Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vol. 33, No. 4, pp 322Y328 x Copyright B 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that arterial stiffness is associated with lumbar flexibility (LF).
Stretching exercise targeted to improve LF may have a beneficial effect on reducing arterial stiffness.
Objectives: We examined the effects of a single bout of a structured, static stretching exercise on arterial
stiffness, LF, peripheral and central blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) and tested the association between LF
Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/jcnjournal by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVBTqaQBI4TdoDK81RTdckBLqXhBduGSWvIhn3+I0RTDm8c/fOMab00M= on 06/25/2018
and central arterial stiffness. Method: The study had a pretest-posttest design without a control group. Thirty
healthy women followed a video demonstration of a 30-minute whole-body stretching exercise. Carotid-femoral
pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), augmentation index, LF, peripheral and central BP, and HR were measured
before and after the stretching exercise. Results: One bout of a static stretching exercise significantly reduced
cf-PWV (t29 = 2.708, P = .011) and HR (t29 = 7.160, P = .000) and increased LF (t29 = 12.248, P G .000).
Augmentation index and peripheral and central BP also decreased but did not reach statistical significance.
Despite no association found between cf-PWV and LF, the larger increase in LF the subjects had, the larger
decrease in cf-PWV they had after exercise (r = 0.500, P = .005). Conclusions: Study findings highlight the
potential benefit of a static stretching exercise on central arterial stiffness, an independent predictor of
cardiovascular morbidity. Static stretching exercise conducted in the sitting position may be used as an effective
intervention to reduce cardiovascular risk after a cardiac event or for patients whose sympathetic function
should not be overly activated or whose gaits are not stable.
KEY WORDS: blood pressure, heart rate, pulse wave velocity, stretching exercise, vascular stiffness
322
arterial stiffness, lumbar flexibility (LF), peripheral and artery site (d-femoral) were measured on the body
central BP, and heart rate (HR) in community-residing surface using a tape measure. Carotid-femoral PWV
healthy women. The authors also tested whether LF is was calculated as the difference in the distances from
associated with central arterial stiffness. We hypothe- suprasternal notch to 2 arterial sites (dpwv) divided by
sized that 1 bout of static stretching exercise would the mean time difference (%t) in t1 from t2 (Figure 1).16
decrease aortic stiffness, peripheral and central BP, and Higher cf-PWV indicates increased arterial stiffness.
HR and increase LF and that LF would be negatively Augmentation index is a commonly used measure
associated with central arterial stiffness. of arterial stiffness obtained from pulse wave analysis
(PWA).17 Pulse wave analysis was obtained by apply-
ing a tonometer on the radial arterial site. It generates
Method the ascending aorta pressure wave from the arterial
Participants pulse waveform by mathematical transformation, using
the method based on Fourier analysis.18 Augmentation
After approval was obtained from the institutional re- index indicates the size of the increase or decrease in
view board, a convenience sample of 32 healthy adult the pulse height as a result of the reflected wave. If the
volunteers was recruited from multiple community loca- reflected peak is greater than the primary peak, AI is
tions of Charlottesville, Virginia, by word of mouth. positive; if the reflected peak is less than the primary
To minimize gender effects, only women were included. peak, AI is negative.19 A higher positive AI indicates
Because adults have a greater cardiovascular risk than increased arterial stiffness. Figure 2 shows how AI is
children, only adults were recruited. To exclude any con- derived from pulse waveforms on the radial artery
founding effect of other exercises, the study excluded site. Augmentation index is known to be affected by
people who were engaging in any types of regular exer- multiple factors including left ventricular ejection, PWV,
cise, defined as more than 3 times a week and more than timing of reflection, BP, and HR.20 Therefore, the AI
30 minutes per exercise. Because the device measuring was adjusted to an HR of 75 beats per minutes and
arterial stiffness requires a regularly occurring pulse was used only to complement PWV data.
waveforms, participants with irregular cardiac rhythm Central BP was also derived by PWA. The shape of
were excluded. The study excluded people with known aortic pressure waves derived from arterial pulse waves
cardiovascular conditions (correx against style, hyper- provides central systolic and diastolic BP, as well as AI.
tension, heart failure, diabetes, or peripheral vascular Blood pressure and HR were determined by measur-
diseases) that may affect arterial stiffness. The people ing brachial BP using WelchAllyn Vital Signs Monitor
with use of medications (eg, antihypertensives, "-blockers, 300 Series (WelchAllyn, New York). The upper arm
thyroid hormones, or steroids) that may affect BP and circumference was measured with a tape to select the
HR were also excluded. After excluding 2 women properly sized cuff.21 The cuff was placed over the bare
who presented irregular heart rhythm and hyperten- arm to maximize validity and reliability of the measures,
sion, data from a total of 30 women (mean [SD] age, with the artery marker on the cuff placed over the
44.37 [10.87] years) were used for data analysis. The
sample consisted of 1 black, 5 Chineses, 2 Indians,
14 Koreans, 1 Taiwanese, and 7 whites. The partici-
pants received an incentive after their participation.
