IV.5.

1 PANGKALAN BARU VILLAGE

IV.5.4.a VILLAGE CONDITION: History, Geographichal Location, Demographics, Social, and

Economic.

History

Pangkalan Baru Village is an area in the Siak Hulu Subdistrict, Kampar Regency, which according to

several community leaders Pangkalan Baru Village is known because there was an old village on the

Kampar riverside. The names of the villages are Rantau Panjang, Teluk Sejati and Ambang

Cempedak. Whereas Pangkalan Baru is a transit place for the community from the old village to the

city of Pekanbaru, which according to the language of the community base = the place to drop by. As

the result, the area is called with the name Pangkalan Baru along with a customs from one generation

to the next generation inherited by local people.

Geographical location

Pangkalan Baru Village is located in Siak Hulu Sub-District, Kampar District, Riau Province. It has

an area of 6,250 ha. This village has regional boundaries as follows:

North : Pekan Baru City

South : Buluh Cina Village

West : Desa Baru Village

East : Buluh Nipis Village

The distance of Pangkalan Baru Village to the Sub-District Capital is around 4 km with a mileage

about 10 minutes. While the distance between the village and the capital city of the regency is around

106 km, which can be reached in about 2 hours while the distance between the village and the

provincial capital is 26 km can be reached in about 30 minutes.

 Figure 4. 4 Map of the Pangkalan Baru Village Area
Source: Google maps 11.37 WIB
Demographics

Based on data from the profile of Pangkalan Baru Village in 2018, this village has a total population

of 5,901 with a total of 1,643 families, consisting of 3,072 males and 2,819 females. Based on the

religion of Pangkalan Baru Village in 2016 there are 3 religions embraced by the community, which

encompasess 5,700 people of Islamic faith, 51 of them are Catholics, and 53 of them are Christians.

While data on population based on the type of education are as follows:

- Elementary School / Islamic elementary School: 1,501 people

- Junior High School / Islamic Junior High Schol: 908 people

- Senior High School / Islamic Senior High School: 1221 people

- Bachelor/ Diploma: 50 people

- Dropout: 50 people

- Illiteracy: 10 people

Social Condition

Based on the results of the headman interview, Karya Indah village still has certain cultural

scores. This also affects the diversity of ethnic groups and the principle of togetherness. There are the

tribal and religion in this village and the relationships that are established by the community are good.

The type of places of worship in this village are musola (small moseques) and mosques.
Economics

Based on the results of interviews with the headman, Pangkalan Beru village has financial

institutions managed by the community itself, the types of institutions that exist such as regular social

gathering, savings and loans are managed by agreement. In addition, this village also has space that

can absorb labor, due to the existence of quite extensive plantation land. Existing plantations are in

the form of oil palm plantation which the ownership are classified into community and company

ownership.

Pangkalan Baru Village also has a space to conduct marketing and trading activities in the

form of village markets and Kaget markets. This Kaget market are held every 2 weeks which have a

good role because it supports the community buying and selling process. The classification of the

welfare level of Pangkalan Baru Village based on the results of the Focus Group Discussion (FGD)

with representatives of the community was obtained as follows:

Table 4. 3 Welfare Classifications of Pangkalan Baru Village

Welfare Classification
Characteristics
Rich Modest Middle Down
House ownership Big and luxurious The house is Houses for rent / boarding with
house not rented in-laws, electricity and water
still connect to neighbors.
Vehicle Owning 5 cars (private Minimum Do not have a vehicle
cars, palm lift trucks, have a
steam picks), owning a motorbike
motorbike
Income (salary) Minimum IDR 5 Approximately Under IDR 1 million
million per month IDR 2 million
Type of job Civil Servants /
Entrepreneurs
Education Minimum high school Good Elementary school or not
education graduating from elementary
school
Suraface area Minimum of 1 hectare The area of
land is enough
for a house
Source: results of the FGD of the Pangkalan Baru Village Community Representative Group

Based on the table above, it shows that the classification of welfare levels in Pangkalan Baru

Village is rich, modest, and middle down. The distinguishing features of each of these classifications

are related to house ownership, vehicles, salary , type of job, recent education and extent.
 During the 5-years period the proportion of the classification of the level of welfare of the

population in Pangkalan Baru Village has increased. The increase in proportion was due to the

willingness of the people of Pangkalan Baru village to develop. The increasing quality of the

economy was triggered by the son of the region who had studied outside the area who then returned to

the village to develop the village, so that jobs were available for the community. In 2018 the

proportion of the classification of welfare levels in Pangkalan Baru Village is as follows:

- Rich: 10%

- Modest: 50%

- Middle Down: 40%

IV.5.1.b LIVELIHOOD ASSET

Analysis of community needs is a strategy to find out the potential that exist in community.

Furthermore, analysis of community needs can be seen through what capital already exists in the

form of human capital, social capital, financial capital, physical capital / instruction, and natural

capital. Sub-village that were sampled in this study were Ngrandu, Nglebak, and Kepuhsari. The fifth

position of community capital in Pangkalan Baru Village was presented at the following asset

pentagon:

Source: results of survey data processing in the community of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018
Figure 4.3 The Asset Pentagon of Pangkalan Baru Village

Figure 4.3 shows the condition of the Pangkalan Baru village community based on

community capital using pentagonal assets from the results of data collection by using survey

techniques. Asset of Pentagonal shows an unbalanced form where each community capital has
 different percentages. Based on the results obtained, the percentage of human capital in Pangkalan

Baru Village is 74%, while the percentage of social capital is 66%, the percentage of financial capital

is 65%, the percentage of physical capital / infrastructure is 73% and the percentage of natural capital

is 49 %. From the pentagonal of the asset, human capital and physical / infrastructure capital in the

community of Pangkalan Baru village are capital that have greater percentage than other community

capital in Pangkalan Baru Village. Meanwhile, social capital, financial capital and natural capital are

smaller capital than other community capital.

HUMAN CAPITAL

Human capital or human resources is one of the capital which surely existed in community.

