Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chair
Baspaly, David British Columbia Common Ground Alliance (BCCGA)
CCGA Executive Committee
Moreau, Nathalie Info-Excavation L’Alliance pour la protection des Vice-Chair
infrastructures souterraines du Québec (APISQ) CCGA Executive Committee
Public Works Department - City of Winnipeg & Treasurer
Saedal, Derrick
Manitoba Common Ground Alliance (MCGA) CCGA Executive Committee
Alberta One Call (AOC) &
Sullivan, Michael President
Canadian Common Ground Alliance (CCGA)
Secretary
Douglas, Jim Ontario Regional Common Ground Alliance (ORCGA)
CCGA Executive Committee
Past Chair
Tweedie, James Canadian Gas Association
CCGA Executive Committee
Bellissimo, Vince Canadian Construction Association Director
Underground
Canadian Common Ground Alliance
Best Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014
100
Infrastructure Damage
Prevention
98397_ORCGA_BestPract-TEXT-Oct2014.indd 100 16/10/14 9:42 A
Best Practices
Version 2.0 – October 2016
Terms and Conditions of Use
The CCGA Best Practices have been developed through the commitment and
consensus of a significant number of stakeholders to serve as an educational
guide to promote damage prevention in Canada. It is subject to the following
limitations:
• The Canadian Common Ground Alliance does not endorse any product,
technology or company even though it is supported financially by its
member companies and sponsors.
Canadian Common
Canadian Common Ground Alliance
Best Practices
Best Practices Version
Version 1.0
2.0 – October 2014
2016
11
Participation
mon Ground at this level
Alliance is not restricted
in Canada. The CCGA to CCGA members.
also acknowledges the establi-
shed Common Ground Alliance Best Practices (United States) initiated by the
In order Ground
Common to facilitate
Studytheandmaintaining
presented to&the governance of these
U.S. Secretary CCGA Best
of Transportation
Practices,
in June 1999. a procedure has been created to guide the submission of potential
changes via a process that provides the oversight & approval of the CCGA
Board
This setofofDirectors
National as well as both
Harmonized Best thePractices
National2.0& Regional Common
- 2016, which Ground
has been
Alliance Best
updated Practices
through Committees.
the commitment andAconsensus
form for the
of itssubmission of potential
members working
changes towards
together to the CCGA
a saferBest Practices
Canada, is partcan be ongoing
of an found ineffort
Appendix D of new
to develop this
document
damage & the change
prevention procedure,
practices as well the “Harmonized
as improve Best
existing Practices
ones. TheseProcess;
prac-
CCGArepresent
tices BP Process V 1.0 – 2014”
a dynamic is available
statement on the
of the type CCGA website.
of activities that CCGA be-
lieves would provide optimum levels of diligence towards preventing damage
to underground infrastructure. It is understood that not all stakeholders are
To participate in the CCGA Best Practices work or to participate in any
presently in a position to adopt all of these practices, however, it is antici-
committee meeting, please check the CCGA website (CanadianCGA.com) to
pated that progress will be made towards following these practices over time.
learn the scope of the various CCGA Committees. The meeting dates and
contact
Comments namesand and numberson
suggestions areimproving
listed for the
eachformat
committee. If you are
and content havewel-
any
generalOur
come. inquiries
intent about the CCGA,
is to make please feel
the statement of free
thesetoBest
contact the CCGA
Practices at the
as easy
following:
to use as possible. If we can improve upon what you see here, your input in
helping us do so would be most appreciated.
The Canadian Common Ground Alliance
4242 Seventh
Participation atStreet SE is not restricted to CCGA members. In order to
this level
Suite 104
facilitate the maintaining & governance of these CCGA Best Practices, a
Calgary, Alberta
procedure has beenT2G 2Y8 to guide the submission of potential changes
created
via a process that provides the oversight & approval of the CCGA Board of
Directors
Tel: as well as both the National & Regional Common Ground Alliance
403.531.3700
Best
Email:Practices Committees. A form for the submission of potential changes to
info@canadiancga.com
the CCGA Best Practices can be found in Appendix D of this document & the
Web: www.CanadianCGA.com
change procedure, the “Harmonized Best Practices Process; CCGA BP Process
V 2.0 – 2016” is available on the CCGA website.
Email: info@canadiancga.com
Web: www.CanadianCGA.com
2-0 Locating
3-0 One-Call
andCentre Practices…………………...................21
Marking Best Practices.................................... 35
4-0 Compliance
6-0 Excavation Best
Best Practices………………………………….…5169
Practices..................................................
Benefits:
The use of common utility corridors would result in the following benefits:
5. Damage Prevention.
•References:
CSA S250-11, Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure
• CSA S250-11, Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure
Canadian Common
Canadian Common Ground
Ground Alliance
Alliance
Best
Best Practices
Practices
Canadian Version 2.0
Version 1.0
Common – October
- October
Ground 2016
2014
Alliance
66
6 Best Practices Version 1.0 - October 2014
Practice Description: Various items are required on the Development
Plans filed prior to the development of lands. Where a Development Plan is
to be filed, the items required should include the location[s] of both above
and underground facilities traversing the land described on the
Development Plan. Identification of the location[s] of both above and
underground facilities on the Development Plan would provide notice to
developers and the public about the existence of infrastructure facilities,
and would alert facility owners/operators of the need to establish
communication with the developers to facilitate planning for the lands
which complements the utility infrastructure. Facility and utility owners
should maintain timely and accurate records of all abandoned and out-of-
service plant, and this information should be identified on Development
Plans along with the existing, future, and proposed facilities.
