0 41.476 0 0 0 0
4 147 0 -32.698 0 0 0 0
30 147 0 31.54 0 0 0 0
9 147 0 31.063 0 0 0 0
27 147 0 30.14 0 0 0 0
26 147 0 25.179 0 0 0 0
10 147 0 24.357 0 0 0 0
25 147 0 21.808 0 0 0 0
33 147 0 21.676 0 0 0 0
6 147 0 21.319 0 0 0 0
24 147 0 20.618 0 0 0 0
23 147 0 20.057 0 0 0 0
11 147 0 18.643 0 0 0 0
12 147 0 14.861 0 0 0 0
34 147 0 14.425 0 0 0 0
13 147 0 12.392 0 0 0 0
3 147 0 -12.104 0 0 0 0
35 147 0 11.121 0 0 0 0
14 147 0 10.45 0 0 0 0
40 147 0 9.062 0 0 0 0
15 147 0 8.843 0 0 0 0
36 147 0 8.499 0 0 0 0
1 147 0 7.892 0 0 0 0
16 147 0 7.495 0 0 0 0
37 147 0 6.693 0 0 0 0
17 147 0 6.365 0 0 0 0
38 147 0 5.884 0 0 0 0
18 147 0 5.398 0 0 0 0
19 147 0 4.631 0 0 0 0
39 147 0 4.003 0 0 0 0
21 147 0 3.768 0 0 0 0
20 147 0 3.725 0 0 0 0
22 147 0 -1.603 0 0 0 0
PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
FOR "REALIGNING THE WESTERN RING ROAD TO
COIMBATORE CITY"

BAR BENDING SCHEDULE

SPAN 12M STRAIGHT
BAR NO BAR DIA SPACING
1 25 90
2 12 90
3 12 150
4 12 150
5 10 200
6 10 200

BAR BENDING SCHEDULE

SPAN 12M 45 SKEW
BAR NO BAR DIA SPACING
1 32 110
1a 32 110
2 16 125
3 16 125
4 16 125
5 10 200
6 10 200

40