This capital can encourage community development. The quality of human capital can be measured

from the level of education, knowledge, and skills as well as the level of health which in this research

measured in the household sphere. The human capital in the community of Pangkalan Baru Village is

outlined in the following table:

Table 4.11 Variables and indicators of the human capital in Pangkalan Baru village

VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE GAP

OF INDICATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
Education 17% K5 The late 8.33% 1.19% 4.37 5.20% -3.1%
Level education of the
head of family
A6 The late 8.33% 1.19% 4.00 4.76% -3.6%
education in
family member
Knowledge 33% A8 Participation in 9.52% 4.76% 1.23 5.87% -3.7%
and Skill employment /
entrepreneurship
training
A10 Active 7.14% 3.57% 1.53 5.48% -1.7%
participation of
family members
in organizations
within the
community in
the past one
year
A12 The role of 4.76% 1.59% 1.13 1.79% -3.0%
family members
who have
participated
actively in
organizations in
the community
VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE GAP
OF INDICATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
R2 Habits in 2.38% 1.19% 1.10 1.31% -1.1%
recording
household
income and
outcome
R41 Cultivation of 9.52% 4.76% 1.30 6.19% -3.3%
land for
production
processes or
daily needs
Health 50% A13 Number of 25.00% 4.17% 5.37 22.36% -2.6%
Status family members
suffering from
severe illness
A14 The habit of 8.33% 2.78% 2.17 6.02% -2.3%
family members
seeking
treatment at
clinics / health
centers /
hospitals
A15 The ability to 16.67% 8.33% 1.77 14.72% -1.9%
bear health costs
independently
Source: results of survey data processing in the community of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

Table 4.11 displays the variables and indicators used to measure human capital. Then, the

average difference or gap to the weight of indicators which has been predetermined can be seen in

Figure 4.4 below:

Education level

Knowledge and Skill

Health status

-4.0% -3.5% -3.0% -2.5% -2.0% -1.5% -1.0% -0.5% 0.0%

Source: results of survey data processing in the community of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018
Figure 4. 4 Average gap in the variable human capital of Pangkalan Baru village.
 Based on the pentagonal asset of the Pangkalan Baru Village community, the amount of

human capital in the community of Pangkalan Baru village is 74%, where the biggest gap / average

difference between the variables of human capital is the level of education, followed by the

knowledge and skills variable and finally the Health status .

Based on the table 4.11, it can be seen that the level of household education which can be

seen from the indicators of the last household head diploma and the last diploma of household

members, shows that the education level of productive age in household members is at the Senior

High School / equivalent level. This shows that the majority of households who are respondents have

fulfilled the 12-year compulsory education set by the government. This is in line with the results of

the village interview, stating that public education is currently high because most people are aware of

the importance of education, according to the community the level of education is directly

proportional to the level of welfare. In addition, because the village of Pangkalan Baru is the capital of

the sub-district, education up to the senior high school level is easily accessible. At the education level

indicator which has the highest gap is the last diploma of the household member with an average

score of 4, namely Junior High School /equivalent.

The biggest variable that has the biggest gap after the level of education is the variable

knowledge and skills. The biggest gap in the knowledge and skills variables is in the indicators of

participation in employment / entrepreneurship training, where it indicates that community members

tend to never attend employment / entrepreneurship training. But according to the village in the

community interview, it was said that general of the workforce has the skills to become a company

laborer, or gardening or have their own jobs. However, there are also people in the labor force

category who appear to have no skills, this was due to laziness to work that arises from within the

person concerned. This is in line with the R41 indicator, which is the cultivation of land for

production processes or daily needs where there is a high gap. It means that the average respondent

does not work on land for daily needs.

Health status variable is variable that has the smallest gap of the two gaps (in this case-

education level variable and knowledge and skills variables). The indicator that has the largest gap is
the number of household members who suffer from severe illness with an average score of 5.37 which

means that in each household there is 1 person who is seriously ill. But after being studied more

deeply, the average household does not suffer seriously ill. Only a small percentage of respondents

has household members who have serious illnesses, but there are more than 4 people who suffer from

severe illness, resulting in a large gap percentage. In addition, the second highest gap is in the

indicators of the habits of household members seeking treatment at clinic / health center / hospital.

Most respondents stated that if there members of household are sick, They are rare to seek treatment

at a health facility. What interesting is that at the indicator of the ability to bear the health costs, most

of the respondents stated that they are willing to bear the health costs independently. This is in line

with the community interviews which stated that the community in the village is already quite good

economically.

SOCIAL CAPITAL

Social capital has an own definition diversity. At the context of life frameworks, social capital

is a guideline to help the community in achieving livelihoods goals. Social capital is measured

through social networking, participating in the network, trust towards surrounding community, and

informal backing in the community. Furthermore, Social capital of Pangkalan Baru Village

community is available on the table below.

VARIABEL WEIGTH NO INDICATOR WEIGTH OF WEIGTH OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap

OF INDIKATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
Social 10% A9 Organization 5.00% 0.83% 1.56 1.30% -3.7%
Networking Existence in
area of
residence.
A20 Relation 1.67% 0.83% 1.90 1.58% -0.1%
among
village
apparatus.
A21 Interaction 3.33% 1.11% 1.81 2.02% -1.3%
among
village
apparatus.
Participating 20% A10 Being 10.00% 5.00% 1.53 7.67% -2.3%
in the Active
Network participation
in
organization
at the
residence.
A11 Participating 3.33% 0.19% 9.38 1.74% -1.6%
VARIABEL WEIGTH NO INDICATOR WEIGTH OF WEIGTH OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF INDIKATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
in
organization
A12 Taking 6.67% 2.22% 1.13 2.50% -4.2%
action in
organization
at the
residence.
Social Trust 40% A22 Number of 3.48% 0.70% 4.17 2.90% -0.6%
ethnic
groups in the
village
A23 Trust 3.48% 0.87% 2.87 2.49% -1.0%
towards
ethnic
groups
diversity
A24 Number of 3.48% 0.70% 3.03 2.11% -1.4%
beliefs in the
village.
A25 Trust 3.48% 0.87% 2.83 2.46% -1.0%
towards
beliefs
diversity
A26 Opinion of 3.48% 0.87% 2.93 2.55% -0.9%
household
members if
there are
different
neighbors in
the belief /
religion line
living near
the house
A35 Trust to 5.22% 1.30% 2.07 2.70% -2.5%
entrust
children and
home to
neighbors
when going
to work
A36 Trust in any 1.74% 0.43% 2.13 0.93% -0.8%
information
provided by
neighbors
A37 Residential 8.70% 2.17% 2.93 6.38% -2.3%
environment
security
A38 Security for 6.96% 1.74% 2.83 4.93% -2.0%
walking
alone at
night in the
environment
Informal 30% A27 Experience 6.67% 3.33% 1.90 6.33% -0.3%
Backing helping
neighbors
A28 Willingness 2.22% 0.74% 2.67 1.98% -0.2%
to provide
VARIABEL WEIGTH NO INDICATOR WEIGTH OF WEIGTH OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF INDIKATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
assistance
A29 The type of 2.22% 0.37% 1.00 0.37% -1.9%
assistance
that is
available
A30 Intensity in 4.44% 1.48% 1.81 2.69% -1.8%
providing
assistance to
neighbors
A31 The type of 4.44% 0.44% 5.93 2.63% -1.8%
assistance
usually
given
A32 A neighbor's 5.00% 2.50% 1.67 4.17% -0.8%
experience
A33 Intensity is 2.50% 0.83% 1.75 1.46% -1.0%
given
assistance
A34 Types of 2.50% 0.25% 6.80 1.70% -0.8%
assistance
received