References:
x CSA S250-11, Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure
Current Practice:
2. Visit the job site to correlate the information already gathered about
existing utility facilities with above ground features;
A utility coordination meeting is set up for the Project Manager to meet with
all utilities having facilities within the boundaries of the project, as well as
potential utilities that may wish to place facilities within the limits of the
project. Plan design drawings and cross sections are circulated to the utility
companies prior to the meeting highlighting potential conflicts. During the
meeting the following issues are addressed:
Ensure that all utilities have been correctly identified on the base
drawings
Identify Areas of conflict
Discuss Potential Solutions
Discuss the Region’s project timing
Address relocation restrictions such as property acquisition, stream or
railway crossings
Discuss additional test pitting that may be required as well as level of
detail required (i.e. SUE)
By this point in time, the utility relocation plans have been submitted and
approved, cost sharing estimates (in accordance with the governing
agreements) have been submitted and approved, written notification to
each utility mandating relocation (in accordance with the governing
agreements) has been given and notification time has passed. All land
acquisition has been secured by the Region, and all utilities should be on
site relocating their facilities.
If the utility can only move during the reconstruction contract, a relocation
timing window must be established to co-ordinate works and provide for a
separation of time and distance between contractors.
At Pre-Tender Meeting
Calls are made to each utility confirming progress on site and ensuring
relocation complete prior to Region’s contractor on site.
References:
x CSA S250-11, Mapping of Underground Utility Infrastructure
DESIGN PROCESS
PRE-BID/BID
PRE-BID/BID
PRE-BID/BID
1-11: Use of Qualified Contractors
1-11:
1-11: Use
Use of
of Qualified
Qualified Contractors
Contractors
Practice Statement: Qualified contractors should be used to excavate on
Practice
Practice Statement:
Statement:facilities.Qualified
Qualified contractors
contractors should
should be be used
used toto excavate
excavate on on
and near underground
and
and near
near underground
underground facilities.
facilities.
Practice Description: Contractors that excavate on and near
Practice
Practice Description:
Description: Contractors
Contractors that excavate
excavate on on and near
underground facilities should possess that the qualifications and near to conduct
necessary
underground
underground facilities should possess the qualifications necessary to
to conduct
such activitiesfacilities
in a mannershouldthatpossess
is boththe qualifications
safe and reliable,necessary
and ensures conduct
a
such
such activities
activities in
in a
a manner
manner that
that is
is both
both safe
safe and
and reliable,
reliable, and
and ensures
ensures a
a
quality product. The use of qualified contractors ensures that contractors
quality
quality product.
product. The
The use
use of
of qualified
qualified contractors
contractors ensures
ensures that
that contractors
contractors
retained to work on a project are capable of performing the work required,
retained
retained to
to work
work on
on Bya
a project
project are capable
capable of
arecontractors performing
of to
performing the work
work required,
the public required,
and operate safely. requiring be qualified, safety is
and operate
and operate safely. By requiring contractors to be qualified, public safety is
protected as safely. By requiring
is the integrity of the contractors
underground to be qualified,
facilities public
in the areasafety
of theis
protected
protected as is
is the
the integrity
asAllowing integrity of
of the
the underground
underground facilities
facilities in
in the
the area
area ofof the
the
excavation. a competitive bidding process from qualified,
excavation.
excavation. Allowing
Allowing a
a competitive
competitive bidding
bidding process
process from
from qualified,
qualified,
competent, and experienced contractors should assure both quality and
competent,
competent, and
and experienced
experienced contractors
contractors should
shouldtoassure
assure both
both quality
quality and
and
price, and should minimize the risk of damage underground facilities.
price, and should minimize the risk of damage to underground
price, and should minimize the risk of damage to underground facilities. facilities.
Example of Practice: Most large organizations involved in capital works
Example
Example of
of Practice:
Practice: Most large organizations involved in
in capital works
have developed policies Most largecontractors.
to qualify organizations involved
These policies capital works
often involve
have developed
have developed policies
policies to qualify
to qualify contractors.
contractors. These policies often involve
establishing criteria in such areas as financing, These
insurance,policies often involve
occupational
establishing
establishing criteria
criteria inin such
such areas
areas as as financing,
financing, insurance,
insurance, occupational
occupational
Canadian Common Ground Alliance
Canadian
Canadian Common
Common Ground
Ground Alliance
Alliance
Best Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014
Best 2.0 – October 2016
Best Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014
Practices Version 1.0 15
2014 15
15
health
health and
and safety,
safety, and
and performance
performance which
which must
must be
be met
met prior
prior to
to participating
participating
in
in the
the bid
bid process.
process.
Benefits:
Benefits:
xx Quality
Quality of
of work;
work;
xx Improved
Improved safety;
safety; and
and
xx Minimized Risk
Minimized Risk
1-12:
1-12: Pre-Bid
Pre-Bid Conferences
Conferences
Practice
Practice Statement:
Statement: Depending
Depending on on the
the size
size and
and scope
scope of
of a
a project,
project, a
a pre-
pre-
bid
bid conference involving all stakeholders, should be held and bids should be
conference involving all stakeholders, should be held and bids should be
accepted
accepted from
from only
only those
those qualified
qualified contractors
contractors attending
attending the
the pre-bid
pre-bid
conference.
conference.
