306 A Study of Sodtanirika
With regard to the
mitrins [is as fo
from Bhavaviveka’s commentary above),
jough non-concept tes that the subject (dharmin, chos
correct reason (samyakhetu, gian ishigs yang
feness [apprehending] forms —
and the reason — a per
when the meaning of
‘The commentary following [the stanza] says:
For, an awareness [apprehending] forms does not have an
entity separate from a perceiver
whereby a correct
of being damaged through
own] assertion and h
nown. To explain this, Bhavaviveka’s Essence of the
(V.17] says:
Part IT: Sautrantika-Svdtantrika-Madhvamika 307
served
so forth are not apprehended,
eye cor
the eye and form." The damage done by renow
nowned in the world that ut an object,
do not exist, but consciousnesses are produced, as is
the case, for example, with a dream conscious
seen by a conscious
ted by beginningless predispositions (udsand, bag