Table 4.12 shows a variable and indicator used to measure the social capital. While the

average gap towards weight of indicator that it has been established, can be shown on the figure 4.5

below.

Social Networking

Participating in the Network

Social Trust

Informal Backing

0.00% -0.50% -1.00% -1.50% -2.00% -2.50% -3.00% -3.50% -4.00%

Source: Tabulation result data survey of Pangkalan Baru Village community- Primer data in 2018.
Figure 4.5. Average gap at the social capital variable of Pangkalan Baru Community.

Based on The Asset Pentagon of Pangkalan Baru Village, social capital in the community

indicated 66% score where the biggest average of variable asymmetry from social capital in the
Village community is social networking. Followed up by Participating in the Network, social trust,

and the variable of informal backing indicated the lowest gap.

The reason why the Gap at the network variable occurring because only a few social

organizations are available in the residence (A9). The number of social organizations are predicted

that they can affect to the low of social opportunities for gaining knowledge and chance to gain

opportunities for reaching their subsistence life goals. From the result of the field research, it shows

that there are several organizations are available in the residence; DKM, Business association,

GAPOKTAN (Gabungan Kelompok Tani/Association of Farmworkers), and Karang Taruna (Youth

association). Average number of respondents only knows one organization, or even they do not know

about available organization in their residence. Moreover, the interesting thing is showed on the able

4.12, virtually any respondent recognizes that they know village apparatus which pointed by indicator

of relation among the apparatus (A20) indicates average score 1,9 with the level of Gap in 0.1%. In

other sides, interaction among village apparatus (A21) tend to indicate intensity rare, less than three

times.

At the variable of participating in the networks, indicator which possess the biggest Gap score

is indicator of taking action in the organization at the residence. Nevertheless, based on the indicator

of Being Active participation in organization at the residence (A10), shows that house members tend

to be active to participate in the community. But, based on the score result of indicator of taking

action in the organization at the residence (A12), shows that they tend to be active as members of

organization. The indicator of taking action in the organization also available in the Human Capital

which shows that knowledge and skill of respondent as the house member tend to not gain up to the

leader capacity.

Variable of Informal backing and trust towards the residence community indicated low gap. It

means that helping each other culture and trust among societies are good. The good thing evidenced

by the interview result from apparatus village who states that social scores like deliberation and

mutual cooperation still be strong scores in the community.

FINANCIAL CAPITAL

Financial Capital is the sources of financial used by the community to reach subsistence life

goals. Variable of the financial capital in this research is covering up loan access, family saving fund,

access to the financial board, economics competency. Financial capital from community of Pangkalan

Baru village is available from this table,

Tabel 4. 1 Variabel and Indicator of Financial capital of Pangkalan Baru Village.

VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICAT WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap

OF OR INDICATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABE
L
Loan access 20% A17 Experienc 10.0% 5.00% 1.97 9.83% -
e of 0.2%
borrowing
money
from
financial
institution
s
A18 A place to 6.7% 0.24% 3.00 0.71% -
borrow 6.0%
money
A19 Use of 3.3% 0.67% 5.00 3.33% 0.0%
loans
Family 30% R1 Income 8.0% 2.00% 2.43 4.87% -
savings conditions 3.1%
for
expenditu
re
R4 Savings 10.0% 5.00% 1.17 5.83% -
ownership 4.2%
R5 Form of 3.0% 1.00% 2.00 2.00% -
savings 1.0%
R6 A place to 1.0% 0.07% 6.00 0.40% -
save 0.6%
savings
R7 There is 2.0% 1.00% 1.40 1.40% -
an 0.6%
allocation
of money
saved
R8 Savings 6.0% 1.20% 3.20 3.84% -
intensity 2.2%
Access to 10% R3 The 10.0% 5.00% 1.53 7.67% -
financial existence 2.3%
institutions of easily
accessible
financial
institution
s
 VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICAT WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF OR INDICATOR MULTIPLIER
VARIABE
L
Economic 40% K6 Job status 10.0% 5.00% 1.93 9.67% -
ability of the 0.3%
head of
the
household
A7 Job status 10.0% 5.00% 1.45 7.27% -
/ income 2.7%
of
household
members
K7 Main 6.7% 0.95% 3.71 3.54% -
employm 3.1%
ent status
K8 Type of 3.3% 1.11% 1.00 1.11% -
livelihood 2.2%
A16 Number 10.0% 2.00% 1.53 3.07% -
of 6.9%
household
members
who work
/ earn

Table 4.13 shows variable and indicator used for measuring financial capital. While the gap

average towards weight of indicator which has been established, can be seen on the figure 4.6 below.

Economic capability

Access to Financial Institution

Loan Access

Family Savings

-3.5% -3.0% -2.5% -2.0% -1.5% -1.0% -0.5% 0.0%

Based on The Asset Pentagon of Pangkalan Baru Village, community financial capital has a

percantage of 65% which shows the largest gap in the largest variable is economic capacity. Followed

by access to financial institutions, access to loans and family savings variables with the lowest

average gap with a gap of 0%.

 Economic capability variable is the variable with the greatest weight so that with a large gap

in this variable, this variable is a priority variable that needs to be improved. The variable economic

capability is built by indicators of the employment status of the head of the household, employment

status / income of household members, the main employment status of the head of household, the type

of livelihood of the head of the household and the number of household members who work / earn.