Practice
Practice Description:
Description: The The project
project owner
owner should
should require
require that
that all
all potential
potential
qualified contractors attend a pre-bid conference involving
qualified contractors attend a pre-bid conference involving the facilitythe facility
owners/operators
owners/operators whose
whose facilities
facilities might
might be
be affected
affected byby the
the proposed
proposed
excavation
excavation and project design. The pre-bid conference should address,
and project design. The pre-bid conference should address, as
as a
a
minimum, the requirements of the project in relation to the
minimum, the requirements of the project in relation to the protection, protection,
support,
support, and
and safe
safe maintenance
maintenance of of the
the facilities
facilities during
during the
the excavation
excavation and
and
construction.
construction. Pre-bid conference proceedings should be recorded and
Pre-bid conference proceedings should be recorded and
minutes
minutes circulated
circulated to
to all
all those
those inin attendance.
attendance.
Examples
Examples of Practice: Pre-bid
of Practice: Pre-bid conferences
conferences normally
normally involve
involve the
the project
project
owner,
owner, the project design staff, the facility owner/operators, and the
the project design staff, the facility owner/operators, and the
potential
potential contractors.
contractors. During
During thethe pre-bid
pre-bid conference,
conference, the
the contractors
contractors are
are
made aware of the special requirements of the project with respect
made aware of the special requirements of the project with respect to to
certification,
certification, safety,
safety, and
and the
the regulatory
regulatory environment.
environment.
Benefits:
Benefits: Pre-bid
Pre-bid conferences
conferences afford
afford the
the opportunity
opportunity for
for discussion
discussion among
among
the
the owner, contractor, designer, and other interested parties of
owner, contractor, designer, and other interested parties of the
the many
many
aspects
aspects of
of a
a proposed
proposed project,
project, including:
including:
1.
1. Scope
Scope clarifications;
clarifications;
2.
2. The
The review of
review of contract
contract documents;
documents;
3.
3. Regulatory
Regulatory requirements;
requirements;
4.
4. Schedules;
Schedules; and
and
5.
5. Damage Prevention.
Damage Prevention.
Pre-bid
Pre-bid conferences
conferences ensure
ensure that
that all
all potential
potential participants
participants in
in the
the project
project
possess
possess the same understanding of the project requirements, and
the same understanding of the project requirements, and
complexities.
complexities.
Canadian
Canadian Common Ground Alliance
Common Ground Alliance
16 Best Practices Version 1.0
Best Practices Version 2.0 – October 2014
1.0 – October 2016
2014
16
1-13: Contact between the Designer/Engineer and
Potential Contractors during the Pre-Bid/Bid
Phase
Practice Statement: Once a project design is completed, the designer/
engineer should be available to answer questions and clarify aspects during
the pre-bid/bid process.
CONSTRUCTION/POST-CONSTRUCTION
2 One-Call Centre
2-0 One-Call Centre Best Practices
2-1: Pro-active Public Awareness, Education and
Damage Prevention Activities
Practice Statement: The one-call centre has a documented, pro-active
public awareness, education, and damage prevention program.
Practice Description: The one-call centre promotes the need to “Click “Call or
Call Before
Before You You
Dig,”Dig,”
to enhance
to enhance
awareness
awareness
of responsibilities
of responsibilities
to safeguard
to safeguard
workers and the public and protect the integrity of the buried infrastructure,
to foster a cooperative approach between the owners of buried facilities and
the digging community toward the prevention of damage to buried facilities
and to promote the service it provides.
Practice Description: There will be only one toll free telephone number
and one toll free fax number for the one-call centre to receive locate
requests. These numbers have toll free North American access, meaning
that a caller can telephone or fax the centre free of charge from anywhere
in North America. The one-call centre will also maintain an e-mail address as
an alternate means to receive locate requests.
Practice Description: Providing the locate request number and the names
of the facility owners/operators who will be notified enhances the efficiency
of the one-call centre process. When provided the names of the facility
owners/operators, the excavator knows which owners/operators will be
notified in the area of the planned excavation. This helps the excavator
determine if the facility owners/operators have responded to the locate
request.
Practice Description:
Description: In In the
the event
eventofofaadamage
damageinvestigation,
investigation,litigation,
litigation,oror
other event,
event, itit is
is often
often necessary
necessary to to have
haveaahard
hardcopy
copyprintout
printoutofofaalocation
location
request ticket.
ticket. TheThe one-call
one-call centre
centrehas
hasthe
theability
abilitytotoproduce,
produce,asasnecessary,
necessary,a a
copy of a location
location request
request ticket
ticket for
forthe
theappropriate
appropriatestatutory
statutoryperiod.
period.
Practice Description: The one-call centre can only work with the
information related to the existence of buried facilities that its members
provide. It is important that the one-call centre be able to produce evidence
that a member’s data is accurate, according to that member. Regular
verification of data is a part of the documented agreement or operating
procedures between the owner or operator of buried facilities and the one-
call centre. Any deletions or additions made by the member are entered into
the database and documentation of the change sent back to the member for
verification, prior to activation.
Practice Description: The one-call centre relays requests for job site
facility meetings for excavators who request them with facility
owners/operators. If a meeting is required to show the limits and schedule
of the work, the one-call centre indicates that a meeting is requested. The
one-call centre requires that the excavator provide sufficient information to
fully identify the boundaries of the proposed work site. A meeting request
does not necessarily eliminate the need for a locate request.
