Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The incidence of dyslipidemia is significantly higher in subjects who switched to DRV/r at dosage 800 mg/100 mg,
patients treated with antiretroviral regimens contain- without keeping the same NRTI backbone.
ing ritonavir compared to other regimens not containing The switch to DRV/r reduced triglycerides levels, total and
ritonavir.1 Moreover, protease inhibitors (PIs) are not LDL cholesterol right after three months. Similar improve-
equally prone to impair the lipid profile. Regimens with ments remained stable during the follow up period. At the
lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) end of the study a significant reduction of triglycerides (TGs),
indeed, induce greater elevations in lipid parameters than total (TCh) and LDL cholesterol were in the order of 47%,
saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r) or atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) or 18%, and 18%, respectively (TGs at T0 383.7 ± 70.2 versus
darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r).2 The objective of this study was T12 202.4 ± 60.7 mg/dL, p < 0.001, TCh at T0 244.7 ± 51.3 ver-
to explore the impact on the lipid profile of switching from sus T12 200.1 ± 31.8 mg/dL, p < 0.001; LDL at T0 139.3 ± 43.4,
“older PIs” to DRV/r in virologically suppressed HIV infected versus T12 114.1 ± 30.7 mg/dL, p < 0.01) (Fig. 1). In addition,
patients after 144 weeks of observation. A prospective open the TCh/HDL ratio has also improved (p = 0.004). Increases
label single center study enrolled a total of 13 Caucasian in CD4+ cell counts and in CD4/CD8 ratio (p < 0.05) were
160 1.00
Mean±SE of LDL (mg/dL)
Anova test for repeated measures p=0.028 Anova test for repeated measures p=0.046
0.95
150
Mean±SE of cystatin
0.90
140
C (mg/dL)
0.85
*
130 0.80
** 0.75
120
0.70
110
0.65
100 0.60
Baseline 3 6 12 18 24 30 36 Baseline 3 6 12 18 24 30 36
Follow-up controls (months) Follow-up controls (months)
400
250
350 240
300 230
220
250 ***
*** 210
200 200
190
150
180
100 170
Baseline 3 6 12 18 24 30 36 Baseline 3 6 12 18 24 30 36
Follow-up controls (months) Follow-up controls (months)
Fig. 1 – Lipid profile of patients: total cholesterol (TCh), LDL cholesterol (LDL), cystatin C and triglycerides (TGs) at baseline
and at different controls of follow-up. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 contrast analysis versus the previous follow-up control.
402 b r a z j i n f e c t d i s . 2 0 1 6;2 0(4):401–402