From the Table 4.13, indicator that has the highest gap is the number of household members who

earn. Based on the results obtained, in one family on average there is only one person working /

earning to help with household income. The interesting thing is that almost all household heads of

respondent work / earn. This can be seen in the indicator of the employment status of the head of the

household (K6) which has an average score of 1.93 and has a gap of 0.3%. The main job status of the

respondent's head of household (K7), if you look at the average score, shows that most of the head of

the household is laborer / employee / employee. Whereas the type of livelihood that is cultivated by

the head of household is food crop agriculture. In addition, from the results of community

representatives' FGDs, which were attended by 13 people, most of the Pangkalan Baru villagers

worked as farmers with a percentage of about 50%, the community of Pangkalan Baru who worked as

fishermen is 25% had fishing livelihoods. The proportion of male and female in each livelihood is

relatively the same, which can be seen in the following Table 4.14:

Table 4. 14 Main Livelihoods of the Pangkalan Baru Village Community Based on the Results of the
Community Representative FGD

MAIN TIME LIVELIHOODS

PROPORTION TOTAL
Farmer Fisherman Laborer
Proportion of
50% 25% 25% 100%
Households
Male 25% 25% 19% 69%
Female 25% 0 6% 31%
Location Pangkalan Baru Pangkalan Baru Pangkalan Baru
Source: results of FGD representative of Pangkalan Baru Village community - Primary data in 2018

In addition to having a main time livelihood, the Pangkalan Baru village community,

especially the middle down ones, also has part time livelihood (another). The results of the

community representatives' FGD showed that there were 50% of the livelihoods made by the middle

down ones, while some made the work of ice packets and fried foods as another job, that is 20% of
the middle down ones and sewing by 30% of the same community group. Part time livelihood is not

only done by male groups, but female groups also do it.

Table 4. 15 Part time Livelihoods of the Pangkalan Baru Village Community Based on the Results of
FGD Community Representatives

Rich Modest Middle down

Part time Proporti
No Male Femal Male Femal Male Femal Location
Livelihoods on
e e e
1 Artisan 60% - - V - V -
2 Ice pack and 20% - - - V - - Pangkalan
fried food Baru
traders
3 Tailor 30% - - V V - - Pangkalan
Baru
Source: results of FGD representative of Pangkalan Baru Village community - Primary data in 2018

The common combination of main time livelihoods and part time livelihood is community

groups that have their main livelihoods as farmers and traders of ice and fried foods. However, the

combination itself is not significant, according to circumstances, sometimes there are farmers &

fishermen who sell in front of the house looking for extra money. For the craftsmen themselves,

whoever gets the important job has the skill, and the time is uncertain. In order to sew on their own,

there are mostly women, before there was training in sewing in the Pangkalan Baru village.

Furthermore, the combination of the main livelihoods with part livelihoods, comparison of the time

allocation used and comparison of income obtained, are presented in the following table:

Table 4. 16 Livelihood Combinations of the Pangkalan Baru Village Community Based on the Results
of the Community Representative FGD

Livelihoods Comparison of Comparison of Information

Combination Time Allocation income
Farmers and traders of 40% farmer; 60% 70% farmer; trader Farmers adjust accordingly they
ice and fried foods trader 30% can also become artisans and
fishermen
Fisherman and Fisherman 50%; Fishermen 80%; Customizing fishermen can be
handyman sewing 50% handyman 20% small-scale farmers but not like the
proportion of farmers
Labor and sewing 80% worker; 20% Labor 70%;
artisan or tailor sewing 30%
Source: results of FGD representative of Pangkalan Baru Village community - Primary data in 2018

From Table 4.16, it can be seen that the main livelihood groups as farmers have part time jobs

as traders. According to the occupational community as farmers, the time needed is only for sowing,

caring for and harvesting. To do this, farmers only need about 3 days a week. For part time jobs as
traders, they are carried out from daylight to late afternoon. The income from the main livelihood as a

farmer compared to the trader is more than twice that compared to the part time livelihood as a trader.

In the main livelihood as fishermen and the part time livelihood as a carpenter, the proportion of time

taken is that the community carries out fishermen's work every morning, but there are certain times

when the water recedes the fishermen do part time jobs as artisans. Aside from being a handyman,

people who have fishermen's livelihoods also cultivate agricultural land such as planting sweet

potatoes. In the livelihood as a laborer, a part time business is carried out by the wife of the worker as

sewing.

Table 4. 17 Relationships and Work Systems in the Livelihood Types of the Pangkalan Baru Village
Community Based on the Results of the Community Representative FGD

No Livelihood Types Work relationship Work system Distribution of

Results / Wages
System
1 Laborer Employee Contract Salary / wages

Source: results of FGD representative of Pangkalan Baru Village community - Primary data

in 2018

Labor is one type of part time livelihoods that is done quite a lot by the people of Pangkalan

Baru Village, especially the middle down ones, as for work relations, work systems and profit sharing

or wage systems presented in Table 4.17 show that there is a working relationship between employees

and bosses. The work system is done by contract, with the distribution of results in the form of salary

or wages.

Gap in access to financial institutions is the second largest gap after economic capability. This

is due to the fact that half of the respondents answered that they are easy to access financial

institutions, and half answered that they are not easy to access financial institutions. Based on

interviews with village officials there are no financial institutions that could be accessed in this

village. The community manages money in groups in the form of social gathering.

In addition to the economic capability variable, the loan access variable in Figure 4.6 shows a

large gap. The results found in the loan access variable indicated that the experience of loan money at

financial institutions has an average score of 1.97 (A17) which indicated that almost all respondents
are not accustomed to borrowing money from financial institutions. The respondents who had

borrowed money, most of them tended to borrow money from public financial institutions which can

be seen in the indicator code A18.

Furthermore, in the family savings variable, the percentage of the indicator of income

conditions on expenditure (R1) is 2.43, where this indicates that the majority of respondents do not

know whether their income is greater than their expenditure or not. Respondents tend not to have

savings, this is indicated by the score of 1.17 in the savings ownership indicator (R4). Meanwhile, for

respondents who have savings, based on the percentage of the savings (R5) indicator which is worth

2.00 indicated that the type of savings held tends to be in the form of money.