Canadian
Canadian Common
Common Ground
Ground Alliance
Alliance
Canadian
Canadian
Best Common
Common
Practices Version Ground
2.0 –
Ground
1.0 Alliance
October 2016
Alliance
2014
Best
Best Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014 29
Best Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014
Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014 29
29
29
1. Speed of Answer
2. Abandoned Calls
3. Busy Signals
4. Customer Satisfaction
The one-call centre has in place a quality of service plan that includes
measurements of accuracy, productivity, and defects in locate request
tickets.
C. Relational Database Quality and System Functionality
3 Locating and
Marking
3-0 Locating and Marking Best Practices
3-1: Use of Records
Practice Statement: Locators utilize on-site facility records at all times.
Errors, omissions and damages, may include, but are not limited to, missing
or non-existent records, misdrawn records, damaged or nonexistent
electromagnetic facilities to physically locate the facility, changes to
The use of a single locator to carry out locate requests for multiple facilities
may simplify communications, with fewer links needed between excavator
and locator.
3-5: Training
Practice Statement: Locators are properly trained and training is
documented.
Primary locate sheet illustrated in Fig.1 should always be placed first and
contain the following information (refer to www.canadiancga.com for full
size version, and Appendix C – How To Read a Locate Sheet):
Canadian
Canadian Common
Common Ground
Ground Alliance
Alliance
Best
Best Practices
Practices Version
Version 2.0
1.0 –– October
October 2016
2014
44
36. Written description of limits of locate, i.e. area covered by this sheet of
locate report.
37. Instructions on use and validity of locate. Specific warning by locator
that limits of locate have been altered since original request.
38. Legend describing symbols used on sketch.
39. Instructions on excavation methods in vicinity of locate marks.
40. Sketch of marks placed by locator.
41. Directional indicator, e.g. north arrow, to provide orientation of sketch.
42. Warning sketch is not to scale.
43. Warning auxiliary sheet is only valid in combination with primary locate
sheet.
44. Regulatory warnings about use of locate information [should be
positioned at bottom of sheet]
Instructions sheet, an example is illustrated in Fig. 3, should be placed after
the auxiliary locate sheets (refer to canadiancga.com
ccga.com for full size
for full
version):
size version):
FIGURE 3 Disclaimer
Canadian
Canadian Common
Common Ground
Ground Alliance
Alliance
Best
Best Practices
Practices Version
Version 2.0
1.0 –– October
October 2016
2014 45
3-15: Damage Investigation and Reporting
Practice Statement: A damaged facility is investigated and reported as
soon as possible after occurrence of damage.
• Method of marking
• Locate sketch
1. Marks on the ground conflict with the locate report – if the marks on the
ground do not match the sketch or other information contained in the locate
report then that portion within the located area affected by this condition is
no longer valid.
QualityAssurance
3-22: Quality Assurance
Practice Statement: Underground facility owners/operators should have a
Quality Assurance (QA) program in place for assessing the accuracy of
locating and marking facilities.
• Verify the most up-to-date records were used to complete the locate
4 Excavation
4-0 Excavation Best Practices
4-1: One-Call Facility Locate Request
Practice Statement: The excavator requests the location of underground
facilities at each site by notifying the facility owner/operator through the
one-call system. Unless otherwise specified in law, the excavator contacts
calls the
the one-call
one-call center
center at least
at least fourfive working
working days
days prior
prior to beginning
to beginning excavation
excavation
procedures.
Practice Description:
Practice Description: Increased
Increased participation
participation in
in aa one-call
one-call notification
notification
system provides for improved communication between excavators and
system provides for improved communication between excavators and
facility operators necessary to reduce damage.
facility operators necessary to reduce damage.
To
To avoid
avoid unnecessary
unnecessary waste
wasteofofresources,
resources,a aproject
projectand/or portion
and/or of the
portion of the
work
work for
for which
which aalocate
locatehas
hasbeen
beenrequested
requestedforforand
andnotnot
yetyet
provided,
provided,hashas
been
been cancelled,
cancelled, deferred
deferred for
foran
anextended
extendedperiod
periodofoftime,
time,oror
just altered
just in in
altered
the
the queue
queue ofof execution,
execution, then
then that
that locate
locate request
request should
should bebe cancelled.
cancelled.
Practice Description: Utilities service the public needs 24x7 and thus
should be protected the same amount of time. Certain conditions exist
which require excavators to work during off-hours (city/road congestion, off
peak utility service hours). While most excavators are on the job site during
regular work hours, the ability to call in future
access work
(phone, locations
internet, after methods)
or other five p.m.
allows
in more
future workflexibility
locationsto after
schedule work,allows
five p.m. not tomore
mention getting
flexibility to around
schedule peak
hours not
work, of locate requests
to mention at the
getting one-call
around center.
peak hours of locate requests at the
one-call center.
4-9: Positive Response
4-9: Positive Response
Practice Statement: The excavator is notified in writing by the
Practice Statement:
underground The excavatorofisthe
facility owner/operator notified in writing
tolerance zone byof the
underground facility owner/operator
by marking, flagging, of theortolerance zone of the
other acceptable methods at
underground
the work site facility
shown by on marking, flagging,
a locate sheet or other
provided acceptable
to the excavator,methods
or is at
the workverbally
notified site shown
and on a locateifsheet
in writing, provided
possible, that anto the
“all excavator, or is exists.
clear” situation
notified
This verbally
takes place and
withinin three
writing, if possible,
working days that annotification
of the “all clear” situation exists.
to the facility
This takes place of
owner/operator within three working
the locate request or days of the notification
a mutually agreed upon to the
date facility
owner/operator
between of the
the locator locate
and request or a mutually agreed upon date
the excavator.
between the locator and the excavator.
