You are on page 1of 4

CHAPTER 3- Social Psychology Controlled processing- reflective,

deliberate, and conscious; “explicit”


How we construct social perceptions as we:
thinking- System 2
Judge events, informed by implicit
Schemas- mental concepts or templates
rules that guide our snap
that intuitively guide our perceptions and
judgements, and by our moods;
interpretations
Perceive and recall events through
Emotional reactions- instantaneous,
the filters of our own assumptions
happening before there is time for
Explain events by sometimes deliberate thinking. Eye/ear -> Thalamus
attributing then to the situation, (brain’s sensory switchboard) -> Amygdala
sometimes to the person; (emotional control center) -> Thinking
cortex.
Expect certain events, thereby
sometimes helping bring them Expertise- people may know intuitively the
about. answer to a problem

System 1- functions automatically and out Snap judgement- can beat a chance at
of our awareness; intuitive, automatic, guessing when given but a very thin slice of
unconscious, and fast way of thinking; also someone.
called “intuition” or “gut feeling”.
Blindsight- having lost a portion of the
Influences more of our actions than we
visual cortex to surgery or stroke, people
realize.
may be functionally blind in part of their
System 2- our conscious attention and field of vision.
effort; deliberate, controlled, conscious,
Overconfidence phenomenon- the
and slower way of thinking.
tendency to be more confident than
Priming- is the awakening or activating of correct; to overestimate the accuracy of
certain associations; activating particular one’s beliefs
associations in memory. Effects surface
Confirmation Bias- we are eager to verify
when stimuli is presented subliminally.
our beliefs but less inclined to seek
Memory system- web of associations evidence that might disprove them;
tendency to search for information that
Embodied cognition- the mutual influence confirms one’s preconceptions
of bodily sensations on cognitive
preferences and social jugements. Three techniques to reduce overconfidence
bias:
Intuitive management- we should tune into
our hunches Prompt feedback

Automatic processing- impulsive, effortless, Estimating probable accuracy


and without awareness- System 1;
Get people to think why their
“implicit” thinking that is effortless,
judgements might be wrong
habitual, and without awareness; roughly
corresponds to intuition. Heuristics- simple efficient thinking
strategies; a thinking strategy that enables
quick efficient judgments; enable us to explanation of why the belief might be true
make routine decisions with minimal effort survives

Representative Heuristic- to judge Misinformation effect- Incorporating


something by intuitively comparing it to our “misinformation” into one’s memory of the
mental representation of a category to use; event, after witnessing an event and
the tendency to presume, sometimes receiving misleading information about it.
despite contrary odds, that somone or
Rosy retrospection- they recall mildly
something belongs to a particular group if
pleasant events more favorably than they
resampling (representing) a typical
experienced them
member. Representativeness (typicalness)
usually reflects reality. Snap judgement of Misattribution- mistakenly attributing a
whether someone or something fits a behavior to the wrong source
category.
Attribution theory- the theory of how
Availability heuristics- a cognitive rule that people explain others’ behavior; attributing
judges the likelihood of things in terms of to internal dispositions (enduring traits,
their availability in memory. If instances of motives, and attitudes) or external
something come readily in mind, we situations
presume it to be a commonplace. Quick
judgements of likelihood of events (how Dispositional attribution- attributing
available in memory) behavior to the person’s disposition and
traits (stable personality)
Probability neglect- we worry about remote
possibilities while ignoring higher Situational attribution- attributing behavior
probabilities to the environment (situations)

Counterfactual thinking- mentally Spontaneous trait inference- an effortless,


simulating what might have been; imagining automatic inference of a trait after
alternative scenarios and outcomes that exposure to someone’s behavior.
might have happened, but didn’t. Underlies Fundamental attribution error- the
our feelings of luck. tendency for observers to underestimate
Illusory correlation- perception of a situational influences and overestimate
relationship where none exists, or dispositional influences upon others’
perception of a stronger relationship than behavior. Fundamental because it colors
actually exists. our explanations in basic and important
ways.
Regression toward the average- the
statistical tendency for extreme scoresor Camera perspective bias
extreme behavior to return toward one’s Self-fulfilling prophecies- a belief that leads
average to its own fulfillment. Have less than
Belief perseverance- persistence of one’s extraordinary power.
initial conceptions, such as when the basis Experimenter bias- participants sometimes
of one’s belief is discredited but an live up to what they believe experimenters
expect of them
Behavioral confirmation- a type of self- that cause others to confirm their
fulfilling prophecy whereby people’s social expectations
expectations lead them to behave in ways

Chapter 4  Self-presentation theory- strategic


reasons we express attitudes that make
 Attitudes- beliefs and feelings related
us appear consistent
to a person or an event (often rooted in
one’s beliefs, and exhibited in one’s  Cognitive dissonance theory- to reduce
feelings and intended behavior) discomfort, we justify our actions to
ourselves. Tension that arises when one
 ABCs of attitudes:
is simultaneously aware of two
o Affect (feelings) inconsistent cognitions.

o Behavior tendency  Self-perception theory- our actions are


self-revealing: when uncertain about
o Cognition (thoughts) our feelings or beliefs, we look to our
 Moral hypocrisy- disjuncture between behavior, much as anyone else would
attitudes and actions  Selective exposure- The tendency to
 Implicit association test (IAT)- seek information and media that agree
computer-driven assessment of implicit with one’s views and you avoid
attitudes. The test uses reaction times dissonant information
to measure people's automatic  Insufficient justification- Reduction of
associations between attitude objects dissonance by Reduction of behavior by
and evaluative words. Easier pairings internally justifying one’s
(and faster responses) are taken to behavior when external justification is
indicate stronger unconscious “insufficient”
associations. Most widely used attitude
measure.  Self-perception theory- Assumes that
we we make similar inferences when
 Principle of aggregation- The effects of we observe our own behavior. When
an attitude become more apparent we are unsure of our attitudes, we infer
when we look at a person's aggregate them much as would someone
or average behavior. observing us- by looking at our behavior
 Theory of planned behavior- knowing and the circumstances under which it
people’s intended behaviors and their occurs.
perceived self-efficacy and control  Facial Feedback Effect- The tendency of
 Role- refers to actions expected of facial expressions to trigger
those who occupy a particular social corresponding feelings such as fear,
position; a set of norms that defines anger, or happiness
how people in a given wocial position  Emotional contagion- Explain why it's
ought to behave fun to be around happy people and
depressing to be around depressed often experience a self-image
people. threat after engaging in an undesirable
behavior; and (b) They can compensate
 Overjustification effect- The result of
by affirming another aspect of the self.
bribing people to do what they already
Threaten people’s self-concept in one
like doing; they may then see their
domain, and they will compensate
actions as externally controlled rather
either by refocusing or by doing doing
than intrinsically appealing.
good deeds in some other domain.
 Self-affirmation theory- Acts are
 Self-affirming- it or supports our sense
embarrassing. A theory that (a) people
of integrity and self-worth

You might also like