You are on page 1of 88
306 A Study of Sodtanirika With regard to the mitrins [is as fo from Bhavaviveka’s commentary above), jough non-concept tes that the subject (dharmin, chos correct reason (samyakhetu, gian ishigs yang feness [apprehending] forms — and the reason — a per when the meaning of ‘The commentary following [the stanza] says: For, an awareness [apprehending] forms does not have an entity separate from a perceiver whereby a correct of being damaged through own] assertion and h nown. To explain this, Bhavaviveka’s Essence of the (V.17] says: Part IT: Sautrantika-Svdtantrika-Madhvamika 307 served so forth are not apprehended, eye cor the eye and form." The damage done by renow nowned in the world that ut an object, do not exist, but consciousnesses are produced, as is the case, for example, with a dream conscious seen by a conscious ted by beginningless predispositions (udsand, bag

You might also like