Practice Description: If the one-call centre or a facility owner/operator
Practice Description:
determines that the excavation or demolition
If the one-call centreisornot near any
a facility of its existing
owner/operator
underground
determines that facilities, it notifiesor
the excavation the excavatoristhat
demolition not nonearconflict
any ofexists and that
its existing
the excavationfacilities,
underground or demolition areathe
it notifies is “clear.” Thisthat
excavator notification
no conflictfrom the and
exists One-
Call
that Centre or the facility
the excavation owner/operator
or demolition will include
area is “clear.” Thisanotification
written “all from
clear”the
response. If an excavator
One-Call Centre has knowledge
or the facility owner/operatorof thewill
existence
include of an underground
a written “all
facility and has received
clear” response. an “all clear,”
If an excavator response, of
has knowledge the excavator
the existenceshould
of an notify
underground
the facility and
One-Call Centre and the
hasfacility
received an “all clear,”ifresponse,
owner/operator known, that the aexcavator
conflict
should
does notifyexist.
indeed the One-Call CentreCentre
The One-Call and theandfacility owner/operator
the facility owner/operatorif known,
that a conflict
should does indeed
make marking theseexist. TheaOne-Call
facilities Centreexcavation
priority before and the facility
begins.owner/
operator should make marking these facilities a priority before excavation
Positive response is a term used to describe the two types of action to be
begins.
taken by a facility owner/operator after it has received notification of intent
Positive
to response is a term used to describe the two types of action to be
excavate.
taken by a facility owner/operator after it has received notification of intent
to excavate.
The excavator should maintain written records of all locates requested and
received.
x Equipment set up
x Pilot Bore
x Back Reaming
x Equipment set up
5 Mapping
5-0 Mapping Best Practices
5-1: One-Call Center Responsibilities and Use of
Mapping
Practice Statement: The land base used by the One-Call Centre mapping
system should be accurate and kept up to date with new information as it
becomes available from source suppliers. Facility owners/operators should
provide regular updates of their notification mapping coverage to ensure the
most current information is utilized in the system. Ideally, the land base used
is available to the public and can produce a ticket for the smallest practical
geographical area utilizing latitude/longitude to describe the location.
There must be a process in place to keep the land base current (both
graphics and attributes) with regular updates and maintenance. This
process should be as automated as possible to avoid user errors while
being cost effective. The database is promptly updated as information is
provided or becomes available from the facility owner/operator. The system
should be able to accept information in standard file format with minimal
human intervention. (The graphic database refers to the member
notification area coverage)
The mapping system should be able to produce a ticket for the smallest
practical geographical area suitable to the member’s requirements. There
needs to be flexibility within the system to handle the various sources of
information contained.
Land base should be made available for public viewing (excavators, project
owners, homeowners, etc.) to validate limits of dig areas. The land base and
database should also available to the one-call center membership for the
update of member database information.
The facility owner/operator should provide the One Call Centre and
associated locate service providers and design consultants with data (e.g.
electronic or paper records, fiche, or other indexing of underground
facilities) that will allow proper ticket creation and notification of excavation
activities near the facility owner/operators’ infrastructure and allow the
locator to accurately mark the underground facility.
6-3: Incentives
Practice Statement: Damage prevention programs include incentives to
promote compliance with laws, regulations and best practices.
Practice Description: Incentives can include, but are not limited to, ease
of access to one-call system, One Call membership and participation
considerations, representation on one-call boards, reasonable enforcement
of regulations, safety and liability protection, preferred access to contract
designers and contractors for bidding, and insurance and overall cost
benefits.
Canadian Common
Canadian Common Ground
Ground Alliance
Alliance
Best Practices
Best Practices Version
Version 1.0
2.0 –– October
October 2014
2016
72
¾ Occupational Health and Safety
Regulation
¾ Oil and Gas Activities Act,
Pipeline Regulation, Pipeline
Crossing Regulation
Manitoba ¾ Manitoba has The Gas Pipeline ¾ Public Utilities
MCGA Act, Regulation Board
140/92 (recently amended ¾ Manitoba
with M.R. 213/2014) Workplace
¾ Workplace Safety and Health Safety & Health
217/2007, Part 26 ¾ National Energy
¾ National Energy Board Act and Board
National Energy Board Pipeline
Crossing Regulations, Parts I
and II
Ontario ¾ ON Regulations 22/04 – ¾ Technical
ORCGA Electrical Distribution Safety, Standards &
subsection 113(1) of Part V111 Safety Authority
of Electricity Act, 1998 (TSSA)
¾ ON Regulations 210/01 – Oil ¾ Electrical Safety
and Gas Pipeline Systems – Authority (ESA)
made under the TSSA 2000 ¾ Ministry of
¾ OH&S Act & Regulations Labour (MOL)
(R.S.O. 1990 chapter 0.1). ¾ National Energy
Construction Projects (O. Reg Board
213/91) S228.1
Quebec ¾ Code de sécurité pour les ¾ CSST
Info-Excavation travaux de construction – (Commission de
Quebec Safety Code for the la santé et de la
construction industry (Fines sécurité du
mentioned in rules 236 & 237) travail)
o 3.15.1 – Diggings, excavations ¾ National Energy
and trenches Board
o 3.18.1 – Demolition (work with
high risk)
¾ National Energy Board Act and
National Energy Board Pipeline
Crossing Regulations, Parts I &
II (PCR I&II)
Saskatchewan ¾ The Saskatchewan ¾ Ministry of
SCGA Employment Act Labour Relations
¾ The Occupational Health and and Workplace
Safety Regulations, 1996 Safety,
¾ The Pipelines Act, 1998 Occupational
¾ The Power Corporation Act Health and
¾ The SaskEnergy Act Safety Division
¾ The Saskatchewan ¾ Ministry of the
Telecommunications Act Economy
¾ National Energy
Board
Federal ¾ NEB Act ¾ National Energy
CCGA ¾ Onshore Pipeline Regulations Board
(OPR)
¾ Pipeline Crossing Regulations,
Parts I & II (PCR I&II)
7 Public Education
7-0 Public Education Best Practices
7-0 Public Education Best Practices
7-0 Public Education Best Practices
7-1: Know the Target Audience and Their Needs
7-1: Know the Target Audience and Their Needs
7-1:
PracticeKnow the Target
Statement: In order toAudience and Their
effectively promote Needs
damage prevention
Practice Statement: damage
and influence/improve In order prevention
to effectively promote
habits, damage prevention
it is necessary to identify
Practice
and Statement: damage
influence/improve In order prevention
to effectively promote
habits, it is damage prevention
necessary toneeds
identify
the target audience, establish what their education and awareness
and influence/improve damage prevention habits, it is necessary to identify
the target audience, establish what their education and
are, and to create a communications package that is tailored to those awareness needs
the
are, target
and toaudience, establish what their
create a communications education
package that isand awareness
tailored to thoseneeds
needs.