PHYSICAL CAPITAL

Physical capital / infrastructure is one of the capitals that can support the achievement of

community development and welfare. The physical / infrastructure capital variables in this study

include residence ownership, quality of houses, clean water facilities, defecation facilities, vehicle

ownership, access to health facilities, access to educational facilities, access to economic facilities,

access to religious facilities, access to information, communication facilities, access to community

activity centers, electricity power and cooking fuel sources. The physical / infrastructure capital

owned by the people of Pangkalan Baru village can be seen in the following table:

Table 4. 18 Variables and Physical Capital Indicators of Pangkalan Baru Village

VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF VARIABEL MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
Residence 13.80% R9 Status of 9.22% 1.84% 3.96 7.31% -1.9%
ownership the building
occupied
R10 Floor area 4.61% 0.92% 2.13 1.97% -2.6%
of the house
Quality of 6.40% R11 The 2.13% 0.21% 5.00 1.06% -1.1%
House building's
main
building
material is
the widest
house
R12 The main 2.13% 0.43% 4.60 1.96% -0.2%
building
material for
 VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF VARIABEL MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
the largest
wall of the
house
R13 The widest 2.13% 0.24% 4.97 1.17% -1.0%
type of
house floor
Clean water 12.80% R14 The main 3.48% 0.32% 7.27 2.30% -1.2%
facilities source of
clean water
(for bathing
/ washing /
etc)
R15 Distance of 3.48% 1.16% 2.32 2.69% -0.8%
the source
of clean
water to the
nearest
waste /
sewage /
feces
shelter
R16 User group 1.16% 0.39% 3.23 1.25% 0.1%
R17 How to 2.32% 0.77% 3.00 2.32% 0.0%
access
clean water
R18 Clean water 2.32% 0.77% 2.87 2.22% -0.1%
channels
defecation 11.70% R19 Ownership 1.95% 0.39% 4.57 1.78% -0.2%
facilities and user
groups of
defecation
facilities
R20 The type of 5.85% 1.46% 3.00 4.39% -1.5%
toilet used
R21 Stool 3.90% 0.78% 3.03 2.37% -1.5%
landfill
Vehicle 10.60% R22 Vehicle 7.09% 3.55% 1.80 6.38% -0.7%
ownership ownership
R23 Type and 3.55% 0.89% 2.04 1.81% -1.7%
number of
vehicles
owned
Access to 7.40% R24 Types and distances of health facilities
health facilities Health 1.35% 0.45% 2.40 1.08% -0.3%
center
assistance
Maternal 1.35% 0.45% 2.83 1.28% -0.1%
and Child
Health
Services
Village 1.35% 0.45% 1.67 0.75% -0.6%
 VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF VARIABEL MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
Maternity
Cottage
(Polindes)
Health 1.35% 0.45% 2.70 1.22% -0.1%
center
Hospital 1.35% 0.45% 1.40 0.63% -0.7%
R25 Condition 0.68% 0.34% 1.63 0.55% -0.1%
of road
access to
health
facilities
Access to 8.50% R26 Types and distances of educational facilities
educational Elementary 1.55% 0.52% 2.90 1.50% -0.1%
facilities School
Junior High 1.55% 0.52% 2.77 1.43% -0.1%
School
Senior High 2.32% 0.77% 2.87 2.22% -0.1%
School
University 2.32% 0.77% 1.30 1.01% -1.3%
R27 Conditions 0.77% 0.39% 1.70 0.66% -0.1%
for road
access to
educational
facilities
Access to 9.60% R28 Types and distances of economic facilities
economic Market 2.13% 0.71% 2.77 1.96% -0.2%
facilities
Cooperative 2.13% 0.71% 2.13 1.51% -0.6%
Village- 2.13% 0.71% 1.00 0.71% -1.4%
Owned
Enterprise
Bank 2.13% 0.71% 1.63 1.16% -1.0%
R29 Conditions 1.06% 0.53% 1.70 0.90% -0.2%
for road
access to
economic
facilities
Access to 3.20% R30 Types and distances of worship facilities
religious Mosque 0.58% 0.19% 2.93 0.57% 0.0%
facilities
Church 0.58% 0.19% 1.10 0.21% -0.4%
Shrine 0.58% 0.19% 1.00 0.19% -0.4%
Monastery 0.58% 0.19% 1.00 0.19% -0.4%
Temple 0.58% 0.19% 1.00 0.19% -0.4%
R31 Condition 0.29% 0.15% 1.83 0.27% 0.0%
of road
access to
worship
facilities
Access to 2.10% R32 The type of 2.13% 0.35% 2.00 0.71% -1.4%
information media
 VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF VARIABEL MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
information
that is most
often
accessed
Communication 5.30% R33 Ease of 5.32% 1.33% 3.07 4.08% -1.2%
facilities getting
network /
telephone
signals
Access to the 3.20% R34 The 1.28% 0.64% 2.00 1.28% 0.0%
center of existence of
community a
activities community
activity
center
R35 Distance to 0.64% 0.32% 2.00 0.64% 0.0%
the center
of
community
activities
R36 Road 0.64% 0.32% 1.57 0.50% -0.1%
conditions
to the
center of
community
activities
R37 Location of 0.64% 0.13% 1.83 0.23% -0.4%
community
center
Electricity 4.30% R38 Source of 2.84% 0.71% 3.66 2.59% -0.2%
power lighting
R39 Installed 1.42% 0.24% 2.63 0.62% -0.8%
power
Cooking fuel 1.10% R40 The main 1.06% 0.27% 2.73 0.73% -0.3%
source fuel /
energy for
cooking
Source: results of survey data processing in the community of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

The variables and indicators used to measure physical / infrastructure capital are shown in

Table 4.18. While the average difference or gap to the weight of indicators can be seen in Figure 4.7

below:
 Cooking fuel source
Electricity power
Access to the center of community activities
Communication facilities
Access to information
Access to religious facilities
Access to economic facilities
Access to educational facilities
Access to health facilities
Vehicle ownership
defecation facilities
Clean water facilities
Quality of House
Residence ownership

-2.5% -2.0% -1.5% -1.0% -0.5% 0.0%

Source: Tabulation result data survey of Pangkalan Baru Village community- Primer data in 2018.
Figure 4.5. Average gap at the social capital variable of Pangkalan Baru Community.

Based on the asset pentagonal of the people of Pangkalan Baru village, physical capital /

community infrastructure has a score of 73% where the largest average variable gap from the physical

/ infrastructure capital of the Pangkalan Baru Village community is residence ownership, information

access, vehicle ownership, communication facilities, and defecation facilities. Other variables have a

gap below 1%, namely the quality of homes, access to economic facilities, sources of information.

Other variables have a percentage of almost 0, namely clean water facilities, access to health facilities,

access to educational facilities, cooking fuel sources, access to religious facilities and access to

community activity centers.

