INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee: LUZVINA D. FUENTES Name of Rater: SARAH PASION CUBAR Position: GUIDANCE COORDINATOR II Position DISTRICT SUPERVISOR Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd – Asuncion District Date of Review: Retiring Period: TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION Weight per PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE SCORE KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) Q E T AVE. >O-100% and above Formulated Annual accomplishement of target Guidance Program without complain >VS-75-99 % accomplishement Implemented of target without complain Guidance Program in Guidance June- >S-51-74% accomplishement of every school 20% Program Dec.2014 target without complain >US 25-50% accomplishement Supervised Guidance of target without complain Program in every >P-24 and below % school accomplishement of target without complain >O-100% and above Administered and accomplishement of target interpreted test without complain results within target >VS-75-99 % accomplishement dates of target without complain Administration of November- Provided at least >S-51-74% accomplishement of Psychological March 15% solution target without complain Test and IQ Test 2014 focused/counseling >US 25-50% accomplishement sessions based on of target without complain tests results within >P-24 and below % the target dates accomplishement of target without complain >O-100% and above accomplishement of target without delay Provide Career >VS-75-99 % accomplishement Guidance and of target without delay July 2014- Career Counseling activties >S-51-74% accomplishement of March 15% Counseling twice a year target without delay 2015 >US -25-50% accomplishement of target without delay >P-24 and below % accomplishement of target without delay >O-1 action research has been Formulate need made without revision assessment, problem >VS-1 action research has been identication of made with 1 revision per students annualy semester Research and Made 1 action September >S-Proposed Action Research 5% Evaluation research based on the 2014 has been made per semester results of the > US - Proposed Action Research identified student’s has been made per semester needs/problems per with 1 revision semester >P-No action research made based on the identifed problems >O- 50 % of the school population without complain >VS-35% of the school Provided individual population without complain Counseling June 2014- and group counseling >S-25% of the school Personal and March 15% academic within the target population without complain 2015 dates > US-15% of the school population without complain >P-10% of the school population without complain >O-3 consultancy per semester Acted as consultant in June 2014- without lapses Consultant/Reso school and community March 10% >VS-2 consultancy per semester urce Speaker per semester 2015 without lapses >S-1 consultancy per semester without lapses > US-1 consultancy per semester with lapses >P-No consultancy within the semester >O- 3 prevention and intervention program per semester without complain >VS-2 prevention and intervention program per Implemented semester without complain intervention programs June 2014- >S-1 prevention and Prevention and per semester March 10% intervention program per Wellness Provided Prevention 2015 semester without complain and Wellness > US-1 prevention and Programs per semeter intervention program per semester with complain >P-No prevention and intervention program per semester >O- 4 linkages per semester without lapses >VS-3 linkages per semester Linked with different Linkages to GOs, June 2014- without lapses government and non- NGOs and other March 10% >S-2 linkages per semester agencies governement agencies 2015 without lapses per semester > US-1 linkages per semester without lapses >P-No linkages per semester
A Qualitative Phenomenological Study of The Effects of Dress Code Policy On The Motivation and Confidence of College Students From Bulacan State Universityapril 82019 1 2