are,
needs.and to create a communications package that is tailored to those
needs.
Practice Description: The fundamental reason for conducting education
Practice
and awarenessDescription:
campaigns The is fundamental reasonpeople
to try to influence for conducting
to changeeducation
their
Practice
and Description:
awareness campaigns The is fundamental
to try to reason
influence for
people conducting
to change education
their
behaviour to reduce utility damage and increase public safety.
and awareness
behaviour campaigns
to reduce is to try to
utility damage andinfluence
increasepeople
public to change their
safety.
behaviour to reduce
The organizations andutility damagewho
individuals andcould
increase public
benefit fromsafety.
damage
The organizations and individuals who could benefit
prevention education and awareness are extensive and diverse. from damageTo identify
The organizations
prevention andand
education individuals
awareness whoarecould benefitand
extensive from damage
diverse. To identify
the target audience:
prevention education and awareness are extensive and diverse. To identify
the target audience:
xthe Examine
target audience:
damage data and trends
xx Examine
Categorize damage data
incidents by:and trends & severity
frequency
x Examine damage data and trends
xx Categorize incidents by:
Rank and prioritize incidents frequency & severity
x Categorize incidents by: frequency & severity
xx Rank and prioritize incidents
To effectively communicate educational objectives:
x Rank and prioritize incidents
xx To effectively
Clearly identifycommunicate
the issues and educational
root causes.objectives:
x To effectively communicate educational objectives:
xx Clearly identify the issues and root causes.
Describe new behaviour and establish what it would take to change
x Clearly identify the issues and root causes.
x Describe
behaviournew behaviour and establish what it would take to change
x Describe new behaviour and establish what it would take to change
x behaviour
Reinforce changes in behaviour.
behaviour
x Reinforce changes in behaviour.
x Reinforce changes in behaviour.
7-2: Develop and Use a Marketing Plan
7-2: Develop and Use a Marketing Plan
7-2:
PracticeDevelop and
Statement: Useaamarketing
Develop Marketing Plan
plan that will take in to account
Practice Statement:
the training needs of theDevelop
target aaudience,
marketing plan that
available will take in to account
resources,
Practice
the Statement:
training needs of Develop
the target aaudience,
marketing plan that
available will take in to account
resources,
communications media and timeframes.
the training needs of the target audience, available resources,
communications media and timeframes.
communications media and
Practice Description: timeframes.
A strategic marketing plan enables better
Practice Description:
implementation, control A
andstrategic marketing
continuity plan enables
of advertising better
and promotional
Practice Description:
implementation, control A strategic marketing plan enables better
programs. The plan sets and continuity
realistic of advertising
goals and and promotional
allocates sufficient resources
implementation,
programs. The control
plan sets and continuity
realistic goals of advertising
and allocates and promotional
sufficient resources
required to achieve them. It also accommodates the need to track and
programs.
required toThe plan them.
achieve sets realistic
It also goals and allocates
accommodates the sufficient
need to resources
track and
analyze results.
required to achieve them. It also accommodates the need to track and
analyze results.
analyze results.
7-3: Practice Project Management
7-3: Practice Project Management
7-3:
PracticePractice Project
Statement: PracticeManagement
Project management when executing the
Practice
marketingStatement:
plan. Practice Project management when executing the
Practice
marketingStatement:
plan. Practice Project management when executing the
Practice Description:
marketing plan. Effective Project management consists of:
Practice Description: Effective Project management consists of:
xPractice Description: Effective Project management consists of:
Goal setting
xx Goal setting
Resource management
x Goal setting
xx Resource management
Task identification
x Resource management
Task identification
xx Timelines
x Task identification
x Timelines
x Timelines
8 Reporting and
Evaluation
8-0 Reporting and Evaluation Best
Practices
8-1: Reporting Information
Practice Statement: All stakeholders have the opportunity to report
information.
Appendix
Appendix A: Glossary of Terms & Definitions
– Abandoned Line or Facility: Any underground or submerged line or
facility no longer in use or not in use at the present time.