From the results obtained, the biggest gap in physics capital is in the ownership variable with

an indicator of the floor area of the house (R10) which is an average score of 2.13. The majority of

respondents have a house floor area of only 37m2 - 45m2, with land ownership status being their own.

However, not a few respondents still rented houses. This is in accordance with the results of

interviews with the village which stated that most of the residents already owned their own homes

even though some of the others were still renting.

In addition, the second largest gap is in the information access variable, this variable is also

important in achieving livelihood goals. Respondents in Pangkalan Baru Village stated that, the type
of information media that is often accessed is only one type (R32), namely the internet. The internet

will be good if people can use it as a media to find positive information, but it can have a negative

effect if it is not used wisely and without direction.

Vehicle ownership can affect the achievement of livelihood goals. This is because, people

who have vehicles can find it easier to access opportunities to find needs in terms of education,

finance and health. From the results obtained, the average vehicle ownership indicator percentage

(R22) is 1.80. The number indicated that the household members who owned vehicles tend to be more

than those who does not have a vehicle, even though the vehicle they own is in the form of two-

wheeled vehicles either on their own or still on credit (R23). The percentage on the R22 indicator also

indicated that the number of respondents who do not have a vehicle is not small.

Variable quality of house, cooking fuel sources, electricity power, clean water facilities, and

good defecation facilities are also predicted to contribute to livelihood goals. These indicate that the

ownership status of the residents of Pangkalan Baru Village is mostly owned by themselves. In

addition, if you look at the average score of the indicators on the variable quality of houses owned by

respondents, the majority of the main building material for the widest house roof is in the form of

zinc. Whereas, for the widest type of house floor (R13) owned by the respondent, it has a percentage

of 4.97 which indicates that most of it is made of cement / red brick but when examined more deeply

there are also respondents who have a floor with a type of soil, bamboo and ceramics although small

amount. For cooking fuel source variables, the results obtained show that the average score of the fuel

/ main energy indicator for cooking (R40) of 2.73 indicates that most still use LPG even though there

are still respondents who use fuel wood. Whereas, for the lighting source variable, based on the score

on the lighting source indicator (R38) which has a score of 3.66, it indicates that the lighting source of

the respondents is mostly PLN electricity with installed power (R39) which is 2.63, which means that

the installed power is 900 watts. However, based on additional information, it was stated that there

were also respondents who still used lamps / torches as sources of lighting and there were also

respondents who connected electricity from neighbors or relatives. Whereas for clean water sources,

based on the average main source of clean water (R14) is 7.27 which indicates the source of clean

water comes from the well bore / pump. But if you look at the data more deeply, most of the
respondents get clean water from protected wells and from unprotected wells. The distance between

the clean water facilities and the distance of the nearest waste / sewage / feces collection (R15) is

more than 10 meters, where the group of users of clean water facilities (R16) is mostly used by the

household itself. Large water indicates that most respondents already have defecation facilities used

by members of their own household, with the type of toilet they have already been in the form of a

toilet.

NATURAL CAPITAL

The natural capital variables discussed in this study are land ownership and livestock

ownership. The following are the results of variables and indicators of the natural capital of Pangkalan

Baru Village.

Table 4. 19 Variables and Indicators of Pangkalan Baru Village Natural Capital

VARIABEL WEIGHT NO INDICATOR WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF AVERAGE SCORE Gap
OF VARIABEL MULTIPLIER
VARIABEL
Land 67% R41 Cultivation / 0% 0.00% 1.30 0.00% 0.0%
Ownership management
of land for
production
processes or
daily needs
R42 Land use 7% 0.95% 1.00 0.95% -5.7%
sector
R44 The total 13% 2.67% 3.00 8.00% -5.3%
area of land
cultivated /
managed
R45 Land 20% 5.00% 4.00 20.00% 0.0%
ownership
status
R46 Events of 27% 6.67% 3.00 20.00% -6.7%
conflict
relating to
land disputes
around the
household
environment:
Livestock 33% R43 Livestock 33% 6.67% 0.00 0.00% -
Ownership ownership 33.3%
that has
economic
score
Source: results of survey data processing in the community of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018
 The variables and indicators used to measure natural capital are shown in Table 4.19. While

the average difference or gap to the weight of the indicators that have been determined can be seen in

Figure 4.8 below:

Livestock
ownership

Land ownership

-35.0% -30.0% -25.0% -20.0% -15.0% -10.0% -5.0% 0.0%

Source: Tabulation result data survey of Pangkalan Baru Village community- Primer data in 2018.
Figure 4.5. Average gap at the social capital variable of Pangkalan Baru Community.

Based on the results obtained, most of the respondents work on / manage the land. The land

use sector is mostly used for agriculture. Whereas, not respondents have livestock. For land ownership

status, most of the respondents stated that the land they own is the right to use. In addition, the

majority of respondents thought that in the village of Pangkalan Baru there are rarely conflicts relating

to land disputes.

IV.5.1.c VULNERABILITY CONTEXT

The vulnerability felt by the people of Pangkalan Baru Village, especially by vulnerable /

middle down groups who are participants in the FGD of vulnerable groups, is very closely related to

low plantation harvest prices. Some of the contexts of vulnerability associated with the dry season are

declining income which causes difficulties to fulfill daily needs.

The context of the vulnerability is assessed by vulnerable groups as having undergone

changes even though they are not yet sufficient. The changes that have occurred over the past 10 years

to the last 5 years are as follows:

Table 4. 20 Analysis of Trends in Changing Pangkalan Baru Villages

Factor that Circumstances 10 Circumstances 5 Current state Future 5 years

changes years ago years ago (In 2018) (prediction in 2023)
(In 2008) (Year 2013)
 Factor that Circumstances 10 Circumstances 5 Current state Future 5 years
changes years ago years ago (In 2018) (prediction in 2023)
(In 2008) (Year 2013)
Road the road is still land road hardening Pavement if for the next 5 years
the community wants
the Pangkalan Baru
Highway to be
expanded
infrastructure or in 2008 there was there has been the community was the condition of the next
infrastructure no supporting construction of able to enjoy the five years according to
infrastructure infrastructure or facilities and the prediction of
within the infrastructure infrastructure at vulnerable people is the
Pangkalan Baru Pangkalan Baru at existence of banks and
Village the Balai adat other infrastructure to
Health Center and support community
the mosque activities and for the
building near the welfare of the
village office community
the presence of if in 2008, in 2013 more and in 2018 many for the next five years,
newcomers from immigrant more immigrants factories stood in they expect more
Javanese, Batak communities and they began toPangkalan Baru extensive employment
Nias. existed but were not settle into village but none of and easier access.
yet significant communities or these products
residents of provided CSR
Pangkalan Baru, funds for land use
they worked more in Pangkalan Baru
on factories thatvillage so that
had been built bypeople did not feel
foreign investorsthe welfare of the
in the village offactory that stood
Pangkalan Baru on the Pangkalan
Baru.
Source: FGD results of vulnerable groups of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

In general, ten years ago, road facilities and infrastructure were still not good. Road facilities

were still land in 10 years ago, and in 2018 the roads have been paved. The public predicts that in the

next 5 years there will be an expansion of the road, because the economic activity in this village has

become increasingly crowded.

