Age Graduated Frequency Percentage

17 years old 3 13.04%

18 years old 18 78.26%
19 years old 2 8.70%
Total 23 100%
Sex
Female 12 52.17%
Male 11 47.83%
Total 23 100%
General Weighted Average
79- 83.98 2 8.70
83.99- 88.97 6 26.09
88.98-93.96 11 47.83
93.97-98.95 4 17.39
Total 23 100%
 Respondent's No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Name B.A Racho C.D Cutarra S. Bagol F. Inting M.J. Caybin D.D. Ungab
Age 18 18 18 18 18 19
Sex F M M M M M
STEM TVL TVL STEM Arts ABM
General Weighted Average 92.1 79 88 89.5 90.06 86.25
A.1 4 4 4 4 3 4
2 5 4 4 5 3 3
3 5 4 4 5 4 4
Composite Mean 4.67 4.00 4.00 4.67 3.33 3.67
Descriptors HE E E HE ME E
B.1 5 2 2 5 3 3
2 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 4 4 4 4 4 5
4 5 4 4 5 4 5
5 5 5 5 5 4 3
Composite Mean 4.6 3.8 3.8 4.6 3.8 4
Descriptors HE E E HE E E
C.1 5 2 2 5 3 4
2 5 4 4 5 3 3
3 5 2 2 5 3 3
4 4 2 2 4 3 3
5 5 4 4 5 4 4
Composite Mean 4.8 2.8 2.8 4.8 3.2 3.4
Descriptors HE ME ME HE ME E
STEM TVL TVL STEM Arts ABM
 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
J. Taculod Jr. M. Ongcoy A. Potot S.R Ugay M.A Ellorimo J.R Daplinan R.J Llanos G. Lacea
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
M F F F M M F F
TVL Arts GAS ABM Arts ABM STEM STEM
82.88 90.31 93.19 93.32 88.88 88.06 95.25 95
4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3
3 4 4 2 2 5 2 2
4 3 2 3 4 4 3 3
3.67 3.33 3.33 3.00 3.00 4.33 2.67 2.67
E ME ME ME ME HE ME ME
3 3 5 2 3 3 4 3
5 4 5 3 4 4 3 3
5 4 4 5 4 5 3 4
4 4 4 5 4 5 3 4
5 4 4 5 5 5 3 4
4.4 3.8 4.4 4 4 4.4 3.2 3.6
HE E HE E E HE ME E
3 3 3 4 4 4 2 3
3 4 4 4 4 5 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4 2 3
4 4 3 4 4 5 2 2
4 4 3 4 3 5 3 3
3.4 3.8 3.2 4 3.6 4.6 2.4 3
E E ME E E HE SE ME
TVL Arts GAS ABM Arts ABM STEM STEM
 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
A. Canaria A.L Tabilo J. Jala C.L Sorongon N.M Suello A.M Tabilo J. Elicot C. Biloy
19 18 18 18 17 17 18 18
F F M M F F F F
TVL Arts Arts STEM GAS GAS ABM GAS
93.69 92.44 92.38 95.31 93.56 91 95 91.38
3 5 3 4 4 5 3 4
2 4 2 3 4 4 1 3
2 5 2 4 4 5 3 3
2.33 4.67 2.33 3.67 4.00 4.67 2.33 3.33
SE HE ME E E HE SE ME
1 5 3 2 3 4 3 3
2 4 3 4 3 5 4 3
2 4 3 5 4 4 4 4
2 4 3 4 4 4 5 3
3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3
2 4.2 3 3.8 3.6 4.2 4 3.2
SE HE ME E E HE E ME
1 4 3 3 3 4 2 3
2 4 3 4 4 3 2 3
2 2 4 3 3 2 2 3
2 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3
2 3.4 3.6 3.2 3.4 3.2 2.4 3
SE E E ME E ME SE ME
TVL Arts Arts STEM GAS GAS ABM GAS
 23 Weighted Mean
R. Namalata Jr.
18
M
TVL
88.56
4
4
4
4.00 3.55
E E
2 3.13
4 3.78
4 4.04
4 4.04
5 4.17
3.8 3.83
E E
2 3.13
4 3.65
2 3.00
2 3.13
4 3.78
2.8 3.34
ME ME
TVL
 Track Not Effective Slightly Effective
Strand/ College Course
O E O E
STEM(Engineering, Nursing) 0 0 0 0.43
ABM(Accountancy, HRM) 0 0 1 0.35
Academic GAS(BSED, BEED) 0 0 0 0.35
TVL (BSMT, Tourism, Electronics Technology) 0 0 1 0.43
Arts and Design (Drafting, Industrial Design, Architecture) 0 0 0 0.43
TOTAL 0 0 2
x²- computed value =15.306
Critical value of x² @ 16 df @0.05 level of significance is 26.29
Result: Insignificant
Decision: Accept the Null Hypothesis
Conclusion: There is no significant difference on the assessment of the Senior High Schoo
x² = Σ ((O-E)²/E)