– Backfill: The act of filling the void created by excavating or the material
used to fill the void.
– Damage: Any impact, stress and/or exposure that results in the need to
repair an underground facility due to a weakening or the partial or complete
destruction of the facility, including, but not limited to, the protective
coating, lateral support, cathodic protection or the housing for the line,
device or facility.
– Land Base: Electronic mapping data that depicts features of the surface of
of the
the earth
earth andand is tied
is tied to real-world
to real-world geographic
geographic coordinates,
coordinates, such
such as
as latitude
latitude
and and longitude.
longitude.
Locate of
– Limite (verb):
locate: The
Theprocess
North,ofSouth,
an underground
East and West plantboundaries
owner/operator or
or other
their agent providing
coordinates information
of the located area. to an excavator which enables them to
determine the location of a facility.
– Locate (verb): The process of an underground plant owner/operator or
– Locate
their agent(noun):
providing The provision of
information to location information
an excavator by an underground
which enables them to
facility owner
determine the(or their agent)
location in the form of ground surface markings and/or
of a facility.
facility location documentation, such as drawings, mapping, numeric
– Locate (noun):
descriptions or otherThe
written documentation.
provision of location information by an underground
facility owner (or their agent) in the form of ground surface markings and/or
– Locate
facility Form:
location Accompanyingsuch
documentation, documentation
as drawings, formapping,
a locate numeric
which is
completed byorthe
descriptions party
other providing
written the locate. A locate form may or may not
documentation.
contain the specific facility location details and/or drawings, but should in all
– Locate
cases Form:
contain administrative
Accompanying aspects of the locate
documentation forsuch as when,
a locate whichwhen,
is why
completed,by
completed andthewho completed
party providingit.the locate. A locate form may or may not
contain the specific facility location details and/or drawings, but should in all
– Locate
cases Request:
contain A communication
administrative aspects ofbetween
the locateansuch
excavator andwhen,
as when, the facility
why
owner/operator
completed, or their
and who agent (usually
completed it. the One Call Centre) in which a
request for locating underground facilities is processed.
– Locate Request: A communication between an excavator and the facility
owner/operator or their agent (usually the One Call Centre) in which a
request for locating underground facilities is processed.
– Near Miss: An event where damage did not occur, but a clear potential
for damage was identified.
–Ticket:
Underground
All data: Beneath
required the
fromground
an excavator
surfaceto
ortransmit a valid
submerged, notification
including
to the underground
where infrastructure
exposed by temporary owner.
excavation.
E-Mail: Affiliation:
TRANSACTION RECORD
Phone:
TRANSACTION RECORD
E-Mail:
TRANSACTION RECORD
Purpose: Describe the purpose of the proposed practice.
RBPC receives, reviews & approves or declines proposed BPs changes as per
their regional process.
RBPC receives, reviews & approves or declines proposed BPs changes as per their regional
Regionally approved BP changes forwarded to NBPC using CCGA BP Form
process.
a minimum of 60 days before the next scheduled NBPC meeting.
Transaction record (TR) to be opened.
Regionally approved BP changes forwarded to NBPC using CCGA BP Form a minimum of 60 days
before the next scheduled NBPC meeting. Transaction record (TR) to be opened.
BPs posted in English & French on CCGA website for 60 day review period
by individual RBPCs
BPs posted in English & French on CCGA website for 60 day review period by individual RBPCs
Decline
(ReasonsDecline
for not Task Team Task Team
(Reasons Assign Recommendatio
Recommendati
Approve
Approve
proceeding Assign Task
on (within 60n (within 60
or recorded for not
& sent Team Task
B or to originator) days of days of
proceeding Team assignment)
recorded & assignment)
sent to
originator)
Canadian
Canadian Common Ground Alliance Alliance
Canadian
Best
Best PracticesCommon Ground
2.0
Version 1.0 Alliance
October
– October 2016
2014
Best Practices Version 1.0 – October 2014 91
Canadian Common Ground
CanadianCommon Alliance
Ground Alliance
Best Practices Version 2.0
1.0 – October 2016
2014
Best Practices Version 1.0 October 2014
92
Appendix D: DIRT Field Form &
Root Cause Tip Card
:
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Public: City Street State Highway County Road Interstate Highway PublicOther
Private: Private Business Private Land Owner Private Easement
Pipeline Power /Transmission Line Dedicated Public Utility Easement
Federal Land Railroad Data not collected Unknown/Other
Cable Television Electric Natural Gas Liquid Pipeline Sewer (Sanitary Sewer)
Steam Telecommunications Water Unknown/Other
Distribution Gathering Service/Drop Transmission Unknown/Other
Unknown Yes No
Unknown Yes No
Contractor County Developer Farmer Municipality Occupant
Railroad State Utility Data not collected Unknown/Other
Auger Backhoe/Trackhoe Boring Drilling Directional Drilling
Explosives Farm Equipment Grader/Scraper Hand Tools Milling Equipment
Probing Device Trencher Vacuum Equipment Data Not Collected Unknown/Other
Agriculture Cable Television Curb/Sidewalk Bldg. Construction Bldg. Demolition
Drainage Driveway Electric Engineering/Survey Fencing
Grading Irrigation Landscaping Liquid Pipeline Milling
Natural Gas Pole Public Transit Auth. Railroad Maint. Road Work
Sewer (San/Storm) Site Development Steam Storm Drain/Culvert Street Light
Telecommunication Traffic Signal Traffic Sign Water Waterway Improvement
Data Not Collected Unknown/Other
Yes (If Yes, Part F is required) No (If No, Skip Part F)
If Yes, which OneCall Center
If Yes, please provide the ticket number
Utility Owner Contract Locator Data Not Collected Unknown/Other
Yes No Data Not Collected Unknown/Other
Yes No Data Not Collected Unknown/Other
This set of National Harmonized Best Practices 1.0 - 2014, is the first but,
through the commitment and consensus of its members working together
towards a safer Canada, will be part of an ongoing effort to develop new
damage prevention practices as well as improve existing ones. These
practices represent a dynamic statement of the type of activities that CCGA
believes would provide optimum levels of diligence towards preventing
damage to underground infrastructure. It is understood that not all
stakeholders are presently
in a position to adopt all of these practices,
however, it is anticipated that progress will be made towards following these
practices over time.