Likewise-with other infrastructures, 10 years ago there was no infrastructure that supports

livelihoods in this area, but now there are BRI links, mosques, and Health center. Educational

facilities have reached high school, thus supporting the improvement of human resources.

The presence of immigrant communities is also one of the changes that take place in

Pangkalan Baru Village. Ten years ago, even though immigrant communities have begun to exist but

there were not many in number. Five years later, due to the large number of factories in the
community, migrants began to live and settle in Pangkalan Baru Village to work in these factories.

The current situation, factories are starting to increase, but what is regretted by the community is that

there are no corporate CSR funds provided to improve community welfare, so that in the next 5 years,

the employment will be easier, and the livelihoods of the people will be better.

Table 4. 21 Conditions of Vulnerability Based on Perspectives of the Pangkalan Baru Village

Community.

Factors / context Parties affected Cause Duration / Consequence

Vulnerability period /
frequency

low-priced the community the price is declining at the time of More preferring to
plantation prices that owns the and unstable. Eid 2018 until spend can choose more
such as palm oil plantation or now it was not important needs than
and rubber. agriculture. stable unnecessary needs.

Source: FGD results of vulnerable groups of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

The Pangkalan Baru village community, which has a large part of its livelihood as a

plantation farmer, is very dependent on the market price of plantation products. According to the

community, the prices of plantation products have not been stable since IED in 2018, so that the

community seeks to prioritize household expenditures, which are the important ones that take

precedence, and do not issue spending which is considered insignificant.

In addition to the community from vulnerable groups, the youth of Pangkalan Baru village

also revealed things that were considered as factors or conditions of vulnerability in the community,

based on the youth perspective. Based on the results of group interviews conducted, the following are

factors, causes and consequences of vulnerability:

Table 4. 22 Vulnerability Conditions Based on Youth Perspective of Pangkalan Baru Village

Factor / condition of Cause of factors / conditions Due to vulnerability factors

vulnerability
Infrastructure especially
roads in the rainy season
become damaged or muddy
of vulnerability
The rainy season causes the
road to become damaged,
often it cannot be traversed or
used to support community
activities
/ conditions
With disruption of
community activities during
the rainy season because
roads become damaged and
impassable often make the
economy of the community
paralyzed which ultimately

Fishing for residents who
work as fishermen in the
rainy season decreases
When the rainy season
comes, palm oil yields
decline
The rainy season makes it
difficult for people to
undergo work as usual.
Source: results of interviews of youth groups in Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018
results in loss of income.
The rainy season often causes The arrival of the rainy
community fish catches to season often makes people
decline even as people often who work as fishermen
cannot catch fish during the unable to work and
rainy season of fish automatically the income is
lost so that people who work
as fishermen cannot fulfill
their daily needs.
The rainy season causes With the reduction in oil
harvests to decline, because palm yields, community
people have difficulty income is declining, both in
harvesting even the worst communities with gardens
conditions cause rotting palm and people who are laborers
fruit or workers.
The rainy season has With the obstruction of
prevented people from community doing work it
undergoing work even certain automatically affects the
jobs cannot be done at all level of income or income of
the community. This has
implications for the difficulty
of fulfilling life needs.

Based on the results of interviews with the youth group of Pangkalan Baru Village, all the

vulnerabilities are caused by the rainy season. In Pangkaan Baru village according to the youth during

the rainy season, all economic activity with any affected livelihood becomes unproductive. This is

caused by the contours of the area which is swamps and peatlands, so that the rain affects every aspect

of livelihood. All youth informants say that the main problem is when the rainy season comes.

Based on the results of interviews with the village officials, disaster that affect the condition

of people's welfare is flood during the onset of the rainy season. The condition is because the

community has difficulties in carrying out activities due to flooding. All community groups working

in the plantation sector feel the impact of the flood.

In general, the direct cause of poverty and vulnerability in Pangkalan Baru village is the price

of oil palm and the rainy season. Both of these affect the income of the community, which in turn

affects the fulfillment of daily needs.

IV.5.1.d TRANSFORMING STRUCTURE & PROCESS

Village government, is the lowest unit in the government system in Indonesia, has policies

and regulations both formal and norms that are obeyed by the community.
 Pangkalan Baru Village is divided into five hamlets, namely Hamlet I which consists of 4

RWs (Administrative unit of resident in the village) with 9 RTs (Neighborhood Associations), Hamlet

II consists of 2 RWs and there are 5 RTs (Neighborhood Associations) in it, Hamlet III consists of 2

RWs and there are 7 RTs (Neighborhood Association), Hamlet IV consists from 3 RWs and there are

6 RTs (Neighborhood Association).

In general, the implementation of Village Governance in the fields of Government,

Development and Community Affairs went well since we served as the Village Heads in 2013. Thus

are cause of the direction and guidance of the DPMD of Kampar Regency, the Governance, Legal and

Human Rights section of the Kampar District Secretariat, the Siak Hulu District Head and full support

and good cooperation from the BPD of Pangkalan Baru Village. So far, with the existence of support

and good cooperation between the Village Government and BPD so that they can set Village

regulations and resolve existing problems in the Village through deliberation and consensus.

Institutions in Karya Indah village consist of:

- Village Chief: 1 person

- Village Secretary: 1 person

- Village Devices: 9 people

- BPD: 9 people

Likewise-with the Community Institutions in the Village namely the RW, the RT, LPM, PKK

and Youth which is a partner for the Village Government in implementing development in the Village

where through their respective fields have driven community participation in development.