Measures
Central arterial stiffness was noninvasively measured
by carotid-femoral PWV (cf-PWV) and Augmentation
Index using the SphygmoCor system (AtCor Medical,
New South Wales, Australia). To measure cf-PWV, an
electrocardiogram monitor was connected, and carotid
and femoral waveforms were captured by a pressure-
sensitive transducer applied on participants" carotid and
femoral sites. The system software calculates the transit
time of the pulse from the left ventricle to the carotid
arterial site (t1) and the transit time of the pulse from
the left ventricle to the femoral arterial site (t2), using FIGURE 1. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) using
SphygmoCor. (AtCor Medical, New South Wales, Australia).
the foot-to-foot method. The distance from the supra- t1, indicates the transit time of the pulse from the left
sternal notch to the carotid artery site (d-carotid) and ventricle to the carotid arterial site; t2, the transit time of the
the distance from the suprasternal notch to the femoral pulse from the left ventricle to the femoral arterial site.
Study Procedure
The authors used a pretest-posttest design without a
FIGURE 2. Representation of central arterial waveform from comparison group. According to the recommendations
pulse wave analysis.19 delta P, indicates difference between for standardization of subject conditions,26 subjects were
systolic blood pressure and pressure at inflection point; PP, instructed to refrain from physical exercise and caf-
pulse pressure; AI, augmentation index. feinated beverage on the day of research participation
until data collection was completed. After obtaining
brachial artery. The arm was positioned at the level of informed consent, participants changed into a gown
the heart without movement.22 Blood pressure was keeping underwear on, and their height and weight
measured in the dominant arm twice with 1-minute were measured. After resting in the supine position for
rest between measures, and the average of the 2 mea- 10 minutes, baseline arterial stiffness, BP, and HR were
sures was used for data analysis.23 measured. Lumbar flexibility was measured before the
Lumbar flexibility (LF) was calculated by the sit-and- intervention. Subjects were then asked to follow the
reach method with a tape measure (ACE Protocol).24 30-minute static stretching exercise video. After the stret-
The sit-and-reach test was first described by Wells and ching, the LF measure was repeated. After a 5-minute
Dillon (1952) to measure lower back and hamstring rest period in the supine position, measures of arterial
flexibility. Subjects sat on a yoga mattress with feet 12-in stiffness, BP, and HR were repeated. For the accurate
apart and heels aligned with the tape measure at the 15-in measures of the physiological data, there was no verbal
mark. While keeping legs and arms straight with palms exchange between the subjects and the research staff.
down and 1 hand placed on top of the other, they were
asked to bend forward slowly and reach forward as far as Statistical Analysis
possible. When subjects held the position of maximum
reach for 2 seconds, flexion distance was recorded in Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for
inches. Windows (version 20.0; Chicago, Illinois). Descriptive
statistics were calculated for all variables of interest.