x² = 15.305952381
 Moderately Effective Effective Highly Effective Total
O E O E O E
2 1.96 1 1.52 2 1.09 5
1 1.57 1 1.22 1 0.87 4
2 1.57 1 1.22 1 0.87 4
0 1.96 4 1.52 0 1.09 5
4 1.96 0 1.52 1 1.09 5
9 7 5 23
=15.306
el of significance is 26.296
cant
ull Hypothesis
of the Senior High School graduates regarding the effectiveness of GAS as to the benefits they have received that can be useful for the col

952381
can be useful for the college course they have currently enrolled. Moreover, they said that GAS was effective and that they have benefite
tive and that they have benefited in terms of quality education, trainings and programs offered by this strand in Senior High School Program
nd in Senior High School Program of Sikatuna National High School.
 Track Not Effective Slightly Effective
Strand/ College Course
O E O
STEM(Engineering, Nursing) 0 0 0
ABM(Accountancy, HRM) 0 0 0
Academic GAS(BSED, BEED) 0 0 0
TVL (BSMT, Tourism, Electronics Technology) 0 0 1
Arts and Design (Drafting, Industrial Design, Architecture) 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 1
x²- computed value =7.858
Critical value of x² @ 16 df @0.05 level of significance is 26
Result: Insignificant
Decision: Accept the Null Hypothesis
Conclusion: There is no significant difference on the assessment of the Senior High School graduates o
x² = Σ ((O-E)²/E)

x² = 7.8583333333
 Slightly Effective Moderately Effective Effective Highly Effective Total
E O E O E O E
0.22 1 0.65 2 2.61 2 1.52 5
0.17 0 0.52 3 2.09 1 1.22 4
0.17 1 0.52 1 2.09 2 1.22 4
0.22 0 0.65 3 2.61 1 1.52 5
0.22 1 0.65 3 2.61 1 1.52 5
3 12 7 23
ted value =7.858
@0.05 level of significance is 26.296
: Insignificant
pt the Null Hypothesis
enior High School graduates on the effectiveness of GAS as to essential learning in preparation for college they have currently enrolled. M

7.8583333333
ave currently enrolled. Moreover, they generally said that this essential learning they received when they took GAS in Senior High School P
ook GAS in Senior High School Program offered by Sikatuna National High School was effective and had helped them in their present taken
lped them in their present taken college course although the course in college they have are not aligned specifically for GAS.
ecifically for GAS.
 Track Not Effective Slightly Effective
Strand/ College Course
O E 1
STEM(Engineering, Nursing) 0 0 1
ABM(Accountancy, HRM) 0 0 0
Academic GAS(BSED, BEED) 0 0 1
TVL (BSMT, Tourism, Electronics Technology) 0 0 0
Arts and Design (Drafting, Industrial Design, Architecture) 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 3
x²- computed value =16.988
Critical value of x² @ 16 df @ 0.05 level of significance is 26
Result: Insignificant
Decision: Accept the Null Hypothesis
difference on the assessment of the Senior High School graduates on the effectiveness of GAS as to the roles and functions that the stran
x² = Σ ((O-E)²/E)

x² = 16.9881944444
 Slightly Effective Moderately Effective Effective Highly Effective Total
E O E O E O E
0.65 2 1.96 0 1.74 2 0.65 5
0.39 0 1.17 2 1.04 1 0.39 3
0.65 3 1.96 1 1.74 0 0.65 5
0.52 3 1.57 1 1.39 0 0.52 4
0.65 1 1.96 4 1.74 0 0.65 5
9 8 3 23
alue =16.988
5 level of significance is 26.296
gnificant
Null Hypothesis
d functions that the strand has extended that can be useful for them in preparation for college course they have currently enrolled. Moreo