The following are the types of community institutions in Karya Indah Village based on 2018

village profile:

- LPM (Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat/Community Empowerment Institute): 1

- PKK (Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga/Family Welfare Development): 1

- Maternal and Child Health Services: 4

- Study: 5 groups

- Rotating savings club: 5 groups

- Save loans: 5 groups

 - Farmer groups: 15 groups

- GAPOKTAN (Gabungan Kelompok Tani/Association of Farmworkers): 1 group

-Youth association: 1 group

- Others: 2 groups

Based on interviews with the village officials, the existence of institutions has a very good

influence to regulate governance in the community.

VILLAGE POLICY AND REGULATION

Recognized by the village secretary in interviewing the village officials, the formal

regulations that apply in the community are referring to existing laws and regulations, as well as

customary regulations which are in the midst of community.

In addition to legal norms, religious norms, social norms and moral norms are still held by the

community. Its influence is quite good for people's livelihoods, specifically regulating people's

behavior in carrying out life

COMMUNITY RELATION WITH OTHER INSTITUTIONS

Based on the results of the FGD conducted on vulnerable community groups, there are several

agencies or stakeholders recognized by the community to influence community livelihoods. The

agency, namely the central government. Relationships between communities and stakeholders are

mapped in the following of VNN diagrams:

Central government

The community
 Source: FGD results of vulnerable groups of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018
Figure 4. 9 Relations of the Pangkalan Baru village community with stakeholders.

From the VNN diagram in Figure 4.9, it can be seen that in the Pangkalan Baru Village

community, stakeholders whose interests are perceived and the congestion is only the central

government. The meaning of closeness or importance here is only because of the distribution of

programs from the central government, without any deep closeness to the community.

Overall, if the community relations between Pangkalan Baru Village and the agencies or

stakeholders in the community are based on the order of importance and proximity are presented in

the table, it can be seen in the following table:

Table 4. 23 Public Relations of Pangkalan Baru Village with Agencies / Stakeholders

Name of Institution / Order of Interest Proximity sequence

Stakeholder (1: The most (1: The closest)
important)
Central government 4 4
Source: FGD results of vulnerable groups of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

ASSITANCE PROGRAM EVALUATION

Based on the results of discussions, both vulnerable community groups and youth groups,

several assistance programs from various agencies have been carried out in Pangkalan Baru Village.

Evaluation of the assistance program is presented in the following table:

Table 4. 24 List of Assistance Programs Implemented in Pangkalan Baru Village

Name of Program Type of Location Program Assistance Program Involvement

the Providing Assistan Benefits Recipient Weaknesse of Female
Assistance Agency ce s and Male in
Program Implementa
tion
F M
Home Government livable covers the very people who the Female and
surgery house village of beneficial need surgical community Male
construct Pangkalan for the aid housing thinks if the
ion Baru community program. program is
not on
target
Raskin (rice Government Rice covers the helping the vulnerable people have Female and
for Poor village of community and non- to buy to Male
community) Pangkalan in food, and vulnerable get the rice.
Baru for communities Although
vulnerable only sold
people to Rp. 70,000
be greatly / 7kg per
helped. family
Source: FGD results of vulnerable groups of Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

The home surgery program was appreciated by the community, the community felt a lot of

benefits from the home surgery program. But according to the community there was still a weakness

in the program, namely the target of beneficiaries of this program. Community involvement in this

program is very large; males contribute to labor in the program, while females cook for carpenters.

The program was felt very well in the context of community development. The community's

understanding of this program is very good, but for people who still need this program just waiting for

a home surgical proposal to be approved by the government.

In the Raskin (Free rice for middle down people) program, the benefits of the program are

greatly felt by the community in order to help the community in the food program. The recipients of

this assistance are from vulnerable and non-community groups. The disadvantage of this program is

that rice is not given for free, but people have to buy at cheap prices relatively. The disadvantage is

that vulnerable people are burdened because they still have to buy the rice.

IV.5.1.e LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES

In dealing with the factors or contexts of vulnerability, of course people need strategies as an

effort to still be able to achieve their livelihood goals. However, the strategies carried out by the

community of Pangkalan Baru Village, which were carried out by themselves until now, have not yet

been able to fulfill their livelihood objectives. Various problems require support from outside parties.

The community survival strategy is presented in the following table:

Table 4. 25 Livelihood Strategies Based on the Perspective of Vulnerable People in the Pangkalan
Baru Village

Main Efforts / Alternative problem-solving strategies / Opportunities for problem solving in

problem strategies solutions at this time the future
that have Can be solved by the Troubleshooting Can be solved by the Troubleshooting
been youth themselves completely youth themselves completely
carried requires outside requires outside
out by help help
the youth Done by Need Done by Need
the youth support the youth support
themselves from themselves from
outside outside
People There is To solve the To solve the
generally no problem of youth problem of youth
have strategy at fully needs fully needs
 Main Efforts / Alternative problem-solving strategies / Opportunities for problem solving in
problem strategies solutions at this time the future
that have Can be solved by the Troubleshooting Can be solved by the Troubleshooting
been youth themselves completely youth themselves completely
carried requires outside requires outside
out by help help
the youth Done by Need Done by Need
the youth support the youth support
themselves from themselves from
outside outside
difficulty all in the support from support from
doing youth stakeholders stakeholders
work
when the
rainy
season
comes
Source: results of interviews of youth groups in Pangkalan Baru Village - Primary data in 2018

Based on the table above, it can be seen that there have not been any efforts made by the

youth to solve the problems (from the perspective of the youth) in the village. Because the problem

faced is a natural problem. Problem solving can only be done to minimize losses caused by these

natural problems.

IV.5.1.f RECOMMENDATION OF INTERVENTION

Based on the findings in the field research, Pangkalan Baru Village, what needs to be

capacitated is management of oil palm if the rainy season appears. The community must be equipped

with knowledge on how to manage oil palm, so that during the rainy season, the impact on the yield of

the plantation is not too large. In terms of community financial management, it also requires

knowledge about financial literacy, where people can manage finances during the harvest season, so

that the community can have savings for long-term investment. In addition, the emergence of factories

will have an impact on the broadening of employment, the community, especially the youth, must be

provided with high competitiveness so that they can occupy positions on the jobs needed around the

factory. The number of environmental problems is also likely to arise environmental problems, the

community must be trained to identify environmental hazards so that they can be controlled. The

potential of CSR is also very large if the community can advocate to factories located around 1

Pangkalan Baru village.