Lampiran 9.

Hasil Uji Statistik

Ketersediaan Garam Iodium Rumah Tangga * EIU

Crosstab

EIU

Tidak Gaki Gaki Total

Ketersediaan Garam Iodium Rumah Cukup Count 28 1 29

Tangga
Expected Count 25.8 3.2 29.0

% of Total 77.8% 2.8% 80.6%

Tidak Cukup Count 4 3 7

Expected Count 6.2 .8 7.0

% of Total 11.1% 8.3% 19.4%

Total Count 32 4 36

Expected Count 32.0 4.0 36.0

% of Total 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.867a 1 .003

Continuity Correctionb 5.326 1 .021

Likelihood Ratio 6.855 1 .009

Fisher's Exact Test .018 .018

Linear-by-Linear Association 8.621 1 .003

N of Valid Casesb 36

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .78.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Ketersediaan Garam Iodium Rumah

Tangga (Cukup / Tidak Cukup) 21.000 1.734 254.275

For cohort EIU = Tidak Gaki 1.690 .886 3.221

For cohort EIU = Gaki .080 .010 .662

N of Valid Cases 36
 Lampiran 9. Hasil Uji Statistik

Konsumsi Pangan Kaya Iodium * EIU

Crosstab

EIU

Tidak Gaki Gaki Total

Konsumsi Pangan Kaya Iodium Sering Count 8 2 10

Expected Count 8.9 1.1 10.0

% of Total 22.2% 5.6% 27.8%

Tidak Sering Count 24 2 26

Expected Count 23.1 2.9 26.0

% of Total 66.7% 5.6% 72.2%

Total Count 32 4 36

Expected Count 32.0 4.0 36.0

% of Total 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.108a 1 .293

Continuity Correctionb .212 1 .645

Likelihood Ratio 1.006 1 .316

Fisher's Exact Test .305 .305

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.077 1 .299

N of Valid Casesb 36

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.11.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Konsumsi Pangan Kaya Iodium (Sering /

Tidak Sering) .333 .040 2.769

For cohort EIU = Tidak Gaki .867 .624 1.204

For cohort EIU = Gaki 2.600 .422 16.034

N of Valid Cases 36
 Lampiran 9. Hasil Uji Statistik

Konsumsi Pangan Goitrogenik * EIU

Crosstab

EIU

Tidak Gaki Gaki Total

Konsumsi Pangan Goitrogenik Sering Count 7 1 8

Expected Count 7.1 .9 8.0

% of Total 19.4% 2.8% 22.2%

Tidak Sering Count 25 3 28

Expected Count 24.9 3.1 28.0

% of Total 69.4% 8.3% 77.8%

Total Count 32 4 36

Expected Count 32.0 4.0 36.0

% of Total 88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .020a 1 .887

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .020 1 .889

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .652

Linear-by-Linear Association .020 1 .889

N of Valid Casesb 36

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .89.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Konsumsi Pangan Goitrogenik (Sering /

.840 .075 9.384
Tidak Sering)

For cohort EIU = Tidak Gaki .980 .732 1.312

For cohort EIU = Gaki 1.167 .140 9.743

N of Valid Cases 36