16.9881944444
y have currently enrolled. Moreover, they said that the GAS offered in Senior High school program of Sikatuna NHS has moderately guided
una NHS has moderately guided and give them direction in their skills and talents needed for their intended college course. It technically s
ed college course. It technically says that it is better to take Senior High School strand in line of the college course they want to pursue to en
course they want to pursue to enhance the their skills and talents.
 Track Not Effective Slightly Effective
Strand/ College Course
O E O E
STEM(Engineering, Nursing) 0 0 0 0.22
ABM(Accountancy, HRM) 0 0 0 0.17
Academic GAS(BSED, BEED) 0 0 0 0.17
TVL (BSMT, Tourism, Electronics Technology) 0 0 1 0.22
Arts and Design (Drafting, Industrial Design, Architecture) 0 0 0 0.22
TOTAL 0 0 1
x²- computed value =12.732
Critical value of x² @ 16 df @ 0.05 level of significance is 26
Result: Insignificant
Decision: Accept the Null Hypothesis
on the assessment of the Senior High School graduates regarding the effectiveness of GAS offered in Sikatuna NHS. Furthermore, General A
x² = Σ ((O-E)²/E)

x² = 12.7321428571
 Moderately Effective Effective Highly Effective Total
O E O E O E
2 1.09 1 3.04 2 0.65 5
1 0.87 2 2.43 1 0.52 4
1 0.87 3 2.43 0 0.52 4
0 1.09 4 3.04 0 0.65 5
1 1.09 4 3.04 0 0.65 5
5 14 3 23
e =12.732
evel of significance is 26.296
ficant
ull Hypothesis
Furthermore, General Academic Strand can be useful for them in preparation for any college courses they have currently enrolled. Moreov

321428571
have currently enrolled. Moreover, they said that the GAS offered in Senior High school program of Sikatuna NHS has effectively help them
na NHS has effectively help them in different college courses which supposedly not really in line with GAS. Overall, GAS offered in Sikatuna
Overall, GAS offered in Sikatuna NHS is effective for the different college courses whether supposedly in line in Academic Track like STEM,
 Respondent's No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Name B.A RachoC.D Cutarra S. Bagol F. Inting M.J. CaybinD.D. UngabJ. Taculod Jr.M. Ongcoy
Age 18 18 18 18 18 19 18 18
Sex F M M M M M M F
STEM TVL TVL STEM Arts ABM TVL Arts
General Weighted Avera 92.1 79 88 89.5 90.06 86.25 82.88 90.31
A.1 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3
2 5 4 4 5 3 3 3 4
3 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 3
B.1 5 2 2 5 3 3 3 3
2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4
3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4
4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 4 3 5 4
C.1 5 2 2 5 3 4 3 3
2 5 4 4 5 3 3 3 4
3 5 2 2 5 3 3 3 4
4 4 2 2 4 3 3 4 4
5 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4
Composite Mean 4.69 3.46 3.46 4.69 3.46 3.69 3.85 3.69
Descriptors HE E E HE E E E E
STEM TVL TVL STEM Arts ABM TVL Arts
 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
A. Potot S.R UgayM.A Ellorimo
J.R DaplinanR.J Llanos G. Lacea A. Canaria A.L Tabilo J. Jala C.L Sorongon
18 18 18 18 18 18 19 18 18 18
F F M M F F F F M M
GAS ABM Arts ABM STEM STEM TVL Arts Arts STEM
93.19 93.32 88.88 88.06 95.25 95 93.69 92.44 92.38 95.31
4 4 3 4 3 3 3 5 3 4
4 2 2 5 2 2 2 4 2 3
2 3 4 4 3 3 2 5 2 4
5 2 3 3 4 3 1 5 3 2
5 3 4 4 3 3 2 4 3 4
4 5 4 5 3 4 2 4 3 5
4 5 4 5 3 4 2 4 3 4
4 5 5 5 3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 4 4 2 3 1 4 3 3
4 4 4 5 3 4 2 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 2 3 2 2 4 3
3 4 4 5 2 2 2 3 4 3
3 4 3 5 3 3 3 4 4 3
3.69 3.77 3.62 4.46 2.77 3.15 2.08 4.00 3.08 3.54
E E E HE ME ME SE E ME E
GAS ABM Arts ABM STEM STEM TVL Arts Arts STEM
 19 20 21 22 23 Weighted Mean
N.M SuelloA.M Tabilo J. Elicot C. BiloyR. Namalata Jr.
17 17 18 18 18
F F F F M
GAS GAS ABM GAS TVL
93.56 91 95 91.38 88.56
4 5 3 4 4
4 4 1 3 4
4 5 3 3 4
3 4 3 3 2 3.13
3 5 4 3 4 3.78
4 4 4 4 4 4.04
4 4 5 3 4 4.04
4 4 4 3 5 4.17
3 4 2 3 2 3.13
4 3 2 3 4 3.65
3 2 2 3 2 3.00
3 3 3 3 2 3.13
4 4 3 3 4 3.78
3.62 3.92 3.00 3.15 3.46 3.59
E E ME ME E E
GAS GAS ABM GAS TVL