Paired t tests were conducted to compare LF, arterial
Intervention
stiffness, BP, and HR before and after the stretching
In the clinical research unit at the university, partic- exercise. Pearson correlation coefficients were com-
ipants were instructed to follow the video demonstra- puted to explore the associations between LF and cen-
tion, which consists of whole-body static stretching tral arterial stiffness assessed by cf-PWV. All reported
TABLE 1 Differences of Cardiovascular Variables Between Before and After Stretching (N = 30)
Pre Post Paired Difference (Pre - Post)
Measures Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) t df Sig. (2-tailed)
cf-PWV, m/s 6.93 (1.54) 6.29 (1.17) .64 (1.28) 2.708 29 .011
AI at HR 75, % 18.67 (11.33) 17.70 (11.02) 0.97 (5.06) 1.046 29 .304
SBP, mm Hg 107.87 (10.75) 106.82 (12.48) 1.05 (4.89) 1.174 29 .250
DBP, mm Hg 63.37 (6.71) 61.88 (6.47) 1.48 (4.41) 1.841 29 .076
MAP, mm Hg 79.63 (8.34) 75.32 (16.45) 4.32 (17.81) 1.328 29 .195
C-SBP, mm Hg 98.30 (12.07) 97.50 (15.06) 0.80 (5.80) 0.862 29 .396
C-DBP, mm Hg 64.07 (6.83) 62.77 (7.08) 1.30 (4.71) 1.513 29 .141
C-MAP, mm Hg 79.30 (8.10) 78.13 (9.10) 1.17 (4.35) 1.470 29 .152
HR, beats per minute 64.88 (6.29) 61.77 (6.29) 3.12 (2.38) 7.160 29 G.001
Sit-and-reach, in 13.37 (4.63) 16.45 (4.79) j3.08 (1.38) j12.248 29 G.001
Abbreviations: AI at HR 75, augmentation index adjusted at a heart rate of 75 beats per minute; C-DBP, central diastolic blood pressure; cf-PWV,
carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; C-MAP, central mean arterial pressure; C-SBP, central systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure;
HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
P values are calculated using a 2-tailed test with statis- exercise on arterial stiffness. Two studies have demon-
tical significance set at P G .05. strated that static stretching decreased peripheral
PWV.14,15 However, 3 studies that included the mea-
Results sure of cf-PWV reported no change in cf-PWV after
stretching.15,27,28 Yamato"s15 (2016) recent study
The age of the subjects ranged from 30 to 64 years, demonstrated that cf-PWV did not change after
with a mean (SD) of 44.37 (10.87) years. Body mass stretching, whereas peripheral arterial stiffness mea-
index ranged from 17.30 to 32.56 kg/m2, with a mean sured by femoral-ankle PWV and brachial-ankle
(SD) of 24 (4.09) kg/m2. The means and standard devi- PWV significantly reduced after stretching. Measur-
ations of all the cardiovascular variables before and ing peripheral arterial stiffness is easier and simpler
after stretching are displayed in Table 1. The table also because it does not require access to carotid and
shows the effects of stretching exercise on all the car- femoral arterial sites. However, a few studies reported
diovascular variables and lumber flexibility. There was limitation of peripheral arterial stiffness in predicting
a significant difference in the scores from preYcf-PWV cardiovascular outcomes.29 On the other hand, the
(mean [SD], 6.93 [1.54]) to postYcf-PWV (mean [SD], measure of cf-PWV, despite its inconvenience, mea-
6.29 [1.17]; t29 = 2.708, P = .011). In addition, HR sures arterial stiffness along the aortic-iliac pathway,
significantly reduced from 64.88 (SD, 6.29) to 61.77 which makes the largest contribution to BP buffering.
(SD, 6.29) beats per minute after stretching exercise Therefore, cf-PWV more accurately reflects patho-
(t29 = 7.160, P G .001). Furthermore, a significant physiological effects of arterial stiffness on cardio-
increase in sit-and-reach was detected from 13.37 vascular conditions and is considered the criterion
(SD, 4.63) to 16.45 (SD, 4.79) after stretching exercise standard measure of arterial stiffness.6 The results of
(t29 = -12.248, P G .001). All other cardiovascular the current study highlight the potential beneficial
variables including AI and peripheral and central BP effect of stretching exercise on the central arterial
also decreased after stretching exercise, but the differ- system.
ence did not reach statistical significance. As shown in Pulse wave velocity measures are directly affected
Table 2, there were no significant associations between by BP; thus, studies must discern whether the change
pre-cf-PWV and pre-LF (r = j0.073, P = .703) and in PWV is secondary to BP change.26 The current
between post-cf-PWV and post-LF (r = 0.082, P = results demonstrate that the observed decrease in
.666). However, subjects who had a greater increase cf-PWV after stretching is independent of BP.