Facility could not be found or located Type of facility or lack of records prevented locating of facility.
Example: Plastic pipelines installed without tracer wire.
Facility marking or location not Includes all areas where marking was insufficient.
sufficient Example: Locator marked the work zone, but missed a service.
Locator misread the ticket and did not locate the entire work zone.
Locator did not use records or interpreted the records incorrectly.
Locator did not tone correctly.
Facility was outside the tolerance zone.
Facility was not located or marked No locating or marking was completed prior to excavation activities.
Example: The facility owner received a notification but did not mark
or locate.
Incorrect facility records/maps Incorrect facility records or maps led to an incorrect locate.
Example: Records do not accurately reflect current plant status.
No notification made to the Excavator did not call the One-Call Center.
One-Call Center
Notification to One-Call Center made, The Excavator contacted the notification center, but did not provide
but not sufficient sufficient information, or the excavator did not provide sufficient notification
time according to requirements and guidelines.
Example: Excavator was excavating outside of the located area
Wrong information provided to the Damage occurred because an excavator provided the wrong
One-Call Center excavation information to the notification centre.
Example: Excavator indicated the wrong dig site.
Failure to maintain marks The marks deteriorated or were lost and the excavator failed to request that
they be restored/refreshed.
Failure to support exposed facilities Facility damage due to lack of support in accordance with generally
accepted engineering practices or guidelines.
Failure to test-hole (pot-hole) Failure to verify physical location of the facility when working within
tolerance zone as defined by accepted practices or guidelines.
Improper backfilling practices Damage caused by improper materials (ex. Large/sharp rocks) in the
backfill or improper compaction of the backfill.
Other insufficient excavation practices Excavator errors that do not fall under one of the above.
One-Call Centre error Includes all issues related to the center such as incorrectly entered data,
ticket transmission failures, et al.
Example: This would include damages that occurred because the center’s
database registry had not been updated to reflect correct location
of underground facilities.
Abandoned facility Damage related to abandoned facilities. Select a more specific root cause.
Example: The abandoned facility may have been located, instead of the
active facility. This does NOT include when an abandoned facility
is thought to have been locted, but it is found to be active after
the excavation exposed the facility or damaged it.
Deteriorated facility Those situations in which an excavation disrupts the soil around the facility
resulting in damage, failure or interruption of service. However, the
deterioration and not the excavation caused the facility damage.
Data not collected Damage occurred, but Root Cause was not identified.
Example: Damage Investigator did not indicate a Root Cause.
Sponsors to follow
Alberta
Platinum
Gold
Sponsors to follow
GOLD
SILVER
BRONZE
Atlantic
aTlanTIC CGa
Gold
Silver
Bronze
Silver
Bronze
Silver
Bronze
QUebeC
QUebeC CGa
CGa
GOLD
GOLD
Saskatchewan
Gold
Silver
SILVER
SILVER
Bronze
BRONZE
BRONZE
sasKaTCHeWan
sasKaTCHeWan CGa
CGa
GOLD
GOLD
Canadian
SILVER CGA Supporters
SILVER
CanaDIan CGa
CanaDIan sUPPoRTeRs
CGa
CanaDIan sUPPoRTeRs
CGa sUPPoRTeRs
BRONZE
BRONZE
Chair
Info-Excavation
Moreau, Nathalie 2016-2017
(Québec CGA)
Executive Committee
Past Chair
British Columbia Common Ground
Baspaly, David 2014-2015
Alliance (BCCGA)
Executive Committee
ATCO Pipelines & Liquids Global Vice-Chair Executive
Reeve, Dean
Business Unit Committee
Canadian Association of Petroleum Treasurer Executive
Ferguson, Travis
Producers (CAPP) Committee
Enbridge Gas New Brunswick &
Secretary Executive
Scott, Todd Atlantic Canada Common Ground
Committee
Alliance
Canadian Common Ground Alliance
Sullivan, Michael President
(CCGA)
Director
Tweedie, James Canadian Gas Association
2013 Past Chair
Public Works Department
Saedal, Derrick Director
City of Winnipeg
Ontario Regional Common Ground
Munro, Ian Director
Alliance (ORCGA)
TransCanada Corporation & Manitoba
Loney, Steven Director
Common Ground Alliance
Saskatchewan Common Ground
Bakker, Dylan Director
Alliance (SCGA)
Saskatchewan Common Ground
Wilson, Luis Director
Alliance (SCGA)
Alberta Common Ground Alliance
Watson, Brad Director
(ABCGA)
Kirk, Sher Canadian One-Call Centres Committee Director
Smyth, Patrick Canadian Energy Pipeline Association Director