in LF after the exercise showed a larger decrease in Stretching is an important element of yoga and tai
PWV (r = 0.500, P = .005). In addition, subjects who chi, and some studies have shown an effect of
had higher PWV before stretching had a greater yoga30Y32 and tai chi33 on reducing arterial stiffness;
decrease in PWV after stretching (r = 0.670, P G .001) however, it is worth noting that certain yoga postures,
and were likely to have a greater increase in LF (r = particularly standing posture and tai chi motions
0.348, P = .060). combined with dynamic tension, may evoke increases
in BP and HR,13 as often observed during isometric
Discussion
exercises.34 Although cardiovascular activity was not
The current study demonstrates that 1 bout of a struc- monitored concurrently during the stretching exercise
tured, static stretching exercise significantly reduced in this study, the gentle stretching motions that were
central arterial stiffness and resting HR. Peripheral BP, conducted in the sitting position are unlikely to cause
as well as AI and central BP, also decreased after stret- a substantial increase of BP, because the results
ching, but the difference between prestretching and demonstrated reduced HR and peripheral and central
poststretching did not reach statistical significance. BP after stretching exercise. Consequently, a structured,
Despite numerous studies examining the benefi- static stretching exercise may be a particularly useful
cial effects of aerobic exercise on cardiovascular health, intervention for people who have risks of cardiac events
a very few studies have explored the effects of stretching or who are recovering from cardiac events. Moreover,
TABLE 2 Correlation Between Lumbar Flexibility and Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (N = 30)
Difference in PreYLumbar PostYLumbar Difference in Lumbar
cf-PWV Flexibility Flexibility Flexibility
PreYcf-PWV 0.670a j0.073 0.030 0.348
PostYcf-PWV j0.210 0.111 0.082 j0.089
Difference in cf-PWV V j0.189 j0.039 0.500b
encouraging that mild, self-directed, inexpensive stretch- 16. Millasseau SC, Stewart AD, Patel SJ, Redwood SR,
ing exercises can produce significant improvement in Chowienczyk PJ. Evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave
velocity: influence of timing algorithm and heart rate. Hyper-
physiological states that are precursors of cardiac disease. tension. 2005;45(2):222Y226. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
For this simple intervention to be used to decrease both pubmed/15642772; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
cardiovascular morbidity/mortality and healthcare 15642772.
costs, further studies are warranted to confirm the 17. Crilly M, Coch C, Clark H, Bruce M, Williams D. Repeat-
results in a larger population. ability of the measurement of augmentation index in the
clinical assessment of arterial stiffness using radial applanation
tonometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2007;67(4):413Y422. http://
REFERENCES www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17558896; http://www.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17558896.
1. Dernellis J, Panaretou M. Aortic stiffness is an independent 18. O"Rourke MF, Pauca AL. Augmentation of the aortic and
predictor of progression to hypertension in nonhypertensive central arterial pressure waveform. Blood Press Monit. 2004;
subjects. Hypertension. 2005;45(3):426Y431. 9(4):179Y185. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15311144;
2. Liao D, Arnett DK, Tyroler HA, et al. Arterial stiffness and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15311144.
the development of hypertension. the ARIC study. Hyper- 19. Lane HA, Smith JC, Davies JS. Noninvasive assessment of
tension. 1999;34(2):201Y206. preclinical atherosclerosis. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;
3. Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H. Current perspec- 2(1):19Y30.
tives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension 20. Hamilton PK, Lockhart CJ, Quinn CE, McVeigh GE. Arterial
and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2003;107(22): stiffness: clinical relevance, measurement and treatment. Clin
2864Y2869. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12796414; Sci (Lond). 2007;113(4):157Y170.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12796414. 21. Maxwell MH, Waks AU, Schroth PC, Karam M, Dornfeld LP.
4. Chung CM, Lin YS, Chu CM, et al. Arterial stiffness is the Error in blood-pressure measurement due to incorrect cuff
independent factor of left ventricular hypertrophy deter- size in obese patients. Lancet. 1982;2(8288):33Y36. http://
mined by electrocardiogram. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344(3): www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6123760; http://www.ncbi.
190Y193. nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6123760.
5. Mitchell GF, Hwang SJ, Vasan RS, et al. Arterial stiffness 22. Umana E, Ahmed W, Fraley MA, Alpert MA. Comparison
and cardiovascular events: the Framingham heart study. of oscillometric and intraarterial systolic and diastolic
Circulation. 2010;121(4):505Y511. blood pressures in lean, overweight, and obese patients.
6. Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, et al. Aortic stiffness is Angiology. 2006;57(1):41Y45. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hyper- gov/pubmed/16444455; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
tension. 2003;34(5):1203Y1206. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/16444455.
pubmed/12677025; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 23. Pickering TG. Measurement of blood pressure in and out of
12677025. the office. 2005;7(2):123Y129. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
7. Nocon M, Hiemann T, Muller-Riemenschneider F, Thalau pubmed/15722659; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
F, Roll S, Willich SN. Association of physical activity with 15722659.
all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review 24. Lemmink KA, Kemper HC, de Greef MH, Rispens P, Stevens M.
and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008; The validity of the sit-and-reach test and the modified sit-and-
15(3):239Y246. reach test in middle-aged to older men and women. Res Q
8. Schuler G, Adams V, Goto Y. Role of exercise in the pre- Exerc Sport. 2003;74(3):331Y336.
vention of cardiovascular disease: results, mechanisms, and 25. Yeo S, Davidge S, Ronis DL, Antonakos CL, Hayashi R,
new perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(24):1790Y1799. O"Leary S. A comparison of walking versus stretching
9. Mora S, Cook N, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Lee IM. Physical exercises to reduce the incidence of preeclampsia: a ran-
activity and reduced risk of cardiovascular events: potential domized clinical trial. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2008;27(2):
mediating mechanisms. Circulation. 2007;116(19):2110Y2118. 113Y130.
10. Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M, Celis-Morales C, Mathers JC. 26. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus
Effects of exercise modalities on arterial stiffness and wave document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and
reflection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of random- clinical applications. 2006;27(21):2588Y2605. http://www.
ized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110034. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17000623; http://www.ncbi.nlm.
11. Sihawong R, Janwantanakul P, Jiamjarasrangsi W. A pro- nih.gov/pubmed/17000623.
spective, cluster-randomized controlled trial of exercise pro- 27. Wong A, Figueroa A. Eight weeks of stretching training
gram to prevent low back pain in office workers. Eur Spine J. reduces aortic wave reflection magnitude and blood pressure
2014;23(4):786Y793. in obese postmenopausal women. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;
12. Yamamoto K, Kawano H, Gando Y, et al. Poor trunk flex- 28(4):246Y250.
ibility is associated with arterial stiffening. Am J Physiol Heart 28. Cortez-Cooper MY, Anton MM, Devan AE, Neidre DB,
Circ Physiol. 2009;297(4):H1314YH1318. Cook JN, Tanaka H. The effects of strength training on
13. Miles SC, Chun-Chung C, Hsin-Fu L, et al. Arterial blood central arterial compliance in middle-aged and older adults.
pressure and cardiovascular responses to yoga practice. Altern Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008;15(2):149Y155.
Ther Health Med. 2013;19(1):38Y45. 29. Choi JC, Lee JS, Kang SY, Kang JH, Bae JM, Lee DH.
14. Nishiwaki M, Yonemura H, Kurobe K, Matsumoto N. Limitation of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in assess-
Four weeks of regular static stretching reduces arterial stiff- ing the risk of stroke: importance of instantaneous blood
ness in middle-aged men. Springerplus. 2015;(4):555. pressure. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(5):417Y425.
15. Yamato Y, Hasegawa N, Sato K, Hamaoka T, Ogoh S, 30. Hunter SD, Dhindsa MS, Cunningham E, et al. Impact of
Iemitsu M. Acute effect of static stretching exercise on arterial hot yoga on arterial stiffness and quality of life in normal
stiffness in healthy young adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. and overweight/obese adults. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(12):
2016;95(10):764Y770. 1360Y1363.
31. Patil SG, Aithala MR, Das KK. Effect of yoga on arterial channels in vascular endothelial cells as mechanotransducers?
stiffness in elderly subjects with increased pulse pressure: Nature. 1987;325(6107):811Y813.
a randomized controlled study. Complement Ther Med. 38. Zheng J, Zhai K, Chen Y, et al. Nitric oxide mediates stretch-
2015;23(4):562Y569. induced Ca2+ oscillation in smooth muscle. J Cell Sci. 2016;
32. Parshad O, Richards A, Asnani M. Impact of yoga on 129(12):2430Y2437.
haemodynamic function in healthy medical students. West 39. Hotta K, Kamiya K, Shimizu R, et al. Stretching exercises
Indian Med J. 2011;60(2):148Y152. enhance vascular endothelial function and improve periph-
33. Shin JH, Lee Y, Kim SG, Choi BY, Lee HS, Bang SY. The eral circulation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
beneficial effects of tai chi exercise on endothelial function Int Heart J. 2013;54(2):59Y63.
and arterial stiffness in elderly women with rheumatoid 40. Leloup AJ, Van Hove CE, Heykers A, Schrijvers DM, De
arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:380. Meyer GR, Fransen P. Elastic and muscular arteries differ
34. Tanaka S, Sugiura T, Yamashita S, Dohi Y, Kimura G, in structure, basal NO production and voltage-gated ca(2+)-
Ohte N. Differential response of central blood pressure to channels. Front Physiol. 2015;6:375.
isometric and isotonic exercises. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5439. 41. Knudson D. The biomechanics of stretching. J Exercise Sci
35. Orourke M. Mechanical principles in arterial-disease. Hyper- Physiother. 2006;2:3Y12.
tension. 1995;26(1):2Y9. 42. Lee YH, Yoon ES, Park SH, Heffernan KS, Lee C, Jae SY.
36. Logan JG, Engler MB, Kim H. Genetic determinants of Associations of arterial stiffness and cognitive function with
arterial stiffness. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2015;8(1):23Y43. physical fitness in patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med.
37. Lansman JB, Hallam TJ, Rink TJ. Single stretch-activated ion 2014;46(5):413Y417.